Votes v Giants

[meher baba]

5 Sinclair
4 Steele
3 Stocker
2 King
1 Gresham (nowhere near his best, but he kept us in it when we were really struggling).

Howard (apart from one dreadful mistake), Webster, Wilkie, Hill, Caminiti, Higgins and Butler all did a bit too.

I agree NWM did many wonderful things, but he also stuffed up a lot. So no points from me tonight.

29 touches at 79% disposal efficiency with 19 of his disposals being kicks... and only 2 clangers for the whole day!!

Second most metres gained after Sinclair. 8 intercept possessions and an impressive 10 marks. He had 4 score involvements including 2 inside 50's (remember he's a backman)

It's ok to vote any way you want but why try justifying your votes with inaccurate information

Yes, he gets good stats. But if you actually watch the game, he turns the ball over far more often than whipping boys such as Howard and Ross. He does lots of really good stuff and has a terrific highlights reel most games. When he tightens up his game, he’s going to be a star. But he’s definitely a mixed bag ATM.

[Laurie]

5.Sinclair
4.Steele
3 Marshall.
4.Wilkie
5.NSM

[Laurie]

Try again
5 Sinclair
4.Steele
3.Marshall
2.Wilkie
1.NWM

BOOM BOOM

[takeaway]

5 Sinclair
4 Steele
3 Stocker
2 King
1 Gresham (nowhere near his best, but he kept us in it when we were really struggling).

Howard (apart from one dreadful mistake), Webster, Wilkie, Hill, Caminiti, Higgins and Butler all did a bit too.

I agree NWM did many wonderful things, but he also stuffed up a lot. So no points from me tonight.

29 touches at 79% disposal efficiency with 19 of his disposals being kicks... and only 2 clangers for the whole day!!

Second most metres gained after Sinclair. 8 intercept possessions and an impressive 10 marks. He had 4 score involvements including 2 inside 50's (remember he's a backman)

It's ok to vote any way you want but why try justifying your votes with inaccurate information

Yes, he gets good stats. But if you actually watch the game, he turns the ball over far more often than whipping boys such as Howard and Ross. He does lots of really good stuff and has a terrific highlights reel most games. When he tightens up his game, he’s going to be a star. But he’s definitely a mixed bag ATM.

NWM easily in best 3 for me.

[Scollop]

Yes, he gets good stats. But if you actually watch the game, he turns the ball over far more often than whipping boys such as Howard and Ross.

Suggest you listen and act on your own advice

Or...

Are you recalling how he's played in previous games and somehow rated him based on previous turnovers and mistakes

Remember... we're voting for how he played in the match yesterday against GWS

[PADDLEPOP1001]

Since
NWM
King
Butler
Steele

[Ghost Like]

5 Sinclair
4 NWM
3 King
2 Steele
1 Higgins

[older saint]

5 Sinclair
4 Wilkie
3 NWM
2 King
1 Stocker

[The Fireman]

NWM ... class

[King Max]

.

I agree NWM did many wonderful things, but he also stuffed up a lot. So no points from me tonight.

29 touches at 79% disposal efficiency with 19 of his disposals being kicks... and only 2 clangers for the whole day!!

Second most metres gained after Sinclair. 8 intercept possessions and an impressive 10 marks. He had 4 score involvements including 2 inside 50's (remember he's a backman)

It's ok to vote any way you want but why try justifying your votes with inaccurate information

Yes, he gets good stats. But if you actually watch the game, he turns the ball over far more often than whipping boys such as Howard and Ross. He does lots of really good stuff and has a terrific highlights reel most games. When he tightens up his game, he’s going to be a star. But he’s definitely a mixed bag ATM.

I actually read this before watching most of the game. I don’t know how they count disposal efficiency or clangers but there were at least 5 occasions where he missed his target badly. And his shot for goal in the last he just seemed to have no confidence in the kick.

Having said that.
Sinclair
Steele
King
Stocker
NWM

[Otiman]

From Champion Data: https://www.championdata.com/glossary/afl/
Disposal Efficiency: Percentage of disposals that are effective.

Effective Handball: A handball to a teammate that hits the intended target.
Effective Kick: The sum of effective short kicks, effective long kicks and effective ground kicks.
Effective Long Kick: A kick of more than 40 metres to a 50/50 contest or better for the team.
Effective Short Kick: A kick of less than 40 metres that results in the intended target retaining possession. Does not include kicks that are spoiled by the opposition.

Ineffective Handball: Handballs that are not advantageous to the team, but do not directly turn the ball over to the opposition.
Ineffective Kick: Kicks that are not advantageous to the team, but do not directly turn the ball over to the opposition. All behinds are also classified as ineffective kicks.

Clanger: An error made by a player resulting in a negative result for his side. Disposal clangers are any kick or handball that directly turns the ball over to the opposition. Frees and 50-metre penalties against, No Pressure Errors, Dropped Marks and Debits are all included in clangers.

[skeptic]

5. Sinclair
4. Steele
3. Stocker
2. NWM
1. King

[Sainter_Dad]

Since
NWM
King
Butler
Steele

LOL - Since NWM became King the Butler is Steele

[MCG-Unit]

5 - Sinclair
2 - Steele
2 - Marshall
2 - Nasiah W-M
2 - Wilkie
1 - Stocker
1 - King

[avid]

5 Sinclair
4 NWM
2 Wilkie
2 Steele
1 King
1 Hill

[Bernard Shakey]

Sinclair
NWM
King
Steele
Michito

[saintbob]

5 Sinclair
4 King
3 NWM
2 Steele
- Wilkie

[Sainter_Dad]

120 Sinclair
62 Wanganeen Milera
57 Steele
40 King
23 Wilkie
19 Marshall
19 Stocker
7 Gresham
6 Butler
3 Wood
2 Owens
1 Higgins
1 Hill

Therefore:
5 Sinclair
4 Wanganeen Milera
3 Steele
2 King
1 Wilkie