Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Sun 13 Aug 2023 8:30pmRichmond subbed off a ruckman and brought on a running player. Ross was going to give them an inch, so he too brought on a running mid for a big player.Vortex wrote: ↑Sun 13 Aug 2023 8:04pmit was a good goal, I love goals, my a favorite part of the game, but why did he get subbed out, I apologise in advance if I have embarrassed you for asking a serious footy question but I'm genuinely interesting in the answer.
Anyone who understands the game know why?
That, plus it rests Sharman for his next assignment as a defensive forward= Tom Stewart.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Tue 09 May 2017 5:39pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 248 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Not sure if anyone picked up on this but his tackling technique was slightly different this week, there was 2 tackles of note, including the Vlaustin tackle where the tackle started off in his customary intimate hug/sexual advance and ended with a more traditional attempt to take the player to ground. Possible the coaches have been trying to train the more feminine tackling technique out of him.
Anyway don’t say I can’t spot the positives.
[/quote]
Geez you post rubbish. Give it a spell
Anyway don’t say I can’t spot the positives.
[/quote]
Geez you post rubbish. Give it a spell
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Tue 28 Apr 2009 4:16pm
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
How can anyone not see the potential?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
The lad can play and he makes a certain poster look like a f****** fool. I love it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12738
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2716 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
He can take the odd grab and kick straight
11 possessions and 2 goals - and one VG mark and goal
Did ok
Stewart did have 30 disposals and take 13 marks
I would like to see more in his game than mark-kick at his size
11 possessions and 2 goals - and one VG mark and goal
Did ok
Stewart did have 30 disposals and take 13 marks
I would like to see more in his game than mark-kick at his size
Last edited by B.M on Sun 20 Aug 2023 12:05pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6088
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
And didn't we plan and execute beautifully, to completely nullify any impact Stewart had?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
50 games in a row isn't that common an achievement.
Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
- Has thanked: 574 times
- Been thanked: 398 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Definitely isnt, I meant 50 in the seniors...to really boost his development in the role.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Not sure we marked Stewart with anyone in particular ..... there were times I saw him marking a variety of Saints players big and small ..... either way his influence was minor despite the amount of times he had it
FWIW Sharmans 2 goals came from marks .... one against Kolodjashnij and the other over Stewart
FWIW Sharmans 2 goals came from marks .... one against Kolodjashnij and the other over Stewart
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Stewart had bugger all impact on the game, Sharman actually had more impact than Stewart.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Can never find that Colin Jazzny’s name on the team sheet.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- D.B.Cooper
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 753 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Cooper couldn’t get a game early in the season when both King & Membrey were injured.
He didn’t give up and I assume worked on the areas of his game that the coaches instructed him to in an extended stretch in the VFL.
Now he is in the team, playing a role and making a decent contribution, this seemed very unlikely in the first 1/4 of the season.
I’m not sold on him being a 150 game player or cementing his place long term, but I admire him getting back in and having a crack and playing some good footy. I like him, he enjoys a goal and is looking more confident each week.
It’s amazing the confidence a player builds when they feel they can string a few games together and not be dropped.
I’d love to see him make it as he has an elite leap and is a good set shot at goal. If he could clunk a few he gets his hands to he’ll become a dangerous forward.
He didn’t give up and I assume worked on the areas of his game that the coaches instructed him to in an extended stretch in the VFL.
Now he is in the team, playing a role and making a decent contribution, this seemed very unlikely in the first 1/4 of the season.
I’m not sold on him being a 150 game player or cementing his place long term, but I admire him getting back in and having a crack and playing some good footy. I like him, he enjoys a goal and is looking more confident each week.
It’s amazing the confidence a player builds when they feel they can string a few games together and not be dropped.
I’d love to see him make it as he has an elite leap and is a good set shot at goal. If he could clunk a few he gets his hands to he’ll become a dangerous forward.
There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Really? That surprises me! You’ve been arguing all week that players should not push past their limitations. Seems pretty reasonable to me that if Ross isn’t expected to lift his arm to spoil a chest mark then Cooper shouldn’t be expected to develop an elite tank
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12738
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2716 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Cooper has a massive tank
Ground level footy is his weakness as he lacks agility. He needs to work on that.
I also think he had more impact than Stewart. Stewart had some impact and Cooper had some impact.
Ground level footy is his weakness as he lacks agility. He needs to work on that.
I also think he had more impact than Stewart. Stewart had some impact and Cooper had some impact.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
I’m inclined to agree with BM. As good as it was to see him kick a couple of goals, one of them a ripper, there were many times he didn’t make a contest when we needed him to. If he can’t run and jump he’s not much else. Needs more agility, more of a tank, stronger body. Right now he’s adequate and probably doing more than Caminiti was. He’s certainly improved but threads being started vindicating his position are still bemusing to me.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 20 Aug 2023 9:24pmReally? That surprises me! You’ve been arguing all week that players should not push past their limitations. Seems pretty reasonable to me that if Ross isn’t expected to lift his arm to spoil a chest mark then Cooper shouldn’t be expected to develop an elite tank
As with all players I don’t really rate, ie Billings, Gresham, I would love to be proven wrong and take zero delight in I told you so threads where ppl proclaim they were right about a player being a dud.
PS thought Gresh was busy last night. Just so desperately need him to be a better finisher
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Go back & watch the reply B.M. Stewart & Sharman weren’t matched against each other all the time over 4 quarters.
Stewart was often on Phillipou, and ran off him many a time, the kid couldn’t go with him most times.
Stewart was often left to cover Higgins.
I also noticed him standing Tim Members twice.
Stewart never followed Sharman when he roamed into the defensive 50 and became a link player.
Don’t think it’s fair to compare Stewart & Sharman’s disposal counts, when they weren’t always opponents.
I think RTB is very shrewd with his use of Sharman over the past few games - keep ‘em guessing Ross!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
Just watched replay
What’s neglected is Sharmans clever touches and ball use in play - blind turn in the middle and give off
Or this hit up out wide to Membrey
He doesn’t waste it
Obvious talent
Only a halfwit think differently
What’s neglected is Sharmans clever touches and ball use in play - blind turn in the middle and give off
Or this hit up out wide to Membrey
He doesn’t waste it
Obvious talent
Only a halfwit think differently
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12738
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2716 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
I think he has a couple of tricks - can jump, has endurance, can take a catch every now and then - a very good kick
Weaknesses
Low productivity, strength, agility, ground level ability
Weaknesses
Low productivity, strength, agility, ground level ability
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Meh to the Sharman doubters.
He has played 30 games in basically the hardest spot on the ground, CHF or at least a decoy HF.
He played wing part of the night the other night.
In a team of poor goal kickers he is a beacon of light
Un predictable X factor can play anywhere, he could be anything under RTB
Hope he stays in.
As for Stewart he gets so much junk possession, the stats are misleading.
Stewart struggles to defend 1 on 1 these days, he is slowing up and in a middling team now, not the same player or quality of stats.
He played wing part of the night the other night.
In a team of poor goal kickers he is a beacon of light
Un predictable X factor can play anywhere, he could be anything under RTB
Hope he stays in.
As for Stewart he gets so much junk possession, the stats are misleading.
Stewart struggles to defend 1 on 1 these days, he is slowing up and in a middling team now, not the same player or quality of stats.