Marsh 2 Game thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 497 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841521Post Moods »

Thanks guys. Good news :D


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841522Post skeptic »

What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841523Post Secret Kiel »

skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
It was good wasn't it. His movement in congestion and skills to distribute under pressure was very good. He's really worked hard in the gym too, he looks likes the enjoys the body work.


Image
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14061
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841525Post The_Dud »

skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:09pm What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery
I watched most of the game, was doing other things at the time, but for me...

Didn’t notice Battle early, but seemed to come more into the game late.

Howard looked good when the ball came down back. Same as Roberton. Neither dominated but did enough. Seems we have a lot of this kind of player.

King’s first half was very good, except for kicking for goal. Missed 3 very gettable set shots, should have kicked 4 before half time. Went out of the game in the second half.

Hannebry was a bit disappointing for mine. Didn’t notice him much.

Hill and Jones stood out for me, maybe because they’re new. Long BOG for mine too.

Ryder looked good in the ruck, but I feel he took away from Marshal’s game, which is my worry going into the season with both of them.
Last edited by The_Dud on Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:17pm, edited 1 time in total.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Viscount Jeremiah
Club Player
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed 23 May 2018 12:51pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841526Post Viscount Jeremiah »

Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:12pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
It was good wasn't it. His movement in congestion and skills to distribute under pressure was very good. He's really worked hard in the gym too, he looks likes the enjoys the body work.

Long has a bit of mongrel in him as well..

You won't see many players break his tackles or beat him 1:1


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12112
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3712 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841528Post Scollop »

skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
Early on in his career, some people in 2018/19 were comparing him to a 50 or 100 game player. You could see that he was a good user of the footy even back then and he just needed games and a coach that understood that. Hardly ever wastes it.

He was sometimes a bit slow early on but I think that’s because he wanted to look for a teammate. His urgency and his game awareness has also improved out of sight.

We’d be a tp 4 team if we had 2 Jack Steeles, 2 Ben Longs, 2 Brad Hills, 2 Dylan Robertons and 2 Romas


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8788
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 662 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841529Post Otiman »

Not once did I think "I wish Bruce/Newnes/Steven/Acres was playing". That in combination from our new recruits doing so well are good signs. The remainder of the standouts of the game are:

Long's shift back is a great move, best on ground.

Hill's short kicking skills seem to be contagious.

Butler and Lonie as a twosome offer much more at ground level up forward. Wait for Gresh to get back and see what happens there.

First half felt like shades of 2019 with the long bombs into 50, poor accuracy, and umpires on the wrong side of every decision.

Battle was very good when he played on the wings - might be worth a shot.

JB needs a breakout season, I still feel there's more potential there to break games open.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12112
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3712 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841531Post Scollop »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:16pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:09pm What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery
I watched most of the game, was doing other things at the time, but for me...

Didn’t notice Battle early, but seemed to come more into the game late.

Howard looked good when the ball came down back. Same as Roberton. Neither dominated but did enough. Seems we have a lot of this kind of player.

King’s first half was very good, except for kicking for goal. Missed 3 very gettable set shots, should have kicked 4 before half time. Went out of the game in the second half.

Hannebry was a bit disappointing for mine. Didn’t notice him much.

Hill and Jones stood out for me, maybe because they’re new. Long BOG for mine too.

Ryder looked good in the ruck, but I feel he took away from Marshal’s game, which is my worry going into the season with both of them.
Wilkie also very good down back as was Paton and even Gears looked like he was back to his early 2019 form.

I sort of agree with you on Roma, but I think Ratts has a long term plan and he said in the pregame interview that he wants Rowan to be a good player for the next ten years and with long seasons it was important to try and work with the 2 rucks while Paddy is still capable. I thought Paddy was poor early but had a much better second half. Roma is such a competitive bloke and I thought he gave 100%

Disappointed in Sinclair’s game. Disappointed in one or two of Kent’s efforts where he squibbed it, but overall he redeemed himself.


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841533Post Secret Kiel »

Viscount Jeremiah wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:16pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:12pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
It was good wasn't it. His movement in congestion and skills to distribute under pressure was very good. He's really worked hard in the gym too, he looks likes the enjoys the body work.

Long has a bit of mongrel in him as well..

You won't see many players break his tackles or beat him 1:1
All of a sudden there's a hard edge and physicality about him.


Image
Cordz2
Club Player
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri 15 Jul 2016 3:05pm
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841534Post Cordz2 »

Otiman wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:29pm Not once did I think "I wish Bruce/Newnes/Steven/Acres was playing".
So true!


Cordz2
Club Player
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri 15 Jul 2016 3:05pm
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841535Post Cordz2 »

Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:45pm
Viscount Jeremiah wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:16pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:12pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
It was good wasn't it. His movement in congestion and skills to distribute under pressure was very good. He's really worked hard in the gym too, he looks likes the enjoys the body work.

Long has a bit of mongrel in him as well..

You won't see many players break his tackles or beat him 1:1
All of a sudden there's a hard edge and physicality about him.
When Cox was late in the contest against Howard - the one player to nudge him in the ribs in retaliation was Longy.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12112
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3712 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841538Post Scollop »

Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:12pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
It was good wasn't it. His movement in congestion and skills to distribute under pressure was very good. He's really worked hard in the gym too, he looks likes the enjoys the body work.
Jack Steele also looking very buff

As Bill Lawry would say...get him up here I want to boof him :wink:


stkfc1
Club Player
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841539Post stkfc1 »

Long was great. Best game I've seen him play. Clark and Long give us great ball movement of HB. Speaking of Clark looked very comfortable in midfield also.

Wilkie played a great game. Liked some of Howard's work. Jones ok but very "fumbly". Needs to be cleaner but early days yet. Can't see Kent Butler and Lonie in the same team. We need another point of difference up forward, so I'd be playing somene like Marsh ahead of Kent. Coffield looked good with only short minutes. Lonie and Butler are a fantastic forward duo.

Billings ok with not being brilliant. Good signs today though.
Battle is the mystery at the moment. He's too good to leave out but where do you play him? We need another tall up forward so it's him or Marsh. Battle first choice. Hanners will be better for the run. Paton played well also. Round 1 team is not easy to to pick with Carlisle, Ross and Gresh to return. Webster and Savage also would have to be in the mix. When's the last time we were this healthy for competition for spots?


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841540Post kosifantutti »

skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:09pm What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery
I thought Roberton looked rusty.

Howard much better than last time.

Max impressive in first half.

Battle impressive late in the game.

Hannebery flashed in and out.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841542Post Secret Kiel »

From today's team.

Kent and Sinclair are certain outs.

Carslile, Seb and Gresh are certain ins.

Robbo or Howard are the ones to make way for Carslile.

Coffield probably makes way for savage, doubtful it will be for Webster.


Image
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12112
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3712 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841546Post Scollop »

If Jake Carlisle is 100% fit I’d play him but if Ben Brown is out it probably means we can risk leaving him out 1 more week

I don’t think Savage plays and I’d keep Coff or maybe play Webster if he’s 100% fit

One bloke that was a little disappointing today was Luke Dunstan. Effort good, displayed his usual hardness and got plenty of touches but he butchered it and wasted countless inside 50’s. He wasn’t alone in this regard but I noticed a few too many clangers from him and long bombs that went straight to the opposition


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841550Post Secret Kiel »

kosifantutti wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:02pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:09pm What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery
I thought Roberton looked rusty.

Howard much better than last time.

Max impressive in first half.

Battle impressive late in the game.

Hannebery flashed in and out.
Robbo was flogged early. As to be expected he needs some conditioning, doubtful he'll be playing in the first few weeks.

Max's only goal looked impressive but there was not one defender putting any pressure on him. That won't happen in a game for points.


Image
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11241
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841552Post Bernard Shakey »

Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:05pm From today's team.

Kent and Sinclair are certain outs.

Carslile, Seb and Gresh are certain ins.

Robbo or Howard are the ones to make way for Carslile.

Coffield probably makes way for savage, doubtful it will be for Webster.
Phillips is obviously out also, or did you see something I didn’t?
Robbo and Howard will both play. Carlisle will have to fight his way back in.
Savage will be at Sandy all year!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1913 times
Been thanked: 890 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841558Post WellardSaint »

skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:01pm Long played the type of game that I’ve wanted Savage to consistently produce

Very good effort
Savage has given many years of service, but I hope Long keeps him out of the side.
Why?
Because Long played HBF as a junior, and is at the moment looking like s more accomplished HBF.
Shano might be playing a lot of Zebs games...


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841562Post Secret Kiel »

Bernard Shakey wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:31pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:05pm From today's team.

Kent and Sinclair are certain outs.

Carslile, Seb and Gresh are certain ins.

Robbo or Howard are the ones to make way for Carslile.

Coffield probably makes way for savage, doubtful it will be for Webster.
Phillips is obviously out also, or did you see something I didn’t?
Robbo and Howard will both play. Carlisle will have to fight his way back in.
Savage will be at Sandy all year!
Yeah Ed is way off the pace.

Saying a player like Savage will be at Sandy all year is petty.

And Carlisle has competition, arguably deliberate and manufactured competition based on contractual cycles and we could be the beneficiaries of that in 2020. Dougal versus Jake is a mouth watering subplot. Jake's future at the club beyond 2020 will be hugely dependent on how Dougal performs. Expect Jake to put up a fight.


Image
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13330
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841563Post The Fireman »

Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:54pm
Bernard Shakey wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:31pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 8:05pm From today's team.

Kent and Sinclair are certain outs.

Carslile, Seb and Gresh are certain ins.

Robbo or Howard are the ones to make way for Carslile.

Coffield probably makes way for savage, doubtful it will be for Webster.
Phillips is obviously out also, or did you see something I didn’t?
Robbo and Howard will both play. Carlisle will have to fight his way back in.
Savage will be at Sandy all year!
Yeah Ed is way off the pace.

Saying a player like Savage will be at Sandy all year is petty.

And Carlisle has competition, arguably deliberate and manufactured competition based on contractual cycles and we could be the beneficiaries of that in 2020. Dougal versus Jake is a mouth watering subplot. Jake's future at the club beyond 2020 will be hugely dependent on how Dougal performs. Expect Jake to put up a fight.
+1


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4346
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841572Post cwrcyn »

With such an influx of new players, they're still working out how they gel together.

Just a quick rundown on a few players

Geary was really solid and quite fit given his slow start to pre-season.
Hannebery is not at peak fitness. He was okay in close but there was no real run from him. He'll need a few more weeks to get to his best
Roberton was very good. He played as we expect from him. Will be a huge asset this year
Wilkie was solid. His kicking is superb and you just know he'll kick it to advantage. I see no problem with having both he and Roberton in the back half
Battle came into the game late when he appeared to move forward. Had a very good last quarter and took a couple of strong contested marks
Coffield spent most of the game on the pine, but when he came on he looked pretty sharp. He's deceptively quick
Sinclair couldn't get into the game.
Butler was pretty good. His tackling pressure is very good. He'll be in the team round 1
Ryder and Marshall were just okay. Not sure is Ryder up forward is going to be a huge asset to us. I think Battle is a better option. It's early to call, though
Kent was busy early. Was in the game quite a bit. Ball use was just so so.
Paton looked like a 100 game player down back. Nothing spectacular, but dependable and hard working. Another deceptively quick player.....Is there a bit of Frankie Peckett about this guy?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841580Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:16pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:09pm What did people think of:
Battle
Howard
King
Roberton
Hannebery

Hannebry was a bit disappointing for mine. Didn’t notice him much.

Coach was happy with him.

From herald sun.com.au

"Ratten praised Dan Hannebery’s “voice and direction” on the field after he collected 18 disposals.'


on the outer
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
Location: Level 3
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841582Post on the outer »

To the top wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:07pm We kept them to just 12 scoring shots

There will be a couple of very happy little kids who wear 21 on their backs

And the Coach

And we have a couple of players to come in

Did anyone put their hands up in the VFL game yesterday?
Stkilda website report said Marsh and Hind standouts for Sandringham balancing their time between midfield and forward line.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Marsh 2 Game thread

Post: # 1841584Post bigcarl »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 08 Mar 2020 7:16pm Ryder looked good in the ruck, but I feel he took away from Marshal’s game, which is my worry going into the season with both of them.
Ratts said before the game that Marshall is 24 and they want him to still be playing for St Kilda at 34. They don’t want him too beaten up.

Grundy is a pretty damn good player, but I thought overall we shaded them in the ruck.

I like the two rucks and I hope we stick with it all season. I know other teams use just the one and a pinch-hitter, but why should we if we have two that are good enough and can both play forward?

Ryder is protection for King and Marshall.


Post Reply