Side vs GWS
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Side vs GWS
Who goes out for Windhager?
Possible candidates
Hastie: think this is the most likely unless they intend to give him a full run on the wing.
Hammer: If the above is desired they could shift Sharman back forward and Hammer to the twos. Hammer does protect Owens from ruck contests however.
Jones: low time on ground and subbed out
Prediction: Hastie out Windhager in, Jones to sub.
Possible candidates
Hastie: think this is the most likely unless they intend to give him a full run on the wing.
Hammer: If the above is desired they could shift Sharman back forward and Hammer to the twos. Hammer does protect Owens from ruck contests however.
Jones: low time on ground and subbed out
Prediction: Hastie out Windhager in, Jones to sub.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Mon 15 May 2017 7:18pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Jones had 6 broken tackles in 1st qtr, Fox mentioned it was the most by a player in a qtr this season. He also fumbled several times and looked disinterested for large parts of the game. He has to be first dropped to make way for windhager and tbh I think he’s days in the AFL are numbered.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Should add I would prefer Hammer out, Windy in, Hastie to the wing rotation. Jones to sub.
Something like the below.
Stocker. Wilkie. Cordy
Milera. Battle. Sinclair
Marshall. Steele. Ross.
Windy. Byrnes. Wilson.
Hill. Membrey. Butler
Higgins. King. Sharman.
Int: Pou. Owens. Bonner. Hastie.
Sub: Jones
Something like the below.
Stocker. Wilkie. Cordy
Milera. Battle. Sinclair
Marshall. Steele. Ross.
Windy. Byrnes. Wilson.
Hill. Membrey. Butler
Higgins. King. Sharman.
Int: Pou. Owens. Bonner. Hastie.
Sub: Jones
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
- TheGreatZacsby
- Club Player
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2023 8:59am
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 243 times
Re: Side vs GWS
I think Butler has to go for Collard. Collard is literally the next Shai Bolton. Needs to be played.
Windy for Hastie and move Jones or Byrnes to Sub.
Windy for Hastie and move Jones or Byrnes to Sub.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8781
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Side vs GWS
With no VFL game I doubt any injured players would make their way in.
Windhager in for Jones seems reasonable.
Hastie should play a full match either at VFL or AFL level next week.
Garcia to play his first game, probably as sub (as much as I hate that)
Windhager in for Jones seems reasonable.
Hastie should play a full match either at VFL or AFL level next week.
Garcia to play his first game, probably as sub (as much as I hate that)
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
Re: Side vs GWS
I just hope the Saints don't get slaughtered by GWS, who could be without Toby after his arm pinning slam dunk tackle on Mac Andrew.
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Side vs GWS
We match up well against GWS. I am more confident against them than I am of us versing Cats, Essendon or Port or the Crows if I'm being honest.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Jones stays for mine. There was a lot to like about how we did at the stoppages: we won the clearances, even though Nankervis was all over Marshall. Jones played his part in that. So I hope they don’t muck around sleigh it too much, just add Windy to the rotations.
I’d love Byrnes to be dropped, but I reckon he’s one of Ross’s koala bears. He might conceivably go back to sub, with Hastie starting. Otherwise Hastie sub.
One of Caminiti or Sharman to come out for Windy. I’d prefer it to be Sharman but I reckon Ross prefers Coops to Cam at this stage.
So
In: Windhager
Out: Sharman or Caminiti
Sub: Byrnes or Hastie
I’d love Byrnes to be dropped, but I reckon he’s one of Ross’s koala bears. He might conceivably go back to sub, with Hastie starting. Otherwise Hastie sub.
One of Caminiti or Sharman to come out for Windy. I’d prefer it to be Sharman but I reckon Ross prefers Coops to Cam at this stage.
So
In: Windhager
Out: Sharman or Caminiti
Sub: Byrnes or Hastie
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12757
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2718 times
Re: Side vs GWS
In
Garcia
Windhager
Out
Hastie
Caminiti or Sharman
B: Wilkie - Cordy - Stocker
HB NWM - Battle - Sinclair
Foll: Marshall - Steele - Windhager
C: Hill - Ross - Wilson
HF: Phillipou - Owens - Butler
F: Membrey - King - Higgins
Int: Garcia - Sharman - Bonner - Byrnes
Sub: Jones
E: Hastie - Collard - Schoenmaker
Garcia
Windhager
Out
Hastie
Caminiti or Sharman
B: Wilkie - Cordy - Stocker
HB NWM - Battle - Sinclair
Foll: Marshall - Steele - Windhager
C: Hill - Ross - Wilson
HF: Phillipou - Owens - Butler
F: Membrey - King - Higgins
Int: Garcia - Sharman - Bonner - Byrnes
Sub: Jones
E: Hastie - Collard - Schoenmaker
Last edited by B.M on Sun 07 Apr 2024 11:23pm, edited 1 time in total.
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3103
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Interesting that Ross said in the post match something to the effect of “Ro was exhausted. We have Campbell who will probably come in at some point”.
Maybe not this week, but it looks like maybe we’ll give Marshall a chop out this year
Maybe not this week, but it looks like maybe we’ll give Marshall a chop out this year
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 492 times
- Been thanked: 316 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Byrnes and Jones out
Windy and Collard in
Hastie to start on the wing and be given a fair crack at it, not just the last 5 minutes like he got today.
Windy and Collard in
Hastie to start on the wing and be given a fair crack at it, not just the last 5 minutes like he got today.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Could see a world where Campbell comes in for a Hammer and rucks 70% of the game.
Giving Ro the ability to play as a forward who pinch hits in the ruck for a game or two.
GWS wouldn't be the worst game to trial that against.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: Side vs GWS
VERSUSsamuraisaint wrote: ↑Sun 07 Apr 2024 10:39pm We match up well against GWS. I am more confident against them than I am of us versing Cats, Essendon or Port or the Crows if I'm being honest.
'Versing' isn't a damn word
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Wed 29 Nov 2023 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 882 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Re: Side vs GWS
WellardSaint wrote: ↑Mon 08 Apr 2024 2:05amVERSUSsamuraisaint wrote: ↑Sun 07 Apr 2024 10:39pm We match up well against GWS. I am more confident against them than I am of us versing Cats, Essendon or Port or the Crows if I'm being honest.
'Versing' isn't a damn word'
“Versing” actually was a verb about poetry before kids started using it the way they do today. The Oxford English Dictionary has it being used as far back as the year 1001 to mean “to compose or make verses.” An example is a sentence from 1909: “He began to verse extemporaneously in her ear.”
No need to thank me. The inner warmth that comes from presenting this is sufficient reward.
"There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: Side vs GWS
If Hastie had done enough to be selected, he needs to start. You can't pick a kid, give him 35 minutes of footy in two weeks and then drop him.
Butler, Caminiti out.
Collard, Windhager in.
Jones sub. Hastie starting 22.
Hill might be touch and go off a six day break and two flights.
Butler, Caminiti out.
Collard, Windhager in.
Jones sub. Hastie starting 22.
Hill might be touch and go off a six day break and two flights.
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8781
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 661 times
Re: Side vs GWS
Briggs, Witts, Xerri - they have all killed Marshall in the past, would expect Campbell to come in for one or more of these opponents.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Side vs GWS
Our stoppage clearance numbers are actually okay.
Our centre clearance numbers only need to improve by 3 or 4 per match.
I'm looking forward to Dow in a couple of weeks.
Our centre clearance numbers only need to improve by 3 or 4 per match.
I'm looking forward to Dow in a couple of weeks.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Side vs GWS
Our stoppage clearance numbers are actually okay.
Our centre clearance numbers only need to improve by 3 or 4 per match.
I'm looking forward to Dow in a couple of weeks.
Our centre clearance numbers only need to improve by 3 or 4 per match.
I'm looking forward to Dow in a couple of weeks.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Side vs GWS
I rather hope not, unless Marshall is actually injured, or so buggered and bruised that he needs a week off (not something you see happening too often with modern AFL players.)
The problem with Marshall has always been that he plays his best football in generally when he is roaming around the ground as a ruckman. For whatever reason, he is far less effective as a KPP. Campbell is more or less purely a tap ruckman: if he and Marshall are in the same team, then you would expect Campbell to be taking most of the rucks. I guess it might work in a double-teaming strategy against someone like Max Gawn, who combines excellent tap work with strong around the ground performance. (Watching the way Melbourne set up this season, I reckon we'll see a team try double-teaming Gawn very soon: if he can be neutralised, Melbourne will have a lot more trouble getting out of their defensive 50, given that they currently use Gawn as their outlet around 50 per cent of the time.)
On the whole, I reckon a better idea is to look to bring in Hayes, who is a superior ruckman to Owens or Caminiti and is also a capable forward. Unlike Campbell, he could be played as a second ruckman, allowing Marshall to remain in the role in which he is the best, but perhaps spend a little more time each game on the bench. I reckon a fully-fit Hayes (if that is achievable) is better value than Sharman, and perhaps Caminiti as well (although I really like the Hammer).
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Side vs GWS
I agree, although I think we did it a bit last year to Byrnes and possibly Sharman too.
Surely Melbourne-Adelaide-Melbourne isn't especially gruelling. Only time for a quick cup of tea and then the plane starts descending. If the Saints have chartered a plane, Hill was probably receiving physio for half the flight home.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Side vs GWS
In: windhager, Campbell
Out: jones, Caminiti
Sub: Jones
I feel like this is a game where Campbell can come in and do 50-60% of rucking. Marshall then becomes a forward/ruck.
Gotta come up with some new trick to beat GWS. Going using the same plan as Richmond won’t work.
Out: jones, Caminiti
Sub: Jones
I feel like this is a game where Campbell can come in and do 50-60% of rucking. Marshall then becomes a forward/ruck.
Gotta come up with some new trick to beat GWS. Going using the same plan as Richmond won’t work.