Angry Dwarf can't control himself...

[Moods]

Are we really that angry about it? Coach in heat of the moment calls someone a cocksucker. Jimmy certainly didn’t seem too perturbed. Coach was pissed off his captain was taken out of the game unfairly. Storm in a tea cup and tbh, I don’t mind the passion. Let’s not all become ‘Caros’ and I’m one of the few that likes Caro

[The G Train Legacy]

Just a Shiite human

Small Man syndrome

[The G Train Legacy]

Well if a poster's info here is correct, that Clarkson called Jimmy (and was it Dougal?) c*cks*ckers. Whilst vulgar and inappropriate, not homophobic. Not only gay gentleman indulge in such.

This was not a AFLW Game though.

And how often anyway do you hear it directed at women?

If as in this case, it was directed at males it implies homophobic connotations.

It does not. It is a term of derision, which was articulated more regularly up until the 90s. Its deployment didn't infer that the person was gay.

Saying it implies homophobic connotations is stereotyping gay blokes I think. Just as gay men are not the sole practitioners of it, not all of them partake.

[Teflon]

I thought there was more said that the old swallower line
Anyway he’s had enough chances
Set fire to the dwarf I say

[St Lenny]

I thought there was more said that the old swallower line
Anyway he’s had enough chances
Set fire to the dwarf I say

Correct, a lot more was said than originally quoted. The papers on Monday said that he wasn't actually Coaching that game.

[cwrcyn]

Clarkson has a long history of this kind of garbage. At last, even the sycophants in the media who've been licking his arse and covering for him for two decades have finally had enough of him.

Everyone in the game knows what a nastyl tosser he is.

[samuraisaint]

If it can be proven give him weeks.

[shrodes]

$20,000 fine and 2 game suspended sentence if he offends again before end of 2025

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1082829

[cwrcyn]

I hope that money comes out of his own Pocket. Doubt it will, though.

It won't stop him, though. He can't help himself. At his core he is a nasty prick.

[Sainter_Dad]

I hope that money comes out of his own Pocket. Doubt it will, though.

It won't stop him, though. He can't help himself. At his core he is a nasty prick.

It is not part of Norf's Soft Cap

[saynta]

Serves the little, racist, homophobic prick right.

[Yorkeys]

AFL again putting aside its stated values (which are to be used only when useful to the Administration or virtue signalling, not really absolutes) to give North yet another leg up. Can't have the guy suspended twice in 2 years, once for racism [unproven] then for gratuitous homophobia and inciting violence. Just a wrist slap. $10k after tax. What % of $1 million is that. That Roos club is getting too many favours.

[magnifisaint]

I hope his team get theirs given to them on a platter by Carlton. Those North tossers don't deserve a monopoly on Good Friday games because they are so crap!

[Devilhead]

Is thread about about Chief from BigFooty?

[asiu]

what is this $10k after tax bullsh1t ?

i didn't understand it the first time i read it
nor now

please explain

[CQ SAINT]

what is this $10k after tax bullsh1t ?

i didn't understand it the first time i read it
nor now

please explain

I think it means that it's a reduced fine.

Say I earn $10k, it's actually $7500 after tax.

[asiu]

yes

***

so ... if the dwarf has to pay a fine of 20 k

said dwarf , has to earn 30 k

1/3 to tax ... 2/3 pays off fine ... yes ?

[Yorkeys]

No.

[asiu]

well

can i have your explanation then ... of how the dwarf only pays 10 of 20

[Sainter_Dad]

well

can i have your explanation then ... of how the dwarf only pays 10 of 20

The fine of $20K is paid - and he claims it as a tax deduction. (Not sure that it should be - but if his accountant will claim it then he gets the deduction)

If Clarkson earns $200,000 the tax on that is $64,667 so he takes home $135,333
If he reduces his income by the $20,000 fine he declares $180,000 Net Income - the tax on this is $55,267 so take home id $124,733

The difference in take home pay is that he is $10,600 lighter in his pocket.

So
AFL gets $20,000
Clarkson gets $10,600 less to spend on his Mortgage and Wine Collection
You, Me and McGee pay the remaining $9,400 as the ATO does not get the tax to spend on your schools and Centrelink etc [Careful, don't stand too close to me I am about to be Flamed]

Once you earn over $180,000 net Income this remains true - at a lower income - ie yours and mine - the ATO does not contribute as much to the fine (I don't believe fines for stupidity should be claimable and I would disallow it)

******* Source - Ethical Accountant

[asiu]

ta Dad

[Scollop]

If he reduces his income by the $20,000 fine he declares $180,000 Net Income - the tax on this is $55,267 so take home id $124,733

That's the theory. It'd be good if it were true for some of the biggest companies in Australia, including the foreign Multinationals.

The burden on individual income taxes would surely come down if we taxed some of these crooks (Multinationals) at a fair rate.

They pay PWC or one of the others and have subsidiaries and affiliates in the British Virgin Islands...and then they pay little or no tax

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-09/ ... tent=other

https://michaelwest.com.au/the-big-mac- ... x-revenue/

[Sainter_Dad]

If he reduces his income by the $20,000 fine he declares $180,000 Net Income - the tax on this is $55,267 so take home id $124,733

That's the theory. It'd be good if it were true for some of the biggest companies in Australia, including the foreign Multinationals.

They pay PWC or one of the others and have subsidiaries and affiliates in the British Virgin Islands...and then they pay little or no tax

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-09/ ... tent=other

https://michaelwest.com.au/the-big-mac- ... x-revenue/

I doubt Clarko has a Tax Haven

I also agree that they use a certain component of their earning to move 'Management Fees' etc to Off-Shore - but in the meantime - they Pay Aussies - who pay Taxes - as opposed to not having a presence in Australia at all.

You can look at it like the Melb Grand Prix loses money - and every Olympics loses money - but they bring dollars to the Shops - who pay overtime - staff pay taxes - it all comes around and we are slightly better off having the event.

[Scollop]

So it's ok for you and me to pay a fair share of income tax..but corporates can pay next to nothing because...'they're doing us a favour by operating in Australia and providing jobs'

Fair enough. That's one view

Here's another

https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2024/how- ... 20million).

[Sainter_Dad]

So it's ok for you and me to pay a fair share of income tax..but corporates can pay next to nothing because...'they're doing us a favour by operating in Australia and providing jobs'

Fair enough. That's one view

Here's another

https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2024/how- ... 20million).

LOL - did not say it was Okay - but look at the details if you get them - the tax paid is as a percentage of earnings not profit - do you pay the full tax on your earnings or do negative gear and claim travel etc

Do you have a business that pays tax on 100% of its earnings

Do you understand how company tax is only put into a franking account for when they declare dividends - that franking credit only then gets distributed to the shareholders and then they declare the earnings - if a company has not paid tax it can’t issue franked dividends - so has to declare unfranked and then the shareholders pay the tax - so dividends are lower


Company tax is a myth - it is ultimately taxed in the hands of the shareholders