The non free to max
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
The non free to max
Simply a disgraceful decision
Smashed front on in a marking contest it is a free all day every day
Smashed front on in a marking contest it is a free all day every day
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7937
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 549 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
Re: The non free to max
Francis and rampe got away with a lot of rough stuff, i thought.
Admittedly, Francis was out of his depth.
Admittedly, Francis was out of his depth.
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Re: The non free to max
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: The non free to max
How about the hands in the back to NWM… stinker. Talk about the umpires assuming they saw something
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: The non free to max
shocking umpiring, but on balance i'm not complaining . afl needs to ditch the fourth ump - not near enough depth in the ump stocks. whilst at it, the afl commentary could drop one of theirs at least.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- TheGreatZacsby
- Club Player
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2023 8:59am
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 244 times
Re: The non free to max
There were a lot of free kicks to King and even Higgins. My partner was watching it and she called a lot of Higgins holds whilst I fixated on Max. Francis can go suck a fat one. Looked like a loser.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: The non free to max
100%.
2 goals from 50m penalties in the last quarter of a tight game? No one is gonna knock that back.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: The non free to max
So they weren't there?
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: The non free to max
Depends which team you follow, isn’t that how it goes?
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: The non free to max
No - you agreed we got the rub of the green - ie when it was 50/50 it went our way
So were the 50s disputable????
They get paid every week - usually against us.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: The non free to max
Yep, sometimes they get paid, sometimes the umps give more leeway. 2 out of 2 is a pretty good strike rate.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 2:36amNo - you agreed we got the rub of the green - ie when it was 50/50 it went our way
So were the 50s disputable????
They get paid every week - usually against us.
Guaranteed this place would be calling for heads to roll if the situation was reversed.
Horse was not happy in the press conference.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- King Max
- Club Player
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2018 11:37am
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: The non free to max
Guy who wasn’t near the contest just ran past NWM to take up the mark. Obvious 50.
Guy who was 2m in front of Owens when he marked it just turned around to stand the mark. Umpire called him back and he ignored him. Umpire was being generous to warn him.
Obvious 50.
Swans two goals from soft frees in the 3rd. I guess they were OK.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: The non free to max
The NWM one was there. The other one was crap IMO.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: The non free to max
The other was a guy who bumped Owens - AFTER HE TOOK THE MARK - and had slowed down - OBVIOUSLY HE WAS PAST THE MARK and was just trying to make the kick further from goal.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
- Location: brisy
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: The non free to max
It seems more umpiring decisions are becoming a toss of a coin you see the same act paid either way many times during a match or over the weekend. It seems they have forgotten about the protected area after a mark.
Still surprised they paid that push in the back in the goal square against Buddy usually miss that probably wouldn’t pay it if it was a goal
Still surprised they paid that push in the back in the goal square against Buddy usually miss that probably wouldn’t pay it if it was a goal
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: The non free to max
The umpiring was poor all game, way over the top. We probably got the better of it overall, but were on the end of some glaring mistakes.
Campbell throwing the ball to himself and being paid holding the man while it was in flight in the first quarter was something.
The dangerous tackles against Ross and Butler confirmed the tackle is dead.
Campbell throwing the ball to himself and being paid holding the man while it was in flight in the first quarter was something.
The dangerous tackles against Ross and Butler confirmed the tackle is dead.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: The non free to max
The free against NVM was a disgrace.
There was another free paid out of the middle to Gulden when he had the ball with one arm and Crouch tackled him by grabbing his other arm. He clearly had possession but the umpire paid holding the man.
Umpires need to stamp out the mauling of King. At one stage, Francis had King pinned to the ground away from the play right in front of the umpires.
There was another free paid out of the middle to Gulden when he had the ball with one arm and Crouch tackled him by grabbing his other arm. He clearly had possession but the umpire paid holding the man.
Umpires need to stamp out the mauling of King. At one stage, Francis had King pinned to the ground away from the play right in front of the umpires.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: The non free to max
This is my take as well. It just feels absurdly random at times whether or not they’re white hot on a rule or going to let it go. To be honest I’ve just stopped caring about it as it’s pointless being invested in a dice rollwally wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 8:29am It seems more umpiring decisions are becoming a toss of a coin you see the same act paid either way many times during a match or over the weekend. It seems they have forgotten about the protected area after a mark.
Still surprised they paid that push in the back in the goal square against Buddy usually miss that probably wouldn’t pay it if it was a goal
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: The non free to max
We have been on the other end of those 50s this season. From a supporter perspective, the application of the standing the mark and getting back is very inconsistent. Players on the mark steal territory all the time. Sometimes it’s called out and a lot of the times it isn’t.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 2:36amNo - you agreed we got the rub of the green - ie when it was 50/50 it went our way
So were the 50s disputable????
They get paid every week - usually against us.
Not sure why some think it’s worth the time to intentionally rile and provoke others on a fan forum about their supporter bias. I do not give a crap about what free kicks the opposition get.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- TheGreatZacsby
- Club Player
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2023 8:59am
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 244 times
Re: The non free to max
I’m going to say something controversial and I love Max King. Got his cutout as my air freshener hanging off my rear view mirror. Would I like some more free kick? Yes but I had a think about it and I’m really glad max didn’t get as many holding free kicks for two reasons.
1. It teaches Max to get creative in a marking contest. We saw him nearly take marks on the ground, he brought it to ground several times and would handball corridor side and in one instance spotted Owens who kicked a goal.
2. We don’t want Max to be another free-Kick Curnow. Nearly everyone I know who loves AFL can’t stand Charlie Curnow because he literally gets gifted goals for piss weak holdings, blocks, chops and front ons that nearly half his goals in the tally this year (if you look at the stats) are from free kicks. We don’t want that negativity for Max because he’s such a confidence player.
1. It teaches Max to get creative in a marking contest. We saw him nearly take marks on the ground, he brought it to ground several times and would handball corridor side and in one instance spotted Owens who kicked a goal.
2. We don’t want Max to be another free-Kick Curnow. Nearly everyone I know who loves AFL can’t stand Charlie Curnow because he literally gets gifted goals for piss weak holdings, blocks, chops and front ons that nearly half his goals in the tally this year (if you look at the stats) are from free kicks. We don’t want that negativity for Max because he’s such a confidence player.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
Re: The non free to max
TheGreatZacsby wrote: ↑Fri 09 Jun 2023 10:21am I’m going to say something controversial and I love Max King. Got his cutout as my air freshener hanging off my rear view mirror. Would I like some more free kick? Yes but I had a think about it and I’m really glad max didn’t get as many holding free kicks for two reasons.
1. It teaches Max to get creative in a marking contest. We saw him nearly take marks on the ground, he brought it to ground several times and would handball corridor side and in one instance spotted Owens who kicked a goal.
2. We don’t want Max to be another free-Kick Curnow. Nearly everyone I know who loves AFL can’t stand Charlie Curnow because he literally gets gifted goals for piss weak holdings, blocks, chops and front ons that nearly half his goals in the tally this year (if you look at the stats) are from free kicks. We don’t want that negativity for Max because he’s such a confidence player.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: The non free to max
Exactly what I was going to post and yet horseface was whinging about our free kicks in his ungracious presserterry smith rules wrote: ↑Thu 08 Jun 2023 11:52pm Simply a disgraceful decision
Smashed front on in a marking contest it is a free all day every day
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: The non free to max
And for the record as it hasn't been highlighted elsewhere, Buddy's second goal wasn't a goal at all. He kicked the ball when both his foot and the ball were behind or over the goal line.
The commentators were too busy wanking over Buddy to notice. Sick making really.
The commentators were too busy wanking over Buddy to notice. Sick making really.