Post-match analysis

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030771Post nostalgicsaint »

B.M wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 6:29pm Happy with an elimination final loss?

I was happier with 2020
And in hindsight 2020 actually set us back several years.

Big picture.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3385
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030809Post older saint »

DJ Higgins wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 5:50pm What a great year. If you told me we were playing finals at the beginning of the year i would have laughed yet we did. As for the game GWS were better. That's it, we were out played by a better team. They took out our big weapons and moved the ball too quickly for us. All the young guys got a taste of finals footy and will be better for it. I am really looking forward to next year now, more than i have been in a decade.

Take a bow boys
Well said. I must admit i am shocked how negative people are here.
We aren't good enough yet, played a team with multiple top 10 draft picks who are mature, and never quit using the same game plan which won 13 games in a season where we were predicted to win 8-10.
I thought the crowd noise when we were coming was awesome. took me back tot he old Moorabin days with Plugger.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5130
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1458 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030813Post Yorkeys »

older saint wrote: Mon 11 Sep 2023 10:30am
DJ Higgins wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 5:50pm What a great year. If you told me we were playing finals at the beginning of the year i would have laughed yet we did. As for the game GWS were better. That's it, we were out played by a better team. They took out our big weapons and moved the ball too quickly for us. All the young guys got a taste of finals footy and will be better for it. I am really looking forward to next year now, more than i have been in a decade.

Take a bow boys
Well said. I must admit i am shocked how negative people are here.
We aren't good enough yet, played a team with multiple top 10 draft picks who are mature, and never quit using the same game plan which won 13 games in a season where we were predicted to win 8-10.
I thought the crowd noise when we were coming was awesome. took me back tot he old Moorabin days with Plugger.
Hear hear.

Had a moment of enlightenment when I realised how big and fast GWS are overall. Remembered Tony74 cautioning our list was in the 6-12 band. Had to belatedly agree as I was being bashed over the head by that truth.

Our coaches have been great. What a dud was Leon Cameron.


wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030855Post wally »

Funny I remember Kingsley copping alot of flak / criticism when he was an assistant at the saints.


wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030856Post wally »

Funny I remember Kingsley copping alot of flak / criticism when he was an assistant at the saints on here


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12768
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030881Post B.M »

They are only bad at StKilda

Coaches and Players seem to go alright elsewhere


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030895Post Teflon »

B.M wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 6:29pm Happy with an elimination final loss?

I was happier with 2020
In a Covid rubbish year?
Think you’re papering over cracks again
I’m happy with this year
Better than I expected with injuries, new coach , game plan and list with holes
Just need to keep turning over deadwood senior players
Juniors stood up more often than not


“Yeah….nah””
nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030896Post nostalgicsaint »

B.M wrote: Mon 11 Sep 2023 7:48pm They are only bad at StKilda

Coaches and Players seem to go alright elsewhere
I hope the irony of this post isn't lost on you.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
The G Train Legacy
Club Player
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 145 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030897Post The G Train Legacy »

B.M wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 6:29pm Happy with an elimination final loss?

I was happier with 2020
Seriously, that was a 17 game season of 1 hour games. A glorified Lightning Premiership. Mickey Mouse compared to a real season. Ryder was in awesome form and Dan Hannebery actually strung together a few games for us at the end of the season. If it had been a 22 game season we probably would've missed. I doubt Hannebery would have managed another 5 games for a start.

St Kilda 2023 would have pummeled St Kilda 2020.


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030911Post shanegrambeau »

That wee vignette on Footy Class by Kano looked shocking, didn’t it. Not in a fatal way, but just looked liked players not finals hard and ready.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12768
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030915Post B.M »

2020 we won a final

With new coaches, new player, new gameplan

I don’t care if it were played in 5 minute quarters on the fkn moon

If we won the premiership in 2020 you wouldn’t have been happy

I was on here and the vibe was pretty good in 2020 after the final win!

I suppose you’d rather have finished in a prelim this year than win a flag in 2020?

Last time I checked, Richmond won 3 premierships in 4 years - not 2


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030917Post nostalgicsaint »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 11:55pm
B.M wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 6:29pm Happy with an elimination final loss?

I was happier with 2020
And in hindsight 2020 actually set us back several years.

Big picture.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8786
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030921Post Otiman »

2020 was a lot different outside of Victoria. You all still have PTSD from it, it seems.


User avatar
lewdogs
Club Player
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 182 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030923Post lewdogs »

B.M wrote: Sun 10 Sep 2023 6:29pm Happy with an elimination final loss?

I was happier with 2020
Jeez mate you've gone down a very negative path after the loss. Of course people would rather have won the game but overall it's been a year of improvement. The key now is to springboard and further improve. You can go on and on about how Pou shouldn't have played or Windy should have been in the middle it changes nothing. The final was a disappointing performance but I think we should cut them some slack considering what happened.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030926Post samoht »

Stocker, Owens, Windhager, NWM even 18 y.o. Phillipou ... they have improved us.
And they will keep maturing and getting better.

I agree, we have improved over 2020 and 2022.

But re the post match analysis ... Billings and Coffield could have made a difference ... we took too many small forwards into the final.

That was a mistake.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031144Post CQ SAINT »

samoht wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 8:14am Stocker, Owens, Windhager, NWM even 18 y.o. Phillipou ... they have improved us.
And they will keep maturing and getting better.

I agree, we have improved over 2020 and 2022.

But re the post match analysis ... Billings and Coffield could have made a difference ... we took too many small forwards into the final.

That was a mistake.
I saw King Caminiti Sharman and Owens line up. Which one was the small forward?

We subbed out a tall?


Billings would have been another small forward, who doesn't kick a lot of goals, ever, does he get clearances or would GWS just give the ball to him?

Coffield is a good player but you wouldn't drop a small forward for him.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031150Post samoht »

CQ saint:

For team balance, and also from what we should have learned about our specialist small forwards from previous finals (their reduced output and effectiveness in tough, physical games) over the last 15 years or so, we probably should've dropped one of our small forwards at least, for a bigger body.

We had 3 small forwards, as it turned out ... I would have just gone with Gresham who at least wins his own ball.

Billings plays taller than his height ... and he's 185 cms. He has more strings to his bow - he'll gather his 20 possessions, and doesn't just rely on delivery.
He's a playmaker - and we needed as many as possible vs GWS.

I think we would have gone better minus the two specialist small forwards ... and of course I'm referring here to Butler and Higgins.

Even Byrnes would have helped with his speed and playmaking around the ground ... that's another player we could have selected ahead of our 2 specialist small forwards to counter what GWS was bringing.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5130
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1458 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031173Post Yorkeys »

Higgins form decline has been one of the most disappointing aspects of this year. Billings run of injuries close up.


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031181Post shanegrambeau »

Marshy from SaintsTV said, Dougal Howard should have been picked (as key defender) and Cordy as a forward.

Sounds 👍 IMO

Alas, spilt milk etc.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031205Post CQ SAINT »

samoht wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 11:20am CQ saint:

For team balance, and also from what we should have learned about our specialist small forwards from previous finals (their reduced output and effectiveness in tough, physical games) over the last 15 years or so, we probably should've dropped one of our small forwards at least, for a bigger body.

We had 3 small forwards, as it turned out ... I would have just gone with Gresham who at least wins his own ball.

Billings plays taller than his height ... and he's 185 cms. He has more strings to his bow - he'll gather his 20 possessions, and doesn't just rely on delivery.
He's a playmaker - and we needed as many as possible vs GWS.

I think we would have gone better minus the two specialist small forwards ... and of course I'm referring here to Butler and Higgins.

Even Byrnes would have helped with his speed and playmaking around the ground ... that's another player we could have selected ahead of our 2 specialist small forwards to counter what GWS was bringing.
Byrnes was stiff, Howard was stiff. Billings just wasn't up to it physically this year. If he doesn't get traded, he can earn a spot in the finals by being the playmates we need, he hasn't inspired me that way since 2021.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031206Post CQ SAINT »

samoht wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 11:20am CQ saint:

For team balance, and also from what we should have learned about our specialist small forwards from previous finals (their reduced output and effectiveness in tough, physical games) over the last 15 years or so, we probably should've dropped one of our small forwards at least, for a bigger body.

We had 3 small forwards, as it turned out ... I would have just gone with Gresham who at least wins his own ball.

Billings plays taller than his height ... and he's 185 cms. He has more strings to his bow - he'll gather his 20 possessions, and doesn't just rely on delivery.
He's a playmaker - and we needed as many as possible vs GWS.

I think we would have gone better minus the two specialist small forwards ... and of course I'm referring here to Butler and Higgins.

Even Byrnes would have helped with his speed and playmaking around the ground ... that's another player we could have selected ahead of our 2 specialist small forwards to counter what GWS was bringing.
Byrnes was stiff, Howard was stiff. Billings just wasn't up to it physically this year. If he doesn't get traded, he can earn a spot in the finals by being the playmaker we need, he hasn't inspired me that way since 2021.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031207Post CURLY »

CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 4:06pm
samoht wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 11:20am CQ saint:

For team balance, and also from what we should have learned about our specialist small forwards from previous finals (their reduced output and effectiveness in tough, physical games) over the last 15 years or so, we probably should've dropped one of our small forwards at least, for a bigger body.

We had 3 small forwards, as it turned out ... I would have just gone with Gresham who at least wins his own ball.

Billings plays taller than his height ... and he's 185 cms. He has more strings to his bow - he'll gather his 20 possessions, and doesn't just rely on delivery.
He's a playmaker - and we needed as many as possible vs GWS.

I think we would have gone better minus the two specialist small forwards ... and of course I'm referring here to Butler and Higgins.

Even Byrnes would have helped with his speed and playmaking around the ground ... that's another player we could have selected ahead of our 2 specialist small forwards to counter what GWS was bringing.
Byrnes was stiff, Howard was stiff. Billings just wasn't up to it physically this year. If he doesn't get traded, he can earn a spot in the finals by being the playmaker we need, he hasn't inspired me that way since 2021.

Byrnes a big no. Billings I think should have played .


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031208Post CQ SAINT »

I think we can just ad GWS to the Brisbane Lions Collingwood and Melbourne as midfields we just can't compete with. Neither Billings or Byrnes would have changed that.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031235Post Vortex »

CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 4:16pm I think we can just ad GWS to the Brisbane Lions Collingwood and Melbourne as midfields we just can't compete with. Neither Billings or Byrnes would have changed that.
Yup!

Was pretty obvious all year, was just making up the numbers, still at least 2 to 3 years of list building to go before we can seriously contend, and that's provided the young players we've blooded in the last few years don't hit a ceiling and prove not to be not capable of becoming GF quality performers. She's a tough business this list management, even with a good coach.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6611
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1340 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2031290Post Jacks Back »

CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 4:06pm
samoht wrote: Wed 13 Sep 2023 11:20am CQ saint:

For team balance, and also from what we should have learned about our specialist small forwards from previous finals (their reduced output and effectiveness in tough, physical games) over the last 15 years or so, we probably should've dropped one of our small forwards at least, for a bigger body.

We had 3 small forwards, as it turned out ... I would have just gone with Gresham who at least wins his own ball.

Billings plays taller than his height ... and he's 185 cms. He has more strings to his bow - he'll gather his 20 possessions, and doesn't just rely on delivery.
He's a playmaker - and we needed as many as possible vs GWS.

I think we would have gone better minus the two specialist small forwards ... and of course I'm referring here to Butler and Higgins.

Even Byrnes would have helped with his speed and playmaking around the ground ... that's another player we could have selected ahead of our 2 specialist small forwards to counter what GWS was bringing.
Byrnes was stiff, Howard was stiff. Billings just wasn't up to it physically this year. If he doesn't get traded, he can earn a spot in the finals by being the playmates we need, he hasn't inspired me that way since 2021.
:shock:


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Post Reply