Mach thread: saints v bombers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960955Post BadRossco »

Reality check fact is we a really a bottom four side that has been playing above their weight, time for changes a lot of blokes out there tonight struggle with the basic skills and are not likely to change now. The selectors should have no trouble finding candidates for Sandy but will pogo with the same rabble


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960960Post Ghost Like »

CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:41pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:39pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:38pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:36pm Those bagging Howard clearly don’t understand his role. Trying to be defend every ball coming in and his opponent.
Lol
You clearly have no idea.
Would have thought his role was to DEFEND.

Wright is average and gave him an absolute bath.

Keep cryin’ Curly!

Howard has to defend the longest kicks in. He hands over when his opponent goes outside 50 and peels back. He’s our leading defensive spoiler for a reason.
He certainly spoilt the game for me tonight.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960961Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:41pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:39pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:38pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:36pm Those bagging Howard clearly don’t understand his role. Trying to be defend every ball coming in and his opponent.
Lol
You clearly have no idea.
Would have thought his role was to DEFEND.

Wright is average and gave him an absolute bath.

Keep cryin’ Curly!

Howard has to defend the longest kicks in. He hands over when his opponent goes outside 50 and peels back. He’s our leading defensive spoiler for a reason.
Wright beat him one-on-one over and over and over and over…


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960962Post IluvHarvey »

SaintDippa wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:44pm Posters bagging Howard. Seriously? I'd have dozen others in the sights before Dooog.
Image


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
DJ Higgins
Club Player
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 269 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960965Post DJ Higgins »

Just left ground and it was worse than what people at home think. Don’t blame the umpires as we got a few soft calls. Blame us
1. No game plan. Players standing still at free kicks. No leads no options except kick it and hope
hill. Don’t blame members. All we do is kick to king. Member went to defend as he was getting some ball up back.
I blame selectors. We don’t need butler and Higgins. Neither snap goals or crumb particular well. Play Sharman and kick it to him. He is a great set shot.
4. I blame rattan Can someone in all honesty tell me what our game plan was. I am not kidding

I am off home now to drink heavily and pat the dog which willl be the only enjoyment I’ve had for a while
Last edited by DJ Higgins on Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:51pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960967Post IluvHarvey »

CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:41pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:39pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:38pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:36pm Those bagging Howard clearly don’t understand his role. Trying to be defend every ball coming in and his opponent.
Lol
You clearly have no idea.
Would have thought his role was to DEFEND.

Wright is average and gave him an absolute bath.

Keep cryin’ Curly!

Howard has to defend the longest kicks in. He hands over when his opponent goes outside 50 and peels back. He’s our leading defensive spoiler for a reason.
Have you ever seen someone spoil the ball back towards the goal square more than him? Don’t bother the answer is no. Good defenders kill the ball when they spoil. Defenders with no brains spoil it back into play.


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960968Post Ghost Like »

SaintDippa wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:44pm Posters bagging Howard. Seriously? I'd have dozen others in the sights before Dooog.
Quite true but let's start with the Captain. Plenty of woefully poor, inept, panicked, ridiculously out of form players...


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960971Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:48pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:41pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:39pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:38pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:36pm Those bagging Howard clearly don’t understand his role. Trying to be defend every ball coming in and his opponent.
Lol
You clearly have no idea.
Would have thought his role was to DEFEND.

Wright is average and gave him an absolute bath.

Keep cryin’ Curly!

Howard has to defend the longest kicks in. He hands over when his opponent goes outside 50 and peels back. He’s our leading defensive spoiler for a reason.
Wright beat him one-on-one over and over and over and over…
That’s garbage in fact it’s lies.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960976Post BadRossco »

A lot of posters appear to be putting the failure down to Ratts but in his defence he has not been dealt a very good hand with very few natural footballers out there.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960978Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:53pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:48pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:41pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:39pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:38pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:36pm Those bagging Howard clearly don’t understand his role. Trying to be defend every ball coming in and his opponent.
Lol
You clearly have no idea.
Would have thought his role was to DEFEND.

Wright is average and gave him an absolute bath.

Keep cryin’ Curly!

Howard has to defend the longest kicks in. He hands over when his opponent goes outside 50 and peels back. He’s our leading defensive spoiler for a reason.
Wright beat him one-on-one over and over and over and over…
That’s garbage in fact it’s lies.
Lol


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960980Post Wayne42 »

BadRossco wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:55pm A lot of posters appear to be putting the failure down to Ratts but in his defence he has not been dealt a very good hand with very few natural footballers out there.
Does that mean our much lauded recruiters are actually inept.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960985Post Teflon »

1966 wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:42pm Club can’t admit it but now need to look at 2023.
This year is gone.
Get Clarkson and get Riewoldt involved.
Put Marshall out and get him right.
Also time to give up on Butler,
Well said


“Yeah….nah””
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960986Post cwrcyn »

The backline was exposed by a midfield that got beaten and wasn't prepared to run both ways. Most of Essendons forward entries we by players with space and time to run freely with the ball while our mids watched from the centre of the ground. Hunter Clark was cooked by quarter time. Zak Jones refused to take the first handball option, as did Greaham


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960989Post CURLY »

Byrnes Long Higgins Butler cannot all play together.

Madness to leave Windhager out with Steele not playing.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960990Post Teflon »

Only 1 top 8 side has lost to lowly Essendon….


“Yeah….nah””
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960993Post CURLY »

Got cut to pieces through the corridor

Battle Howard Wilkie Webster did well considering


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961002Post SaintPav »

Apart from the first 8 min of the third, Essendon controlled the game from the outset.

We could not get our hands on the ball.

Let that sink in!


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Bruce G McAbee
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961005Post Bruce G McAbee »

Can we seriously just let Lethean be handed the Presidency?
We need someone to drag this club into a successful period like Frank Costa or Jeff Kennett did.
I seriously doubt I'll live long enough to see this team win another premiership.
We are still that social club of the 80's.


Think of me long enough to make a memory.
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961007Post Devilhead »

Season is on the brink and we are standing on the cliffs edge with the sea raging below

We can still make finals .... but some serious soul searching has to happen for us to prevail

Swans
Blues
Dockers
Dogs
Eagles
Hawks
Cats
Lions
Swans

Probably have to win 2 of the next 4 ..... then wins against Eagles & Hawks and then 2 of the last 3 to ensure we play finals

5 wins could well not be enough


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961008Post Wayne42 »

Can't wait for Ratts press conference, could be hilarious.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961011Post Ghost Like »

Bruce G McAbee wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:05am Can we seriously just let Lethean be handed the Presidency?
We need someone to drag this club into a successful period like Frank Costa or Jeff Kennett did.
I seriously doubt I'll live long enough to see this team win another premiership.
We are still that social club of the 80's.
Would that be the Old Xavs Presidency with Hanners as Captain Coach?


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961013Post bigcarl »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:04am Apart from the first 8 min of the third, Essendon controlled the game from the outset.

We could not get our hands on the ball.

Let that sink in!
Yep. Pantsed


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961014Post Teflon »

Devilhead wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:08am Season is on the brink and we are standing on the cliffs edge with the sea raging below

We can still make finals .... but some serious soul searching has to happen for us to prevail

Swans
Blues
Dockers
Dogs
Eagles
Hawks
Cats
Lions
Swans

Probably have to win 2 of the next 4 ..... then wins against Eagles & Hawks and then 2 of the last 3 to ensure we play finals

5 wins could well not be enough
Look let’s get real
Even if we pull a win or 3 out of our bum we are making up numbers
We don’t have the cattle or game plan to do anything if finals - we are still playing the small forwards game plan from 2020 (that every other side has worked out) except no one has told Brett.
We are carrying some really suspect decision making footballers - week in week out the same culprits
Jones
Gresham
Howard
Hill
Butler
Either running themselves into trouble or just blazing away to turn it over
And Ratten is already guaranteed a 2-3 year extension
We are in all sorts
Fancy signing a coach now with his toughest, season defining run still to come?
Only an amateur run footy club would do that - who cares what the media say ?????
Not us we are just trying so hard to be respected we’ll dovv be whatever it takes even if that means in the end we’ll still be laughed at


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961018Post Wayne42 »

Here we go, Ratts is mumbling in front of the press.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961019Post Wayne42 »

ratts said he and his coaching group didn't see it coming, he should have read a couple of the threads on here that predicted we would lose.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Post Reply