Match Thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868451Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:47pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:45pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:43pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:41pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:39pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:36pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:34pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:30pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:05pm 6.14, pretty much sums it up.

We’ve regressed back to the Richo era Saints. We’ve totally forgotten what we did and how we played the first half of the year.

Too many plodders keep getting picked. Seb team high clangers again. Geary cost us the first goal of the game and 2 in the last quarter. How many goals has Hill kicked this year? King looks to have the cleanest hands on the ground in our forward 50...

We haven’t played a good game since we beat the Swans. Time to stop accepting mediocrity.

Like someone said earlier, my opinion of Ratten has dropped this second half of the season. What is the game plan? Why do we keep making the same mistakes over and over and over...
You actually lie
How many forward 50 tackles again?
You lied in a attempt to bag our captain. Disgusting.
Cost the first goal of the game by pulling out of the mark and letting Darling get a clear run at it.

Cost the first of the last quarter by letting the ball get passed him in the middle leading to the Kennedy goal, and them getting a run on.

Cost another in the last because he panicked in a simple one-on-one.

He’s a liability.
Such a lier. Especially the Allen free but typical of a lier.
What the f*ck is a ‘lier’???
You. Just make stuff up. Tell untruths. Disgusting habit
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 9:22pm
24 forward 50 tackles no free kicks.
And corrected it. Unlike you who just bullshits


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868453Post Teflon »

suss wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:52pm
Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:47pm
DJ Higgins wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:45pm Terrible shots at goal cost us. taking too many hopeful snaps. Ratten has gotten our skills a lot better but not a tactician in my opinion.
Stop blaming King as the entry to him was terrible and when he got near the ball he was good, especially for a big man.
Hopefully Kent has played his last game for us as he was crap, in fact based on tonight a lot of players could be dropped. Good news is we may only have more week of this crap
King was great tonight
Kid would be a star at Geelong but we’ll stifle his development u watch
Max King?
Tried his guts out tonight the delivery in was shithouse
Honestly the kid shouldn’t be our saviour down there he’s 15 games in?
Ffs let him play as a lead up forward and not bomb it in so he has to outmark a pack


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868456Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:48pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:47pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:45pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:43pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:41pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:39pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:36pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:34pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:30pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:05pm 6.14, pretty much sums it up.

We’ve regressed back to the Richo era Saints. We’ve totally forgotten what we did and how we played the first half of the year.

Too many plodders keep getting picked. Seb team high clangers again. Geary cost us the first goal of the game and 2 in the last quarter. How many goals has Hill kicked this year? King looks to have the cleanest hands on the ground in our forward 50...

We haven’t played a good game since we beat the Swans. Time to stop accepting mediocrity.

Like someone said earlier, my opinion of Ratten has dropped this second half of the season. What is the game plan? Why do we keep making the same mistakes over and over and over...
You actually lie
How many forward 50 tackles again?
You lied in a attempt to bag our captain. Disgusting.
Cost the first goal of the game by pulling out of the mark and letting Darling get a clear run at it.

Cost the first of the last quarter by letting the ball get passed him in the middle leading to the Kennedy goal, and them getting a run on.

Cost another in the last because he panicked in a simple one-on-one.

He’s a liability.
Such a lier. Especially the Allen free but typical of a lier.
What the f*ck is a ‘lier’???
You. Just make stuff up. Tell untruths. Disgusting habit
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 9:22pm
24 forward 50 tackles no free kicks.
And corrected it. Unlike you who just bullshits
Nope, made up some bulls*** but weren’t quite bright enough to realise it is easily fact checked, and got called out for it.

Disgusting habit 👎


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868457Post Teflon »

True Believer wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:02pm
Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:44pm
SaintPav wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:40pm We’re clearly not good enough but better than last season.
I’m not so sure tbh I think we’ve had a good draw and run but there are clearly sides below us that are better
We are pretenders
We've had the same draw as everyone else - play each team once!
Sorry I think we’ve gotten sides at good t8mes aka Tigers and Cats and tonight a half strength wet toast but we are just out of s5eam and have been worked out


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868459Post The_Dud »

Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:51pm
suss wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:52pm
Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:47pm
DJ Higgins wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:45pm Terrible shots at goal cost us. taking too many hopeful snaps. Ratten has gotten our skills a lot better but not a tactician in my opinion.
Stop blaming King as the entry to him was terrible and when he got near the ball he was good, especially for a big man.
Hopefully Kent has played his last game for us as he was crap, in fact based on tonight a lot of players could be dropped. Good news is we may only have more week of this crap
King was great tonight
Kid would be a star at Geelong but we’ll stifle his development u watch
Max King?
Tried his guts out tonight the delivery in was shithouse
Honestly the kid shouldn’t be our saviour down there he’s 15 games in?
Ffs let him play as a lead up forward and not bomb it in so he has to outmark a pack
Yep, dropped one mark in the first he should have taken but that’s it.

Got one opportunity on the lead and gobbled it up, shocker! Hopefully the coaches took note.

Was our best player in F50 when the ball went to ground too.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868461Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:54pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:48pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:47pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:45pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:43pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:41pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:39pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:36pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:34pm
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:30pm
The_Dud wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:05pm 6.14, pretty much sums it up.

We’ve regressed back to the Richo era Saints. We’ve totally forgotten what we did and how we played the first half of the year.

Too many plodders keep getting picked. Seb team high clangers again. Geary cost us the first goal of the game and 2 in the last quarter. How many goals has Hill kicked this year? King looks to have the cleanest hands on the ground in our forward 50...

We haven’t played a good game since we beat the Swans. Time to stop accepting mediocrity.

Like someone said earlier, my opinion of Ratten has dropped this second half of the season. What is the game plan? Why do we keep making the same mistakes over and over and over...
You actually lie
How many forward 50 tackles again?
You lied in a attempt to bag our captain. Disgusting.
Cost the first goal of the game by pulling out of the mark and letting Darling get a clear run at it.

Cost the first of the last quarter by letting the ball get passed him in the middle leading to the Kennedy goal, and them getting a run on.

Cost another in the last because he panicked in a simple one-on-one.

He’s a liability.
Such a lier. Especially the Allen free but typical of a lier.
What the f*ck is a ‘lier’???
You. Just make stuff up. Tell untruths. Disgusting habit
CURLY wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 9:22pm
24 forward 50 tackles no free kicks.
And corrected it. Unlike you who just bullshits
Nope, made up some bulls*** but weren’t quite bright enough to realise it is easily fact checked, and got called out for it.

Disgusting habit 👎
Corrected it to the 10 with out a free and no frees in our forward 50 other than Ryders on the actual 50 line.

You just make stuff up to justify your hatred of Geary.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868465Post The_Dud »

Everything I said was true, try opening your other eye and watching the players instead of counting free kicks.

He’s a liability, and many agree. How many other club captains even have their place in the side questioned?? It’s embarrassing if he’s given another year.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868468Post bigcarl »

Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 11:51pm
suss wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:52pm
Teflon wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:47pm
DJ Higgins wrote: Thu 10 Sep 2020 10:45pm Terrible shots at goal cost us. taking too many hopeful snaps. Ratten has gotten our skills a lot better but not a tactician in my opinion.
Stop blaming King as the entry to him was terrible and when he got near the ball he was good, especially for a big man.
Hopefully Kent has played his last game for us as he was crap, in fact based on tonight a lot of players could be dropped. Good news is we may only have more week of this crap
King was great tonight
Kid would be a star at Geelong but we’ll stifle his development u watch
Max King?
Tried his guts out tonight the delivery in was shithouse
Honestly the kid shouldn’t be our saviour down there he’s 15 games in?
Ffs let him play as a lead up forward and not bomb it in so he has to outmark a pack
Yep. He should be playing Marshall or Ryder deep. They have the upper body strength to compete with full grown men. King is a season away from that


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5971
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 334 times
Been thanked: 711 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868469Post shanegrambeau »

Supporters deserve an explanation about Carllisle's omission. While Howard and Wilkie were honest, the whole defence was beaten. How many loose players were left in open space? Carlisel!! What the F is going on? Coach Explain!

Delist Kent
Membrey - worst season since recruitment - including the one when he couldn't hit a barn door from two meters away.
What a dsisater.

Again - coaching panel! Why was Ryder toiling away against Nat in the last?

Midfield is sooo 'C' grade. Jones doesn't have fingers for a ground ball in traffic. Ross...I dunno, he looks C grade.

Gresham and Dunstan missed.

Butler - as I said early in the season, is patchy, but I concede, small forwards can be. He has played as many sub-par games as great ones.

We are missing confidence too. Billings? Are you OK?

What can they do? The selection committee? they don't want to be seen to be regressive just to win four points. Long may be a forward afterall? Even Savage on a wing?

I wanted Nathan Brown tonight. Remember that guy, but perhaps WC are just too mobile.

Miserable tidings Saints.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
User avatar
SaintDippa
Club Player
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 116 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868471Post SaintDippa »

Same old same old. Games are won by scoring more than the opposition. Der. The way the ball enters the F50 entry therefore is the driver to score more than the opp. Top sides always are kicking to space, always have 15m chip options, always have structure where players are positioned. We, well we bomb and pray. Also how many times tonight did a F50 go straight to an Eagle? Can't beat the top sides playing this way. Had more inside 50 against most top sides but the bomb is expected, planned for and negated. So disappointed. Eagles were primed for the taking and Ratts couldn't get it done.


CarlD
Club Player
Posts: 466
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 12:24pm
Location: Central Coast
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Match Thread

Post: # 1868516Post CarlD »

Last night, in theory, was the Saints' best chance to beat the Eagles for a while. The Eagles were Injury-struck and the weather conditions should have impacted their kick and mark game, yet the scoreboard says that they still found a way to outscore us.

Very disappointed with the last 10 minutes in particular. Having gotten back in control there was little to stop Nic Nat and Kelly doing what they liked at the end. Even allowing for some dubious umpiring, there was a spirit within the Eagles to change the game's momentum yet again. The Saints had little in response.

The game encapsulated where the Saints are at. To be a force in the league there is still a considerable way to go. As has been pointed out by many on here recruiting has had it's flaws and the midfield is a significant problem. One can only hope that if the AFL do reduce list sizes that more Jack Steele apples fall from trees.

Happier that the penny seems to have dropped that kicking out from the back after points should be long unless there is a rolled gold short option with further prospects downfield. In a game of shorter quarters and lower scoring the mistakes from turnovers at the back that have resulted in goals to the opposition may have made the difference between making and not making finals this year. One can only hope that there is enough left in the tank to deal with GWS next week.

Speed kills. I like the idea in concept of playing at pace but if the result is that the opposition's backs intercept mark at will the smalls have less chance to work their magic. However, aside from Dan Butler, I am unconvinced that any of the other smalls offer consistent performance (the earlier comment notwithstanding) and would expect an overhaul for the GWS match.


Post Reply