Finals. AFL. 2021

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924923Post perfectionist »

Umpiring was OK. The ARC was a joke. Looks like Marcus Bontempelli has a calf and will be out, along with Cody Weightman with concussion.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924924Post SaintPav »

Umps tried to help them get over the line in last year's EF from memory.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924925Post SaintPav »

The umpiring was ok?

Yeah, right.
🥱


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12750
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924926Post B.M »

Why are they blatantly favoured?

Surely there’s a reason??


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924927Post SaintPav »

The new Hawthorn.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 784 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924930Post Banger9798 »

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/08/31/ ... ck-ladder/

Their lead just increased by another 9 kicks tonight....but clear winners


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924932Post CURLY »

B.M wrote: Sat 04 Sep 2021 11:41pm Why are they blatantly favoured?

Surely there’s a reason??
Has to be something in it. The WB games are nearly unwatchable due to the umpiring. It’s just that bad. I hate Brisbane and tonight I ended up feeling bad for them. It’s cheating nothing more.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924936Post Wayne42 »

The umpiring was fine tonight i thought, mind you, i don't watch the umpires.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924939Post shanegrambeau »

Port would have loved that...to see the Bullies absolutely getting drained of every drop of energy, suffer a massive late injury, a potential concussion ruling and knowing that the dogs have to fly across the country to Perth, hole up, and then fly back to Adelaide to play them..Meanwhile the Port boys are chillin' on the back deck at home with a barbie. (Drinking Coopers)


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924942Post Scollop »

B.M wrote: Sat 04 Sep 2021 11:41pm Why are they blatantly favoured?

Surely there’s a reason??
How many times did you see Bob Murphy or Easton Wood (or these day Marcus Bontempelli) remonstrating with umpires?

Bevo got his grounding and learnt about respecting umpires from the best coach of the modern era. The University of Hawthorn is where they were taught to do everything in your control to make sure you Do Not Give the umpires an excuse to dislike you.

It starts with your coach and your on field leaders. They go out of their way to treat the umpires in a better manner than their opponents. It's drilled into every player to use each moment that they come into contact with an umpire as a moment to show their admiration and respect. It's subtle but it works.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924944Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Sun 05 Sep 2021 3:01am
B.M wrote: Sat 04 Sep 2021 11:41pm Why are they blatantly favoured?

Surely there’s a reason??
How many times did you see Bob Murphy or Easton Wood (or these day Marcus Bontempelli) remonstrating with umpires?

Bevo got his grounding and learnt about respecting umpires from the best coach of the modern era. The University of Hawthorn is where they were taught to do everything in your control to make sure you Do Not Give the umpires an excuse to dislike you.

It starts with your coach and your on field leaders. They go out of their way to treat the umpires in a better manner than their opponents. It's drilled into every player to use each moment that they come into contact with an umpire as a moment to show their admiration and respect. It's subtle but it works.

So what your saying is the umpires cheat.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924945Post Scollop »

No

I'm saying they are not robots and they are not insects (I don't think maggots have feelings :|)

But it's more than that. The players and coaches set the benchmark for all lower and junior leagues.

Surely even the dumbest of the dumb need to realise you cannot show disrespect in any way. It'll cost you like it did for our team under Thommo, and for individuals like Schnieder and Milne and more recently Carlisle

Take it one step further and see what happens when you openly display disrespect with a smattering of aggression. Toby Greene says hello
Last edited by Scollop on Sun 05 Sep 2021 8:22am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924946Post asiu »

i wholeheartedly agree with this

stupid , not to operate this way


It starts with your coach and your on field leaders. They go out of their way to treat the umpires in a better manner than their opponents. It's drilled into every player to use each moment that they come into contact with an umpire as a moment to show their admiration and respect. It's subtle but it works.
but , only every time.




ps
i used it religiously on the cricket field

got away with murder
Last edited by asiu on Sun 05 Sep 2021 8:46am, edited 1 time in total.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924948Post Scollop »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 04 Sep 2021 11:43pm The new Hawthorn.
The Hawthorn players had it drummed into them. Roughead would know


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924949Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Sun 05 Sep 2021 8:04am No

I'm saying they are not robots and they are not insects (I don't think maggots have feelings :|)

But it's more than that. The players and coaches set the benchmark for all lower and junior leagues.

Surely even the dumbest of the dumb need to realise you cannot show disrespect in any way. It'll cost you like it did for our team under Thommo, and for individuals like Schnieder and Milne and more recently Carlisle

Take it one step further and see what happens when you openly display disrespect with a smattering of aggression. Toby Greene says hello

Umpires are there to adjudicate the rules not to make friends. If it’s there it’s a free whether or not they like or dislike the player or club. If k not it’s cheating.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924950Post Scollop »

OK, be stubborn. Disregard all the evidence that points to umpire bias.

Keep thinking that they are not human and they will not favour certain players

Argue with an ump and see how far it gets you

Show disrespect or anger or be a smartarse and continually backchat the umps and see how far it gets you


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924951Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Sun 05 Sep 2021 9:06am OK, be stubborn. Disregard all the evidence that points to umpire bias.

Keep thinking that they are not human and they will not favour certain players

Argue with an ump and see how far it gets you

Show disrespect or anger or be a smartarse and continually backchat the umps and see how far it gets you
Surely it’s simple if it’s a free pay it.

If it’s not it’s play on. If a umpire sees a WB player drop the ball and he thinks he never remonstrates I will allow it. It’s cheating.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924952Post longtimesaint »

WB always seem to get the “rub of the green “ and it’s not the blatant frees but the 50/50 judgement calls that get them home.


One year will be our year
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924953Post Scollop »

It’s going to be close to impossible to have 3 different umpires on the ground thinking exactly the same and adjudicating every single decision exactly the same as each other…and exactly the same as CURLY

You’re saying that all footy followers and all people should think and perceive every football incident exactly the same and every human on earth needs to think like you do

Have you ever thought that maybe you’re the one who is wrong?!?

You want a world where we are all identical. It’s not going to happen. Life is complex. You can't have everything in life be that simple





You want robots to replace humans


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5113
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924954Post Yorkeys »

While we are observing:
I think Dan McKenzie got a bad rap by some (coaching staff?) after being put on Cameron and Betts by Richo a few seasons ago. Cameron is highly skilled quick silver and Betts was very handy at the time. Not sure how Easton Wood quietened Charlie after quarter time, perhaps team coaching (?). Anyway Wood is a star, if aging, and Cameron just made him look pedestrian early.

I think we are good enough to put up respectable performances against this years #4 - #8 teams - conveniently ignoring the floggings we got from Essendon and Doggies when we were off our tucker - but need a couple more elements to be serious contenders (doh!), like a never give up/give in ruthless spirit and as we all know another athletic tall defender and back up ruck.

As much as I admire Brad Hill's skills I find it hard to see us winning a final with him playing half back. The successful teams have really hard nuts in those positions and they are very skilled as well.

Beverage is just about best coach going around (?) E.g. see how Schache has become a footballer under his coaching and Doggies can still win a game after being dominated in the ruck contests by a team with Neale and Zorko in the square.

Daniher isn't much chop in tough games. Fair/unfair?

Wow of a game.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924957Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Sun 05 Sep 2021 9:21am It’s going to be close to impossible to have 3 different umpires on the ground thinking exactly the same and adjudicating every single decision exactly the same as each other…and exactly the same as CURLY

You’re saying that all footy followers and all people should think and perceive every football incident exactly the same and every human on earth needs to think like you do

Have you ever thought that maybe you’re the one who is wrong?!?

You want a world where we are all identical. It’s not going to happen. Life is complex. You can't have everything in life be that simple





You want robots to replace humans

All you want is umpiring without bias. One team cannot continually get the rub of the green. Commentators and the media are even calling it out now. WB are not just getting 50/50 calls they’re getting preferential treatment.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924958Post Ghost Like »

I wholeheartedly agree with you scollop in terms of respect the official, trying to limit displaying your emotion to a decision. Certainly won't rub an umpire with thin skin up the wrong way.

That said, there must be something wrong with the rules of our game when our on field umpires, who are all on six figures, cannot sing from the same prayer book as officials.

We have too many grey / interpretive rules to allow any consistency in human decisions. You are correct that those who are more understanding of umpires have every chance of getting more favourable decisions.

However it also hasn't stopped or harmed decisions being made in the favour of the very demonstrable Selwood & Dangerfield.

Young Highmore needs to pull his head in with regards to trying to tell the umps how they should umpire or critiquing their decisions.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924965Post asiu »

the “rub of the green “
proof of concept right there

'n funny enough , thats the goal


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924966Post Teflon »

Scollop wrote: Sun 05 Sep 2021 3:01am
B.M wrote: Sat 04 Sep 2021 11:41pm Why are they blatantly favoured?

Surely there’s a reason??
How many times did you see Bob Murphy or Easton Wood (or these day Marcus Bontempelli) remonstrating with umpires?

Bevo got his grounding and learnt about respecting umpires from the best coach of the modern era. The University of Hawthorn is where they were taught to do everything in your control to make sure you Do Not Give the umpires an excuse to dislike you.

It starts with your coach and your on field leaders. They go out of their way to treat the umpires in a better manner than their opponents. It's drilled into every player to use each moment that they come into contact with an umpire as a moment to show their admiration and respect. It's subtle but it works.
Yep another GT failing I can hear....
Great lessons from Grant ....lol


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Finals. AFL. 2021

Post: # 1924975Post perfectionist »

In the last two minutes, there was one free paid. A centre ruck infringement - crucial as always, especially when scores are level! This was correct, as Oscar McInerney used his knee to keep Tim English from the contest. After that, there were two other possible frees, neither paid. The first was a push in the back to Laitham Vandermeer, with Brandon Starcevich pushing him forward and landing in the left side of his back. Should have been paid but the fact that a point was scored perhaps deflected the umpires' attention. The second was deliberate out of bounds - where the ball was kicked by both players in their running movement and then was perhaps hit onto the boot of Duryea by Cameron's hand. No free - a correct decision.


Post Reply