Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
B.M wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 7:42pm
But Kosi Pickett?… for a disgusting act
What?? 2 weeks
Outcome should not determine penalty
Appeal if you have the nuts!
We get to
Plead our case - but being St Kilda the plea will be - how much Vaseline do we need to bring
We stand to lose nothing to take this as far as we can
I agree that compared to some of the dog acts that have put someone into next week - this was soft - Murphy should be embarrassed to call himself a footy player
The Hammer v The Pillow
Did Hammer have a duty of care to ask Murphy if he was a powder puff?
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
Murphy was looked at - I believe - but was insufficient force - Caminiti should argue the same - just that Murphy is soft - Murphy hit Hammer in the throat.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
saynta wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:21pm
Just watched AFL Tonight. No mention that Caminiti was retaliating to a coward punch. Am I surprised. No I am not.
Channel 7 news saying Murphy had to be helped from the ground. At the same time showing him jogging off unassisted abusing our bench.
We all know both hit each other, but you couldn’t possibly suspend on that blurry, grainy, shithouse vision.
Where exactly does it prove any contact lol
But the kangaroo court have already made their decision, but to show a ‘process’ it’s straight to the tribunal.
No proper vision doesn’t matter when the saints are involved. Ask Steven Baker.
Have to appeal that
It’s not even sufficient evidence
It’s just media trial beat up
To argue that was intentional when that low life piece of cr@p took a dive is disgusting
Just once risk a fine St Kilda and call out this pathetic Shiite for what it is
Go media nuts to tell these bastards we won’t keep taking this
**** joke
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Teflon wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:48pm
Have to appeal that
It’s not even sufficient evidence
It’s just media trial beat up
To argue that was intentional when that low life piece of cr@p took a dive is disgusting
Just once risk a fine St Kilda and call out this pathetic Shiite for what it is
Go media nuts to tell these bastards we won’t keep taking this
**** joke
Yes but he's got concussion and can't play on Anzac day and Kossie Pickett got off!
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
maverick wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:05pm
Have to appeal that
Certainly not intentional and severe is way too strong
There was no blood, nothing swollen and he retaliated to a strike prior.
2 weeks is more than enough, 4 plus is a joke
Yep, a fifth-game 19-year-old reacting to being bullied by older, more experienced players who should know better. This bullying of teenagers has to stop. It is rife in the AFL and a terrible look for the game.
maverick wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:05pm
Have to appeal that
Certainly not intentional and severe is way too strong
There was no blood, nothing swollen and he retaliated to a strike prior.
2 weeks is more than enough, 4 plus is a joke
Yep, a fifth-game 19-year-old reacting to being bullied by older, more experienced players who should know better. This bullying of teenagers has to stop. It is rife in the AFL and a terrible look for the game.
This is nonsense. They are all adults.
If it’s happening in the game where are the cavalry to fly the flag when needed?
maverick wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:05pm
Have to appeal that
Certainly not intentional and severe is way too strong
There was no blood, nothing swollen and he retaliated to a strike prior.
2 weeks is more than enough, 4 plus is a joke
Yep, a fifth-game 19-year-old reacting to being bullied by older, more experienced players who should know better. This bullying of teenagers has to stop. It is rife in the AFL and a terrible look for the game.
This is nonsense. They are all adults.
If it’s happening in the game where are the cavalry to fly the flag when needed?
Of course it’s nonsense, but it changes the narrative from our guy being a vile thug to something of a victim. May even mitigate four weeks down to two if done cleverly. But I suspect we will just suck it up.
Meanwhile the news reports don’t even mention that the kid was retaliating.
Last edited by bigcarl on Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:54pm, edited 1 time in total.
How come Murphy doesn't get an invite to the same tribunal? Off the ball - deliberate, high contact, don't know the impact but it should be a couple of weeks. Or is the lesson to be learnt here "Get in first" as the retaliator is the one who gets pinged?
flack wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:48pm
How come Murphy doesn't get an invite to the same tribunal? Off the ball - deliberate, high contact, don't know the impact but it should be a couple of weeks. Or is the lesson to be learnt here "Get in first" as the retaliator is the one who gets pinged?
He’ll get an invite to provide his version of events, which can’t be trusted with the concussion and all
Wasnt concussed when gobbing off on the boundary….
As I’ve mentioned earlier, I was more disappointed after the game as it looked like Caminiti was sucking up and ready to exchange gifts!!!
just want to see the club get around him and support him to the hilt.
Appeal if needed and ask why he isn't getting a medal for retaliating to a coward skunk player.
flack wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:48pm
How come Murphy doesn't get an invite to the same tribunal? Off the ball - deliberate, high contact, don't know the impact but it should be a couple of weeks. Or is the lesson to be learnt here "Get in first" as the retaliator is the one who gets pinged?
chook23 wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 7:56pm
I am still not convinced he hit him high
Unless there is other vision
Was this the incident that caused the concussion??
Can a hit in chest cause concussion via a head jolt
Cammo forearmed him to the jaw in the end but Murphy dropped just as Cammo got him. It was supposed to be a forearm to the chest. Dead unlucky.
Murphy is a flat out fvckwit for punching a bloke to start it when he himself has a glass jaw as bad as McCartin. And then pisses and moans coming off the ground as he rightly got sat on his ar£e
