Less vulgar commentator review
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Less vulgar commentator review
Last night was painful to listen to. Channel AFL continue to use ex players on games of their sides, Bolton was probably better than most but him, Hodge, Darcey( worst for bias) cant be impartial. Richo is probably the least bias - BT wears a collingwood scarf i am sure.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Perhaps it only exists on my remote, but there's this little button that I can push called "mute" which turns off the sound but still allows me to watch the picture. Watching Saints players kick to a group of three opposition players, or trip over the ball is bad enough. Listening to someone's description of it only makes it worse, accurate or not.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Criticism of the commentary has been around on this forum and likely most others for as long as I can remember.
My sense is that it’s almost universally hated… every channel, every station, 90% of the broadcasters, year after year.
I’ve never really gotten it.
The format is pretty simple.
You have a play by play commentator and then you have people there to provide colour commentary (match analysis, opinions, details on incidents/talking points etc). The idea is that that stuff is supposed to keep it interesting during the slow parts of play with play by play less important on TV because you have the too.
It all seems relatively inoffensive to me. Don’t really understand why it bothers people so much. With regards to the commentary last night… people seem incensed with the discussion of the Dan Butler tackle with Daisy being singled out as the main culprit but it seems to me, at least while they thought it was a concussion, that it was identified as something that would be a big talking point.
And all of them engaged in the conversation and the replay showed it over and over.
And let’s be honest… games like last night aren’t exactly filled with exciting play by play moments. There was one goal in the first quarter.
They lean in to colour to keep the audience.
I don’t get what the big deal is. Perhaps, as I pointed out elsewhere… my expectations are just sooooo low that it can’t bother me
My sense is that it’s almost universally hated… every channel, every station, 90% of the broadcasters, year after year.
I’ve never really gotten it.
The format is pretty simple.
You have a play by play commentator and then you have people there to provide colour commentary (match analysis, opinions, details on incidents/talking points etc). The idea is that that stuff is supposed to keep it interesting during the slow parts of play with play by play less important on TV because you have the too.
It all seems relatively inoffensive to me. Don’t really understand why it bothers people so much. With regards to the commentary last night… people seem incensed with the discussion of the Dan Butler tackle with Daisy being singled out as the main culprit but it seems to me, at least while they thought it was a concussion, that it was identified as something that would be a big talking point.
And all of them engaged in the conversation and the replay showed it over and over.
And let’s be honest… games like last night aren’t exactly filled with exciting play by play moments. There was one goal in the first quarter.
They lean in to colour to keep the audience.
I don’t get what the big deal is. Perhaps, as I pointed out elsewhere… my expectations are just sooooo low that it can’t bother me
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Foxtel, on Sundays, used to offer a "Press Red" option.
One of the options, allowed yo to watch the game without the commentators but still hear the crowd and game noise.
The commentators in those games were Clinton Grybas, Wayne Carey, and Tiff Cherry (on the boundary). They were the at their peak at the time and were the best commentary team in the caper.
One of the options, allowed yo to watch the game without the commentators but still hear the crowd and game noise.
The commentators in those games were Clinton Grybas, Wayne Carey, and Tiff Cherry (on the boundary). They were the at their peak at the time and were the best commentary team in the caper.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Happened more than once too.perfectionist wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:59am Perhaps it only exists on my remote, but there's this little button that I can push called "mute" which turns off the sound but still allows me to watch the picture. Watching Saints players kick to a group of three opposition players, or trip over the ball is bad enough. Listening to someone's description of it only makes it worse, accurate or not.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I have to agree with older saint but I never really listen to the fuckwits.
- TheGreatZacsby
- Club Player
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2023 8:59am
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 242 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
i had a little run in with Darcy a few years ago. I live in near Sydney and had to get to Melbourne fast - my Dad died very early that morning and needed to be with Mum and my sisters. Anyhow when i borded the plane i accidentally sat in the wrong seat and it was Luke Darcy's seat. Well didn't he carry on like a prat. I said i was sorry and moved but he still kept at it, in the end i said look, i'm not thinking so straight, my Dad has just passed away - eventually he shut up after the lady sitting next to him said - who do you think you are, give it a rest .....older saint wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:19am Last night was painful to listen to. Channel AFL continue to use ex players on games of their sides, Bolton was probably better than most but him, Hodge, Darcey( worst for bias) cant be impartial. Richo is probably the least bias - BT wears a collingwood scarf i am sure.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Former bulldogs player from the western suburbs. 'nough said.happy feet wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 11:51ami had a little run in with Darcy a few years ago. I live in near Sydney and had to get to Melbourne fast - my Dad died very early that morning and needed to be with Mum and my sisters. Anyhow when i borded the plane i accidentally sat in the wrong seat and it was Luke Darcy's seat. Well didn't he carry on like a prat. I said i was sorry and moved but he still kept at it, in the end i said look, i'm not thinking so straight, my Dad has just passed away - eventually he shut up after the lady sitting next to him said - who do you think you are, give it a rest .....older saint wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:19am Last night was painful to listen to. Channel AFL continue to use ex players on games of their sides, Bolton was probably better than most but him, Hodge, Darcey( worst for bias) cant be impartial. Richo is probably the least bias - BT wears a collingwood scarf i am sure.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Channel 7 does not encourage commentating, it encourages barracking. It has never been more obvious than last night. It was supposed to be all about superman Buddy (30 AFL fantasy Points, great game Buddy) and St Kilda did not fit the narrative. The Saints were scripted as the sideshow. The hoo-ha about Buddy kicking just won goal to take him past Doug Wade on the all-time goal kickers list was completely OTT. There was no mention of the fact that it has taken Super Bud 83 more career games to pass Doug, we are just meant to believe he is the greatest living footballer.
Then, Dan Butler's superbly executed tackle. The commentators were n raptures until they realized the umpire deemed it dangerous. Cue the pile-on! Daisy nagged away about it for 10 minutes while whole passages of play went without commentary. It was a case of toe the AFL line, don't criticize a poor umpiring decision and, while they were at it, conduct a kangaroo court. None of the muppets recalled Blake was limping in discomfort in the first quarter so they assumed when he was subbed out it was through concussion. He had a sore tootsie, FFS! Even the boundary rider got it wrong.
It was the worst and most biased commentary I have ever listed to on TV (ABC radio broadcasts from Adelaide and Perth stoop lower. And that was without the brainless babbling of Brian Taylor.
Then, Dan Butler's superbly executed tackle. The commentators were n raptures until they realized the umpire deemed it dangerous. Cue the pile-on! Daisy nagged away about it for 10 minutes while whole passages of play went without commentary. It was a case of toe the AFL line, don't criticize a poor umpiring decision and, while they were at it, conduct a kangaroo court. None of the muppets recalled Blake was limping in discomfort in the first quarter so they assumed when he was subbed out it was through concussion. He had a sore tootsie, FFS! Even the boundary rider got it wrong.
It was the worst and most biased commentary I have ever listed to on TV (ABC radio broadcasts from Adelaide and Perth stoop lower. And that was without the brainless babbling of Brian Taylor.
Saint supporter since '62
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
My answer? MUTE the *merchants!
*"Merchant Banker"...rhymes with..................
of all the commentaries I opt for ABC Grandstand.
*"Merchant Banker"...rhymes with..................
of all the commentaries I opt for ABC Grandstand.
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Geeez… what a grub.happy feet wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 11:51ami had a little run in with Darcy a few years ago. I live in near Sydney and had to get to Melbourne fast - my Dad died very early that morning and needed to be with Mum and my sisters. Anyhow when i borded the plane i accidentally sat in the wrong seat and it was Luke Darcy's seat. Well didn't he carry on like a prat. I said i was sorry and moved but he still kept at it, in the end i said look, i'm not thinking so straight, my Dad has just passed away - eventually he shut up after the lady sitting next to him said - who do you think you are, give it a rest .....older saint wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:19am Last night was painful to listen to. Channel AFL continue to use ex players on games of their sides, Bolton was probably better than most but him, Hodge, Darcey( worst for bias) cant be impartial. Richo is probably the least bias - BT wears a collingwood scarf i am sure.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
Blows my mind why someone would carry on after an apology over a mistake.
Must have been a terrible experience
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I don't think one thing you said here about the commentators here is accurate.Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 12:00pm
Then, Dan Butler's superbly executed tackle. The commentators were n raptures until they realized the umpire deemed it dangerous. Cue the pile-on! Daisy nagged away about it for 10 minutes while whole passages of play went without commentary. It was a case of toe the AFL line, don't criticize a poor umpiring decision and, while they were at it, conduct a kangaroo court. None of the muppets recalled Blake was limping in discomfort in the first quarter so they assumed when he was subbed out it was through concussion. He had a sore tootsie, FFS! Even the boundary rider got it wrong.
- Daisy specifically said Blakey came into the game with an injury and that could be the reason he was subbed out
- They all spoke about it (and the way the AFL is heading regarding concussions) over 2-3 minutes once Blakey was subbed off
- All of them seemed to be saying the same thing; perfect tackle BUT in todays AFL IF there is a concussion then the precedent seems to be a suspension
Why so many have their knickers and a knot about this after a great win is beyond me!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8185
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I don't like listening to Daisy Pearce. She is a try hard that has an unpleasant voice. She should take a leaf out of Richie Benauds book. If it's obvious don't say anything. People are more interested in the game than the commentary.
I prefer to listen to Wayne Carey. He's a tosser but I respect his football intellect.
I prefer to listen to Wayne Carey. He's a tosser but I respect his football intellect.
Last edited by magnifisaint on Fri 09 Jun 2023 12:34pm, edited 1 time in total.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Yeah I’m kind of with you on this one. It’s not like reflecting on a key moment or event that’s happened in the game is a new thing either. How many times do you see a bad injury or blunder get replayed over and over again + discussed adnauseumThe_Dud wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 12:20pmI don't think one thing you said here about the commentators here is accurate.Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 12:00pm
Then, Dan Butler's superbly executed tackle. The commentators were n raptures until they realized the umpire deemed it dangerous. Cue the pile-on! Daisy nagged away about it for 10 minutes while whole passages of play went without commentary. It was a case of toe the AFL line, don't criticize a poor umpiring decision and, while they were at it, conduct a kangaroo court. None of the muppets recalled Blake was limping in discomfort in the first quarter so they assumed when he was subbed out it was through concussion. He had a sore tootsie, FFS! Even the boundary rider got it wrong.
- Daisy specifically said Blakey came into the game with an injury and that could be the reason he was subbed out
- They all spoke about it (and the way the AFL is heading regarding concussions) over 2-3 minutes once Blakey was subbed off
- All of them seemed to be saying the same thing; perfect tackle BUT in todays AFL IF there is a concussion then the precedent seems to be a suspension
Why so many have their knickers and a knot about this after a great win is beyond me!
I still don’t get what the issue is
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I can't watch St Kilda games with commentary on. It's music for me.
A bunch of records gets me through in a far more serene manner. I recommend it.
A bunch of records gets me through in a far more serene manner. I recommend it.
- stevie
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I don’t watch any footy at all - even free to air - I just check the score on the fantasy app.
One of the great memories of Darsehole’s career was when he missed out on playing in a GF in 97/98 along with his other Bullfrog buddies. Loved seeing them wallow in misery.
One of the great memories of Darsehole’s career was when he missed out on playing in a GF in 97/98 along with his other Bullfrog buddies. Loved seeing them wallow in misery.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Yep good postTrev from the Bush wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 12:00pm Channel 7 does not encourage commentating, it encourages barracking. It has never been more obvious than last night. It was supposed to be all about superman Buddy (30 AFL fantasy Points, great game Buddy) and St Kilda did not fit the narrative. The Saints were scripted as the sideshow. The hoo-ha about Buddy kicking just won goal to take him past Doug Wade on the all-time goal kickers list was completely OTT. There was no mention of the fact that it has taken Super Bud 83 more career games to pass Doug, we are just meant to believe he is the greatest living footballer.
Then, Dan Butler's superbly executed tackle. The commentators were n raptures until they realized the umpire deemed it dangerous. Cue the pile-on! Daisy nagged away about it for 10 minutes while whole passages of play went without commentary. It was a case of toe the AFL line, don't criticize a poor umpiring decision and, while they were at it, conduct a kangaroo court. None of the muppets recalled Blake was limping in discomfort in the first quarter so they assumed when he was subbed out it was through concussion. He had a sore tootsie, FFS! Even the boundary rider got it wrong.
It was the worst and most biased commentary I have ever listed to on TV (ABC radio broadcasts from Adelaide and Perth stoop lower. And that was without the brainless babbling of Brian Taylor.
I have to say even Lewis on Fox (I know he’s Buddy bum chum) telling us that Franklin was Ablett and Dunstall and someone else rolled into 1 WTF - the guys a champion….but don’t go near those legends please …ffs Franklin can’t and has never been able to take a mark over his friggin head!!
I noted he at least had the sense to not try any comparison with Lockett ….that would just be other level stupid
The hype was just way over top
“Yeah….nah””
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2509
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
- Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I had the TV muted and assumed that the constant replaying of the Butler tackle was about a debate over whether it was worth a free kick!
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 656 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
Phil Davis offered some good insight last night, but he is a bit rough around the edges for a commentator.
Daisy usually offers excellent special comments, and does her best work as a boundary rider.
I didn't notice the rest of the commentary team, which is a good thing.
At least it wasn't BT.
Daisy usually offers excellent special comments, and does her best work as a boundary rider.
I didn't notice the rest of the commentary team, which is a good thing.
At least it wasn't BT.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
I didn't even know who the commentators were and cared even less.Otiman wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 8:44pm Phil Davis offered some good insight last night, but he is a bit rough around the edges for a commentator.
Daisy usually offers excellent special comments, and does her best work as a boundary rider.
I didn't notice the rest of the commentary team, which is a good thing.
At least it wasn't BT.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
The buddy love continued on the ch7 news tonight .
They said that he was in his sick bed all week and was in doubt right up until the game started .
Obviously just to hide the fact the buddy was terrible . He got one goal from a juggling mark where our defenders went to ground and the other goal looked like his foot was over the line . Would love to know why it was checked by the umpires .
Buddy is a champion of the game , but his last 5 years have been hampered by injury and average at best .
He played slightly better last year ( as many do in the final year of their contract when they're looking to go round again ) but has been a liability this year .
I'd reckon if the Horse could have that time again , he would have tapped him on the shoulder last year and said it's time !
They said that he was in his sick bed all week and was in doubt right up until the game started .
Obviously just to hide the fact the buddy was terrible . He got one goal from a juggling mark where our defenders went to ground and the other goal looked like his foot was over the line . Would love to know why it was checked by the umpires .
Buddy is a champion of the game , but his last 5 years have been hampered by injury and average at best .
He played slightly better last year ( as many do in the final year of their contract when they're looking to go round again ) but has been a liability this year .
I'd reckon if the Horse could have that time again , he would have tapped him on the shoulder last year and said it's time !
In red white and black from 73
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12098
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3705 times
- Been thanked: 2578 times
Re: Less vulgar commentator review
'Say that again' You told him your dad passed away and he kept at it...What a prick of a human!happy feet wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 11:51ami had a little run in with Darcy a few years ago. I live in near Sydney and had to get to Melbourne fast - my Dad died very early that morning and needed to be with Mum and my sisters. Anyhow when i borded the plane i accidentally sat in the wrong seat and it was Luke Darcy's seat. Well didn't he carry on like a prat. I said i was sorry and moved but he still kept at it, in the end i said look, i'm not thinking so straight, my Dad has just passed away - eventually he shut up after the lady sitting next to him said - who do you think you are, give it a rest .....older saint wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:19am Last night was painful to listen to. Channel AFL continue to use ex players on games of their sides, Bolton was probably better than most but him, Hodge, Darcey( worst for bias) cant be impartial. Richo is probably the least bias - BT wears a collingwood scarf i am sure.
Daisy may have been a great player and tactically very smart but professor obvious - out ranks captain, and her fascination/bias to certain players make your ears bleed. Talks for the sake of talking at times and flipped 3 times on the butler thing before condeming him as Blakey was concussed- which he wasn't!
How about a 1 minute quick discussion and let the Chook lotto man work it out.
Was nice with a minute to go when it was clear we would win they actually started giving us some complementary comments. Bolton was actually trying to be impartial talking about structures and effort.
Can't stand it when Darcy and Ling are working together. Two of the most biased commentators when their teams are playing. They both also hate St Kilda so will always crucify our blokes at every opportunity
Darcy was also one of the most staunch defenders of Essendon during the ASADA drugs investigation. He pushed their agenda (that it was only 'supplements' ) through his media profile and tried to hoodwink the public
I remember how filthy Darcehole was during the Melbourne Covid lockdowns. He is part owner of quite a few pubs and bars and he and Eddie would have arguments on air regarding the Covid policies at the time. Eddie was supporting ALP policies and Darcehole was supporting his mates ScoMo and Frydenburg
I think it was Jason Dunstall who nicknamed him Darcehole. Quite appropriate really