Facts behind how Hanners broke his ankle

[HitTheBoundary]

sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?

First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.

And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.

wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?

your gagging of such may be in breach.

Mods ????

ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE

Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity

So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?

To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.

bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.

Nothing wrong with Mary Poppins. Unless you're misogynous.

[asiu]

i thought the nun that flew was sexier

mary wore doc martins

[saynta]

sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?

First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.

And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.

wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?

your gagging of such may be in breach.

Mods ????

ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE

Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity

So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?

To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.

bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.

You are an outstandingly, astonishingly angry man. This is a football fans' forum.

Sure is. And no place to be calling a saints player a drunk.

ps. Angry I'm not. Disgusted with some of the comments on this thread. Certainly.

[B.M]

Aren’t we allowed to speculate?

It’s a fan forum, what news is ever that substantiated, unless it’s a media release.

[BackFromUSA]

sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?

First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.

And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.

wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?

your gagging of such may be in breach.

Mods ????

ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE

Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity

So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?

To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.

bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.

You are an outstandingly, astonishingly angry man. This is a football fans' forum.

OK STOP NOW BEFORE I HAVE TO BAN ALL OF YOU

[skeptic]

In fairness, I don’t think anybody called Hannebery a drunk... rather some have speculated that he may have been drinking when the accident happened.

Being an alcoholic is different to drinking at a party. The only thing in this thread alluding to him having a drinking problem is the over blown reaction to the suggestion he may have been drinking.

To be honest... I think most ppl could accept it comfortably if the story was he was at a family function, had a few beers and tripped. It’s not like anyone is calling him a girl.

[SaintPav]

► Show Spoiler

sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?

First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.

And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.

wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?

your gagging of such may be in breach.

Mods ????

ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE

Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity

So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?

To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.

bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.

You are an outstandingly, astonishingly angry man. This is a football fans' forum.

OK STOP NOW BEFORE I HAVE TO BAN ALL OF YOU

[The Fireman]

a mass banning ... see what you've caused Saynta

[CQ SAINT]

don’t bother nobend

The formula for relating the depth of treads and the height of risers was developed by Francois Blondel, a French architect, in 17th century. Based on observations of people’ gaits, the formula suggested that twice the riser height plus the tread depth should be between 610 mm and 635 mm. While there have been variations across the countries in applying this formula, it has been widely adopted in stair building.

does that insinuate that Kiel is very rigid ?

It might insinuate a variation in his gait.

[saynta]

a mass banning ... see what you've caused Saynta

Nah, not me mate. Takes more than one for a mass banning.

[Joffa Burns]

clause 7.2.3.2 from AS 1657 - 2013 states:

The combination of twice the riser plus the going (2R+G) shall be not less than 540mm, and not greater than 700mm.

A riser shall not be less than 130mm and not greater than 225mm

The going shall be not less than 215mm and not greater than 335mm.

All risers and goings in the same flight of stairs shall be uniform dimensions within a tolerance of plus or minus 5mm.


There is more but you get my drift, your formula was wrong, and I should have added very incomplete in terms of what is required for the design of stairs to be compliant with AS 1657.

Excellent work Keil, I don’t know anything about stairs so I googled AS1657, seems like you are only scratching the surface with your comments.

We do not understand the risers or balustrade or hand rails if they were fitted, required or whether their should have been guarded due to being under construction.

Perhaps a full investigation is required to establish the root cause of the injury or even a royal commission

https://www.ozstair.com.au/ncc-regulations/

[outside66]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

[freely]

... It’s not like anyone is calling him a girl.

Clear provocation!

[magnifisaint]

Can someone state the facts please?
I want to really know what sort of drugs he was on when he fell down the stairs. Its not a hard one to ask is it?

[sunsaint]

Can someone state the facts please?
I want to really know what sort of drugs he was on when he fell down the stairs. Its not a hard one to ask is it?

I can't substantiate the actual drug
But it was certainly a downer

[magnifisaint]

Can someone state the facts please?
I want to really know what sort of drugs he was on when he fell down the stairs. Its not a hard one to ask is it?

I can't substantiate the actual drug
But it was certainly a downer

I reckon Curnow is using Hanners supplier.

[The Fireman]

he was certainly tripping

[Shaggy]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

ITK's know. NFI's speculate.

[skeptic]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

ITK's know. NFI's speculate.

And those with double standards try to dissuade discussion on a fan forum.

Oh the righteousness

[asiu]

we are good at that , between us all.

add a dash of faux outrage
some selective reading
a pinch of shaded insult
a stir ‘n a fold

and hey presto

its cricket season
‘n ‘off’ season on the boards

merry not happy jan day to us all

[CQ SAINT]

As long as there is no running with scissors, no pulling hair and no nasty name calling - fair call I reckon.

[asiu]

no scratching or biting


might need a safe word

[Shaggy]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

ITK's know. NFI's speculate.

And those with double standards try to dissuade discussion on a fan forum.

Oh the righteousness

I love the discussion. But everyone is guessing what happened with Dan depending upon their own bias.

[skeptic]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

ITK's know. NFI's speculate.

And those with double standards try to dissuade discussion on a fan forum.

Oh the righteousness

I love the discussion. But everyone is guessing what happened with Dan depending upon their own bias.

Yes generally people have their biases. It’s really not that big a deal

[Shaggy]

It's interesting how ITK's are only accepted or called upon when it's positive news however when ITK's come out with something negative it's lambasted as "unsubstantiated". To be honest, you don't even need to be an ITK to have an understanding of certain players "recreational" activities...

ITK's know. NFI's speculate.

And those with double standards try to dissuade discussion on a fan forum.

Oh the righteousness

I love the discussion. But everyone is guessing what happened with Dan depending upon their own bias.

Yes generally people have their biases. It’s really not that big a deal

It is not a big deal. As I said "ITK's know and NFI's speculate."