St Kilda vs Western Bulldogs
10 Jack Billings (STK)
6 Zak Jones (STK)
4 Jack Steele (STK)
3 Josh Dunkley (WB)
3 Daniel Butler (STK)
2 Bailey Smith (WB)
1 Jade Gresham (STK)
1 Bailey Williams (WB)
Coaches votes
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
saynta
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23162
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
-
Scollop
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12099
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3708 times
- Been thanked: 2579 times
-
Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: Coaches votes
The three doggies were the best of the doggies by a long shot - St Kilda had few stand out players - everyone just played better than we expect.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Coaches votes
24 saints
6 doggies
You're a harsh man spinner
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Coaches votes
No Hunter Clark?? Clearly they have no idea hey.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
Simon Templar
- Club Player
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:57pm
- Location: Middura
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Coaches votes
Am I the only one that thought Ryder's stunning silver service to our mids during first 2 and 1/2 quarters, was deserving of at least a MENTION? A ruck clinic he put on with the ball down the throat of our mids which enabled us first use out of the centre!!! A priceless advantage but not one mention in any votes that I've seen.
Go you good things....!!!
-
George27
- Club Player
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Re: Coaches votes
Paddy got plenty of votes from Saintsational members ! See the separate thread. He was terrific.Simon Templar wrote: ↑Tue 16 Jun 2020 12:21am Am I the only one that thought Ryder's stunning silver service to our mids during first 2 and 1/2 quarters, was deserving of at least a MENTION? A ruck clinic he put on with the ball down the throat of our mids which enabled us first use out of the centre!!! A priceless advantage but not one mention in any votes that I've seen.
-
kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Coaches votes
Some of those hitouts from Paddy reminded me of that guy who flipped the ball over the back in the last seconds of the Port game a couple of years ago.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Coaches votes
Correct, it couldn't be that the coaches who officiate have more of a clue of who performed better on the day than a layman supporter who only watched the game on TV.
Must be an AFL conspiracy to cheat Hunter Clark out of a coaches vote, cheating AFL against St Kilda once again
. I don't understand how the Saints allow this to happen.Cheating umpires, cheating fixture and now cheating Hunter Clark out of Coaches votes!
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Coaches votes
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Tue 16 Jun 2020 1:09pmCorrect, it couldn't be that the coaches who officiate have more of a clue of who performed better on the day than a layman supporter who only watched the game on TV.
Must be an AFL conspiracy to cheat Hunter Clark out of a coaches vote, cheating AFL against St Kilda once again
Cheating umpires, cheating fixture and now cheating Hunter Clark out of Coaches votes!
I wasn't the one questioning others that didn't have him in like I was the messiah.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
CQ SAINT
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Coaches votes
Clark does a lot of good things. Ball chasing and running out of key defensive posts aren't amongst them. He needs to be more aware of where his man is and he needs to make better choices about blocking the skinny defensive side and leaving his man on the fat side creating a possible overlap or outnumber. Coaches will exploit that.
He is an attacking player and treads the outside waiting to pounce, block and rebound or sweep and drive the ball forward. He does this effectively, if not impressively but you can't be everywhere at once.
If not for bad kicking by the dogs we could have been 18 points behind very quickly early on because of ball chasing on the skinny side of defensive zones. Clark was either running back or on the wrong side on 4 Bulldogs attacks in the first 6 or so minutes. Then he does something brilliant and sets up a goal with 2 possessions in a play.
It got corrected and he worked harder to make better position in the next 3 quarter but a lot of what goes wrong with our backline is pressure we create by bad positioning.
Was he worth a vote, I'd give him one but maybe he is being reminded a bit about both aspects of his abilities. He is a good defender and a good attacker but he clearly has a preference on which way he impacts.
He is an attacking player and treads the outside waiting to pounce, block and rebound or sweep and drive the ball forward. He does this effectively, if not impressively but you can't be everywhere at once.
If not for bad kicking by the dogs we could have been 18 points behind very quickly early on because of ball chasing on the skinny side of defensive zones. Clark was either running back or on the wrong side on 4 Bulldogs attacks in the first 6 or so minutes. Then he does something brilliant and sets up a goal with 2 possessions in a play.
It got corrected and he worked harder to make better position in the next 3 quarter but a lot of what goes wrong with our backline is pressure we create by bad positioning.
Was he worth a vote, I'd give him one but maybe he is being reminded a bit about both aspects of his abilities. He is a good defender and a good attacker but he clearly has a preference on which way he impacts.