I saw him as similar to Steele, who cost us a future second. Paying a first plus something seems a high price.damienc wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 12:46pm Not quite understanding the over the top enthusiasm for Caldwell.
Anyone would think he is an A grade world beater.
Reality check. Played a total of 11 AFL games. Was not a regular in the Giants best 18.
Has potential, is the most you could say about him. Maybe potential.
If we get Higgins to go with Crouch and McKernan plus a Frawley, then I don't think we need a Caldwell.
Just saying.
The Caldwell conundrum
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 595 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1167 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Correct. Jye is a very good player. He'll be excellent.
But he won't make us better next year. I can see Ross barely getting much of a run in our midfield next year, let alone Jye. Jye would spend a bit of time at Sandy should he have ever come to us.
Go you red, black & white warriors
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Probably true. But I have to admire Essendon’s trade strategy if they pull it all off. Caldwell will be a 10 year player, Dunkley too. I’m glad we’re not going for Treloar because with Hannebery, Crouch and Hill we have already recruited three highly paid players who are into the last third of their careers. Caldwell and Dunkley are still in their first trimester. Would prefer to be recruiting a mix of younger guys as well who can be long term Saints. Like we did last year with Howard, Butler and Jones.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
St Kilda actually took Max King at 4 in that draft but Caldwell was strongly considered.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3637
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 492 times
- Been thanked: 316 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Would GWS accept pick 21?
I know he chose the Bombers but surely he would come around to playing for the team he supported as a kid, if we could get the job done.
I know he chose the Bombers but surely he would come around to playing for the team he supported as a kid, if we could get the job done.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Oh FFS give it a rest.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Your acquaintance rang you. Remember, nobody wants to own up to being your mate!SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
Saint supporter since '62
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Why write this crap !! Seriously this forum needs an area where muppets can post total crap ...
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
We don't have the trade currency to buy Caldwell (we have a vault protecting both 2000 and 2021 first rounders)SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
Our only hope of securing him this year is he goes into the pre season draft in which case expect Hawthorn to grab him ahead of Essendon.
Only if both of them fail do we get a look in.
Now if he goes back to GWS for a year then he is a possibility.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
If he agrees to come to us we are happy to use our FRDP.ace wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:36pmWe don't have the trade currency to buy Caldwell (we have a vault protecting both 2000 and 2021 first rounders)SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
Our only hope of securing him this year is he goes into the pre season draft in which case expect Hawthorn to grab him ahead of Essendon.
Only if both of them fail do we get a look in.
Now if he goes back to GWS for a year then he is a possibility.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
No need for you to read my posts st.byron. Anyway, I am saying goodbye in 100 minutes and heading back to Bigfooty.st.byron wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:25pmOh FFS give it a rest.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
That's actually Richmond's first round draft pick we swapped FRDPs in the Higgins trade.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:44pmIf he agrees to come to us we are happy to use our FRDP.ace wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:36pmWe don't have the trade currency to buy Caldwell (we have a vault protecting both 2000 and 2021 first rounders)SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
Our only hope of securing him this year is he goes into the pre season draft in which case expect Hawthorn to grab him ahead of Essendon.
Only if both of them fail do we get a look in.
Now if he goes back to GWS for a year then he is a possibility.
Presently pick 21 but lucky if not 25 or later on the night.
GWS says goodbye to you.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2020 8:23pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
It was Richmond's FRDP but it's ours now.ace wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:50pmThat's actually Richmond's first round draft pick we swapped FRDPs in the Higgins trade.SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:44pmIf he agrees to come to us we are happy to use our FRDP.ace wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:36pmWe don't have the trade currency to buy Caldwell (we have a vault protecting both 2000 and 2021 first rounders)SaintPelican66 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Nov 2020 5:17pm My mate just rang me again. We are currently talking to Caldwell again.
Our only hope of securing him this year is he goes into the pre season draft in which case expect Hawthorn to grab him ahead of Essendon.
Only if both of them fail do we get a look in.
Now if he goes back to GWS for a year then he is a possibility.
Presently pick 21 but lucky if not 25 or later on the night.
GWS says goodbye to you.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4344
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
Caldwell? No........that's not going to happen. He's already committed to those Sh#tbags. End of story
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: The Caldwell conundrum
GWS capitulated for 2 seconds
Pick 29 and future 2nd both tied to Essendon so = 1306 points
Returned 44 and 74 worth 362 points
So Dildo got Caldwell for 944 points equivalent to pick 19.
Pick 29 and future 2nd both tied to Essendon so = 1306 points
Returned 44 and 74 worth 362 points
So Dildo got Caldwell for 944 points equivalent to pick 19.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times