Kayo - not ok?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994413Post saynta »

Life Long Saint wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 3:53pm
saynta wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 3:22pm
Life Long Saint wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 3:08pm
saynta wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 2:52pm
Life Long Saint wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 1:11pm
saynta wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 4:06pm Know nothing about kayo and am not interested in learning.

Why drive chinese crap when you have an Italian sports car.
This is one of the most inane things I've read on this forum...And if you've been around on here for a while, you'll know that's saying something.
To claim to know nothing about it and not want to is fine, but to then go and try to make an incorrect analogy is ridiculous.
If you're talking stricly about sports viewing, then Kayo is actually closer to the Italian sports car than the Chinese crap. Foxtel is like a P76 in comparison.

The minute someone challenges your closed mindedness, you resort to swearing and defensive posturing.
saynta wrote:Fox screens the whole 9 AFL games every week plus FI so I really don't get what the big deal is with f****** kayo.

ps I have a big screen tv...3 of them in fact.

And I would never enter a f****** sports bar. Why the f*** would I?
Good for you on all fronts. What a hero you are.

Just so you know...Kayo is, essentially, Foxtel, but for a fraction of the cost and none of the infrastructure. You can live stream all the same channels, plus replays and other sports not on Foxtel.
With the right interface, you can simultaneously stream up to four things at once. Can't do that with Foxtel.
Satellite/Cable TV is dying. It's old tech and will be phased out sooner rather than later.
Streaming services are the future.
I am not stupid Pal. Of course I know that kayo is part of Foxtel.

I have two boxes so can stream two games at the one time and record 4 other channels if I was a mind too, but of course I don't. So why the f*** would I want to watch/stream 4 things at once?

I am really only interested in Saints games but do watch others if they look like being OK.

You don't have to be rude and calling me a hero is f****** a bit rich, just because I prefer foxtell to some steaming service that keeps buffering all the time.

Foxtell is not dying anytime soon and frankly I could not give a rats toss bag for anything cable. :roll:

AFFSlso could not give a rats about costs. I worked for over 50 years so I could enjoy my retirement without having to penny pinch.

If that makes me a hero in your eyes, you certainly have bigger problems than me. :twisted: :roll: :roll:
OK Boomer! Again with the swearing!
You are a fair dinkum walking contradiction!
I don't know your generation and really don't give a f***, but what's with the name calling. I used to like your posts. I have never called you any names.

I certainly am not a boomer, baby or otherwise. And for the record, everyone f****** swears. It's an adult thing at least in the legal circles I used to mix. Don't you watch streaming services like Stan, Netflix or amazon. Swearing is a fact of life. Don't f****** like it, don't read my posts, and stop trying to censor me.
Of course I swear but don't feel the need to do it in such an aggressive form on a fan forum like you do. You drop the f word like a school kid that's just learned about the word.
I treat this forum like a public arena and am not disposed to just drop f bombs everywhere.

And if you've worked for over 50 years, then you would have to have been born prior to 1964, and if you were born after 1946, then you're a boomer!
I was born in 1945, I am definitely not a boomer as I keep saying.

As I said before if you don't like my posts, don't read them and stop trying to be a censor. Not your f****** job.
Last edited by saynta on Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:20am, edited 1 time in total.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994414Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 8:30pm
saynta wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 11:50am
The_Dud wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 10:32am
saynta wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 9:59am
The_Dud wrote: Wed 08 Feb 2023 8:56am The usual untouchable posters doing nothing to dispel their "out of touch wealthy Boomer" stereotype, dropping curse words and homophobic slurs left and right, while the authorities look the other way.

Carry on, nothing to see here.
I should report your post, There were no homophobic slurs from me and I resent you implying that there were. An outright lie. Another poster can't say the same thing but I ignored his offensive post.

There was nothing in any of my posts that would cause the mods any angst while your post was clearly in breach, as was your mates.

And for the umteemth time I am not a f****** boomer. Never was. :roll: :roll:

Now I will go back to ignoring you, which I find far more enjoyable.
saynta wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 5:44pm ...pay 50 bucks plus for a pkt of fags
I don't care what terms for things were common in the 80s, that word is a slur, there's no debate. Feel free to use Urban Dictionary if you're confused...

You jump to abuse and swearing and :roll: as soon as someone tries to interact with anything you post.

Grow up Stinger.
Trust you to find a slur were non existed or was intended. Cigarettes have always been called fags in my neck of the wood. I think someone with an ounce of common sense would have noticed I said a pkt..short for packet. You really have a one track mind but then who else but you goes in to bat for f****** maggots.

You tell someone called stinger to grow up where it you who needs to grow up and mind your own f****** business and leave moderation/adjudication to the mods.

I have more important things to do at the moment than reply to inane posts from the likes of you
“Someone called stinger…”

You’re Stinger. You run two separate accounts. Remember?

Also you are the one who took a nickname for a former coach, ran to Urban Dictionary to invent a slur out of it, and then complained and got posters banned, or did you forget that too?

But using well known homophobic slurs on here? Nah go for it!

You are a stereotype, a cliche, the inspiration for dozens of Betoota articles. Using homophobic slurs regularly in your everyday life doesn’t surprise me at all.

And again your behaviour has derailed a thread. Repercussions? Nah, of course not.
Reinventing history again are we? You have a very sick mind.

And I didn't derail this thread . Posters like you engaging in personal insults and abuse did. Par for the course from you.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994415Post The_Dud »

Kayo is great, streaming services are constantly improving, in the near future Foxtel will be 100% streaming (no dish) too, they already sell these kind of plans.

If I didn't currently have access to Foxtel I would be getting Kayo, at least for the footy season (and maybe NFL). The rest of the stuff on Foxtel is pretty rubbish, waste of money above the $30 for Kayo if you ask me 👍


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994416Post The_Dud »

saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:07am
Reinventing history again are we? You have a very sick mind.

And I didn't derail this thread . Posters like you engaging in personal insults and abuse did. Par for the course from you.
Let's make it simple.


Are you Stinger? Yes or no.

Did you go to Urban Dictionary, search 'Cho' and then post the definition on here? Yes or no.

Did you complain about people then using that nickname for Richo? Yes or no.


The internet never forgets, we all know the answers to these questions, but if you're going to continue to lie at least this will make it (even more) clear and obvious.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11354
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1349 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994417Post Sainternist »

saynta wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 6:53pm Fox screens the whole 9 AFL games every week plus FI so I really don't get what the big deal is with f****** kayo.

ps I have a big screen tv...3 of them in fact.
At $30 /month it’s more affordable than Foxtel. As I mentioned before, I just want what Foxtel has to offer in the way of sports. If I paid an extra $100 /month for Foxtel, it would a waste of money for me, as I don’t care for the non-sports channels on offer.

You have three big screen TVs, eh? Is that so you can watch them all simultaneously, one for each of your eyes (third one for your third eye)? Ommmmmmmm 🧘🏼‍♂️


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994418Post saynta »

Sainternist wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:58am
saynta wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 6:53pm Fox screens the whole 9 AFL games every week plus FI so I really don't get what the big deal is with f****** kayo.

ps I have a big screen tv...3 of them in fact.
At $30 /month it’s more affordable than Foxtel. As I mentioned before, I just want what Foxtel has to offer in the way of sports. If I paid an extra $100 /month for Foxtel, it would a waste of money for me, as I don’t care for the non-sports channels on offer.

You have three big screen TVs, eh? Is that so you can watch them all simultaneously, one for each of your eyes (third one for your third eye)? Ommmmmmmm 🧘🏼‍♂️
No. 1 in each of the Family room, Lounge room and bed room.

I was just stating that I didn't need kayo and I had enough options without it.

I can watch sport whilst my partner can watch whatever she wants. No friction here as to who controls the remote.

We like watching some foxtell shows, news etc as well as sport, so foxtell is the go for us, but whatever floats your boat.

I was just voicing an opinion as to my choice/preference and for that I copped a ton of abuse.

But hey this is SS so what else did I expect.


User avatar
King Max
Club Player
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2018 11:37am
Has thanked: 123 times
Been thanked: 258 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994419Post King Max »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:24am Kayo is great, streaming services are constantly improving, in the near future Foxtel will be 100% streaming (no dish) too, they already sell these kind of plans.

If I didn't currently have access to Foxtel I would be getting Kayo, at least for the footy season (and maybe NFL). The rest of the stuff on Foxtel is pretty rubbish, waste of money above the $30 for Kayo if you ask me 👍
We had an issue with our cable last year. Foxtel weren’t interested in fixing it. They just said we’ll send you out a new box and you can hook it up to the internet.

But we don’t have the sports package. I’ve been using Kayo since it started. And I’m only paying $15 a month through Telstra.

No problems with Foxtel since we have been streaming.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994420Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:30am
saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:07am
Reinventing history again are we? You have a very sick mind.

And I didn't derail this thread . Posters like you engaging in personal insults and abuse did. Par for the course from you.
Let's make it simple.


Are you Stinger? Yes or no.

Did you go to Urban Dictionary, search 'Cho' and then post the definition on here? Yes or no.

Did you complain about people then using that nickname for Richo? Yes or no.


The internet never forgets, we all know the answers to these questions, but if you're going to continue to lie at least this will make it (even more) clear and obvious.
I don't lie but I have better things to do with my time that respond to stupid questions from you.

And as I said to one of your mates, I don't answer questions from posters I despise.

Last time I respond to you in this thread.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994421Post saynta »

King Max wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 12:34pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:24am Kayo is great, streaming services are constantly improving, in the near future Foxtel will be 100% streaming (no dish) too, they already sell these kind of plans.

If I didn't currently have access to Foxtel I would be getting Kayo, at least for the footy season (and maybe NFL). The rest of the stuff on Foxtel is pretty rubbish, waste of money above the $30 for Kayo if you ask me 👍
We had an issue with our cable last year. Foxtel weren’t interested in fixing it. They just said we’ll send you out a new box and you can hook it up to the internet.

But we don’t have the sports package. I’ve been using Kayo since it started. And I’m only paying $15 a month through Telstra.

No problems with Foxtel since we have been streaming.
Cable? Don't know what that is about as our foxtel has always been received via a sat disk. But if you are happy with kayo, good for you. We are more than happy with foxtel. :D :D


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994423Post Vortex »

Great! Finally free speech is allowed to flourish on SS.

Anyone want to chat about the efficacy of the Covid vaccine and corrupt governmenta introducing mandates?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994425Post saynta »

Vortex wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 1:27pm Great! Finally free speech is allowed to flourish on SS.

Anyone want to chat about the efficacy of the Covid vaccine and corrupt governmenta introducing mandates?
Ah. no.


User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5288
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994428Post Munga »

therabbitinthehat wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 6:33am Jump on ozbargain.com.au and look for the free month stuff - they hand them out like candy, a lot of them through uber eats and delivery services.

I've had in-season subscriptions for 3 years and never paid a cent for it, I just cancel in off-season as I rarely use it for anything but the games.
I've looked on there. What the go with people sharing accounts? Surely some bozo will just change your email address and password??


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994430Post The_Dud »

saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 12:48pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:30am
saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:07am
Reinventing history again are we? You have a very sick mind.

And I didn't derail this thread . Posters like you engaging in personal insults and abuse did. Par for the course from you.
Let's make it simple.


Are you Stinger? Yes or no.

Did you go to Urban Dictionary, search 'Cho' and then post the definition on here? Yes or no.

Did you complain about people then using that nickname for Richo? Yes or no.


The internet never forgets, we all know the answers to these questions, but if you're going to continue to lie at least this will make it (even more) clear and obvious.
I don't lie but I have better things to do with my time that respond to stupid questions from you.

And as I said to one of your mates, I don't answer questions from posters I despise.

Last time I respond to you in this thread.
Thanks Stinger, that gives all the answers we need.

Apologies to st.byron for the diversion from the thread topic.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
guitars4
Club Player
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2018 11:56pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994432Post guitars4 »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 3:31pm
saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 12:48pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:30am
saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:07am
Reinventing history again are we? You have a very sick mind.

And I didn't derail this thread . Posters like you engaging in personal insults and abuse did. Par for the course from you.
Let's make it simple.


Are you Stinger? Yes or no.

Did you go to Urban Dictionary, search 'Cho' and then post the definition on here? Yes or no.

Did you complain about people then using that nickname for Richo? Yes or no.


The internet never forgets, we all know the answers to these questions, but if you're going to continue to lie at least this will make it (even more) clear and obvious.
I don't lie but I have better things to do with my time that respond to stupid questions from you.

And as I said to one of your mates, I don't answer questions from posters I despise.

Last time I respond to you in this thread.
Thanks Stinger, that gives all the answers we need.

Apologies to st.byron for the diversion from the thread topic.
I was hoping SB would have shut it down earlier to save the other SS followers the tit for tat response but I suppose we are all adults & we can just choose to avoid the post


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11354
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1349 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994433Post Sainternist »

saynta wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 12:11pm
Sainternist wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 11:58am
saynta wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 6:53pm Fox screens the whole 9 AFL games every week plus FI so I really don't get what the big deal is with f****** kayo.

ps I have a big screen tv...3 of them in fact.
At $30 /month it’s more affordable than Foxtel. As I mentioned before, I just want what Foxtel has to offer in the way of sports. If I paid an extra $100 /month for Foxtel, it would a waste of money for me, as I don’t care for the non-sports channels on offer.

You have three big screen TVs, eh? Is that so you can watch them all simultaneously, one for each of your eyes (third one for your third eye)? Ommmmmmmm 🧘🏼‍♂️
No. 1 in each of the Family room, Lounge room and bed room.

I was just stating that I didn't need kayo and I had enough options without it.

I can watch sport whilst my partner can watch whatever she wants. No friction here as to who controls the remote.

We like watching some foxtell shows, news etc as well as sport, so foxtell is the go for us, but whatever floats your boat.

I was just voicing an opinion as to my choice/preference and for that I copped a ton of abuse.

But hey this is SS so what else did I expect.
You don’t need to justify your viewing choices to me, mate. I’m all for people choosing for themselves. Kayo is just an affordable alternative to going all out on getting Foxtel when you only want their sports channels. I hope I didn’t contribute to the ton of abuse you’re claiming you copped. Honestly, I was just joking about the three TVs and the third eye because someone else mentioned a split screen with games being played simultaneously.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
therabbitinthehat
Club Player
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue 09 Jun 2009 2:11pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994437Post therabbitinthehat »

Munga wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 1:57pm
therabbitinthehat wrote: Thu 09 Feb 2023 6:33am Jump on ozbargain.com.au and look for the free month stuff - they hand them out like candy, a lot of them through uber eats and delivery services.

I've had in-season subscriptions for 3 years and never paid a cent for it, I just cancel in off-season as I rarely use it for anything but the games.
I've looked on there. What the go with people sharing accounts? Surely some bozo will just change your email address and password??
No idea with the account sharing thing, but for a while you could watch on multiple outlets using the same login so not surprised. Usually it's telstra, or uber eats, or those types offering the free month thing


Rubyjo
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
Has thanked: 204 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994440Post Rubyjo »

I've given out my foxtel log in to 5 different people ..for free ..they don't need kayo or a fox subscription...you need friends like me.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7936
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 254 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994464Post bobmurray »

The Fireman wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 9:00pm this thread is like blankety blanks

can I buy a vowel ?
Buying a vowel was on Wheel of Fortune. :lol:


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5939
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994471Post samuraisaint »

bobmurray wrote: Fri 10 Feb 2023 6:05pm
The Fireman wrote: Tue 07 Feb 2023 9:00pm this thread is like blankety blanks

can I buy a vowel ?
Buying a vowel was on Wheel of Fortune. :lol:
Cyril said ..."


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5126
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1458 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Kayo - not ok?

Post: # 1994477Post Yorkeys »

Does Foxtel have the "turning point " adds, or is it just KO? Watching guys deluded about body image is a bit disorientating do you think?


Post Reply