So there you go.

[The_Dud]

Haha, can't even keep track of your own bulls**t hey Curls?!

I'd love to hear you rationalise how Eleni handing us the game on a silver platter fits into the AFL backed umpiring conspiracy against us that you've been pushing for years

More backflips coming up I think! lol

[CURLY]

Haha, can't even keep track of your own bulls**t hey Curls?!

I'd love to hear you rationalise how Eleni handing us the game on a silver platter fits into the AFL backed umpiring conspiracy against us that you've been pushing for years

More backflips coming up I think! lol

Explain how she did this Dud. Given we were up and had the ball 30 meters out in heaps of space with a minute to go her decision just gave clowns like you reason to cheer.

[saynta]

So we have the HS quoting an AFL spokesperson stating that the umpires got the Butler decision wrong.

Assuming the HS do not fabricate a direct quote from a spokesperson, we have the body that writes and adjudicates the rules confirming the decision was incorrect.

But this is still not good enough for some of our Saintsational resident experts to reassess their take on this decision being correctly awarded

This is not about the lop sided free kick count of the game and my personal belief we were on the bad end of the umpiring in this match, particularly the 2nd half, it is about the one isolated incident in the dying moments of the game which was a decision in our favor which was clearly an umpiring mistake confirmed by the AFL.

The irony is the perpetrator of the mistake was the umpire who was accused of blatant cheating against us by the " moron minority" of the forum. Now what person who blatantly cheats against us actually awards an incorrect free to us in the dying moments to put the match beyond doubt?

This really shows the utter stupidity of some forum members to suggest the umpires are constantly cheating against us.

I think this decision confirms that the female maggot is incompetent rather than a cheat.

[Joffa Burns]

Haha, can't even keep track of your own bulls**t hey Curls?!

I'd love to hear you rationalise how Eleni handing us the game on a silver platter fits into the AFL backed umpiring conspiracy against us that you've been pushing for years

More backflips coming up I think! lol

He should be in either politics or gymnastics with that god given talent to backflip

[Joffa Burns]

I think this decision confirms that the female maggot is incompetent rather than a cheat.

Don't reckon you'll get too many arguments on that point

[Joffa Burns]

Haha, can't even keep track of your own bulls**t hey Curls?!

I'd love to hear you rationalise how Eleni handing us the game on a silver platter fits into the AFL backed umpiring conspiracy against us that you've been pushing for years

More backflips coming up I think! lol

Explain how she did this Dud. Given we were up and had the ball 30 meters out in heaps of space with a minute to go her decision just gave clowns like you reason to cheer.

[The_Dud]

So we have the HS quoting an AFL spokesperson stating that the umpires got the Butler decision wrong.

Assuming the HS do not fabricate a direct quote from a spokesperson, we have the body that writes and adjudicates the rules confirming the decision was incorrect.

But this is still not good enough for some of our Saintsational resident experts to reassess their take on this decision being correctly awarded

This is not about the lop sided free kick count of the game and my personal belief we were on the bad end of the umpiring in this match, particularly the 2nd half, it is about the one isolated incident in the dying moments of the game which was a decision in our favor which was clearly an umpiring mistake confirmed by the AFL.

The irony is the perpetrator of the mistake was the umpire who was accused of blatant cheating against us by the " moron minority" of the forum. Now what person who blatantly cheats against us actually awards an incorrect free to us in the dying moments to put the match beyond doubt?

This really shows the utter stupidity of some forum members to suggest the umpires are constantly cheating against us.

I think this decision confirms that the female maggot is incompetent rather than a cheat.

Speaking of incompetence...

It was an incorrect disposal if it wasn't holding the ball.

Either way it was an infraction and we got a justified free kick.

No, you are wrong. Both holding the ball and incorrect disposal rely on a "legal tackle" first. If it was a "legal tackle" then it was holding the ball. If it wasn't a "legal tackle", that is, a push that was legal, then there was no free, but play on.

It was incorrect disposal and a legitimate freekick.

At least she had the excuse of seeing it once at full speed from one angle...

[CURLY]

The Oracle has spoken the only one who's opinion can be right.

[sunsaint]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

[SaintPav]

and the s*** show just goes on and on and on.....

[CURLY]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

30-14. 7 forward 50 frees to GWS warrants discussion.

[Mr Magic]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

[The_Dud]

The Oracle has spoken the only one who's opinion can be right.

Knowing the rules has nothing to do with opinion.

Maybe reflect on this next time you're going off your tree...

[The_Dud]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

[CURLY]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

You take shots at everyone labeling them everything from sexist to racist and anything else offensive. That isnt the forum we wanted.

[The_Dud]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

You take shots at everyone labeling them everything from sexist to racist and anything else offensive. That isnt the forum we wanted.

Firstly, what's that got to do with umpiring?

Secondly, I know people like you want to continue living in your "boys club / she was asking for it / it's hard to be white" world (just think Parliament house), but it's 2021 Curly, people (by no means just me) are going to call you out on your sh*t now, time to grow up.

[SaintPav]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

Well that just makes you a total hypocrite.

Instead of contributing to the problem, has it ever occurred to you to model the behaviour you want to see!

Let’s be honest; this isn’t even about the umpiring any more.

[CURLY]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

You take shots at everyone labeling them everything from sexist to racist and anything else offensive. That isnt the forum we wanted.

Firstly, what's that got to do with umpiring?

Secondly, I know people like you want to continue living in your "boys club / she was asking for it / it's hard to be white" world (just think Parliament house), but it's 2021 Curly, people (by no means just me) are going to call you out on your sh*t now, time to grow up.

There you go again you can't help yourself. You think by labeling people like you do you somehow win. Your a disgrace but I guess you already know that. Probably a school teacher to I gather going by your antics.

[saynta]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

You take shots at everyone labeling them everything from sexist to racist and anything else offensive. That isnt the forum we wanted.

Firstly, what's that got to do with umpiring?

Secondly, I know people like you want to continue living in your "boys club / she was asking for it / it's hard to be white" world (just think Parliament house), but it's 2021 Curly, people (by no means just me) are going to call you out on your sh*t now, time to grow up.

There you go again you can't help yourself. You think by labeling people like you do you somehow win. Your a disgrace but I guess you already know that. Probably a school teacher to I gather going by your antics.

Nail, hammer. head.

[The_Dud]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

Well that just makes you a total hypocrite.

Instead of contributing to the problem, has it ever occurred to you to model the behaviour you want to see!

Let’s be honest; this isn’t even about the umpiring any more.

I signed up to this site in 2007 apparently, and I've been highlighting Curly's constant spamming about imaginary umpiring conspiracies for only about the last 3 seasons, so I'd say I gave the 'modelling the behaviour I want to see' plan a fair crack already!

[roskilde]

In the heat of the moment, I’d have paid that every single time

I guess technically it’s incorrect but it also feels like it’s in the spirit of the game

Agreed and let's not forget the ball basically spilled in the direction of two saints with some space so free kick or no we were probably going to get a shot.

Its the framing of the decision as the difference between us winning and losing which annoys me most - compounded of course by the general level of bad umpiring on the day.

[CURLY]

In the heat of the moment, I’d have paid that every single time

I guess technically it’s incorrect but it also feels like it’s in the spirit of the game

Agreed and let's not forget the ball basically spilled in the direction of two saints with some space so free kick or no we were probably going to get a shot.

Its the framing of the decision as the difference between us winning and losing which annoys me most - compounded of course by the general level of bad umpiring on the day.

That's the piss off about it. We get reamed for all but 1 minute and apparently we got gifted the game.

[saynta]

In the heat of the moment, I’d have paid that every single time

I guess technically it’s incorrect but it also feels like it’s in the spirit of the game

Agreed and let's not forget the ball basically spilled in the direction of two saints with some space so free kick or no we were probably going to get a shot.

Its the framing of the decision as the difference between us winning and losing which annoys me most - compounded of course by the general level of bad umpiring on the day.

That's the piss off about it. We get reamed for all but 1 minute and apparently we got gifted the game.

Well said mate, f****** well said in fact.

[roskilde]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

There you go again. The 'But mommy he did it first!' defense. Your usual go to when people point out that you're everything you complain Curly is -- and then some!

As I said in the game day thread if it's such a problem for you ban the guy. It's easy to do.

(BTW as we both know it still would be a problem because you just like bickering. Don't pretend without Curly you wouldn't find someone else to bicker with. Know thyself, Dud.)

[saynta]

Oh curly
Seriously do us a favour and just disappear
It's the same irrational stuff week in week out

Please don't Curly.
At least you give the counterbalancing POV to those that find nothing we (Saints) do, vis-a-vis umpiring decisions ,is ever correct.
We're always wrong
Even if an umpire makes a mistake, we're either wrong or it doesn't matter.

I actually find it amazing that posters take aim at Curly and not The Dud for his blatant trolling of Curly re this?
Without the deliberate trolling there would have been very little "tit for tat", IMHO

Without the constant spamming and whinging the issue wouldn't even exist...

I suggested not focusing on the umpires at all, but was quickly shot down, so this is the forum that they wanted.

There you go again. The 'But mommy he did it first!' defense. Your usual go to when people point out that you're everything you complain Curly is -- and then some!

As I said in the game day thread if it's such a problem for you ban the guy. It's easy to do.

(BTW as we both know it still would be a problem because you just like bickering. Don't pretend without Curly you wouldn't find someone else to bicker with. Know thyself, Dud.)

Yeah, spot on but he is already one of two stalkers I have somehow collected.