Saints v Blues

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889895Post sunsaint »

cwrcyn wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 4:10pm Highmore got 9 possessions in a half in his first AFL hit out.
Just a small sample i agree and against Carlton
But liked what i saw
He looked composed was clean with disposal and will improve with more games


Seeya
*************
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889913Post bigcarl »

ace wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 6:13pm
aussie sainter wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 7:58pm Zac Williams enjoy a nice 3-4 week holiday you dog
You can't call him that.
He is part indigenous, a Wiradjuri man.
Careful what you call him or you will have Scollop & Co barking at you.
Perhaps “sniper” is a better description


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889914Post saynta »

bigcarl wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 7:59pm
ace wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 6:13pm
aussie sainter wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 7:58pm Zac Williams enjoy a nice 3-4 week holiday you dog
You can't call him that.
He is part indigenous, a Wiradjuri man.
Careful what you call him or you will have Scollop & Co barking at you.
Perhaps “sniper” is a better description
Well. It was a low act.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889921Post asiu »

a dog is a dog

hey Ace


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
SAINT-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
Has thanked: 576 times
Been thanked: 403 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889928Post SAINT-LEE »

The Fireman wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 11:14pm
Jacks Back wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 11:09pm
bigred wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 10:48pm Defence was terrible. Just loose and completely sloppy.

I cant sit through a whole year of that.

Offence... Ball movement... Was fcuking awesome in that first half.

My main concern is that better teams will tear us a new one if we are that horrible on a turnover.
Carlton scored I reckon 8 goals from stoppages (ball ins and throw ups). Definitely need to tighten up.

At least we walk away with the 4 points!

Did anyone see what happened to Butler as he limped off with about 10 minutes to go in the last qtr?
we got 4 points ?
Cramps for Butler, he was on the electrolytes all night after the game


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 497 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889929Post Moods »

Beno88 wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 7:51am Some vastly different views of the game on here. Some seriously harsh given it's a practice match.

Sinclair, Hill, Lonie, Ross, Steele, Membrey all excellent. All look in fantastic shape. Looks as though we've learnt how to use Hill effectively.

Clark, Long and Gresham were all good, but seemed to tire after halftime, as many did.

Higgins the best of the new recruits. Crouch a little off. Highmore will debut this year, maybe even round one.

There must be concerns if Ryder goes down while Marshall is out. McKernan and Hunter, while they weren't disgraced last night, will be monstered by the comp's better ruckmen.

Wilkie was strong, but we looked very vulnerable in defence. Leaked goals way too easily, especially from stoppages.

Would've liked to have seen Bytel & Wood get more time. Both were effective in the final quarter. McKenzie was ok too.

Offensively we were excellent in the first half, ball movement was fluent, direct and we consistently locked the ball inside 50 until we scored. They obviously changed tact in the second half, but the go slow didn't work. We either had too many players running forward of the ball or we lacked the skill to hold on to the footy. One of our downfalls in 2020 was not running as hard back as we do forward, this was still evident last night. That said, I liked the way we responded when challenged in the final term. When Carlton got within a kick, we flicked the switch again and outscored them 21 to 1.

Positive overall, disappointed for Frawley, but I doubt many of us had him in our Round 1 side.
I agree with much of this. What was the go with our defensive stoppages? Terrible. The good news is that surely that can be fixed easily you would think. My opinion was that the blues scored some flukey snap goals out of packs whilst our goals were more structured.

I also thought that it looked like we were trualing a different game plan in the 2nd half. Worrying it appears we only have one pace. Like last year when we try to slow it down and play possession football we look clueless and allowed Carlton back into the game. When we play helter skelter we look dangerous. The problem with that is that the games will go for a lot longer this year, and I fear that we will burn ourselves out. We need to learn to slow the ball down like the Cats do and WC do. I guess to be very effective at that method you need some very dangerous big men all over the ground. Carlisle has a great pair of hands but I'm not sure he will cope with our sprinting style of play. Howard is very athletic. McKernan appears to have a great pair of hands and could be dangerous. Just feel that we are a key big man short down back and forward. Marshall injury hurts. Carlisle was supposed to play that role but appears out of favour.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889940Post Life Long Saint »

saynta wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 8:07pm
bigcarl wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 7:59pm
ace wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 6:13pm
aussie sainter wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 7:58pm Zac Williams enjoy a nice 3-4 week holiday you dog
You can't call him that.
He is part indigenous, a Wiradjuri man.
Careful what you call him or you will have Scollop & Co barking at you.
Perhaps “sniper” is a better description
Well. It was a low act.
Completely unnecessaary considering it was a practice match.
The Blues made three late hits on the night all resulting in downfield frees.
It's not tough. Just dumb footy before the season has even started.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889943Post samuraisaint »

Moods wrote: Sat 06 Mar 2021 1:53am
Beno88 wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 7:51am Some vastly different views of the game on here. Some seriously harsh given it's a practice match.

Sinclair, Hill, Lonie, Ross, Steele, Membrey all excellent. All look in fantastic shape. Looks as though we've learnt how to use Hill effectively.

Clark, Long and Gresham were all good, but seemed to tire after halftime, as many did.

Higgins the best of the new recruits. Crouch a little off. Highmore will debut this year, maybe even round one.

There must be concerns if Ryder goes down while Marshall is out. McKernan and Hunter, while they weren't disgraced last night, will be monstered by the comp's better ruckmen.

Wilkie was strong, but we looked very vulnerable in defence. Leaked goals way too easily, especially from stoppages.

Would've liked to have seen Bytel & Wood get more time. Both were effective in the final quarter. McKenzie was ok too.

Offensively we were excellent in the first half, ball movement was fluent, direct and we consistently locked the ball inside 50 until we scored. They obviously changed tact in the second half, but the go slow didn't work. We either had too many players running forward of the ball or we lacked the skill to hold on to the footy. One of our downfalls in 2020 was not running as hard back as we do forward, this was still evident last night. That said, I liked the way we responded when challenged in the final term. When Carlton got within a kick, we flicked the switch again and outscored them 21 to 1.

Positive overall, disappointed for Frawley, but I doubt many of us had him in our Round 1 side.
I agree with much of this. What was the go with our defensive stoppages? Terrible. The good news is that surely that can be fixed easily you would think. My opinion was that the blues scored some flukey snap goals out of packs whilst our goals were more structured.

I also thought that it looked like we were trualing a different game plan in the 2nd half. Worrying it appears we only have one pace. Like last year when we try to slow it down and play possession football we look clueless and allowed Carlton back into the game. When we play helter skelter we look dangerous. The problem with that is that the games will go for a lot longer this year, and I fear that we will burn ourselves out. We need to learn to slow the ball down like the Cats do and WC do. I guess to be very effective at that method you need some very dangerous big men all over the ground. Carlisle has a great pair of hands but I'm not sure he will cope with our sprinting style of play. Howard is very athletic. McKernan appears to have a great pair of hands and could be dangerous. Just feel that we are a key big man short down back and forward. Marshall injury hurts. Carlisle was supposed to play that role but appears out of favour.
Agree, except about Carlisle coping with our sprinting style of play. He's our CHB. And we are better with him in the side. Like Longy he succumbs to rash decisions sometimes in the heat of the moment, although this manifests itself in different ways with Carlisle, but there's no doubt we are better with him there. Put him in against the Eagles in our penultimate H&A match last season and we win. A lot of sides get cheap goals quickly against us without him there.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1889953Post saintsRrising »

Moods wrote: Sat 06 Mar 2021 1:53am My opinion was that the blues scored some flukey snap goals out of packs whilst our goals were more structured.
Well not so much all flukey as often the Blues ruckmen and team mates knew how to position themselves for the forward ball ups and Hunter did not and our backs were not well postioned. But yes Ryder and Marshall would do much better at this.

Our rucks and backs need to set up better for these plays. So yes I agree we should be capable of doing better at this.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6347
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1890037Post Sainter_Dad »

saintsRrising wrote: Sat 06 Mar 2021 11:17am
Moods wrote: Sat 06 Mar 2021 1:53am My opinion was that the blues scored some flukey snap goals out of packs whilst our goals were more structured.
Well not so much all flukey as often the Blues ruckmen and team mates knew how to position themselves for the forward ball ups and Hunter did not and our backs were not well postioned. But yes Ryder and Marshall would do much better at this.

Our rucks and backs need to set up better for these plays. So yes I agree we should be capable of doing better at this.
Pitonet was roughing Hunter up and physically man handling him out of the around the ground ruck contests - Hunter held his own in the centre bounces but Carlton had the better of the around the ground ruck contests.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1890124Post bigcarl »

Zac Williams cops ban

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-ne ... 071fe8653e

Richly deserved


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1890176Post saynta »

bigcarl wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 7:59pm
ace wrote: Fri 05 Mar 2021 6:13pm
aussie sainter wrote: Thu 04 Mar 2021 7:58pm Zac Williams enjoy a nice 3-4 week holiday you dog
You can't call him that.
He is part indigenous, a Wiradjuri man.
Careful what you call him or you will have Scollop & Co barking at you.
Perhaps “sniper” is a better description
The brown bagging lowlifes are appealing the low life sniper's one month suspension. :roll:


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5130
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1458 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1890182Post Yorkeys »

Late addendum: I can report Carlton supporters at Lockett end, L2 were ungracious and seemed to dislike the umpiring; found it hard to acknowledge a) individuals skills of the Saints and b) that we were playing them on a brake. The Saints people singing coming out was pretty uplifting and some of the lines most amusing. I sense an enjoyable season, footy gods willing.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Saints v Blues

Post: # 1890203Post saynta »

Good. The sniper lost his appeal. Will be missing round 1


Post Reply