evertonfc wrote: ↑Mon 29 Jul 2019 10:53pm Paton - 20yo, 186cm, 77 kg (Pick #46, 2017 National Draft) - avg 14.71 touches.
McKenzie - 23yo, 184cm, Weight 78 kg (Pick #22, 2014 National Draft) - avg 12.31 touches.
Remarkably similar players - reliable, mid-sized half-back flankers without any particularly notable skills or physical assets, but who would be dominant VFL players because of their reliability.
I struggle to find a place for both of them in our best 22 going forward, not least because they are so similar, and Nick Coffield will probably get opportunities in the coming year.
McKenzie has grabbed a three-year deal earlier this season, so he's safe in his career for a while. But is there a position for him if Paton keeps his place?
While they have overlap, I see them as quite different.
Paton is the better lockdown defender, and more highly skilled of the two. Though is still very capable with his offensive play. You can put him on the oppositions best small forward. At only 39 games he is still developing, and has potetial to grow into other roles.
McKenzie is the better overall athlete and is harder at the contest. Currently can play wing, or hb. I would not put him on the oppositions best small forward in a shut down role when I have Paton or Webster.
McKenzie may well end up competing with tis year with Hill, Billings, Wood for a slot in the team. He will not displace Sinclair. And players like Lienert and Highmore have emerged as well as the not available Coffield.