Lipinski?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924393Post B.M »

Yes

I would do that


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924408Post saynta »

st.rod wrote: Thu 02 Sep 2021 12:46pm How about a swap for Ben Long?
Does Lipinski put the fear of god into opposition players or make them s*** their shorts?

No thanks.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924467Post B.M »

He might actually get the ball more than 8 times per game though. I would take ten more possessions over an aggressive bump or two anyday!!!

Do you honestly reckon AFL players are fearful?!

You generally don’t get to that level if you hear footsteps

Ben Long is average at best


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6611
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1340 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924473Post Jacks Back »



As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924544Post Ghost Like »

B.M wrote: Thu 02 Sep 2021 4:14pm He might actually get the ball more than 8 times per game though. I would take ten more possessions over an aggressive bump or two anyday!!!

Do you honestly reckon AFL players are fearful?!

You generally don’t get to that level if you hear footsteps

Ben Long is average at best
Forgive me if this sounds contrarian but isn't there someone on this site that uses the phrase "s***s himself" when talking about a kid? That same poster has continued with that analogy as if they are trying to justify themselves from a hissy fit during a Geelong game.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924562Post B.M »

Didn’t I say

s***s himself with the ball - are you talking about Coffield?

You must really take notice of my posts?! To remember that?? I reckon that was a while ago?!

You not a teeny bit obsessed are you?!

I have said, I don’t think it courage comes naturally to Coffield, but he obviously displays plenty of courage at times with his intercept marking!!!

The only player who I’ve ever mentioned something about doing something soft is Jamie Cripps

That was because I saw him take short steps and pull out of a contest in a VFL game!

BTW
Courage doesn’t need a birth certificate.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924565Post Ghost Like »

Quite funny B.M.. You strike me as someone who wouldn't pick & choose on the field but you sure as hell cover your bases when it comes to an opinion. You don't like being pulled up or told you're wrong.

Not obsessed, simply noting your desire to run down kids. Understandable though, no B&Fs, no Brownlow votes, why encourage them? Why give them any value? Why give them any hope? You wouldn't waste your time talking to them, would you?

Fvck me, if you can pick and choose between Cyril's AA merits & Ross's merits, is there any point arguing?

Can we please make a sticky thread, "The Gospel According to St (Big) Mart"? This should allow your pontifications without being questioned.

Amen


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924649Post Wayne42 »

I think we can do without an ego thread, for anyone. Thanks :lol: :lol:


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924650Post Wayne42 »

Lipinski supposedly has nominated either Carlton or Collingwood as preferred destinations if he is traded.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/03/ ... ian-clubs/


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924665Post B.M »

Settle down Ghostlike

It’s only a footy forum


happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1835
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 350 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1924699Post happy feet »

Ghost Like wrote: Thu 02 Sep 2021 11:18pm Quite funny B.M.. You strike me as someone who wouldn't pick & choose on the field but you sure as hell cover your bases when it comes to an opinion. You don't like being pulled up or told you're wrong.

Not obsessed, simply noting your desire to run down kids. Understandable though, no B&Fs, no Brownlow votes, why encourage them? Why give them any value? Why give them any hope? You wouldn't waste your time talking to them, would you?

Fvck me, if you can pick and choose between Cyril's AA merits & Ross's merits, is there any point arguing?

Can we please make a sticky thread, "The Gospel According to St (Big) Mart"? This should allow your pontifications without being questioned.

Amen
[/quote

B.M makes some pretty good posts that are worth reading. I accept he invests more time into this site and footy, analysing statistics and the like. But he lets himself down with an inability to accept the opinions of other as well as his snide remarks that are generally uncalled for and detract from his knowledge about the game and his passion for the Saints.


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 534
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1925030Post BadRossco »

Sorry to cut back to the subject matter but it is all probably academic as Lipinski has nominated Carlton or Collingwood which proves we are not seen as a destination club for young hopefuls. The has beens looking to improve their retirement payout will come but not the likes of Jye Caldwell who preferred the injectors. Some of the reasons could be location, chance of making finals but more likely the financial position and long term viability of the club.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1925032Post B.M »

Howard
Crouch
Hill
Zak Jones


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 784 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1925041Post Banger9798 »

Higgins
Butler


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1925055Post CQ SAINT »

Collingwood and Carlton are a rabble. Lipinski clearly thinks his chances are better at a rabble. He is at a destination club.


BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 534
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Lipinski?

Post: # 1925139Post BadRossco »

Granted we did pick some younger players but Crouch was headed for the cats until Cameron blew their budget so both him and Hill followed the mighty dollar. Jones and Higgins grew up as Saints supporters and Butler and Howard were both looking for more game time but it’s great they came as they have all been handy although one in particular is probably over paid. Hopefully we can become a more attractive destination the development of RSEA park could help as Seaford was a bit of a drawback


Post Reply