Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 233 times
Contact:

Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032613Post StPeter »

Neale ,the winner didn't even make All Australian.

Jack Steele won 3 BOG votes and three 2nd best votes. I don't think many Saints fans saw that!

Sinclair, although polling well with 21 votes from 10 games, did not receive a vote round v GWS although having 37 disposals, 733 metres gained and two goals (uniformly given BOG by every media outlet).

Plenty of other anomalies but will leave it at that.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10504
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032615Post CURLY »

It’s getting worse.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10504
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032616Post CURLY »

It’s getting worse.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Big Max
Club Player
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue 22 Aug 2023 11:26pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032617Post Big Max »

Not much love for Rowan Marshall and our All Australian Callum Wilke.


Big Max
Club Player
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue 22 Aug 2023 11:26pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032619Post Big Max »

Errol Gulden a bit stiff not to get 3 votes in the final round with 42 classy possessions.

Personally I wouldn't have Neale in my All Australian team either.


Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032624Post Trev from the Bush »

Rohan Marshall, 3 x 1 vote games,
Callum Wilkie 1 x 2 vote game,
Mason Wood 1 vote,
Michito Owens zero votes.

I must have been watching a different team all year.

And the winner got 3 votes for a seven-kick game.

Says it all really. Time to take the responsibility for voting off the FOUR umpires and get their guide dogs do the voting.

I believe the absolute media saturation, coupled with instant celebrity of media faves, ingrains umpires' psyche and has them watching for those players. A sham.


Saint supporter since '62
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12098
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3705 times
Been thanked: 2578 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032625Post Scollop »

It's BS.

How did Gulden not get bog in Round 24? Petracca won them the game. He had exactly the same disposals as Viney. No votes. Cost me big time in my trifectas and pick 4

Umpires alone shouldn't be voting. They need a panel. Coaches should vote along with umps and 1 of the Foxtel or channel 7 commentators. Cameron Ling and Luke Darcy are not allowed to be involved due to fwit factor

Should be renamed the Midfielder's Medal


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12098
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3705 times
Been thanked: 2578 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032628Post Scollop »

Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:20am
And the winner got 3 votes for a seven-kick game.
Was that the game against GWS where Charlie Cameron kicked 7 goals?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19154
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2030 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032631Post SaintPav »

Becoming irrelevant every year.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032632Post meher baba »

More than ever, thr Brownlow is a contest favouring possession accumulators in the midfield or on the half back line. KPPs, especially rucks (at least this year) need not apply.

A contest in which Jack Viney finishes ahead of Toby Greene and Tim Taranto and Brad Crouch finish ahead of Charlie Curnow is a contest I can’t take at all seriously.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032633Post shanegrambeau »

Brad Crouch 18 Brownlow Votes!

2 more than Grand Finalists Jordan De Goey and Pendlebury combined.

Good Brownlow value is Brad Crouch!

Feels strange!


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032634Post Teflon »

Biggest midfield profile medal
Daicos will win 3 while Hamish is unzipping him…


“Yeah….nah””
Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032637Post Trev from the Bush »

Scollop wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:29am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:20am
And the winner got 3 votes for a seven-kick game.
Was that the game against GWS where Charlie Cameron kicked 7 goals?
Yep.


Saint supporter since '62
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 233 times
Contact:

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032641Post StPeter »

Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:52am
Scollop wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:29am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:20am
And the winner got 3 votes for a seven-kick game.
Was that the game against GWS where Charlie Cameron kicked 7 goals?
Yep.
Interesting to compare the winner's year (playing mid-field) with that of Sinclair- averages per games played.

Fantasy points Sinc 102.1 (elite); Neale 95 (abv av)

Disposals Sinc 28.9 (elite); Neale 26.9 (abv av)

Kicks Sinc 19.6 (elite); Neale 12.1 (abv av)

Handballs Sinc 9.3 (elite); Neale 14.8 (abv av)

Effective kicks Sinc 14.3 (Elite); 7.6 Neale (abv av)


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12098
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3705 times
Been thanked: 2578 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032645Post Scollop »

StPeter wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 2:06am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:52am
Scollop wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:29am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:20am
And the winner got 3 votes for a seven-kick game.
Was that the game against GWS where Charlie Cameron kicked 7 goals?
Yep.
Interesting to compare the winner's year (playing mid-field) with that of Sinclair- averages per games played.

Fantasy points Sinc 102.1 (elite); Neale 95 (abv av)

Disposals Sinc 28.9 (elite); Neale 26.9 (abv av)

Kicks Sinc 19.6 (elite); Neale 12.1 (abv av)

Handballs Sinc 9.3 (elite); Neale 14.8 (abv av)

Effective kicks Sinc 14.3 (Elite); 7.6 Neale (abv av)
How many kick-ins (after the opposition score a behind) does Lachie Neale get each game - on average?

Or... Bontempelli or Jack Steele for that matter?

You've also omitted two other stats. Contested vs Non contested is important. Tackles are also important.

Sinclair doesn't usually have high tackle numbers.

It seems from some of the voting in various games (e.g Viney vs Petracca...or Steele vs Sinclair) that umpires - and coaches - value tackles. Makes sense that tackles get noticed by an ump because they hold up play and give a free kick to reward the tackler.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7087
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 367 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032648Post mad saint guy »

I've never understood why the Brownlow holds any prestige. Umps should also just be there to enforce the rules, not decide which players are best.


wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032650Post wally »

Last year it was joked on here that Windhager’s effort on Neale cost him the Brownlow .


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6610
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1338 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032652Post Jacks Back »

wally wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 7:08am Last year it was joked on here that Windhager’s effort on Neale cost him the Brownlow .
Was he on him in the last game (I can't remember)? Might have cost him again if he was (the whole match).


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032654Post Yorkeys »

SaintPav wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:34am Becoming irrelevant every year.
Voted by the men & women who every week demonstrate incompetence & petty vindictiveness.
Neale is a class act but not better/ more valuable than Harris Andrews who is essential for BNE.
Another vector for betting, that's all.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032655Post Yorkeys »

Teflon wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 12:38am Biggest midfield profile medal
Daicos will win 3 while Hamish is unzipping him…
Poor Hamish. Overly gushy and tongue tied even by AFL mc standards. Amateur hour.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9150
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032656Post spert »

I think the Brownlow now is more about whoever is running past the umpire enough times with the ball, or disposing of it a lot in the umpire's vision, not so much the effect a player is having on the actual game. Neale is a great player though.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032657Post Life Long Saint »

Every year we hear the same complaints.

We have to remember that the Brownlow Medal is the umpires award. Always has been. Always should be.

It's not like we don't have a multitude of other awards.
We have:
  • All Australian - Awarded based on position by a panel of "experts"
  • Player MVP - Awarded by the players
  • Coaches MVP - Awarded by the coaches
  • A plethora of media awards from all the major papers and radio broadcasters
  • And, lastly, the club B&F awards
If we don't like the Brownlow result, then why not elevate some of the others above it, or reduce the importance of the the Brownlow?

Oh, and one more thing...All the individual league awards, no matter who votes on them, are won by midfielders!


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032660Post The_Dud »

As LLS said above, there are plenty of awards to choose from if you don’t like one. Each has its flaws, supporters will always find something about each to whinge about.

It’s always been a midfielders award, tho I’d have Bont and Petracca ahead of Neale.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8773
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 658 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032662Post Otiman »

IMO make the AFL awards night the big one, make the AFLCA votes silent throughout the year.

Just have to keep Bont and Danger away from the mic.

https://aflcoaches.com.au/awards/the-af ... 3/20240124


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19154
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2030 times

Re: Brownlow. Did the Umps get it Right?

Post: # 2032663Post SaintPav »

The_Dud wrote: Tue 26 Sep 2023 9:41am As LLS said above, there are plenty of awards to choose from if you don’t like one. Each has its flaws, supporters will always find something about each to whinge about.

It’s always been a midfielders award, tho I’d have Bont and Petracca ahead of Neale.
It probably needs a revamp though as it’s beginning to lose its prestige.

Times have changed and the game is now very quick. The umpires already have plenty to do.

AFL changes the rules all the time. This award looks like it needs some reform.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Post Reply