CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 1:26pmIn a heartbeat but he aint going anywhere.Vortex wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 1:20pmIn his first few years he looked like a high school kid against men and always seem to have that look a bunny gets with the high beam on. He still does.saintkid wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 11:28pmWith all due respect, I cannot believe this comment. There are many times when Billings has been unable to hold a tackle. His physical limitations are still quite obvious. After seven seasons, he should be performing much better and a lot more consistent.The_Dud wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 8:15pmBillings is one of the only blokes in the team who actually knows how to stick a tackle.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 10:50am Again, the Billings hate is quite confusing. Claims he pulled out of two contests on Friday night is rubbish. Billings takes his turn. To s*** can him yet claim we can get Taranto if we trade him, makes no sense. He's either good or he's not, he has value or he doesn't. Make up your minds.
I read somewhere that he can be covered??? If he was that easy to cover why are Lonie, Kent, Marsh, Sinclair getting games. He's had a better year than Hannebery, Hill and Ross.
Billings is vital for our next Premiership tilt. Has Norm Smith written all over him, maybe, maybe not but I can see him being a Premiership player. If Hill can have 3, JB certainly deserves one.
Billings has had a disappointing year and anyone assessing him objectively would draw on this. His performance tonight in the Trevor Barker Award speaks for itself. Another underwhelming year, at an age and stage of his career where he should shine.
Please let's be impartial here and move away from the 'favorites bandwagon' for a moment.
At his age and draft postion he should be in the top 10 of every TB list. Time to get ruthless and use what currency he has to trade up to a finals capable player.
No disrespect. It is what it is.
Brad Hill
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Brad Hill
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Tue 21 Feb 2012 1:59pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: Brad Hill
Seriously Billings is soft as a marshmallow.
I honestly believe we should shop him around and see whats on offer did pull out of contests on Friday evening and thats not the first time he has done that .
Does not hurt the opposition and so overrated by some on here.
I honestly believe we should shop him around and see whats on offer did pull out of contests on Friday evening and thats not the first time he has done that .
Does not hurt the opposition and so overrated by some on here.
- johnearljames
- Club Player
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue 21 Jul 2020 1:25pm
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 155 times
Re: Brad Hill
You can't have 22 players that play like Jack Steele or Dougal Howard nor do you what them all to be like that.
Every footy club needs those highly skilled players like Billings and Hill.
Get real people.
Every footy club needs those highly skilled players like Billings and Hill.
Get real people.
Want to watch the most boring and devious thing on television and probably in mankind's history, then tune into a daily live press conference at 11am.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: Brad Hill
If you want to trade Billings you will need to reverse Ratt's thinking for a start. He has already stated his plans for Billings for next year - one of the reasons for getting in a mid or 2 is to allow players who can hit the scoreboard to spend a lot more time in the forward line - Billings was specifically mentioned. Post match presser after Tigers loss.Vortex wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 1:20pmIn his first few years he looked like a high school kid against men and always seem to have that look a bunny gets with the high beam on. He still does.saintkid wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 11:28pmWith all due respect, I cannot believe this comment. There are many times when Billings has been unable to hold a tackle. His physical limitations are still quite obvious. After seven seasons, he should be performing much better and a lot more consistent.The_Dud wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 8:15pmBillings is one of the only blokes in the team who actually knows how to stick a tackle.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 10:50am Again, the Billings hate is quite confusing. Claims he pulled out of two contests on Friday night is rubbish. Billings takes his turn. To s*** can him yet claim we can get Taranto if we trade him, makes no sense. He's either good or he's not, he has value or he doesn't. Make up your minds.
I read somewhere that he can be covered??? If he was that easy to cover why are Lonie, Kent, Marsh, Sinclair getting games. He's had a better year than Hannebery, Hill and Ross.
Billings is vital for our next Premiership tilt. Has Norm Smith written all over him, maybe, maybe not but I can see him being a Premiership player. If Hill can have 3, JB certainly deserves one.
Billings has had a disappointing year and anyone assessing him objectively would draw on this. His performance tonight in the Trevor Barker Award speaks for itself. Another underwhelming year, at an age and stage of his career where he should shine.
Please let's be impartial here and move away from the 'favorites bandwagon' for a moment.
At his age and draft postion he should be in the top 10 of every TB list. Time to get ruthless and use what currency he has to trade up to a finals capable player.
No disrespect. It is what it is.
As for being in the top 10 of every TB list, apart from his early years, he HAS been in the top 10, last 3 years at least. This year an exception, but whilst he was left prominently on the wing for the first half of the season, he would have been at least top 3 in the TB award. Due to injuries to mids, Hannerbury, then Ross, and especially Gresh, Ratts had to change the structure and as a result for the rest of the season Billings, being one of the few capable of playing anywhere except key positions, was shunted all over the place, forward, back, occasionally wing and sometimes on the ball, quite often during a game. Understandably, his output, but not his efficiency, diminished, but still did OK imo. Well up in the stats and second only to Steele in some areas.
You don't let elite ball users go, much harder to find than grunt players. Thankfully the club know that. His contract expires in 2021, and I wouldn't be surprised if the club was in discussions to extend his contract now, perhaps even entice him to stay by offering the vice captaincy.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5786 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Brad Hill
I keep hearing this, I've watched the game twice, when were they?Laurie wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 2:41pm Seriously Billings is soft as a marshmallow.
I honestly believe we should shop him around and see whats on offer did pull out of contests on Friday evening and thats not the first time he has done that .
Does not hurt the opposition and so overrated by some on here.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Brad Hill
Gee we are in trouble if he is given an onfield leadership role, he's anything but.takeaway wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 3:06pmIf you want to trade Billings you will need to reverse Ratt's thinking for a start. He has already stated his plans for Billings for next year - one of the reasons for getting in a mid or 2 is to allow players who can hit the scoreboard to spend a lot more time in the forward line - Billings was specifically mentioned. Post match presser after Tigers loss.Vortex wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 1:20pmIn his first few years he looked like a high school kid against men and always seem to have that look a bunny gets with the high beam on. He still does.saintkid wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 11:28pmWith all due respect, I cannot believe this comment. There are many times when Billings has been unable to hold a tackle. His physical limitations are still quite obvious. After seven seasons, he should be performing much better and a lot more consistent.The_Dud wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 8:15pmBillings is one of the only blokes in the team who actually knows how to stick a tackle.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 10:50am Again, the Billings hate is quite confusing. Claims he pulled out of two contests on Friday night is rubbish. Billings takes his turn. To s*** can him yet claim we can get Taranto if we trade him, makes no sense. He's either good or he's not, he has value or he doesn't. Make up your minds.
I read somewhere that he can be covered??? If he was that easy to cover why are Lonie, Kent, Marsh, Sinclair getting games. He's had a better year than Hannebery, Hill and Ross.
Billings is vital for our next Premiership tilt. Has Norm Smith written all over him, maybe, maybe not but I can see him being a Premiership player. If Hill can have 3, JB certainly deserves one.
Billings has had a disappointing year and anyone assessing him objectively would draw on this. His performance tonight in the Trevor Barker Award speaks for itself. Another underwhelming year, at an age and stage of his career where he should shine.
Please let's be impartial here and move away from the 'favorites bandwagon' for a moment.
At his age and draft postion he should be in the top 10 of every TB list. Time to get ruthless and use what currency he has to trade up to a finals capable player.
No disrespect. It is what it is.
As for being in the top 10 of every TB list, apart from his early years, he HAS been in the top 10, last 3 years at least. This year an exception, but whilst he was left prominently on the wing for the first half of the season, he would have been at least top 3 in the TB award. Due to injuries to mids, Hannerbury, then Ross, and especially Gresh, Ratts had to change the structure and as a result for the rest of the season Billings, being one of the few capable of playing anywhere except key positions, was shunted all over the place, forward, back, occasionally wing and sometimes on the ball, quite often during a game. Understandably, his output, but not his efficiency, diminished, but still did OK imo. Well up in the stats and second only to Steele in some areas.
You don't let elite ball users go, much harder to find than grunt players. Thankfully the club know that. His contract expires in 2021, and I wouldn't be surprised if the club was in discussions to extend his contract now, perhaps even entice him to stay by offering the vice captaincy.
Having said that I can see why Ratts wants to turn him into a role player.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23164
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9113 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Brad Hill
Vortex wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 4:49pmGee we are in trouble if he is given an onfield leadership role, he's anything but.takeaway wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 3:06pmIf you want to trade Billings you will need to reverse Ratt's thinking for a start. He has already stated his plans for Billings for next year - one of the reasons for getting in a mid or 2 is to allow players who can hit the scoreboard to spend a lot more time in the forward line - Billings was specifically mentioned. Post match presser after Tigers loss.Vortex wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 1:20pmIn his first few years he looked like a high school kid against men and always seem to have that look a bunny gets with the high beam on. He still does.saintkid wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 11:28pmWith all due respect, I cannot believe this comment. There are many times when Billings has been unable to hold a tackle. His physical limitations are still quite obvious. After seven seasons, he should be performing much better and a lot more consistent.The_Dud wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 8:15pmBillings is one of the only blokes in the team who actually knows how to stick a tackle.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 10:50am Again, the Billings hate is quite confusing. Claims he pulled out of two contests on Friday night is rubbish. Billings takes his turn. To s*** can him yet claim we can get Taranto if we trade him, makes no sense. He's either good or he's not, he has value or he doesn't. Make up your minds.
I read somewhere that he can be covered??? If he was that easy to cover why are Lonie, Kent, Marsh, Sinclair getting games. He's had a better year than Hannebery, Hill and Ross.
Billings is vital for our next Premiership tilt. Has Norm Smith written all over him, maybe, maybe not but I can see him being a Premiership player. If Hill can have 3, JB certainly deserves one.
Billings has had a disappointing year and anyone assessing him objectively would draw on this. His performance tonight in the Trevor Barker Award speaks for itself. Another underwhelming year, at an age and stage of his career where he should shine.
Please let's be impartial here and move away from the 'favorites bandwagon' for a moment.
At his age and draft postion he should be in the top 10 of every TB list. Time to get ruthless and use what currency he has to trade up to a finals capable player.
No disrespect. It is what it is.
As for being in the top 10 of every TB list, apart from his early years, he HAS been in the top 10, last 3 years at least. This year an exception, but whilst he was left prominently on the wing for the first half of the season, he would have been at least top 3 in the TB award. Due to injuries to mids, Hannerbury, then Ross, and especially Gresh, Ratts had to change the structure and as a result for the rest of the season Billings, being one of the few capable of playing anywhere except key positions, was shunted all over the place, forward, back, occasionally wing and sometimes on the ball, quite often during a game. Understandably, his output, but not his efficiency, diminished, but still did OK imo. Well up in the stats and second only to Steele in some areas.
You don't let elite ball users go, much harder to find than grunt players. Thankfully the club know that. His contract expires in 2021, and I wouldn't be surprised if the club was in discussions to extend his contract now, perhaps even entice him to stay by offering the vice captaincy.
Having said that I can see why Ratts wants to turn him into a role player.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2018 7:42pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Brad Hill
Longer quarters next year will allow him to shine through. (I hope)
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: Brad Hill
At Marvel ?Saintmatt wrote: ↑Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:39pm I’m a huge fan of Hill (my ex is a Dawks supporter and I’ve watched a lot of him) but, tonight he had a poor game. But he was terrific the two weeks prior.
Of all our new players - he’s the one who’s had the hardest time being used properly in our game plan. He’s a bona fide proper wingman who excels at the end of quarters and matches - he’s still running at the same pace and intensity in the last min as first.
He’s the one with another pre-season of training our game plan that will make us seriously good. Especially at Marvel.
First we have to be released from our 5km prisons.
Then players need to be allowed to train as a team, not just players living in the same household training together for 1 hour a day.
We could be playing in Queensland again next year.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Brad Hill
FP players are where you hide the lower contributors so I would say for the 800k we pay Billings I'd be looking to play him on a other team. Use his trade value while we can.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14061
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2094 times
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14061
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2094 times
Re: Brad Hill
Yep, it's pretty clear to everyone the guy does himself no favours by blatantly shirking contests.Peanut Farm wrote: ↑Mon 12 Oct 2020 10:48pm Hill got absolutely torched by Cornes on Footy Classified tonight - 100% spot on.
I also liked how Llyody put it on him that he can't just hide behind the excuse "they don't give me the ball", he's got to win his own ball at times too.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: Brad Hill
Yep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Brad Hill
I rate you as an astute and objective observer. Well picked up. (Insert emoji)takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:11amYep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.
Billings is a keeper. It's that soft Brad Hill we should kick out. He's on 900k.
Ps...both are keepers.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Brad Hill
Be fair... the 3 touches Kent gets in his ‘up the ground role’ + his 2 goals in nearly 3 months are far more valuable than what a player like Billings could ever hope to contribute. You just don’t understand modern football, or the modern forward pocket, or the role of specialists role players.takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:11amYep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: Brad Hill
Oh boy, don't tell me we are going to have to listen to you troll this site with your pet expert subject matter all summer. We get it already.skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 12:49pmBe fair... the 3 touches Kent gets in his ‘up the ground role’ + his 2 goals in nearly 3 months are far more valuable than what a player like Billings could ever hope to contribute. You just don’t understand modern football, or the modern forward pocket, or the role of specialists role players.takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:11amYep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14061
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2094 times
Re: Brad Hill
Oh the ironyVortex wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 2:09pmOh boy, don't tell me we are going to have to listen to you troll this site with your pet expert subject matter all summer. We get it already.skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 12:49pmBe fair... the 3 touches Kent gets in his ‘up the ground role’ + his 2 goals in nearly 3 months are far more valuable than what a player like Billings could ever hope to contribute. You just don’t understand modern football, or the modern forward pocket, or the role of specialists role players.takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:11amYep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Brad Hill
Self reflection can be hardThe_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 7:07pmOh the ironyVortex wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 2:09pmOh boy, don't tell me we are going to have to listen to you troll this site with your pet expert subject matter all summer. We get it already.skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 12:49pmBe fair... the 3 touches Kent gets in his ‘up the ground role’ + his 2 goals in nearly 3 months are far more valuable than what a player like Billings could ever hope to contribute. You just don’t understand modern football, or the modern forward pocket, or the role of specialists role players.takeaway wrote: ↑Tue 13 Oct 2020 9:11amYep, the lower contributors like Charlie Cameron, Toby Greene, etc. I see for effect you've applied the SS incremental formula to Billings salary, which is not 800k.
I think it's time for your next campaign subject.