Votes v WCE

[Ghost Like]

5 Crouch (for 4 quarters of effort when others thought it was optional)
4 Owens
3 Marshall
2 NWM
1 Sinclair

[Scollop]

5 Crouch (for 4 quarters of effort when others thought it was optional)
4 Owens
3 Marshall
2 NWM
1 Sinclair

What a croc. Crouch was the only player that gave effort for the whole match was he. You're rewarding him for 8 touches in the second half are you?

Butler gave effort for 4 quarters. Hill gave effort for 4 quarters. Wilkie and Howard and Webster gave effort for 4 quarters.

Max King gave effort...for 3 and a half quarters ( )

[Scollop]

maybe just put your votes in and stop trying to convince everyone how much smarter than them you are. an empty vessel and all that.

Wassamatter mate?

Is the weather getting you down?

[Ghost Like]

5 Crouch (for 4 quarters of effort when others thought it was optional)
4 Owens
3 Marshall
2 NWM
1 Sinclair

What a croc. Crouch was the only player that gave effort for the whole match was he. You're rewarding him for 8 touches in the second half are you?

Butler gave effort for 4 quarters. Hill gave effort for 4 quarters. Wilkie and Howard and Webster gave effort for 4 quarters.

Max King gave effort...for 3 and a half quarters ( )

Did Crouch not sign your flag one day scollop? You've hated him for weeks now. You even think (not be surprised) he will be dropped for the Melbourne game. That suggests all the others tried in the midfield played better, Steele, Ross, Gresham, Windhager.

You claim people only look at stats when giving votes, yet when you want to sh!t can someone's votes, you quote stats. That's quite funny.

Anyway, they were my votes, not yours. We agree to disagree. Crouch is not our worst midfielder this year, to suggest he will or should be dropped, damages your credibility.

[MCG-Unit]

3 - Crouch
3 - Sinclair
2 - Howard
2 - Michito-san
2 - Wood
2 - Marshall
1 - Steele

0 - WCE crowd

[Scollop]

To GL,

If I voted straight after the match when my emotions are all over the shop I'd probably have gone to the statistics and maybe voted similar to everyone else.

I don't care if I offend people or go against the grain. I use statistics ONLY after I've watched the replay. I try and balance impact and visual perception with actual data to decide who I vote for.

Watch the replay of the game. Watch the second half. Better still...wait until the coaches association votes are cast. Ross Lyon mentioned quite a few players and gave credit where credit was due. He didn't mention Crouch - did he?

You said Crouch gave effort for 4 quarters when others thought it was optional. Name them? Who are your 'others'?

[Ghost Like]

Last post on this scollop because it's a voting thread, if you need me to tell you who thought effort was optional perhaps you need to watch the first half again and tell me the ones who gave 100% in the first half. Hint: Crouch, Owens and ???? I still find it amusing you think Crouch should be dropped but no mention of our other midfielders. Our midfield must be seriously A grade if we can be dropping Crouch.

Congratulations on your magic formula for selecting votes, I go on what I see during the game, we are different in that regard. Again, your faith is in statistics (funny) and what RTB says (Teflon will be happy).

Do we need better midfielders than Crouch? Yes, but that also means, at present, we need better mids than Steele, Ross, Gresham...all no brainers, yet you consistently pillor Crouch. We have not got 4 A grade mids at Sandy to replace our current B grade line up.

[B.M]

Crouch gets votes on his 17 tackle effort alone

His first half was mighty

Probably fkd after HT

[CQ SAINT]

Crouch gets votes on his 17 tackle effort alone

His first half was mighty

Probably fkd after HT

Correct. Crouch had a real crack. He isn't there to carve holes through the defence.

[Scollop]

We have not got 4 A grade mids at Sandy to replace our current B grade line up.

Steele isn't B Grade for a start.

You post stuff like that and you question my credibility

Good one.

[Scollop]

Crouch gets votes on his 17 tackle effort alone

His first half was mighty

Probably fkd after HT

Let's recruit rugby league players if we just need tacklers...

Nah...just kidding. Crouch is a beauty. He wore them out and they gave in due to his pressure. Couldn't have won against WCE without him

[The_Dud]

We have not got 4 A grade mids at Sandy to replace our current B grade line up.

Steele isn't B Grade for a start.

You post stuff like that and you question my credibility

Good one.

Sorry to keep the non-vote posts going, but just have to add, current Steele is definitely not A-grade

[B.M]

He also got the ball 18 times - which means a good balance between offence and defence. He played well imo
Waned a bit in the second half. Possibly cooked!

[Ghost Like]

We have not got 4 A grade mids at Sandy to replace our current B grade line up.

Steele isn't B Grade for a start.

You post stuff like that and you question my credibility

Good one.

So you think his current form is A grade? Yes, your credibility is taking a hit on this one Scollop.

Forget that as a collective (line up), our midfield is pure B grade, of which Steele's current form is not helping lift it from the depths of mediocrity.

[Bernard Shakey]

Michito
Crouch
NWM
Marshall
Sinclair

[Otiman]

Coaches votes interesting this week. 1 vote to Steele and not a single vote in this thread. No votes to Crouch.

I certainly didn't see it that way.

[Borat]

Dougal Howard - bestest of ground
Ryan Byrnes
Seb Ross
Josh Battle
Jack Higgins

You drinking the goats piss Borat ..skull skull skull .cheers..I love ya mumma

Yes, I drink up good yesterday to celebrate mighty Saints win!

[Josh Battle]

Marshall
Owens
Sinclair
Wood
Howard

[Sainter_Dad]

77 Marshall
76 Crouch
66 Owens
40 Sinclair
17 Wood
15 Howard
14 Hill
10 Wanganeen Milera
4 Byrnes
3 Ross
3 Wilkie
2 Battle
1 Gresham
1 Higgins
1 Steele

Therefore:
5 Marshall
4 Crouch
3 Owens
2 Sinclair
1 Wood