Now that we have Hill, there's no going back. Hill has exceeded my expectations. He is an asset to the club for his leadership and as far as his efforts and performance on field...he deserves every dollar we're paying him
But...I still believe it was wrong of St Kilda to do the trade for what we gave up. Had we kept Blake...then it was an ok deal for the picks alone
At the start of 2017 Blake Acres was just a 20 year old. By the end of that year he started showing signs that he was improving and he even played a game where he notched up 30 disposals.
Over the next 2 years he was in and out of the senior side. The younger players were always the scapegoats when we had losses and he never settled in one position.
Just as he's about to come up to that 80 game mark where fitness, maturity and experience combine to give you a complete player, we get rid of him.
Thanks Richo and Lethers
https://www.saints.com.au/news/280853/s ... lake-acres
The other ridiculous thing to note in the 'review' at the end of the article is Richo states that Blake plays best when he's settled in one position...but Richo continues to screw up his development over the next 2 years.
2018 and 2019 were horrible years for Saints fans. The coach and footy department were under pressure. They brought in too many senior recycled players and it stifled the development of certain players including the Blake