Ben King

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12770
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911494Post B.M »

Not sure about that

Whilst he was injured, he was still in the AFL system. In fact, he was part time at StK doing his rehab at 17 in his draft year. With the use of elite facilities.

Recovering from an ACL doesn’t mean you can’t hit the gym, doesn’t mean you can’t begin building a tank.

On crutches 8-12 weeks, walking then jogging within 5 months. Full training in 9 months and playing in 12 months.

He played for Sandy for half a dozen games in his first season, and did his syndosmosis.

Again, with an ankle, you can still hit the gym!!!

One of my criticisms of Max is that he is still scrawny and pushed around with ease. 3 years in a full time training environment and he is skinny as a rake?!

If you look at the photo of Ben on AFL.com
There is no way Max has as big an upper body… WTF is that?!

Add to that, comparing the movement of the pair is interesting
Ben get most of his ball with aggressive leading
Max stands i50 or jogs around with a defender looking completely gassed… his aerobic fitness seems to be horrendous


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911496Post Teflon »

saintsRrising wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:49am
Teflon wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:36am
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:03am Geeez I bet Max would love that delivery. Reckon he’s the better contested mark at this stage but Ben is better at finding space
And you would be right - saw the below post on BF thought it interesting (been banned lately so had lots more Tim to peruse) ...interesting reading but to me...Ben clearly plays the lead up role better ...,Max far better contested ....point is play 1 at roaming CHF/Link player and other out of square .....we’d be a nightmare (still grab mid with this years pick and pray to god we get an academy steal too...)

******************************

The main differences are
- Ben has kicked straight while Max has not. Ben had 55 shots on goal in his 14 games this year and converting at 61.8% while Max has had 48 shots from his 13 games and converting at 37.5%.

- While Ben has 6 more marks inside 50 this year, Max has significantly more contested marks.

- Ben has had 4 GA this year compared to Max's 9, which could be explained by each sides forward set up or Ben backing himself more to kick the goal but the difference in that number just stood out in comparison to how similar all their other numbers are.

And when you look at their one-on-one win rate, Max is in the top bracket alongside Hawkins having a 44% win rate in those contests while only losing 16%. While Ben struggles in one-on-ones with his win rate at 25% while his loss rate is at 39% which puts him 2nd to Josh Bruce for having the worst win-loss differential. This might have more to do with how Gold Coast set up their forward line or move the ball, but also shows the impact of Max's contested marking ability up forward compared to Ben who does better getting that separation from defender to get the uncontested mark.

All this to say, Max isn't really behind his brother in terms of quality. He just has the yips.

That plus the ACL and all the lost recovery time. Ben effectively has a year head start on Max.

Ben has had more experience at the highest level, and more of a run to build his body and tank.

Ben is at 46 games and Max at 31. Typically many players start to really fond their feet after 50 odd games. Big forwards probably longer than that.


With both players they will certainly get a lot, lot better yet.
Yep great shout
And a year of MATCH PLAY in development is a lot - most AFL players, as is widely accepted, don’t hit their straps till 50 games and KPP maybe longer so a full year of playing (close to 2 with rehab/conditioning to get back) is a big difference - Ben was still playing school footy while Max was out.
What’s interesting is Max’s stats at same stages are comparable to Hawkins, Lynch, Hipwood etc in fact not many have had better starts inside 30 games as he’s having
What’s more interesting here is when people say they can’t play in side forward structure- rubbish the stats tell you they are different players and together would be an almighty handful


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3665 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911512Post skeptic »

Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14061
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2094 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911514Post The_Dud »

The difference between the two to me is Ben is in a much better forward set up, got a lot of balls leading into space inside 50, a concept that seems totally foreign to our coaches it would appear!

Also he just looks more confident at this point, again I would put this down to the system he is working in, he's a lot happier.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Viscount Jeremiah
Club Player
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed 23 May 2018 12:51pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911517Post Viscount Jeremiah »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 10:04am The difference between the two to me is Ben is in a much better forward set up, got a lot of balls leading into space inside 50, a concept that seems totally foreign to our coaches it would appear!

Also he just looks more confident at this point, again I would put this down to the system he is working in, he's a lot happier.
And he's also played another season than Max.

For what it's worth though despite playing one less season Max still averages more disposals, contested marks, ground ball gets etc..

What I've noticed about ben is he is sensational at getting free inside 50 and taking uncontested marks inside 50. Max should look at how he is doing that because Max is a better-contested mark already but not as good at getting uncontested marks


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911522Post samuraisaint »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 10:04am The difference between the two to me is Ben is in a much better forward set up, got a lot of balls leading into space inside 50, a concept that seems totally foreign to our coaches it would appear!

Also he just looks more confident at this point, again I would put this down to the system he is working in, he's a lot happier.
It's all about who's delivering the ball to him. The kicks into the forward line are pinpoint passes, or at worst, kicks into the forward line which are not to players being double teamed. The Suns moved the ball really quickly last night. I was impressed by the way they backed themselves in. To be honest, I usually only watch the Suns when they play us, so I wasn't surprised. The last five or six times we have beaten them, but only by single digits, and that includes games in Melbourne at Docklands. (I just checked we have beaten them 6 times in a row - twice in Melbourne - and the last five wins have been by an average 4 points, so we never get an easy game against them.)

One thing they do have in common is that they are good at ground level.

Lockett had guys like Winmar and Harvey kicking the ball to him. Makes a big difference.

If we see Hannebery this year (fingers crossed), watch Ming's numbers go right up.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9153
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911524Post spert »

All the pinpoint passes in the world come to nothing if a FF is not leading. Ben has this in his forward game, Max hasn't, but should if he sees himself as a key position player. Plugger was a hard leader to the ball coming down the field, and when you're coming to the forward line, you have scope to pass to a teammate coming at you.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12770
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911528Post B.M »

Are you saying GC is better coached?


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14061
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2094 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911535Post The_Dud »

Mostly our forward line always seems congested, and times when we get a fast break from half back our forwards are always too far up the ground to take advantage.

If the coach wanted a player/players to hold their ground inside 50 to give us more structure I think we would see that.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911540Post samuraisaint »

B.M wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 11:21am Are you saying GC is better coached?
I am not. I think Ratten is a far better coach than he is given credit for. With our injury list this year we have been up against it since the practice games in March.
I like Dew's press conferences though, he reminds me a bit of the ones Graham Gellie used to give in the good old, bad old days.

I did like the way the Suns took the game on last night however.

Having said that, defensively their game plan does not stand up to intense pressure, and this is why they don't win more than six games a year as a rule.

They won last night because their Full Back Sam Collins was phenomenal. Even so, there is only one of him and Lynch nearly won it for the opposition last night.

Their game plan works best when they have Bing at one end and Collins at the other, because they are both execllent players and will beat their opponent. They have got Touk Miller in the middle who is an absolute beast and who, like Collins, flies under the media radar beacuse the Suns are irrelevant on the footy media landscale. Collins looked injured in the final quarter but, warrior that he is, he played the game out manfully.

Rankine is going to be an absolute ripper too. He is dangerous and the opposition need to put time into him, because he'll kill you if you don't pay him respect. I remember he kicked an absolute freak goal against us last year at Metricon which went close to winning the game for them.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6473
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911543Post Vortex »

skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 9:51am Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t
The only trading currency we have is players, so which players can we afford to trade to get Ben in without robbing Peter to pay Paul? Billings and Dunstan are the only two I can think of that GC MIGHT be interested and I don't think they would take that deal as they are clearly on the record announcing they are in the market for experienced players who can provide onfield leadership. GC will not let Ben go at any cost is how I'm reading the tea leaves so that still leaves us in the market for a key tall.

I think we should be looking to trade players to secure GCS pick 3 to find a key tall at another club because until we do our significant structural problem will keep us in the bottom 8.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911555Post magnifisaint »

Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911561Post desertsaint »

cite mental health issues to excuse going home. use this to pressure the suns into taking billings as a straight swap. put a hit out on hannebury and there's his salary well taken care of with the excess plus the money saved on billings to entice kelly over.
succesful clubs need to play dirty sometimes.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911572Post Saintmatt »

skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 9:51am Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t
Ming and Bing do have the experience of playing together ... but only in the same team; not the same area of the ground. Max was always the forward and Ben always had to play CHB. It wasn't until Max did his knee that Ben played forward. Lloydy has spoken about this a lot.

I see a lot on here about how they would be a nightmare to cover forward but, has anyone thought that at St Kilda - one of them might be way more valuable as a CHB than as a key forward?


Go you red, black & white warriors
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3665 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911580Post skeptic »

Saintmatt wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 5:27pm
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 9:51am Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t
Ming and Bing do have the experience of playing together ... but only in the same team; not the same area of the ground. Max was always the forward and Ben always had to play CHB. It wasn't until Max did his knee that Ben played forward. Lloydy has spoken about this a lot.

I see a lot on here about how they would be a nightmare to cover forward but, has anyone thought that at St Kilda - one of them might be way more valuable as a CHB than as a key forward?
Has been on my mind...

IF we get him and manage to keep Battle... i imagine that Battle and Bing alternate btw CHB/CHF as per match ups and performance. I like the potential versatility


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911585Post Ghost Like »

skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 7:16pm
Saintmatt wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 5:27pm
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 9:51am Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t
Ming and Bing do have the experience of playing together ... but only in the same team; not the same area of the ground. Max was always the forward and Ben always had to play CHB. It wasn't until Max did his knee that Ben played forward. Lloydy has spoken about this a lot.

I see a lot on here about how they would be a nightmare to cover forward but, has anyone thought that at St Kilda - one of them might be way more valuable as a CHB than as a key forward?
Has been on my mind...

IF we get him and manage to keep Battle... i imagine that Battle and Bing alternate btw CHB/CHF as per match ups and performance. I like the potential versatility
Battle may be alternating with Bing but between clubs.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911586Post magnifisaint »

Ghost Like wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 8:22pm
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 7:16pm
Saintmatt wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 5:27pm
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 9:51am Personally I reckon it’s absolutely worth trading away picks/players to get Bing now.

Would be a HUGE coup. Him and Max pbly have experience playing together and would form a great dynamic… are passionate Saints guys and both look like stars in the making
That’s your FF and CHF for 10 years taken care of

Personally I think ppl overrate the value of draft picks - more of them flounder then don’t
Ming and Bing do have the experience of playing together ... but only in the same team; not the same area of the ground. Max was always the forward and Ben always had to play CHB. It wasn't until Max did his knee that Ben played forward. Lloydy has spoken about this a lot.

I see a lot on here about how they would be a nightmare to cover forward but, has anyone thought that at St Kilda - one of them might be way more valuable as a CHB than as a key forward?
Has been on my mind...

IF we get him and manage to keep Battle... i imagine that Battle and Bing alternate btw CHB/CHF as per match ups and performance. I like the potential versatility
Battle may be alternating with Bing but between clubs.
The Sun's would want 4 Josh Battles for one Ben King and they'd still be short changed


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911596Post Wayne42 »

magnifisaint wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 3:13pm Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.
Even an idiot is only guessing when or if Ben might ask for a trade to the Saints.
I think the Suns will keep him, and, there is absolutely NO indication that he wants to go to the Saints, it's purely speculation.

Makes for good forum copy though.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911635Post magnifisaint »

Wayne42 wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 11:32pm
magnifisaint wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 3:13pm Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.
Even an idiot is only guessing when or if Ben might ask for a trade to the Saints.
I think the Suns will keep him, and, there is absolutely NO indication that he wants to go to the Saints, it's purely speculation.

Makes for good forum copy though.
I think in his heart he'd much rather be at the Saints playing with his brother. The Suns realise this and I'm sure St Kilda is trying to figure out what deal has to be made. It's a fait accompli


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911640Post Wayne42 »

magnifisaint wrote: Sat 03 Jul 2021 5:25pm
Wayne42 wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 11:32pm
magnifisaint wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 3:13pm Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.
Even an idiot is only guessing when or if Ben might ask for a trade to the Saints.
I think the Suns will keep him, and, there is absolutely NO indication that he wants to go to the Saints, it's purely speculation.

Makes for good forum copy though.
I think in his heart he'd much rather be at the Saints playing with his brother. The Suns realise this and I'm sure St Kilda is trying to figure out what deal has to be made. It's a fait accompli
The Suns will probably want Marshall and draft picks.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
sainterinsydney
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon 30 Nov 2009 11:03am
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911645Post sainterinsydney »

The fact that Caro said that the Saints are confident of nabbing Bing indicates to me that Bing has obviously either said to Max or the club directly that he wants to come to the Saints. Max and Ben probably speak with each other constantly and it would be shocking that Bing hasnt mentioned something to Max.


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 784 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911649Post Banger9798 »

magnifisaint wrote: Sat 03 Jul 2021 5:25pm
Wayne42 wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 11:32pm
magnifisaint wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 3:13pm Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.
Even an idiot is only guessing when or if Ben might ask for a trade to the Saints.
I think the Suns will keep him, and, there is absolutely NO indication that he wants to go to the Saints, it's purely speculation.

Makes for good forum copy though.
I think in his heart he'd much rather be at the Saints playing with his brother. The Suns realise this and I'm sure St Kilda is trying to figure out what deal has to be made. It's a fait accompli
Love the confidence Magnifisaint
Talk the deal into existence
Of course he's coming to the Saints. How could he not ?


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911654Post Wayne42 »

Banger9798 wrote: Sat 03 Jul 2021 7:05pm
magnifisaint wrote: Sat 03 Jul 2021 5:25pm
Wayne42 wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 11:32pm
magnifisaint wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 3:13pm Of course he's coming to the Saints. Any idiot would know that especially after his brother signs a 4 year extension.
Even an idiot is only guessing when or if Ben might ask for a trade to the Saints.
I think the Suns will keep him, and, there is absolutely NO indication that he wants to go to the Saints, it's purely speculation.

Makes for good forum copy though.
I think in his heart he'd much rather be at the Saints playing with his brother. The Suns realise this and I'm sure St Kilda is trying to figure out what deal has to be made. It's a fait accompli
Love the confidence Magnifisaint
Talk the deal into existence
Of course he's coming to the Saints. How could he not ?
I wonder if the Kings are like the McKay's and don't want to play in the same team. They haven't actually said they want to play together. :lol:


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Post Reply