Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
The only bizarre thing was sending Carey out to face 1 ball.
The declaration had everything to do with time of day, and overs remaining
They didn’t want to start day 5 with a 20 over old ball
Instead have 12 - 15 at them and make them start again the next day with a relatively new ball.
Once the juice went out of the ball - batting looked much easier
I suspect 400 was the target, I think they believed Carey would not go out and get the team there quickly in a couple of overs. No one else had the pads so they had to declare.
Some rain and dropped chances cost the win, not the timing of the declaration.
I think the Aussies were a bit gun shy due to stuffing up a few 4th innings recently.
The previous 4 days had shown the pitch wasn’t too hard to bat on once the ball got a bit older. When you bat teams out of the game you give them no incentive to take risks trying to chase the target. If you dangle a carrot you’ve got a better chance of bowling them out IMO.
You gotta risk losing sometimes to win.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Declarations targets are always easier to make after the game is over. As it turned out, we could have declared any time after 159 (end of over 51) and still not lost - although the dynamics of the game might have been different. I would have declared after Usman got his century i.e. at the end of over 67. He batted on for another 2 overs. Pretty close.
I think it was a good declaration. Not too conservative and still leaving 100+ overs a fifth day wicket. Bairstow and Stokes were going there for a while in the first innings and they were scoring at 6 an over easy. 8-10 overs and 50 runs less on the target would have completely changed the fourth innings and perhaps the Aussies were aware that England, for all their batting frailty, have some guys who can score in a hurry.
Some good arguments above.
yes..
1) keep the ball fresh is an interesting one...2/5 (just do more damage in the evening? )
2) Should have declared after Usman made 100 ..well, but we look weak mentally (not team first) ...3/5
3) Aussies gun shy...mmnn ..maybe yes...3/5
4) 91 overs was not enough + ...yes 4/5..hard to argue given how piss-weak Eng have been..
I know it is easy in hindsight, but I wonder what could have been!!
The POms are obviously looking better.
Glad Usman got his ton. Looks like he's been unlucky at the selection table.
I wonder if the Cummins and Langer had a word in Khawaja's ear to the tune of, 'Look, we are gonna declare at over so and so...'. ???
I thought it was a perfect declaration. Enough runs on the board to just about put victory out of the English reach -- though Headingley of course would have been in the back of all their minds -- and more than enough overs to bowl them out. We fell one wicket short. Ho-hum. Great captaincy from Cummins and the game was a dead rubber anyway.
As much as I'd love a whitewash I've learned to never be greedy as a Saints fan.
This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
Sanity has prevailed. Khawaja holds his spot and moves up to open with Warner. Head comes back in. Harris dropped.
Waiting on a fitness test this arvo (i.e bowl in the nets) to see if ScoBo comes up after injuring himself in Sydney. Some conjecture also around that Starc may need a rest. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/ ... arris-axed
Reported both of you to the appropriate authorities for using ludicrous nicknames.
This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
Marcus Harris is the happiest bloke in the dressing room. At least his career is still on life support. If he'd played, the plug would have been pulled.