Ben Long. Furious

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5113
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1969716Post Yorkeys »

So if Long and Gresh were contesting a loose ball starting together 10m from the pill:
1 Who would get posession, and 2
Where would the ball go.
For extra nominate by foot or hand disposal.


supersaints2
Club Player
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun 12 Aug 2018 12:18pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 63 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1969718Post supersaints2 »

There were worse players, at least he has acted hotvho every time.


I used to be supersaints but after 16 years my profile dissapeared... ??? if I make any reference to past posts .. it will be under supersiants.. glad to be back on line
bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1969721Post bangaulegend »

sunsaint wrote: Sat 23 Jul 2022 7:04pm ahh think thats what I said - someone above mentioned they would trade Steele before Gresham
I was agreeing with you . I think you have misunderstood my post :wink:


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1969724Post shanegrambeau »

I would say the problem is again - Brad f Hill!

It’s all his fault, again.

The travesty of justice.

Poor poor Ben Long

Never given a chance

And evil wretched spoiled Brad Hill.

I blame Brad Hill.

It’s the reason I am going bald too.

Brad Bloodcy Hill.

Sorry ‘Longy’!


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1969726Post sunsaint »

bangaulegend wrote: Sat 23 Jul 2022 8:32pm
sunsaint wrote: Sat 23 Jul 2022 7:04pm ahh think thats what I said - someone above mentioned they would trade Steele before Gresham
I was agreeing with you . I think you have misunderstood my post :wink:
ahhh true - I needed a thumbs up smilie :!:


Seeya
*************
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12748
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970198Post B.M »

How long did Ben play for today?

5 possessions?!

Just can’t find the footy?!


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17048
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3663 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970213Post skeptic »

B.M wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 10:55pm How long did Ben play for today?

5 possessions?!

Just can’t find the footy?!
That’s the problem with him for sure.

At the same time, 7 tackles, hurt at least one opponent and set up a goal with another, kicked an important goal too. IMO more important to the team then generally credited but... until he starts getting closer to 12-15 touches consistently... will remain in and out.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970221Post Teflon »

B.M wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 10:55pm How long did Ben play for today?

5 possessions?!

Just can’t find the footy?!
Ben Long 20 pressure acts, second in the side (behind Steele on 21
Could he get more possessions? Yep but like last week …..brings others into the game like Butler and Higgins through his pressure
I’d like to see him have a spell on ball occasionally…
Tough racking up 30 as a small defensive forward


“Yeah….nah””
Annoyedsaint
Club Player
Posts: 538
Joined: Sun 27 May 2018 9:49pm
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970226Post Annoyedsaint »

Five possessions lol 🤣🤣🤣

It’s not even a duscussion.
Wouldn’t get a game in Geelong’s reserves with 5 possessions.

He’s 24 years old.
Seriously, how much more do you wait??
He’s in delisted territory given he cannot find the ball and doesn’t kick any goals


bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970228Post bangaulegend »

Not his best game for sure but his pressure & goal in a tight contest were handy IMO


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12748
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970270Post B.M »

Doesn’t matter what your role is or what else you do

5 touches in a game of footy is poor

Why can’t he find the ball?


Eg, he played in Billings role

Last week I think Billings had 21 - that 16 more involvements

If Billings got 5 touches in a game we’d be calling for his head


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7394
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 156 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970273Post chook23 »

B.M wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 4:45am Doesn’t matter what your role is or what else you do

5 touches in a game of footy is poor

Why can’t he find the ball?


Eg, he played in Billings role

Last week I think Billings had 21 - that 16 more involvements

If Billings got 5 touches in a game we’d be calling for his head
B.M wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 4:45am Doesn’t matter what your role is or what else you do

5 touches in a game of footy is poor

Why can’t he find the ball?


Eg, he played in Billings role

Last week I think Billings had 21 - that 16 more involvements

If Billings got 5 touches in a game we’d be calling for his head
Spot on


saint4life
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970276Post Vortex »

Crickey can't believe some are happy with Long's game.

He's Kent all over, a reasonable pressure player in very small patches but fades in and out and just can't be consistent with whatever he does. Is a liability and won't be remaining on the journey to finding a full complement of top 4 players.


User avatar
Templar
Club Player
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
Has thanked: 257 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970296Post Templar »

Annoyedsaint wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 11:23pm Five possessions lol 🤣🤣🤣

It’s not even a duscussion.
Wouldn’t get a game in Geelong’s reserves with 5 possessions.

He’s 24 years old.
Seriously, how much more do you wait??
He’s in delisted territory given he cannot find the ball and doesn’t kick any goals
So look at stats and drop Long and Battle? Bring in two player from the magoos that had higher numbers under the D column. Got it.


Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23161
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9108 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970304Post saynta »

Annoyedsaint wrote: Sun 24 Jul 2022 11:23pm Five possessions lol 🤣🤣🤣

It’s not even a duscussion.
Wouldn’t get a game in Geelong’s reserves with 5 possessions.

He’s 24 years old.
Seriously, how much more do you wait??
He’s in delisted territory given he cannot find the ball and doesn’t kick any goals
Really? You didn't watch the game then?


User avatar
Templar
Club Player
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
Has thanked: 257 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970305Post Templar »

Vortex wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 6:17am ...reasonable pressure player in very small patches...
3rd in the Saints tackle count after coming on at quarter time.
Had west coast players ducking for cover and all totally legal.
Nailed a shot on goal from distance.

And last week Long's intensity as emergency sub with short amount of game time was in stark contrast to the rest of the team.

But the haters want him dropped for someone with more elegance and finess. Maybe he should go to Geelong where most of them play like with that level
of damaging intensity.

We can trade him for a sleek looking outside posession gatherer.


Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970307Post Vortex »

Templar wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 10:42am
Vortex wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 6:17am ...reasonable pressure player in very small patches...
3rd in the Saints tackle count after coming on at quarter time.
Had west coast players ducking for cover and all totally legal.
Nailed a shot on goal from distance.

And last week Long's intensity as emergency sub with short amount of game time was in stark contrast to the rest of the team.

But the haters want him dropped for someone with more elegance and finess. Maybe he should go to Geelong where most of them play like with that level
of damaging intensity.

We can trade him for a sleek looking outside posession gatherer.
Might as well argue Kent should be playing in the best 22.
Long wouldn't get a game anywhere else.


User avatar
Templar
Club Player
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
Has thanked: 257 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970311Post Templar »

No comparison.


Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970315Post The_Dud »

As others have said, almost leading the team in pressure acts and tackles in only 3 quarters of a game.

Ranked higher than Gresh, Sharman and Battle, and just behind Clark, which just illustrates the work he does without the ball.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Templar
Club Player
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
Has thanked: 257 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970316Post Templar »

Long was pretty ordinary before he was dropped. But so have been 90% of the squad hence our collective coniptions.

Last two weeks has brought the relentless intensity we have clearly been lacking.

Gives me the shytes when a player comes to play, turns a corner, does the team thing without hesitation, has a good game and then gets panned. Gives me the shytes no end.

Can I suggest that people hold the disdain and disparagment until he has a bad game? Would that be fair?

Kudos when it is due and stoked Ben is showing good form. You go bloke.


Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970331Post loris »

Why don’t players kick to Long, when he’s got into clear space on half forward? Members ignored him twice yesterday and kicked long to a pack contest, and ball rebounded once & got locked in the other time for ball up & Eagles eventually cleared. Then Sinclair, who usually shows good periphery vision, ignored Long on his own, waving arms for all to see, & bombed it long for no effect.
I’ve noticed on TV in games that Long has played, he’s often making position in the open & overlooked. Why? Is this instructions not to go through Long, he’s only there to drag a rebounding defender out of the game?
Being at game live it’s obvious Long is ignored too much. Maybe he’s ignoring coach’s instructions and breaking/leading to wrong areas for the game plan? He’d get a lot more possessions if players used him when he’s made position & free.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17048
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3663 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970334Post skeptic »

The comparison btw Long and Kent is a good one for all the wrong reasons.

Long is the reason why players like Kent and Lonie should never have played as much as they did… all the BS about pressuring, guarding space, doing roles… Long is the epitome of actually doing that stuff in a measurable way.

He consistently harasses, tackles, chases and creates… 7 tackles yesterday. 7. Kicked one goal and created more. Only 5 touches, seems like it should have been more.

The flip side is of course… until he’s able to get more of the ball, he’ll remain on the periphery of the top 22


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23161
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9108 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970335Post saynta »

loris wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 12:19pm Why don’t players kick to Long, when he’s got into clear space on half forward? Members ignored him twice yesterday and kicked long to a pack contest, and ball rebounded once & got locked in the other time for ball up & Eagles eventually cleared. Then Sinclair, who usually shows good periphery vision, ignored Long on his own, waving arms for all to see, & bombed it long for no effect.
I’ve noticed on TV in games that Long has played, he’s often making position in the open & overlooked. Why? Is this instructions not to go through Long, he’s only there to drag a rebounding defender out of the game?
Being at game live it’s obvious Long is ignored too much. Maybe he’s ignoring coach’s instructions and breaking/leading to wrong areas for the game plan? He’d get a lot more possessions if players used him when he’s made position & free.
I've wondered the same thing. It's so f****** obvious it's bordering on being disgraceful. Happens all the time and must be shattering to Ben.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970337Post loris »

saynta wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 12:33pm
loris wrote: Mon 25 Jul 2022 12:19pm Why don’t players kick to Long, when he’s got into clear space on half forward? Members ignored him twice yesterday and kicked long to a pack contest, and ball rebounded once & got locked in the other time for ball up & Eagles eventually cleared. Then Sinclair, who usually shows good periphery vision, ignored Long on his own, waving arms for all to see, & bombed it long for no effect.
I’ve noticed on TV in games that Long has played, he’s often making position in the open & overlooked. Why? Is this instructions not to go through Long, he’s only there to drag a rebounding defender out of the game?
Being at game live it’s obvious Long is ignored too much. Maybe he’s ignoring coach’s instructions and breaking/leading to wrong areas for the game plan? He’d get a lot more possessions if players used him when he’s made position & free.
I've wondered the same thing. It's so f****** obvious it's bordering on being disgraceful. Happens all the time and must be shattering to Ben.
It’s hard to pickup if you only see games on TV. I’ve occasionally glimpsed him fee & calling for ball. Because the TV doesn’t always pick up what’s in front of him etc. so I assume he’s not in the best position.
However at the match yesterday, it stood out like the proverbial dog’s balls :oops: So I assume it’s part of the structure & game plan. Dumb, dumb, dumb to ignore a player in the clear who can approach goal from where the defenders ain’t (as Jack Dyer would say). And supporters go on about Long not getting enough of the ball! Don’t they watch the game in totality or only watch where the ball is being kicked, not what’s opening up on the ground?
At least he’s not Brad Hill calling for the ball when he hasn’t got a clear pathway through opposition players, so has to run around in circles & not get an effective kick away or worse still turn it over.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23161
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9108 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: Ben Long. Furious

Post: # 1970339Post saynta »

The one with Members was the worst. I said to my partner , he better kick this and of course he missed.


Post Reply