Is Caminiti in trouble?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19157
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Has it been confirmed that his concussion was from that incident?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23162
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3949 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Murphy threw a punch, took a dive, then threw a tantrum. What a f****** gutless clown.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 492 times
- Been thanked: 316 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Not listed in Collingwood’s injuries, Macrae was just covering for his player because he was embarrassed by the way he went down!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Having watched it a number of times now , what I find most interesting is what a waste of time four umpires are !
It took a few repeats to work out who were the boundary umps and who were the field umps. But once noticed , one umpire is up the other end so can't see too much , the other three are within 40 metres of the ball yet the way they are positioned have their backs to 14 players .
I thought the idea of four umpires was so they could see more infringements off the ball .
Just like this one !
It took a few repeats to work out who were the boundary umps and who were the field umps. But once noticed , one umpire is up the other end so can't see too much , the other three are within 40 metres of the ball yet the way they are positioned have their backs to 14 players .
I thought the idea of four umpires was so they could see more infringements off the ball .
Just like this one !
In red white and black from 73
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
The neutrals reckon he’s in a bit of trouble, so my money is on he’ll miss a few
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Will be a pisstake if he goes but we know we cop it.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19157
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
When Caminiti turned around Murphy kind of did this weird movement and ducked down and it looks like he got hit in the head.
He’ll get a few weeks for that.
He’ll get a few weeks for that.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19157
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Murphy hit him first in a very similar action, with a jab to the face... Caminiti relatialited in kind but got him flush
Camininti will get suspended but Murphy should also get suspended for his hit on Caminiti.. I assume he will not
Camininti will get suspended but Murphy should also get suspended for his hit on Caminiti.. I assume he will not
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Yes it was behind play but it was Murphy who initiated a box on... hitting Caminiti first... So it was hardly Caminiti who decided to engage "well behind the play"
HE will get a couple of weeks but so should Murphy
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
It was not only behind the play, it was from behind, a king hit.
Reckless, high contact and huge impact cause Caminiti gonna knock your arse out.
f*** the 2 weeks, well earnt. Pussies like that shouldn't be playing on Anzac Day. Repercussion concussion, sad, dangerous, but appropriate in the circumstances.
Reckless, high contact and huge impact cause Caminiti gonna knock your arse out.
f*** the 2 weeks, well earnt. Pussies like that shouldn't be playing on Anzac Day. Repercussion concussion, sad, dangerous, but appropriate in the circumstances.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2018 9:49pm
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 128 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Agree to an extent. You try that on the wrong bloke in local footy and you are wearing one on the chin.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 12:07am It was not only behind the play, it was from behind, a king hit.
Reckless, high contact and huge impact cause Caminiti gonna knock your arse out.
f*** the 2 weeks, well earnt. Pussies like that shouldn't be playing on Anzac Day. Repercussion concussion, sad, dangerous, but appropriate in the circumstances.
Niggle compared to that are much different.
But consequences are we lose a tall forward for an important game.
- King Max
- Club Player
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2018 11:37am
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
A king hit from behind? Did you actually see it?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 12:07am It was not only behind the play, it was from behind, a king hit.
Reckless, high contact and huge impact cause Caminiti gonna knock your arse out.
f*** the 2 weeks, well earnt. Pussies like that shouldn't be playing on Anzac Day. Repercussion concussion, sad, dangerous, but appropriate in the circumstances.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
https://www.afl.com.au/video/907191/mur ... wsFeed:YesKing Max wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 12:40amA king hit from behind? Did you actually see it?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 12:07am It was not only behind the play, it was from behind, a king hit.
Reckless, high contact and huge impact cause Caminiti gonna knock your arse out.
f*** the 2 weeks, well earnt. Pussies like that shouldn't be playing on Anzac Day. Repercussion concussion, sad, dangerous, but appropriate in the circumstances.
Takealook for yourself, first3 seconds.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
- Location: brisy
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
They just showed it on the today show one angle clearly shows Murphy hits him first in the neck/ jaw then he responds.It is off the ball but not like Caminiti hit him from nowhere.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
He struck Caminiti first. It was cowardly, Caminiti was turning, it was filthy behaviour, even for a football field.
His force was probably greater than Caminiti's, it was not only intentional but a gross violation of his code of conduct and the rules and had Caminiti ducked the same way he did, then, he'd probablybe telling us how remorseful he was.
It's extraordinary that he will probably get off scott-free. The message it sends to young people, young men and woman is irresponsible, to say the least.
On a day when we say, just looking the other way is not ok.
Like I said, Caminiti earnt his weeks and he will do them, but that other d**khead should do just as many for his part. Caminiti was defending himself.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
It's rare for me to have much sympathy for the people who have to make rulings on these sorts of things, but this one is tough.
Here's how I see it.
1. Murphy threw a punch (of sorts) at Caminiti.
2. Caminiti went to respond by trying to give Murphy a shove in the chest the way that players do to each other all game every game.
3. For some reason Murphy ducked forward and the contact ended up being to his head. There was really no way known that Caminiti could have expected that to happen.
To me, it was unintentional high contact, and could be deemed reckless at a bit of a stretch. First offence. One or two weeks at most, and he'd have to consider himself unlucky.
Here's how I see it.
1. Murphy threw a punch (of sorts) at Caminiti.
2. Caminiti went to respond by trying to give Murphy a shove in the chest the way that players do to each other all game every game.
3. For some reason Murphy ducked forward and the contact ended up being to his head. There was really no way known that Caminiti could have expected that to happen.
To me, it was unintentional high contact, and could be deemed reckless at a bit of a stretch. First offence. One or two weeks at most, and he'd have to consider himself unlucky.
Last edited by meher baba on Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:35am, edited 2 times in total.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
I get that these things can get emotive, but that’s one of the most hysterical responses I’ve ever read. Are you being serious?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 8:14am
He struck Caminiti first. It was cowardly, Caminiti was turning, it was filthy behaviour, even for a football field.
His force was probably greater than Caminiti's, it was not only intentional but a gross violation of his code of conduct and the rules and had Caminiti ducked the same way he did, then, he'd probablybe telling us how remorseful he was.
It's extraordinary that he will probably get off scott-free. The message it sends to young people, young men and woman is irresponsible, to say the least.
On a day when we say, just looking the other way is not ok.
Like I said, Caminiti earnt his weeks and he will do them, but that other d**khead should do just as many for his part. Caminiti was defending himself.
Murphy, at worst, threw a punch/arm that’s connected with Hammer’s shoulder/chest area as hammer was turning. It’s still unclear exactly what Hammer did in response, but unfortunately Murphy has a glass jaw so has concussion, which sadly means our man will miss. This nonsense re code of conduct etc and messages being sent to young people…..
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
I saw nothing serious in it, but Caminiti made some kind of front-on above the shoulders contact in response to Murphy's contact to Caminiti from behind as the vid clearly shows. Murphy didn't look dazed or concussed when he came off- looked pretty clear and alert. If it was a Geelong player, then it would be a warning or fine, but being a young Saints player, probably a week or two.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
I agree, but he lay on the ground spread eagled for about 30 sec before coming offspert wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:08am I saw nothing serious in it, but Caminiti made some kind of front-on above the shoulders contact in response to Murphy's contact to Caminiti from behind as the vid clearly shows. Murphy didn't look dazed or concussed when he came off- looked pretty clear and alert. If it was a Geelong player, then it would be a warning or fine, but being a young Saints player, probably a week or two.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
Gotta add some drama to itMoods wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:15amI agree, but he lay on the ground spread eagled for about 30 sec before coming offspert wrote: ↑Mon 17 Apr 2023 9:08am I saw nothing serious in it, but Caminiti made some kind of front-on above the shoulders contact in response to Murphy's contact to Caminiti from behind as the vid clearly shows. Murphy didn't look dazed or concussed when he came off- looked pretty clear and alert. If it was a Geelong player, then it would be a warning or fine, but being a young Saints player, probably a week or two.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Is Caminiti in trouble?
murphy instigated it, and then dropped his head into what would have been a strike to the chest. Whether he slipped or whether he was trying to buy a free who knows? Spargo did the same thing against essendon this week and the free went against him. As I see it there was no intent, and if it's reckless conduct to throw punches or elbows at an opponent's chest in retaliation to having been struck youself from behind, then half the afl players will be having a spell at some time this year. Murphy's history is irrelevant - you can't have some players deemed more protected than others.
Of course the afl will ignore commonsense, especially when they can make a point using a smaller club and a low profile player. So two weeks. If it was Cripps he'd be running around next week.
Of course the afl will ignore commonsense, especially when they can make a point using a smaller club and a low profile player. So two weeks. If it was Cripps he'd be running around next week.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "