Sharman is a natural forward and to me is better value than Caminiti with King now back in. Caminiti has a lot of upside and will only get better with a couple of seasons under his belt
Votes v Swans
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Votes v Swans
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Re: Votes v Swans
I’m a huge Caminiti fan but agree he’s gone off the boil. Membery has to come in. I will re watch last quarter
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11241
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: Votes v Swans
5. NWM
4. Sinclair
3. Butler
2. Crouch
1. Wilkie
How does a player who has just been signed for 3 years get subbed out by a player who’s career is hanging by a thread?
4. Sinclair
3. Butler
2. Crouch
1. Wilkie
How does a player who has just been signed for 3 years get subbed out by a player who’s career is hanging by a thread?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Votes v Swans
5. Sinclair
4. NWM
3. Crouch
2. Owens .... "Michito really gets you going."
1. Marshall
1. Wilkie
I voted for once ... 6 players.
4. NWM
3. Crouch
2. Owens .... "Michito really gets you going."
1. Marshall
1. Wilkie
I voted for once ... 6 players.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: Votes v Swans
95 Crouch
86 Wanganeen-Milera
71.25 Sinclair
67.33 Owens
55.25 Wilkie
24 Marshall
15.58 Butler
3.33 King
1 Sharman
0.25 Steele
Therefore:
5 Crouch
4 Wanganeen-Milera
3 Sinclair
2 Owens
1 Wilkie
86 Wanganeen-Milera
71.25 Sinclair
67.33 Owens
55.25 Wilkie
24 Marshall
15.58 Butler
3.33 King
1 Sharman
0.25 Steele
Therefore:
5 Crouch
4 Wanganeen-Milera
3 Sinclair
2 Owens
1 Wilkie
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Votes v Swans
Obviously just a tad late for votes but I thought our best were Wilkie, Marshall, Steele, Sincs, Nas, Owens, Butler, and Crouch.
I would have had Steele and Marshall in my votes...both tireless. Both involved in scoring chains and i50's and amongst the top tacklers. Steele was inspirational
Special mention to the Pou who is showing great leadership qualities at such a young age. Worked hard and had important touches as well as laying plenty of tackles
Webster did a fantastic job on Papley. Howard and Battle were solid. Wood and Gresh also good. Some players down on disposals but many played their roles.
It's fantastic that we aren't relying on the same guys each week to get us over the line. True team effort
Hills game was under rated. He actually ran his guts out and was probably one of the highest for pressure acts...after Butler of course
I would have had Steele and Marshall in my votes...both tireless. Both involved in scoring chains and i50's and amongst the top tacklers. Steele was inspirational
Special mention to the Pou who is showing great leadership qualities at such a young age. Worked hard and had important touches as well as laying plenty of tackles
Webster did a fantastic job on Papley. Howard and Battle were solid. Wood and Gresh also good. Some players down on disposals but many played their roles.
It's fantastic that we aren't relying on the same guys each week to get us over the line. True team effort
Hills game was under rated. He actually ran his guts out and was probably one of the highest for pressure acts...after Butler of course
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Votes v Swans
None for the coach ?Scollop wrote: ↑Sun 11 Jun 2023 8:16pm Obviously just a tad late for votes but I thought our best were Wilkie, Marshall, Steele, Sincs, Nas, Owens, Butler, and Crouch.
I would have had Steele and Marshall in my votes...both tireless. Both involved in scoring chains and i50's and amongst the top tacklers. Steele was inspirational
Special mention to the Pou who is showing great leadership qualities at such a young age. Worked hard and had important touches as well as laying plenty of tackles
Webster did a fantastic job on Papley. Howard and Battle were solid. Wood and Gresh also good. Some players down on disposals but many played their roles.
It's fantastic that we aren't relying on the same guys each week to get us over the line. True team effort
Hills game was under rated. He actually ran his guts out and was probably one of the highest for pressure acts...after Butler of course
Disappointed
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Votes v Swans
It's called The Easter Memorial Saintsational Player of the Year award
You better let Sainter_Dad and everyone else know that you've changed the rules and we can now vote for coaches
What a tool!
Always looking to antagonise
You better let Sainter_Dad and everyone else know that you've changed the rules and we can now vote for coaches
What a tool!
Always looking to antagonise
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Votes v Swans
Sorry only antagonising “tools” like u
What an over sensitive hysterical muppet …it shows in the dribble you post …but carry on
Still how bout that coaching hey ???
“Yeah….nah””
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Votes v Swans
Only thing you're capable of is bagging others about their views.
Stop sitting on the fence each week and put in some votes muppet man.
What's the matter? Scared of being embarrassed...or Don't you have any balls to put on the line...It's ok. I'll accept marbles.
I noticed you made mention of a Saints player somewhere in between everyone else's votes. How did he go in the coach's votes? Did the coaches have him on the podium for a Brownlow vote?