ShArman should never have played. Tonight just ended that arguement. Barely VFL standard and so far off AFL.
If he wants to play AFL he has to bang the door down at VFL first.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
ShArman should never have played. Tonight just ended that arguement. Barely VFL standard and so far off AFL.
Not at all. He was the worst player on the ground by a mile, dropped marks, clangers ootf, ZERO tackles, can't chase. But the point is he hasn't done anything at VFL level to warrant selection in the first place. Just a dumb selection.HardSaint wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:37am I think youre being a bit rough there on young Cooper
He was indicative of the whole team and had we had a functional team out there with structures and experienced players leading by example, Sharman's errors could have been put in context, If anything he tried too hard, in absense of anything on offer from the team as a whole
I dont think on tonought;s performace there were many players who "should have played" if if they could have
He wouldn't get picked in a good team because he would be required to earn his spot in the first place.
We’ll saidskeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
Watch the game again. If he’s running straight at the ball he’ll jump at it with confidence, not withstanding he jumped under it a couple of times. Coming in from an angle he reaches for the ball not committing his body. That tells me one of two things I) he’s concerned about body contact or ii) he’s completely devoid of confidence. Either way, he was swatted away in the contests like a fly.Teflon wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 2:05amWe’ll saidskeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
Brain dead twits potting Sharman and letting our “leaders” off the hook
Sharman is a piece of the puzzle for future- not the messiah
We need him to come good to be the true 2nd lead up forward option that Membrey can’t be
You develop him - you don’t bring him in 1 game then drop him cause a guy in game 7 did t save the whole team who were Shyte
Dumb thinking
I’d be looking at Jones, Billings, Ross, Webster etc before potting Sharman
100% agree. People coming after Sharman and Max King is just absurd. Can think of ten other players who are more senior and more indicative of our current malaise.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
So ….
Heaps of players in the gun but it's fairly obvious Sharman is way out of his depth at the level. He's got the turning circle of the titanic so he looks all at sea when he comes up the ground and there is some ground ball to chase. He looks magnificent running in straight lines and floating in from behind or from the side of a contest to take a mark using his height and long arms. He's the Dougal Howard of the forward line.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:44am100% agree. People coming after Sharman and Max King is just absurd. Can think of ten other players who are more senior and more indicative of our current malaise.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
I've said it a thousand times. We're an average football team when we don't play with dare and run from behind. We don't have the kicks in our side to play slow, methodical, up-the-line football. What we do have is players who take the game on from half back and back their pace through the midfield.
If Ratts isn't teaching that every week, then he's daft. Which I don't think he is. This side is just so flaky when it comes to confidence. We don't have enough successful seasons, if any, where we've gotten the results to trust our ability and game style.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think we're a top four side with this list. But we're a hell of a lot better than what we're showing at the moment.
Least of our worries at the moment, mate. Honestly. Max King looked like a VFL player last night.Vortex wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:57amHeaps of players in the gun but it's fairly obvious Sharman is way out of his depth at the level. He's got the turning circle of the titanic so he looks all at sea when he comes up the ground and there is some ground ball to chase. He looks magnificent running in straight lines and floating in from behind or from the side of a contest to take a mark using his height and long arms. He's the Dougal Howard of the forward line.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:44am100% agree. People coming after Sharman and Max King is just absurd. Can think of ten other players who are more senior and more indicative of our current malaise.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
I've said it a thousand times. We're an average football team when we don't play with dare and run from behind. We don't have the kicks in our side to play slow, methodical, up-the-line football. What we do have is players who take the game on from half back and back their pace through the midfield.
If Ratts isn't teaching that every week, then he's daft. Which I don't think he is. This side is just so flaky when it comes to confidence. We don't have enough successful seasons, if any, where we've gotten the results to trust our ability and game style.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think we're a top four side with this list. But we're a hell of a lot better than what we're showing at the moment.
I don't think we'll ever see him attend a ruck contest again, and it's probably going to take a while for him to get another AFL call up, I don't expect to see him play AFL again this season.
And that's not to suggest he is a slow learner, it's more a reflection of how poor the standard is at VFL presently which is due to issues from the Pandemic still impacting the 2nd tier comps across all states. Some of the stories I'm hearing are dire. But anyway that is why more than ever players like Sharman look like rock stars at VFL level.
So on this insistence the AFL level is where Sharman should stay to learn his craft, not a realistic option when you are so far out of your depth.
How many kids did we have playing with under 30 to 50 games, how many did we have with under 10. AFL quality is the problem and Sharman is part of that problem.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 10:02amLeast of our worries at the moment, mate. Honestly. Max King looked like a VFL player last night.Vortex wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:57amHeaps of players in the gun but it's fairly obvious Sharman is way out of his depth at the level. He's got the turning circle of the titanic so he looks all at sea when he comes up the ground and there is some ground ball to chase. He looks magnificent running in straight lines and floating in from behind or from the side of a contest to take a mark using his height and long arms. He's the Dougal Howard of the forward line.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:44am100% agree. People coming after Sharman and Max King is just absurd. Can think of ten other players who are more senior and more indicative of our current malaise.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
I've said it a thousand times. We're an average football team when we don't play with dare and run from behind. We don't have the kicks in our side to play slow, methodical, up-the-line football. What we do have is players who take the game on from half back and back their pace through the midfield.
If Ratts isn't teaching that every week, then he's daft. Which I don't think he is. This side is just so flaky when it comes to confidence. We don't have enough successful seasons, if any, where we've gotten the results to trust our ability and game style.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think we're a top four side with this list. But we're a hell of a lot better than what we're showing at the moment.
I don't think we'll ever see him attend a ruck contest again, and it's probably going to take a while for him to get another AFL call up, I don't expect to see him play AFL again this season.
And that's not to suggest he is a slow learner, it's more a reflection of how poor the standard is at VFL presently which is due to issues from the Pandemic still impacting the 2nd tier comps across all states. Some of the stories I'm hearing are dire. But anyway that is why more than ever players like Sharman look like rock stars at VFL level.
So on this insistence the AFL level is where Sharman should stay to learn his craft, not a realistic option when you are so far out of your depth.
See this is why Sharmans's legend is excessively disproportionate to his actual ability. Claiming he split the packs open sounds fantastic, but it was very poor play by a kid who isn't up to the standard, not only did he fly for the same ball as King who actually had every right to be in the contest, really all he was doing was going for a cheap flashy mark from behind a pack. It looks fantastic when it comes off. He cant do the basics and he can't do the basics incredibly poorly. He's not going to make the grade at this stage without a mountain of learning his craft VFL level and even then I don't think he will.mad saint guy wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 10:43am Doesn't get much tougher for a raw, young key forward than a game where his team is absolutely mauled at the ridiculously small ground that is the SCG. Especially when kicking to a lead isn't part of the game plan.
He didn't have a good game but he did come very close to taking some epic marks and he busted some packs open. No one else presented at the footy with the same intent in that game
Been at plenty of football clubs where the selectors start potting the younger players for the sins of senior players. Creates a pretty toxic environment. Would like to think our match committee is smart enough not to drop a 21 year old match winner due to some of the worst ball movement I've ever seen.Vortex wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 10:09amHow many kids did we have playing with under 30 to 50 games, how many did we have with under 10. AFL quality is the problem and Sharman is part of that problem.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 10:02amLeast of our worries at the moment, mate. Honestly. Max King looked like a VFL player last night.Vortex wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:57amHeaps of players in the gun but it's fairly obvious Sharman is way out of his depth at the level. He's got the turning circle of the titanic so he looks all at sea when he comes up the ground and there is some ground ball to chase. He looks magnificent running in straight lines and floating in from behind or from the side of a contest to take a mark using his height and long arms. He's the Dougal Howard of the forward line.Lennylegs wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 9:44am100% agree. People coming after Sharman and Max King is just absurd. Can think of ten other players who are more senior and more indicative of our current malaise.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
I've said it a thousand times. We're an average football team when we don't play with dare and run from behind. We don't have the kicks in our side to play slow, methodical, up-the-line football. What we do have is players who take the game on from half back and back their pace through the midfield.
If Ratts isn't teaching that every week, then he's daft. Which I don't think he is. This side is just so flaky when it comes to confidence. We don't have enough successful seasons, if any, where we've gotten the results to trust our ability and game style.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think we're a top four side with this list. But we're a hell of a lot better than what we're showing at the moment.
I don't think we'll ever see him attend a ruck contest again, and it's probably going to take a while for him to get another AFL call up, I don't expect to see him play AFL again this season.
And that's not to suggest he is a slow learner, it's more a reflection of how poor the standard is at VFL presently which is due to issues from the Pandemic still impacting the 2nd tier comps across all states. Some of the stories I'm hearing are dire. But anyway that is why more than ever players like Sharman look like rock stars at VFL level.
So on this insistence the AFL level is where Sharman should stay to learn his craft, not a realistic option when you are so far out of your depth.
King is a very unique but arguably more concerning issue. Giving up mid contest is a mental weakness that has no place on an AFL field. Has never been tolerated by any coach in the history of the game. It's a shame he's going to be playing at Sandy next week because it only exaserbates our main issue of not having enough AFL grade players.
One thing is for sure, it's going to be a very small forward line against the Blues, Higgins will be our FF.
It’s not about his legend that’s just drossVortex wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 11:02amSee this is why Sharmans's legend is excessively disproportionate to his actual ability. Claiming he split the packs open sounds fantastic, but it was very poor play by a kid who isn't up to the standard, not only did he fly for the same ball as King who actually had every right to be in the contest, really all he was doing was going for a cheap flashy mark from behind a pack. It looks fantastic when it comes off. He cant do the basics and he can't do the basics incredibly poorly. He's not going to make the grade at this stage without a mountain of learning his craft VFL level and even then I don't think he will.mad saint guy wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 10:43am Doesn't get much tougher for a raw, young key forward than a game where his team is absolutely mauled at the ridiculously small ground that is the SCG. Especially when kicking to a lead isn't part of the game plan.
He didn't have a good game but he did come very close to taking some epic marks and he busted some packs open. No one else presented at the footy with the same intent in that game
And Crickey if he makes the grade it will be because the coaches have found a game plan that fits his very limited skill set. He has the turning circle of tbe titanic and is useless below is kneees and he refused to chase and tackle so there is no way he can be a forward that plays up the ground.
It's time we get realistic about what this kid can and can't do.
Logical discussion madeskeptic wrote: ↑Sun 26 Jun 2022 12:57am I see this pattern so often
Young player X comes in and looks promising
Easily dropped, erratic opportunity
Gets selected in a big game - onus for them to perform or they will be dropped
Entire team plays poor and he along with others crumble under pressure
Dropped and written off
One can’t make good decisions based on limited data and making snap decisions based off of particularly good or bad results is bad decision making.
You need a degree of consistency and opportunity to improve
IMO very little to be gained from tonight. We obviously have problems but we’re better than this. Now is the time to back our processes and fix the problems. Cooper Sharman isn’t close to the biggest problem or cause for this result.
Highmore at least put some consistent runs on the board last year. At this stage I would consider him and Lienart as genuine options considering our year is more or less over and we need to get games into them.IluvHarvey wrote: ↑Sat 25 Jun 2022 10:57pmHow? Showed he can jump tonight and that’s it. Looked destined to play 20-30 games in his career by tonight’s standards. Love how there are some players who can do no wrong on this forum. He was rubbish tonight (like everyone else).
The love for him and Highmore is hilarious.