Drafting 25

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
seano1
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 22 Sep 2008 7:10pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Drafting 25

Post: # 2053745Post seano1 »

Do we start playing for a better draft position for 2025 now .. start playing all our youngsters getting game time into them accepting this season is gone …..which it is i believe.
Get whoever needs operations done now do they are right for pre season.
Guys like Heath , Keeler need game time to see where they’re at …. If they are no good put the next one in and stop wasting time on them.
Mid season draft has to be midfielders who can actually deliver the ball to a forward who is leading not standing tall for a bomb it in and hope for the best


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2720 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053749Post B.M »

Rebuilding

The biggest myth in footy!!!

Getting your picks right is key

Geelong in 2007 had pick 8 - selected Bartel
We had pick 5 - selected X. Clarke

We had pick 21 and selected M.Maguire
They had 24 and selected Steve Johnson

Dal Santo 13 and Kelly 17 was a nil all draw

We had pick 37 selected Montagna
They had pick 40 (f/s) Gary Ablett Jnr

That’s why they won 3 premierships and we won zero

Got to get pick right - especially high picks


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053760Post Life Long Saint »

B.M wrote: Fri 19 Apr 2024 10:21pm Geelong in 2007 had pick 8 - selected Bartel
We had pick 5 - selected X. Clarke

We had pick 21 and selected M.Maguire
They had 24 and selected Steve Johnson

Dal Santo 13 and Kelly 17 was a nil all draw

We had pick 37 selected Montagna
They had pick 40 (f/s) Gary Ablett Jnr

That’s why they won 3 premierships and we won zero

Got to get pick right - especially high picks
Bartel won the Brownlow in 2007. He was drafted in 2001!

That draft was good no matter who you got. We were thrown with Clarke as West Coast surprisingly selected Judd when most expected Sampi to go with that pick.
The other major factor with Geelong's drafting was that Ablett was selected as a F/S with pick 40.

I would still argue that our draft selections were good enough. I am not unhappy with any of them and hindsight drafting is the easiest game in town.
Geelong have been the best and most consistent team at player development. They had their own VFL team since it's merging with the VFA...Allowing their players to be like shark's teeth...If one goes down, there's another ready to take their place playing the right way for the team.

Geelong took Charlie Gardiner before they took Johnson. And Johnson nearly didn't make it as an AFL player. Very, very troubled early on. I doubt that we would have picked him and backed ourselves to develop him with his attitude. Could have been another Caydn Beetham.

I was more than happy with the careers of Dal Santo, Montagna, Clarke, and MCGuire in the RW&B.

It's very easy to pick the right player 23 years after they were drafted.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8783
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053761Post Otiman »

Build a winning culture, play to win every game. Throw everything at it and build that mentality.

As soon as you play for picks you lose.

Just ask North. Hawthorn, Carlton, Essendon.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2720 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053766Post B.M »

I was ok with who we drafted

Ball - injury
X.Clarke - injury
Maguire - Injury

But fact is Geelong drafted better! That why they won 3

And there is no doubt they developed better!


JB interviewed Stevie J and was very much looking at him in 01
But ultimately went for Maguire who was a reach at 21 as he was predicted to go 40-60 range


User avatar
Saint 58
Club Player
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:10am
Location: Anywhere the Saints are playing in Melbourne
Has thanked: 253 times
Been thanked: 106 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053931Post Saint 58 »

B.M wrote: Fri 19 Apr 2024 11:36pm I was ok with who we drafted

Ball - injury
X.Clarke - injury
Maguire - Injury

But fact is Geelong drafted better! That why they won 3

And there is no doubt they developed better!


JB interviewed Stevie J and was very much looking at him in 01
But ultimately went for Maguire who was a reach at 21 as he was predicted to go 40-60 range
Geelong won those three flags cos of the F/S rules at the time
Hawkins, Abllet & Scarlett as third round selections
This allowed them to also select Selwood, Bartel & I forget the third guy

Under todays rules - no Selwood, no Bartel, no third guy
They would not have made the GF in 2007
We would have crushed them in 2009 IF they had got there
Pies would also have beaten them in 2011, again IF they had got there

This may have also stopped free agents going there for the “culture” BS
and we wouldn’t be crapping on about how great they are!!


What you do for others will define your life.
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7936
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 254 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053936Post bobmurray »

AFL clubs are starting to say they can't rebuild via the draft, the way it's designed with it's built in compromises makes it almost impossible.
So how does a club rebuild, does it take 58 years and adding ?


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053967Post Vortex »

bobmurray wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 1:17am AFL clubs are starting to say they can't rebuild via the draft, the way it's designed with it's built in compromises makes it almost impossible.
So how does a club rebuild, does it take 58 years and adding ?
It takes stability and a long time, our club has been stuck in an antiquated business model for a very long time that sacks coaches when the going gets tough. Need to take a leaf out of WC Eagles book and not let the media or other external noises run the club.

The most important person at the club right now is the Prez, he can't afford to blink, this is his deck of cards and he has to stay the coarse no matter how long that is.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2720 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053974Post B.M »

They were the rules at the time - they got a bit lucky

But still

To win 4 premierships in 15 years and only miss the finals once and never ‘rebuild’ is commendable

We couldn’t do it

Remember
We were also the beneficiary of 2 priority picks and 2 x Number 1 picks and 2 x number 2 picks in 3 years

Something Geelong never got


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9153
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2053995Post spert »

B.M wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 10:34am They were the rules at the time - they got a bit lucky

But still

To win 4 premierships in 15 years and only miss the finals once and never ‘rebuild’ is commendable

We couldn’t do it

Remember
We were also the beneficiary of 2 priority picks and 2 x Number 1 picks and 2 x number 2 picks in 3 years

Something Geelong never got
Geelong were very strong and focussed from the top down from around the mid 00s and the management of the club didn't take poor performances from anyone in a leadership role including the coach. In contrast, we have had a history of weak administration and always looked for the magic wand solution to our problems, looking for star quality and quick fixes and letting the tail wag the dog rather than building a solid foundation. It has happened again with a president with stars in his eyes looking for star appeal to somehow improve the club. We should never have gone backwards and dragged Lyon back into it. We failed miserably after we dragged Blight back from retirement with $$, and it's all going to blow up in our faces again.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8783
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054005Post Otiman »

Are we forgetting about Geelongs Father/Son premierships?

Breed to succeed.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2720 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054011Post B.M »

They never got priority picks

We did


Nick DalSanto Claus
Club Player
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed 29 Nov 2023 8:53pm
Has thanked: 882 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054016Post Nick DalSanto Claus »

And we had the disadvantage of having Elshaug and Pelchen in charge of our post-2011 "rebuild", which failed miserably, and for which we are still paying.

It's important to get those early picks right, but it's more important to get the pickers of the picks, right.


"There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2720 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054018Post B.M »

Most were sucking their balls at the time!!!

SS were Springfield
Pelchen was Lyle Lanley


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054019Post perfectionist »

Geelong won the flags in that era because they had Scarlett and Enright. Either one plays with us and we win flags. We were never going to get Scarlett (F/S) but Corey Enright (6 AAs) at pick 47 was one of the greatest "fluke" picks of all time. We took Caydn Beetham (9) and Jason Blake (24) ahead of Enright.


Nick DalSanto Claus
Club Player
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed 29 Nov 2023 8:53pm
Has thanked: 882 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054020Post Nick DalSanto Claus »

Add the terrible record of John Beveridge's recruiting. He is described as a "guru", based mainly on the fact that he'd survived for 30 years.

Check his record. It's shocking, overall. It was our trading in of players, such as Gehrig, Hamill, Penny, Guerra, Black, Powell, Lawrence, Voss, Gardner and King, that helped turn us around.

He was not responsible for securing these players. Had he not had Riewoldt handed to him, his record would be shambolic. He even stuffed up the best draft pack ever seen in 2001. Yes, he did pick Ball, Dal Santo and Montagna, but missing Judd by trying to be too smart cost us at least two flags.

Don't trust me on this. Check his record, including drafting players sight-unseen, such as Howard and Sweeney amongst others. Do the names of Quirk, Sims, Malone, our number one pick used on Harding, Russo and Nugent ring a bell? With the exception of Malone, who was a first rounder, all the others were our number one picks. Three number one and another first rounder, all wasted.

His refusal to draft Jack Riewoldt was also a howler. He went for Armitage, despite Roo begging him to take his cousin.

His record in the 90's was also poor. He was no guru. His record is down right embarassing.

I often wonder why he cops so little criticism on here, when he was the architect of our mediocrity.

He was in charge from 1983 until 2008, and after that he remained on as a "consultant" to Peake, Pelchen, Elshaug and Liberatore. Those four remain as the guilty partners in our continued mediocrity.

Hopefully SOS, Gubby, Dalrymple, Lambert and our scouts can now rectify things. Thank goodness COVID gifted us Windy and Mitchito.


"There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8783
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054022Post Otiman »

Nick DalSanto Claus wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 3:04pm Add the terrible record of John Beveridge's recruiting. He is described as a "guru", based mainly on the fact that he'd survived for 30 years.
Not enough credit was given to Toce for the succesful drafting.

Gags was good as well, but only from a SA perspective.


User avatar
D.B.Cooper
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 793 times
Been thanked: 756 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054027Post D.B.Cooper »

I agree with BM's point, drafting is key.

It is easy to say Geelong got a huge kiss on the d!ck with their father son selections of Hawkins and Ablett, but we got priority selections in 200 (#2 and #5 in the 2001 super draft) so I don't believe we have anything to bitch about.

Geelong's drafting was OK in 1999 as well, with the following:
Joel Corey #8
Chapman #31
Ling #38
Enright #47
All Australian guns in the 2nd and third rounds.

We gave up #17 to Freo for Heath Black, Freo traded it to Geelong who picked James Kelly (with our traded pick).

Like all clubs Geelong had plenty of busts, but played to the rules of the time but also drafted brilliantly in 1999 & 2001 setting up their legacy.


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
D.B.Cooper
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 793 times
Been thanked: 756 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054028Post D.B.Cooper »

Otiman wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 3:58pm
Nick DalSanto Claus wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 3:04pm Add the terrible record of John Beveridge's recruiting. He is described as a "guru", based mainly on the fact that he'd survived for 30 years.
Not enough credit was given to Toce for the succesful drafting.

Gags was good as well, but only from a SA perspective.
Gags did a good job in identifying SA talent, but was an atrocious list Manager and deal maker.

Had a butt average reputation in the finance industry as well.


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
D.B.Cooper
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 793 times
Been thanked: 756 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054030Post D.B.Cooper »

Nick DalSanto Claus wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 3:04pm Add the terrible record of John Beveridge's recruiting. He is described as a "guru", based mainly on the fact that he'd survived for 30 years.

Check his record. It's shocking, overall. It was our trading in of players, such as Gehrig, Hamill, Penny, Guerra, Black, Powell, Lawrence, Voss, Gardner and King, that helped turn us around.

He was not responsible for securing these players. Had he not had Riewoldt handed to him, his record would be shambolic. He even stuffed up the best draft pack ever seen in 2001. Yes, he did pick Ball, Dal Santo and Montagna, but missing Judd by trying to be too smart cost us at least two flags.

Don't trust me on this. Check his record, including drafting players sight-unseen, such as Howard and Sweeney amongst others. Do the names of Quirk, Sims, Malone, our number one pick used on Harding, Russo and Nugent ring a bell? With the exception of Malone, who was a first rounder, all the others were our number one picks. Three number one and another first rounder, all wasted.

His refusal to draft Jack Riewoldt was also a howler. He went for Armitage, despite Roo begging him to take his cousin.

His record in the 90's was also poor. He was no guru. His record is down right embarassing.

I often wonder why he cops so little criticism on here, when he was the architect of our mediocrity.

He was in charge from 1983 until 2008, and after that he remained on as a "consultant" to Peake, Pelchen, Elshaug and Liberatore. Those four remain as the guilty partners in our continued mediocrity.

Hopefully SOS, Gubby, Dalrymple, Lambert and our scouts can now rectify things. Thank goodness COVID gifted us Windy and Mitchito.
Whilst you are correct about our drafting, I do remember being told by a club official in 2004 that JB was brilliant at identifying talent but was provided significantly fewer resources than other clubs and we were not professional in this department.

I can't validate but this sounds too St kilda like to be incorrect.


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8783
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054041Post Otiman »

What's our draft hand like in this years draft? I recall we did a bunch of pick trades and I think have Adelaide's second rounder.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054051Post CURLY »

Can’t compare Vic teams with a Geelong list with the various advantages they have. The father sons on top of go home/ lifestyle they can offer.

Our list was in front of theirs at the end of 2006.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Saint 58
Club Player
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:10am
Location: Anywhere the Saints are playing in Melbourne
Has thanked: 253 times
Been thanked: 106 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054056Post Saint 58 »

I agree that drafting is the key
The point with Geelong is not their f/s picks
It's the fact that they got them for peanuts & still got Selwood, Bartel, etc.
Then the AFL realised they had to change it
Too late ... Three flags, thank you very much

Even now using a bunch of late picks for points is BS
If a f/s is worth a first rounder, that's what it should cost you
If you don't have a first rounder, get one
If you can't get one, too bad


What you do for others will define your life.
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
Nick DalSanto Claus
Club Player
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed 29 Nov 2023 8:53pm
Has thanked: 882 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054088Post Nick DalSanto Claus »

D.B.Cooper wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 4:25pm
Nick DalSanto Claus wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2024 3:04pm Add the terrible record of John Beveridge's recruiting. He is described as a "guru", based mainly on the fact that he'd survived for 30 years.

Check his record. It's shocking, overall. It was our trading in of players, such as Gehrig, Hamill, Penny, Guerra, Black, Powell, Lawrence, Voss, Gardner and King, that helped turn us around.

He was not responsible for securing these players. Had he not had Riewoldt handed to him, his record would be shambolic. He even stuffed up the best draft pack ever seen in 2001. Yes, he did pick Ball, Dal Santo and Montagna, but missing Judd by trying to be too smart cost us at least two flags.

Don't trust me on this. Check his record, including drafting players sight-unseen, such as Howard and Sweeney amongst others. Do the names of Quirk, Sims, Malone, our number one pick used on Harding, Russo and Nugent ring a bell? With the exception of Malone, who was a first rounder, all the others were our number one picks. Three number one and another first rounder, all wasted.

His refusal to draft Jack Riewoldt was also a howler. He went for Armitage, despite Roo begging him to take his cousin.

His record in the 90's was also poor. He was no guru. His record is down right embarassing.

I often wonder why he cops so little criticism on here, when he was the architect of our mediocrity.

He was in charge from 1983 until 2008, and after that he remained on as a "consultant" to Peake, Pelchen, Elshaug and Liberatore. Those four remain as the guilty partners in our continued mediocrity.

Hopefully SOS, Gubby, Dalrymple, Lambert and our scouts can now rectify things. Thank goodness COVID gifted us Windy and Mitchito.
Whilst you are correct about our drafting, I do remember being told by a club official in 2004 that JB was brilliant at identifying talent but was provided significantly fewer resources than other clubs and we were not professional in this department.

I can't validate but this sounds too St kilda like to be incorrect.
Unfortunately, DBC, we are both right. It was well known in the AFL industry that during the 90s and onto the GT era, our recruiting budget was almost non-existent. Excuse accepted.

The brilliant talent spotting? A big maybe, but does it explain his inability to select those he had identified, if he did at all?

My main point was that Elshaug and Pelchen cop a lot of s*** on here. Based purely on his record, JB is just as culpable, if not moreso than those two.


"There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
User avatar
Bowey Boy
Club Player
Posts: 1155
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005 7:15pm
Location: Animal Enclosure
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Drafting 25

Post: # 2054095Post Bowey Boy »

B.M wrote: Fri 19 Apr 2024 10:21pm Rebuilding

The biggest myth in footy!!!

Getting your picks right is key

Geelong in 2007 had pick 8 - selected Bartel
We had pick 5 - selected X. Clarke

We had pick 21 and selected M.Maguire
They had 24 and selected Steve Johnson

Dal Santo 13 and Kelly 17 was a nil all draw

We had pick 37 selected Montagna
They had pick 40 (f/s) Gary Ablett Jnr

That’s why they won 3 premierships and we won zero

Got to get pick right - especially high picks
Geelong were gifted champions like Ablett and Hawkins. We got David Sierakowski and Stuart Annand on the silver service platter. Clearly we were too stupid to recognise that Petracca and Judd were decent footballers. And that Ben Cousins was a very good indecent footballer.


"I think, 'You kick a footy mate, you kick a footy. It's not like you've got a cure for cancer. You kick a footy, stop thinking you are so special'." - Samantha Black
Post Reply