RUCK Duo Zero

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
SAINT-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1264
Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
Has thanked: 574 times
Been thanked: 398 times

RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848644Post SAINT-LEE »

Is it me or is the RoMo and Ryder show not getting the job done?

Week 1 we got 2 extra hit outs and it seemed okay.
Week 2 we won hit outs by a lot but only just won hit out to advantage.
Week 3 we were beat down by Grundy, only 5 more but he gave 89% advantage compared to Rowan's 43%.

The output from Rowan around the ground has drastically diminished.
Overall Rowan has not improved SO FAR (we cant judge his flippin career off 3 games). But a 3 game sampling of this ruck duo has so far shown Rowan's contested possessions almost half from 2019, his disposals drop 31%, his goals, hell....everything has fallen.

Have the comp figured him out after a breakout season?
Has he lowered intensity with Ryder to back up?

Has the new set up hurt his style? Last year he averaged 67% offensive play...in 2020 its 39%...He's mostly playing defense.


This isnt a sky falling or apocalyptic post just wondering. Not all tag teams on paper equate to increased production.

Not all team system changes suit every players style.

The good news is we have Brett....not the human AL, formerly known as coach, who would've given this failing ruck duo 6 seasons to work it out before making adjustments.


User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6346
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848652Post Sainter_Dad »

SAINT-LEE wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 8:55pm
Week 2 we won hit outs by a lot but only just won hit out to advantage.
I stopped reading here - Against the dogs it was 20 Hitouts to Advantage v 2. You kind Sir/Madam have an over expectation if this is "Only just won".


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848664Post Ghost Like »

To be honest, if Marshall had been the sole ruck, the way most were playing it would have been a 10 to 15 goal drubbing. From memory (I won't be watching it again), the majority of their scoring came when Marshall was rucking and Grundy could select which mid to clear the ball.

Our performance tonight was a genuine team effort. Please do not get sucked in by romanticised memories of Marshall's rucking when he simply replaced, thankfully, Longer who stepped down (not up) after Hickey. RoMa was an accidental ruckman. He's good but has so much to learn, especially now opposition rucks are watching tapes of him now.

We lack a Cripps or Pendlebury to pick up and lead a poor performing midfield. I love Jack Steele, I want him to get vocal and call out the high priced underperformers.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848667Post Spinner »

Ryder's not doing enough around the ground or forward to justify the two. Especially with he reduced quarters.

Expect a change to a single ruck next week, surely.


Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848686Post Saintmatt »

[media][/media]
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 10:19pm To be honest, if Marshall had been the sole ruck, the way most were playing it would have been a 10 to 15 goal drubbing. From memory (I won't be watching it again), the majority of their scoring came when Marshall was rucking and Grundy could select which mid to clear the ball.

Our performance tonight was a genuine team effort. Please do not get sucked in by romanticised memories of Marshall's rucking when he simply replaced, thankfully, Longer who stepped down (not up) after Hickey. RoMa was an accidental ruckman. He's good but has so much to learn, especially now opposition rucks are watching tapes of him now.

We lack a Cripps or Pendlebury to pick up and lead a poor performing midfield. I love Jack Steele, I want him to get vocal and call out the high priced underperformers.
Personally, I’d like Jack Steele to start with calling out his inept stand-in Captain. It makes me sick watching him waddle around the midfield - handballing to feet, dink kicking sideways and pointing at everyone.

He shows zero urgency or energy - not great when he’s got stuff all skill to rely on either 👎🏼


Go you red, black & white warriors
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8388
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1910 times
Been thanked: 887 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848688Post WellardSaint »

Saintmatt wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 12:27am [media][/media]
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 10:19pm To be honest, if Marshall had been the sole ruck, the way most were playing it would have been a 10 to 15 goal drubbing. From memory (I won't be watching it again), the majority of their scoring came when Marshall was rucking and Grundy could select which mid to clear the ball.

Our performance tonight was a genuine team effort. Please do not get sucked in by romanticised memories of Marshall's rucking when he simply replaced, thankfully, Longer who stepped down (not up) after Hickey. RoMa was an accidental ruckman. He's good but has so much to learn, especially now opposition rucks are watching tapes of him now.

We lack a Cripps or Pendlebury to pick up and lead a poor performing midfield. I love Jack Steele, I want him to get vocal and call out the high priced underperformers.
Personally, I’d like Jack Steele to start with calling out his inept stand-in Captain. It makes me sick watching him waddle around the midfield - handballing to feet, dink kicking sideways and pointing at everyone.

He shows zero urgency or energy - not great when he’s got stuff all skill to rely on either 👎🏼
One glaring lazy error was a handpass to a guy's ankles, when that guy was next to a Pie, and Useless stood without moving, no follow-up assist at all. Spectator.
Horrible. And many more like it


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1993 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848691Post bigcarl »

Jumped and beaten everywhere really. Not sure the two rucks is what caused that. Just lost confidence and what started as a dirty day became dirtier by the minute.

Disappointing, but the Magpies are a good side. It will click.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6610
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1338 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848693Post Jacks Back »

SAINT-LEE wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 8:55pm The good news is we have Brett....not the human AL, formerly known as coach, who would've given this failing ruck duo 6 seasons to work it out before making adjustments.
The only thing is, will Ratts drop Ryder when everyone made a song and dance about all the new (old) recruits last year? I'm not sure he will want to embarrass himself by dropping Ryder.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848708Post Ghost Like »

Saintmatt wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 12:27am [media][/media]
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 10:19pm To be honest, if Marshall had been the sole ruck, the way most were playing it would have been a 10 to 15 goal drubbing. From memory (I won't be watching it again), the majority of their scoring came when Marshall was rucking and Grundy could select which mid to clear the ball.

Our performance tonight was a genuine team effort. Please do not get sucked in by romanticised memories of Marshall's rucking when he simply replaced, thankfully, Longer who stepped down (not up) after Hickey. RoMa was an accidental ruckman. He's good but has so much to learn, especially now opposition rucks are watching tapes of him now.

We lack a Cripps or Pendlebury to pick up and lead a poor performing midfield. I love Jack Steele, I want him to get vocal and call out the high priced underperformers.
Personally, I’d like Jack Steele to start with calling out his inept stand-in Captain. It makes me sick watching him waddle around the midfield - handballing to feet, dink kicking sideways and pointing at everyone.

He shows zero urgency or energy - not great when he’s got stuff all skill to rely on either 👎🏼
We can improve immediately by making a statement of intent and make Steele the Captain.


User avatar
Sanctorum
Club Player
Posts: 1961
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 1074 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848731Post Sanctorum »

Ghost Like wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 9:25am
Saintmatt wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 12:27am [media][/media]
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 10:19pm To be honest, if Marshall had been the sole ruck, the way most were playing it would have been a 10 to 15 goal drubbing. From memory (I won't be watching it again), the majority of their scoring came when Marshall was rucking and Grundy could select which mid to clear the ball.

Our performance tonight was a genuine team effort. Please do not get sucked in by romanticised memories of Marshall's rucking when he simply replaced, thankfully, Longer who stepped down (not up) after Hickey. RoMa was an accidental ruckman. He's good but has so much to learn, especially now opposition rucks are watching tapes of him now.

We lack a Cripps or Pendlebury to pick up and lead a poor performing midfield. I love Jack Steele, I want him to get vocal and call out the high priced underperformers.
Personally, I’d like Jack Steele to start with calling out his inept stand-in Captain. It makes me sick watching him waddle around the midfield - handballing to feet, dink kicking sideways and pointing at everyone.

He shows zero urgency or energy - not great when he’s got stuff all skill to rely on either 👎🏼
We can improve immediately by making a statement of intent and make Steele the Captain.
I agree that Seb Ross is not the leader that St Kilda needs but the problem is that the players chose him as VC, and heir-apparent to Geary, and Jack Steele is not even in the leadership group, so it's unlikely he will be promoted to captain this year, as much as we would like to see that...

Of the current leadership group, (apart from C & VC) - Membrey, Roberton, Billings and Hill, I favour Brad Hill as he has the class to lead the team by example, and is obviously respected by the players.

So unfortunately Ross will have the honours - based on last night's game I would drop him for Dunstan, but as with Geary when he's fit, the selectors are not going to dump him.


"Any candidate for political office, once chosen for leadership, must have the will to take the wheel of a very powerful car, tasked from time to time to make a fast journey down a narrow, precipitous mountain road – and be highly skilled at driving. Otherwise, he is disqualified from the company of competent leaders."

John Carroll, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at La Trobe University.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848732Post The_Dud »

It is disappointing that it appears some players are untouchable, and can just cruise along in mediocrity, occasionally having a good game, knowing they’re safe.

While other players can’t get a consistent go in the seniors even though they bust their ass every game they get to play.

Back to the ruck, we can’t have the number 1 ruckman only touching the ball 5 and 8 times a game, that’s back to the Billy Longer days.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4567
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848734Post whiskers3614 »

There's a bloke at Geelong who would perfectly complement Marshall...
Rhys something or other


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848735Post Joffa Burns »

Clearly the Ryder affect is diminishing Romas influence on the game and hurting the performance in my opinion.

The other worrying issue is Romas reluctance to jump at ruck contests last night, was it a strategy against Grundy?

Never wanted Ryder recruited as he was terrible last year but hoped he would turn back the clock in 2020.
Other that touching up a young ruck against the Dogs in the centre square Ryder doesn't look like it, he looks a player to contest the ruck and nothing more, very Longer like.

Perhaps Ryder out and Battle in as a forward, or Battle goes back and Carslile tried forward.
In the shorter games Roma can ruck 95% as he thrives on the workload.

Battle for Ryder please!


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848739Post BarryGrogan »

Our midfield is very, very ordinary.

Without Ryder, I actually think we'd be 0-3 with the lowest % of all time.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9150
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848742Post spert »

BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 2:45pm Our midfield is very, very ordinary.

Without Ryder, I actually think we'd be 0-3 with the lowest % of all time.
Ryder did a good job in the ruck against the Dogs, but the same ground level players who benefitted from his rucking in that game, didn't look interested in the hard ball last night. Not sure about Paddy, but I think Roma is not hitting the contests as he was last season and may need to lift a bit. Maybe Abbott could get a run at some stage.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23155
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9105 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848743Post saynta »

Spinner wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 10:22pm Ryder's not doing enough around the ground or forward to justify the two. Especially with he reduced quarters.

Expect a change to a single ruck next week, surely.
Would be an extremely safe bet.


BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848746Post BarryGrogan »

Jacks Back wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 12:41am
SAINT-LEE wrote: Sat 20 Jun 2020 8:55pm The good news is we have Brett....not the human AL, formerly known as coach, who would've given this failing ruck duo 6 seasons to work it out before making adjustments.
The only thing is, will Ratts drop Ryder when everyone made a song and dance about all the new (old) recruits last year? I'm not sure he will want to embarrass himself by dropping Ryder.
I can't see a reason why Ryder would be dropped.

The club clearly want two ruckmen playing, with most acknowledging that Marshall is a better half forward than he is a ruckman.
I don't think we're even really playing two ruckmen anyway. Marshall was recruited as a key forward, and he's pretty much playing in that role.
Membrey, King and Marshall, with three smalls around them is a decent forward half that has worked well when the midfield is remotely competitive.

Ryder is clearly our best ruckman, and has overall performed better than probably 90% of the team so far this season.


Lonie adds nothing. Gresham is a liability.

Need to hope Bytel can play, and ghat Hunter Clark loses the Dad Bod and can become a midfielder. Otherwise, we'll only ever be a top 6-8 team.



I hope they stick to the plan, as I like what I see in terms of the structure and our style of play.

Once we learn to play together, we'll be a good team.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2080
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848767Post freely »

Sanctorum wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 1:38pm I favour Brad Hill as he has the class to lead the team by example, and is obviously respected by the players.
jeezus. well, there's your problem right there.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848773Post Joffa Burns »

BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 3:34pm with most acknowledging that Marshall is a better half forward than he is a ruckman.

Ryder is clearly our best ruckman,

Lonie adds nothing. Gresham is a liability.
Who is the most that acknowledge Marshall is a better half forward than a ruck man? Couldn’t establish himself as a forward and was 2nd in B&F as a ruck.

In what universe is Ryder currently better than Romas 2019 form. Paddy 2020 is a Longer clone, he’s not the 2016 Ryder.

Gresham a liability? Hind and Marsh were liabilities and perhaps Ryder & even Hannebery who looks disinterested. Gresham has some disposal issues to work on, but that comment is ridiculous.
At least he can win the ball.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Peanut Farm
Club Player
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2018 7:42pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848780Post Peanut Farm »

Joffa Burns wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 6:33pm
BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 21 Jun 2020 3:34pm with most acknowledging that Marshall is a better half forward than he is a ruckman.

Ryder is clearly our best ruckman,

Lonie adds nothing. Gresham is a liability.
Who is the most that acknowledge Marshall is a better half forward than a ruck man? Couldn’t establish himself as a forward and was 2nd in B&F as a ruck.

In what universe is Ryder currently better than Romas 2019 form. Paddy 2020 is a Longer clone, he’s not the 2016 Ryder.

Gresham a liability? Hind and Marsh were liabilities and perhaps Ryder & even Hannebery who looks disinterested. Gresham has some disposal issues to work on, but that comment is ridiculous.
At least he can win the ball.
Marshall & Ryder combo is the least of our problems. We kicked 1 goal after half time in perfect conditions on a big open ground.
Gresham cant kick, agree Hind & Marsh are not up to it. Hannebery....well what can we do? I can go on with a few more players. Hope there at least 4 changes this week.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8388
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1910 times
Been thanked: 887 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848794Post WellardSaint »

Ratten said there'll be games where we will have only one ruckman due to match-ups.
He might drop Ryder this week, to 'go back and work on things' exactly why Robbo didn't get picked.

Let RoMa ruck most of this game to hopefully regain some of his touch.
Tigers play really well re tactics around clearances, and if we let em dominate us in that space, it will get ugly.
Roma being dominant will help us a lot


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848804Post samoht »

We lost the clearances by 11, and Grundy had almost as many possessions as Marshall and Ryder combined.
And by playing one ruckman - they theoretically had another ground-level player that we didn't have who racked up another 20 plus possessions.

So, effectively we were 20 + 11(clearances) = 31 possessions behind - just in the ruck vs Collingwood.

We effectively lost the game just there.

We need to rethink the ruck.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848806Post Joffa Burns »

samoht wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 9:46am We lost the clearances by 11, and Grundy had almost as many possessions as Marshall and Ryder combined.
And by playing one ruckman - they theoretically had another ground-level player that we didn't have who racked up another 20 plus possessions.

So, effectively we were 20 + 11(clearances) = 31 possessions behind - just in the ruck vs Collingwood.

We effectively lost the game just there.
The big concern for me & many on this site was what negative affect the Ryder recruitment may have on Marshalls performance and development.

Assuming Marhsalls 2019 was not a Corey McKernan 1996 one off, you'd suggest the impact is already visible.

Collingwood played Cameron who pretty much played forward so you are correct that they had access to an extra mid die to our selection policy.

One of Marshalls strengths last year was carrying the workload and running out the game.

I doubt Ratten will have the ticker to drop Ryder, even if he thinks its justified though perhaps he thinks the balance is correct. Who knows.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848809Post The_Dud »

Joffa Burns wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 10:23am
samoht wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 9:46am We lost the clearances by 11, and Grundy had almost as many possessions as Marshall and Ryder combined.
And by playing one ruckman - they theoretically had another ground-level player that we didn't have who racked up another 20 plus possessions.

So, effectively we were 20 + 11(clearances) = 31 possessions behind - just in the ruck vs Collingwood.

We effectively lost the game just there.
The big concern for me & many on this site was what negative affect the Ryder recruitment may have on Marshalls performance and development.

Assuming Marhsalls 2019 was not a Corey McKernan 1996 one off, you'd suggest the impact is already visible.

Collingwood played Cameron who pretty much played forward so you are correct that they had access to an extra mid die to our selection policy.

One of Marshalls strengths last year was carrying the workload and running out the game.

I doubt Ratten will have the ticker to drop Ryder, even if he thinks its justified though perhaps he thinks the balance is correct. Who knows.
Yeah, seems a bit odd to take a young guy out of the position where he just came 2nd in the B&F.

Help him out if he needs it, but don't replace him.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: RUCK Duo Zero

Post: # 1848811Post Joffa Burns »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 10:33am
Joffa Burns wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 10:23am
samoht wrote: Mon 22 Jun 2020 9:46am We lost the clearances by 11, and Grundy had almost as many possessions as Marshall and Ryder combined.
And by playing one ruckman - they theoretically had another ground-level player that we didn't have who racked up another 20 plus possessions.

So, effectively we were 20 + 11(clearances) = 31 possessions behind - just in the ruck vs Collingwood.

We effectively lost the game just there.
The big concern for me & many on this site was what negative affect the Ryder recruitment may have on Marshalls performance and development.

Assuming Marhsalls 2019 was not a Corey McKernan 1996 one off, you'd suggest the impact is already visible.

Collingwood played Cameron who pretty much played forward so you are correct that they had access to an extra mid die to our selection policy.

One of Marshalls strengths last year was carrying the workload and running out the game.

I doubt Ratten will have the ticker to drop Ryder, even if he thinks its justified though perhaps he thinks the balance is correct. Who knows.
Yeah, seems a bit odd to take a young guy out of the position where he just came 2nd in the B&F.

Help him out if he needs it, but don't replace him.
Yep, normally you replace a veteran with a young buck, we have the next potential Grundy and have largely replaced him with a veteran.

Marshall can pinch hit forward with some ruck assistance, but I don't know where this Marshall is a forward talk comes from.

He may have been recruited as a forward but he never locked down a spot in the team as a forward, only came to prominence when given ruck duties die to injuries to other players.

Plenty of players are recruited as forwards or backs but make a career in a different position.
When has Marshall ever dominated as a forward?
He's been a dominant and combative ruck.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Post Reply