Howard the steal of the trade period

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837862Post prwilkinson »

Nick_BlueNRG wrote: Sat 18 Jan 2020 1:30pm
saint6709 wrote: Fri 17 Jan 2020 4:37pm Any word re his second 3km trial ? Anyone know how he went ?
He beat his PB by 28 seconds.
Good signs considering the second TT came straight after the Xmas break.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837863Post CQ SAINT »

It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.


damienc
Club Player
Posts: 1318
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
Has thanked: 613 times
Been thanked: 413 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837864Post damienc »

kosifantutti wrote: Mon 20 Jan 2020 4:39pm
Wow.


damienc
Club Player
Posts: 1318
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
Has thanked: 613 times
Been thanked: 413 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837865Post damienc »

BackFromUSA wrote: Tue 21 Jan 2020 3:54am Not liking how easily Carlisle gets King out of the contest. Max has a lot to learn. On the other hand great defending by Carlisle.
That is a tough call. Looked to me like neither was in the contest.


User avatar
BackFromUSA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837882Post BackFromUSA »

damienc wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 12:20pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Tue 21 Jan 2020 3:54am Not liking how easily Carlisle gets King out of the contest. Max has a lot to learn. On the other hand great defending by Carlisle.
That is a tough call. Looked to me like neither was in the contest.
Yes because Carlisle shoved King in the chest out early to get him out of the contest (taking away his launch run at the ball) and then checked (one could say "blocked") King's run back into the contest successfully keeping out of the contest.

Max has to learn to either engage his backman early to clear his own path to the ball OR wrong foot his backman by taking the long road to the contest and fly from the side like Roo used to do.

Well done to Carlisle who probably realises that he can't match Max for speed and is taking away his run early in contests.

There is a reason that Carlisle has been a good defender for many years. Don't judge him on his not even half fit end to 2019.


AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)

"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
DJ Higgins
Club Player
Posts: 1876
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 269 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837888Post DJ Higgins »

So a bigger guy with years more experience outplayed a guy yet to debut in a single play King will show glimpses this year but cut him some slack. Plus apparently it his running that gets him the ball not necessarily pack marks. Either way great grab from Howard, now if he can get some fitness he should be a starter


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837889Post Linton Lodger »

BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 5:52pm
damienc wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 12:20pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Tue 21 Jan 2020 3:54am Not liking how easily Carlisle gets King out of the contest. Max has a lot to learn. On the other hand great defending by Carlisle.
That is a tough call. Looked to me like neither was in the contest.
Yes because Carlisle shoved King in the chest out early to get him out of the contest (taking away his launch run at the ball) and then checked (one could say "blocked") King's run back into the contest successfully keeping out of the contest.

Max has to learn to either engage his backman early to clear his own path to the ball OR wrong foot his backman by taking the long road to the contest and fly from the side like Roo used to do.

Well done to Carlisle who probably realises that he can't match Max for speed and is taking away his run early in contests.

There is a reason that Carlisle has been a good defender for many years. Don't judge him on his not even half fit end to 2019.
It is the only possible way to defend against Max, stop him getting to the ball drop. All opposition will try it on him and when he learns to beat that tactic, watch out.


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837892Post To the top »

Howard was played as a forward at AFL level in his final few AFL games for reasons which were not known - except he was seen as Westhoffs successor as the proverbial “swing” player

Was dropped to the SANFL, kicking 3 from a respectable number of possessions in his first game at that level but not recalled to the AFL side

The next 2 games had a handful of possessions only - and was not qualified to play SANFL finals so his season finished

My sources say he only played the 3 SANFL games and it was suspected he would not be at Alberton in 2020 - which has proven correct

So when did St Kilda make their approach - and did they know Howard was unsettled hence sought out his Manager?

St Kilda will play him in defence where his athleticism for such a big man is outstanding

Remember also that St Kilda have access to South Australian intel


goods
Club Player
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun 24 May 2009 7:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837899Post goods »

Secret Kiel wrote: Fri 17 Jan 2020 1:22pm The odds are very high that not all 5 of our traded recruits will become best 22 players.

As a side note I've wondered why Howard was selected as captain for one game ahead of so many other seemingly obvious and/or appropriate choices.
why are you questioning this value ? it it what it is.


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837905Post Secret Kiel »

goods wrote: Thu 23 Jan 2020 2:44am
Secret Kiel wrote: Fri 17 Jan 2020 1:22pm The odds are very high that not all 5 of our traded recruits will become best 22 players.

As a side note I've wondered why Howard was selected as captain for one game ahead of so many other seemingly obvious and/or appropriate choices.
why are you questioning this value ? it it what it is.
Not question his value, merely wondering aloud what happened between him and his old club between Captaincy and contract release.


Image
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1837928Post saintspremiers »

According to Ladey at the members do the other day, King will get the ball to the ground a lot - but may not take heaps of marks overhead


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838143Post Saintmatt »

CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.


Go you red, black & white warriors
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23165
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9115 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838145Post saynta »

interesting.


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838158Post To the top »

Stmatt is pretty close

As I put earlier St Kilda has very good intel and connections re the SANFL

Port Adelaide’s Captain also hails from the Mighty Redlegs - as does the CEO at Alberton

And then there is Gags, where the family name is the stuff of legends at the Club

It helps to know people no matter the Industry


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838161Post Secret Kiel »

Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.


Image
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838164Post CQ SAINT »

Secret Kiel wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 8:45pm
Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.
Lol. You have a strange way of looking at things. He was killing it down back, they made him Captain, his manager starts to talk contract, then they switched him, he does ok and has 2 bad games, they don't move him back, they drop him.
They were raising the bar after making him Captain. They thrrew him a bone and he wanted a steak. Lesser players take the captaincy for less money. Obviously, he wasn't keen on that.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838171Post Joffa Burns »

I have no clue but I find it difficult to comprehend the logic around devaluation of a playing asset.

Common sense would assume a player showing form and leadership would be nurtured not marginalized whilst fulfilling the role where he is required by the team.

What ever happened it is now in the past and we have a potential 10 year tall defender if he can fulfill his early promise. Plenty have moved at his stage in the career and gone to great heights such as Mal Michael.

The kid has size and speed, whether he will be a player or not is yet to be determined, but he is not A grade overnight just because we recruited him.

There is a reason he finished the season in the SANFL but that is behind him now.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Nick_BlueNRG
Club Player
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun 18 Aug 2019 12:53pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838175Post Nick_BlueNRG »

Joffa Burns wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 8:32am I have no clue but I find it difficult to comprehend the logic around devaluation of a playing asset.

Common sense would assume a player showing form and leadership would be nurtured not marginalized whilst fulfilling the role where he is required by the team.

What ever happened it is now in the past and we have a potential 10 year tall defender if he can fulfill his early promise. Plenty have moved at his stage in the career and gone to great heights such as Mal Michael.

The kid has size and speed, whether he will be a player or not is yet to be determined, but he is not A grade overnight just because we recruited him.

There is a reason he finished the season in the SANFL but that is behind him now.
Austin and Howard will be our 2 "A" grade KP defenders for the next 10 years. Ironically both recruited from Port Adelaide.


(M)ake (S)t Kilda (S)elf (S)ustainable
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838177Post Saintmatt »

Secret Kiel wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 8:45pm
Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.
You're strange. Really strange. I made no reference to devaluing Howard; only regarding how early we begun speaking with his manager and the connection between the two. I think you'd be well placed to get out of the sun and have a spell for a bit.

The simple fact is that lost of players and officials have played, coached and been administrators together at lots of different clubs. Trotter and Gallagher are very close from their time at Norwood and hence, had a personal relationship that later transcended to their professional lives. It's like Gubby Allan with all of the GWS kids he was responsible for at the outset of their franchise. Like in any business - people generally prefer to deal with people they enjoy working with and hence, lean on those relationships at different times to get business done.


Go you red, black & white warriors
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838179Post SaintPav »

Nick_BlueNRG wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 10:11am
Joffa Burns wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 8:32am I have no clue but I find it difficult to comprehend the logic around devaluation of a playing asset.

Common sense would assume a player showing form and leadership would be nurtured not marginalized whilst fulfilling the role where he is required by the team.

What ever happened it is now in the past and we have a potential 10 year tall defender if he can fulfill his early promise. Plenty have moved at his stage in the career and gone to great heights such as Mal Michael.

The kid has size and speed, whether he will be a player or not is yet to be determined, but he is not A grade overnight just because we recruited him.

There is a reason he finished the season in the SANFL but that is behind him now.
Austin and Howard will be our 2 "A" grade KP defenders for the next 10 years. Ironically both recruited from Port Adelaide.
Is that a problem for you, is it?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838183Post Secret Kiel »

Saintmatt wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 12:10pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 8:45pm
Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.
You're strange. Really strange. I made no reference to devaluing Howard; only regarding how early we begun speaking with his manager and the connection between the two. I think you'd be well placed to get out of the sun and have a spell for a bit.

The simple fact is that lost of players and officials have played, coached and been administrators together at lots of different clubs. Trotter and Gallagher are very close from their time at Norwood and hence, had a personal relationship that later transcended to their professional lives. It's like Gubby Allan with all of the GWS kids he was responsible for at the outset of their franchise. Like in any business - people generally prefer to deal with people they enjoy working with and hence, lean on those relationships at different times to get business done.
CQ states, "perhaps Port were trying to devalue",

You reply, "spot on".


Image
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6092
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838185Post CQ SAINT »

Joffa Burns wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 8:32am I have no clue but I find it difficult to comprehend the logic around devaluation of a playing asset.

Common sense would assume a player showing form and leadership would be nurtured not marginalized whilst fulfilling the role where he is required by the team.

What ever happened it is now in the past and we have a potential 10 year tall defender if he can fulfill his early promise. Plenty have moved at his stage in the career and gone to great heights such as Mal Michael.

The kid has size and speed, whether he will be a player or not is yet to be determined, but he is not A grade overnight just because we recruited him.

There is a reason he finished the season in the SANFL but that is behind him now.
I guess it is easier to.understand that when you have a potential young leader, who is also a key defender and killing it, you move him into the ruck and push him forward. Then when he has 2 bad games in that role, you drop him. That is just plain stupid.
I'm.not saying he is immediately worth 5 years and what we pay him but the lack of acknowledgement from Port and the fact they wanted him cheaper and eventually traded him, says the were trying to devalue him.
Most of the commentary around his trade described shock, shortsightedness and mistake by Port.
I.hope he lives up to the challenge and very happy to have him on board. The depth, flexibility, competition and upside for our key backs, both established and developing is exciting.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3665 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838187Post skeptic »

Secret Kiel wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 3:08pm
Saintmatt wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 12:10pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 8:45pm
Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.
You're strange. Really strange. I made no reference to devaluing Howard; only regarding how early we begun speaking with his manager and the connection between the two. I think you'd be well placed to get out of the sun and have a spell for a bit.

The simple fact is that lost of players and officials have played, coached and been administrators together at lots of different clubs. Trotter and Gallagher are very close from their time at Norwood and hence, had a personal relationship that later transcended to their professional lives. It's like Gubby Allan with all of the GWS kids he was responsible for at the outset of their franchise. Like in any business - people generally prefer to deal with people they enjoy working with and hence, lean on those relationships at different times to get business done.
CQ states, "perhaps Port were trying to devalue",

You reply, "spot on".
CQ Saint wrote quite a few things and he replied ‘pretty much spot on’... the implication is that he agreed with most of it rather than the one specific point you’ve zeroed in on


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838188Post Devilhead »

It all seems pretty straightforward to me

Saints engage Howard's manager at the start of 2019 season.

Port only catch wind re: of him talking to Saints - late in the season (and are pissed)

Port drop Howard

Port trade Howard
Last edited by Devilhead on Thu 30 Jan 2020 5:30pm, edited 1 time in total.


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Howard the steal of the trade period

Post: # 1838189Post Saintmatt »

skeptic wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 5:17pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 3:08pm
Saintmatt wrote: Thu 30 Jan 2020 12:10pm
Secret Kiel wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 8:45pm
Saintmatt wrote: Wed 29 Jan 2020 1:08pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Wed 22 Jan 2020 10:40am It appears he was being moved around and didnt like it. Before being dropped he was kicking goals and going into the ruck. It wreaks of the same thing with Carlisle at Essendon. He was told that his future at Alberton was in these roles after a great year in 2018 playing most of the season as a backman with a few cameo ruck roles. He has had some impressive forward scalps in wins that Port may not have expected. Id say his manager put him on the market earlier than divulged and we made the right offer. Perhaps Port where trying to devalue him and it flipped on them.
This is pretty much spot on. We begun speaking with Howard's Manager (whom our List Manager knows very well from their time together at Norwood) from quite early on in the 2019 season.
Nup, not spot on. Howard was made Captain for round 9 and it was a victory, Hinkley firmly believed he was an emerging leader and a big part of the future. They were not devaluing him midway in the season so any discussion with Port early on in the season was not about trading a future leader of the club.
You're strange. Really strange. I made no reference to devaluing Howard; only regarding how early we begun speaking with his manager and the connection between the two. I think you'd be well placed to get out of the sun and have a spell for a bit.

The simple fact is that lost of players and officials have played, coached and been administrators together at lots of different clubs. Trotter and Gallagher are very close from their time at Norwood and hence, had a personal relationship that later transcended to their professional lives. It's like Gubby Allan with all of the GWS kids he was responsible for at the outset of their franchise. Like in any business - people generally prefer to deal with people they enjoy working with and hence, lean on those relationships at different times to get business done.
CQ states, "perhaps Port were trying to devalue",

You reply, "spot on".
CQ Saint wrote quite a few things and he replied ‘pretty much spot on’... the implication is that he agreed with most of it rather than the one specific point you’ve zeroed in on
Dare I say it Skeptic but, ummm - spot on. I clearly have/had no idea of what Port were thinking in moving Howard to the forward line and then dropping him - trying to devalue him ior not. But I do know full well when we started speaking with David Trotter. Anyway - we move on.

The simple fact is that we've managed to land a 23 yo who was good enough to Captain a better team than ours ... in his 37th game or something stupid like that. KPP with proper leadership attributes like that do not grown on trees.

The seething reaction of Port's fans - then and still now - towards their club and in particular Hinkley and Cripps - should tell you everything about how well we've done in this particular transaction.


Go you red, black & white warriors
Post Reply