Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Just watching the first qtr of this game and it's a bit of a worry when Kent is one of the best players
1/4 time
Sandy 2.3.15
Casey 4.2.26
1/4 time
Sandy 2.3.15
Casey 4.2.26
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Saw first quarter and saw geary kick a goal which was good. Saw our ruck was doing his best but Majak seemed to be on top of him
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Getting pumped at half time, not much to discuss for the Saints. Ryder Ok looks like he needs another couple of games to get going.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Unwatchable. Woeful standard. Leo Connolly looks the only player who could have been selected in our firsts today out of this lot. Ryder will need a couple more games to get his fitness up
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
- Location: brisy
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Just out of curiosity is Dunstan playing for Casey?
I read somewhere they took Lonie on the top up via Caseyis he playing or still playing with someone else?
I read somewhere they took Lonie on the top up via Caseyis he playing or still playing with someone else?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5132
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1458 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Interesting to see M. Allison in one passage. Deary me. Jake Batchelor has a big job on his hands.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2016 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
My player ratings for Sandy
Windhager. About 20 touches. 7/10
Owens. The same 7/10
Connolly. Only defender who gave us run and drive. Unlucky not to be playing seniors 7/10
Heath. Got better as the game went on. Typical 19 year old ruck. He's definitely not a potato 5/10
Ryder. Solid
Allison. Won't want to watch the replay of that performance 2/10
Geary. As you would expect 5/10
Kent. Busy early but faded. May have done a calf in the 4th. 4/10
Windhager. About 20 touches. 7/10
Owens. The same 7/10
Connolly. Only defender who gave us run and drive. Unlucky not to be playing seniors 7/10
Heath. Got better as the game went on. Typical 19 year old ruck. He's definitely not a potato 5/10
Ryder. Solid
Allison. Won't want to watch the replay of that performance 2/10
Geary. As you would expect 5/10
Kent. Busy early but faded. May have done a calf in the 4th. 4/10
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
If we have got any brains Geary, Ryder and Kent should not play for St Kilda again. Ryder and Geary are retiring at the end of the season anyway so what's the point? Kent is not good enough so rule a line through him. If their form is good, by all means play Owens, Connolly, Heath and Allison. But knowing the selectors, Ryder and Geary will be in next week so they can take part in Maddies match FMD.cwrcyn wrote: ↑Sun 27 Mar 2022 4:01pm My player ratings for Sandy
Windhager. About 20 touches. 7/10
Owens. The same 7/10
Connolly. Only defender who gave us run and drive. Unlucky not to be playing seniors 7/10
Heath. Got better as the game went on. Typical 19 year old ruck. He's definitely not a potato 5/10
Ryder. Solid
Allison. Won't want to watch the replay of that performance 2/10
Geary. As you would expect 5/10
Kent. Busy early but faded. May have done a calf in the 4th. 4/10
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
So how many AFL Listed players on the park for Sandringham?
Given you are only as strong as your weakest
And this feeds up to the side and n WA
Given you are only as strong as your weakest
And this feeds up to the side and n WA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Nine St Kilda listed players v 16 Melbourne listed players.
Geary and Kent are only injury back ups now. Ryder is old, but he's still a very fine player and important to us this year. We're still in the business of winning games, after all
Geary and Kent are only injury back ups now. Ryder is old, but he's still a very fine player and important to us this year. We're still in the business of winning games, after all
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
The first time I've seen Allison play. Even he would agree he had a stinker. Has so much to learn about how to play one on one. Lacks strength and aggression. Doesn't know when to stay or go
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Agree with most os SuunyErnies comments but Ryder must come in when match fit but Kent and Gears are no longer AFL standard that is if Kent ever was. Owens, Winghager and Heath could well earn a spot later in the season with Kyle a little further away. Peris may not make it and Allison is border line VFL standard
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
That’s what you want to see/hear
Bigfooty saying Windhager just needs midfield time
Good signs
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
- Has thanked: 195 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
If you play Ryder you are forfeiting the chance to expose Heath. At the end of the year I would rather have given Heath 10 - 15 games than 10 - 15 to Ryder. Ryder can have a farewell game in round 23. Our list is in a world of pain and there is no room for sentiment anymore. We have to grow some balls and become ruthless. But as usual, it won't happen and Ryder will play 15 games this year (barring injury).BadRossco wrote: ↑Sun 27 Mar 2022 4:59pm Agree with most os SuunyErnies comments but Ryder must come in when match fit but Kent and Gears are no longer AFL standard that is if Kent ever was. Owens, Winghager and Heath could well earn a spot later in the season with Kyle a little further away. Peris may not make it and Allison is border line VFL standard
St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!
NeXus
NeXus
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
https://www.saints.com.au/news/1088099/ ... un-rampant
BEST
Casey: Brown, Dunstan, van Rooyen, Munro, Baker, Daw
Sandringham: Ryder, Windhager, Connolly, Owens, Heath, Geary, Seaton
BEST
Casey: Brown, Dunstan, van Rooyen, Munro, Baker, Daw
Sandringham: Ryder, Windhager, Connolly, Owens, Heath, Geary, Seaton
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
You must be joking?BadRossco wrote: ↑Sun 27 Mar 2022 4:59pm Agree with most os SuunyErnies comments but Ryder must come in when match fit but Kent and Gears are no longer AFL standard that is if Kent ever was. Owens, Winghager and Heath could well earn a spot later in the season with Kyle a little further away. Peris may not make it and Allison is border line VFL standard
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Given we have
Howard
Billings
Coffield
Jones
Bytal
Hannebery
Highmore
Long
Sharman
Adams
All not playing plus a few I’ve forgotten
Howard
Billings
Coffield
Jones
Bytal
Hannebery
Highmore
Long
Sharman
Adams
All not playing plus a few I’ve forgotten
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Only watched 3/4 it was tough watching ended in 83 point hammering.
Curly the other players would have helped but Casey were a class above across all lines.
Windhager played mid mostly after 1/2 time. He and Connolly were our best, had 23 touches.
Connolly had 20 touches and was creative in a tough day in defence.
Owens also did ok with 20 touches. He will be a player just needs time at that level.
Peris shows enough to say he has a future. Is really courageous and a great tackler for his size.
Kyle got a knock in the 2nd quarter, difficult game when the ball lived at the other end.
Paddy looked sluggish and definitely not match fit. Although he still contributed.
Geary got a bit of it but still does the dumb things.
Heath has plenty of upside, competes well & has quick hands for a big man.
Kent usual game some ok mostly rubbish.
Allison absolute worst on field, he is no where near it. Why he got a contract extension last year is another list management mystery?
Curly the other players would have helped but Casey were a class above across all lines.
Windhager played mid mostly after 1/2 time. He and Connolly were our best, had 23 touches.
Connolly had 20 touches and was creative in a tough day in defence.
Owens also did ok with 20 touches. He will be a player just needs time at that level.
Peris shows enough to say he has a future. Is really courageous and a great tackler for his size.
Kyle got a knock in the 2nd quarter, difficult game when the ball lived at the other end.
Paddy looked sluggish and definitely not match fit. Although he still contributed.
Geary got a bit of it but still does the dumb things.
Heath has plenty of upside, competes well & has quick hands for a big man.
Kent usual game some ok mostly rubbish.
Allison absolute worst on field, he is no where near it. Why he got a contract extension last year is another list management mystery?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
I see that our better players included Windhager, Connolly, Owens and Heath.
Which gives one cause for optimism.
Pity the forum can't concentrate on any positives at the moment.
All the negative crap being posted is quite depressing.
Which gives one cause for optimism.
Pity the forum can't concentrate on any positives at the moment.
All the negative crap being posted is quite depressing.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4346
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Heath doesn't yet have the fitness or experience against men to qualify him for senior football. It's his first proper game outside of junior football. If he excels this season, then maybe two games at the end of the year (if we have injuries) But I doubt the club would even do that.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: Sandy v Casey on AFL.com
Impatient Sainter wrote: ↑Sun 27 Mar 2022 5:39pm Only watched 3/4 it was tough watching ended in 83 point hammering.
Curly the other players would have helped but Casey were a class above across all lines.
Windhager played mid mostly after 1/2 time. He and Connolly were our best, had 23 touches.
Connolly had 20 touches and was creative in a tough day in defence.
Owens also did ok with 20 touches. He will be a player just needs time at that level.
Peris shows enough to say he has a future. Is really courageous and a great tackler for his size.
Kyle got a knock in the 2nd quarter, difficult game when the ball lived at the other end.
Paddy looked sluggish and definitely not match fit. Although he still contributed.
Geary got a bit of it but still does the dumb things.
Heath has plenty of upside, competes well & has quick hands for a big man.
Kent usual game some ok mostly rubbish.
Allison absolute worst on field, he is no where near it. Why he got a contract extension last year is another list management mystery?
Of course having 10 more AFL listed players would help. Let’s be serious it’s a massive advantage.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL