No.1
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: No.1
I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: No.1
Getting things 'right' off the field has always been the (best) first move to success. An all too rare situation for us I'm afraidhappy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
How hard can it really be? The Hawks eat this stuff for dinner
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
- Has thanked: 258 times
- Been thanked: 211 times
Re: No.1
It hasn't happened by accident.
My theory is we haven't been a basket case since Peter Summers and Richo took over, both these men have left a great legacy however it is the nature of the business that good work is not always obvious and that the development of a club and list through the use of the draft takes time. Then the arrival of Simon Lethlean and Dan Hanneberry surely announced us as a club that was well and truly heading in the right direction and a destination club. All of the admin appointments, coaches and players since are surely now seen as people continuing on the good work of their predecessors since Peter Summers arrival. After yesterday we can also probably start praising the appointment of James Gallagher.
Essentially we have been continuously improving club and list since 2014.
My theory is we haven't been a basket case since Peter Summers and Richo took over, both these men have left a great legacy however it is the nature of the business that good work is not always obvious and that the development of a club and list through the use of the draft takes time. Then the arrival of Simon Lethlean and Dan Hanneberry surely announced us as a club that was well and truly heading in the right direction and a destination club. All of the admin appointments, coaches and players since are surely now seen as people continuing on the good work of their predecessors since Peter Summers arrival. After yesterday we can also probably start praising the appointment of James Gallagher.
Essentially we have been continuously improving club and list since 2014.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
- Has thanked: 613 times
- Been thanked: 413 times
Re: No.1
Moving from Seaford to Moorabbin was huge.happy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
- Location: incarnate
- Has thanked: 286 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: No.1
This No.1.damienc wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:08amMoving from Seaford to Moorabbin was huge.happy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
Can you imagine prospective players touring the facilities at Seaford and saying...Yep this is where I want to spend my twenties!
Ratten and our new CEO and various coaches and off field staff including the likes of Slater and Dermie all help.
Nee!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: No.1
Money talks but Gallagher and Lethlean sound like good operators.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: No.1
Yep this the biggest factor. That combined with shipping out Richo and changes to the footy dept.damienc wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:08amMoving from Seaford to Moorabbin was huge.happy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
- Has thanked: 258 times
- Been thanked: 211 times
Re: No.1
Yes of coarse, the new facilities back at Moorabbin has been huge for us hasn't it.fugazi wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:12amThis No.1.damienc wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:08amMoving from Seaford to Moorabbin was huge.happy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
Can you imagine prospective players touring the facilities at Seaford and saying...Yep this is where I want to spend my twenties!
Ratten and our new CEO and various coaches and off field staff including the likes of Slater and Dermie all help.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17052
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: No.1
I also think that harsh or not, from early 2018 there was a perception about Richo and us needing to sack him.
When you factor everything into season 2019, I actually think he coached as well as could be expected but perception is everything and we looked like an absolute basket case.
The change with Ratten, an experienced coach, regardless of if he’s good or a hack symbolises change and exciting opportunity. There’s no actual hint of success prior to the trade but it’s perception
When you factor everything into season 2019, I actually think he coached as well as could be expected but perception is everything and we looked like an absolute basket case.
The change with Ratten, an experienced coach, regardless of if he’s good or a hack symbolises change and exciting opportunity. There’s no actual hint of success prior to the trade but it’s perception
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: No.1
I reckon he had a fair bit to do with the early sniffing out and dealing with managers. Gallagher & Lethlean did the final wheeling and dealing.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: No.1
It's the first big reason. A $50million facility in the heart of the bayside area. If that's Summer's only legacy then he gets a tick from me.damienc wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:08amMoving from Seaford to Moorabbin was huge.happy feet wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 8:58am I have a question.
How did we go from becoming a so called basket case to a “destination club” ?
Would love to here your views.
The next big reason is Lethers. He's the one who's reshaped our drafting and recruiting depts and brought the whole club into the 21st century.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
- Has thanked: 278 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
Re: No.1
I have a view that Cho's vanilla brand of football, vanilla selection policy, vanilla approach to recruitment (ie. the type of player he wanted) basically meant we were consistently average.skeptic wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:02am I also think that harsh or not, from early 2018 there was a perception about Richo and us needing to sack him.
When you factor everything into season 2019, I actually think he coached as well as could be expected but perception is everything and we looked like an absolute basket case.
The change with Ratten, an experienced coach, regardless of if he’s good or a hack symbolises change and exciting opportunity. There’s no actual hint of success prior to the trade but it’s perception
The gap between the best and worst was quite small.
This meant that we were able to have a relatively competitive season with some significant off-field issues.
However this same vanilla and bland approach to football, also meant that our best was still quite mediocre.
Even if we didn't have injuries, I still think we would have ended up pretty close to where we did. We still wouldn't have beaten the good teams, and still would have probably gone 50/50 with the average ones
So personnally, I don't think Cho coached particularly well last year. We didn't beat any good teams, we were beaten easily by in-form teams, and we fell over the line against rubbish ones.
That was pretty much the story of his time at the helm.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun 18 Aug 2019 12:53pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: No.1
Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
(M)ake (S)t Kilda (S)elf (S)ustainable
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
Re: No.1
they will feel the need to be as good as Hill.Nick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:42am Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
No1
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun 18 Aug 2019 12:53pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: No.1
yeah rightioThe Fireman wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:45amthey will feel the need to be as good as Hill.Nick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:42am Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
No1
(M)ake (S)t Kilda (S)elf (S)ustainable
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: No.1
Get a job!Nick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:47amyeah rightioThe Fireman wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:45amthey will feel the need to be as good as Hill.Nick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:42am Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
No1
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1167 times
Re: No.1
Lethlean said as much last night. He praised James Gallagher for getting the deals done and also, Gubby for keeping everyone sane and focused when things went a bit sideways throughout the period. I don't think you can underestimate that. A cool head when everyone is losing theirs is a great thing to have in your corner.derby Street wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:16amI reckon he had a fair bit to do with the early sniffing out and dealing with managers. Gallagher & Lethlean did the final wheeling and dealing.
Go you red, black & white warriors
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
- Location: brisy
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: No.1
We have thrown big money at a few guys and failed. Getting Hannerbury started the ball rolling and now Hill reaffirms it even if we paid overs.
The combination of off field staff, location has made us a better looking outfit.
Players want success and to be at their best so higher paid recruits will help achieve that.
The combination of off field staff, location has made us a better looking outfit.
Players want success and to be at their best so higher paid recruits will help achieve that.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17052
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: No.1
We offered bucket loads of more for years and haven’t gotten closed to a high profile player that wasn’t damagedNick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:42am Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
Hill is the biggest name we’ve landed for tears
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1167 times
Re: No.1
It's funny how people talk about paying overs for Hill. So what? We had to - the guy is (a) quality at what he does and what we need and (b) had two years on a contract to run. If Cho hadn't have been so goddam selfish - we could've had the same leverage with Steven and Geelong last trade period.wally wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 12:28pm We have thrown big money at a few guys and failed. Getting Hannerbury started the ball rolling and now Hill reaffirms it even if we paid overs.
The combination of off field staff, location has made us a better looking outfit.
Players want success and to be at their best so higher paid recruits will help achieve that.
However, no one seems to be talking about how we paid massive unders for Howard. Go ask a Port supporter today how they're feeling about that deal (Hint: it's like how most Saints fans are feeling about being bent-over by the Cats)
Seriously - talk about a glass half empty mentality.
Go you red, black & white warriors
- DownAtTheJunction
- Club Player
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:24pm
- Location: Dark Side Of The Moon
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: No.1
Thank you for your perspective. I would see it differently.Nick_BlueNRG wrote: ↑Thu 17 Oct 2019 11:42am Face facts everyone, we offered more money than any other team could to Hill. $900k per year is ridiculous money.
Now that our Salary cap has been squeezed to the max, lets see how many players "nominate" us next year.
PS. How do you think the rest of the players are going to feel when this Hill guy waltzes in and is earning more than everyone else?
We really haven’t had anyone worth paying 900K. I doubt anyone else would pay Hill that.
It is simply a fact that weaker clubs have to pay ‘overs’ (perhaps 50% more) to attract high end talent. North Melbourne have been desperate to land a big fish for years and have repeatedly failed.
Many clubs pay around Hill’s salary for a number of players. West Coast has several – McGovern ($1.2 mill) and Naitanui (reportedly over $1mill), Kennedy (900K – 1 mill), Yeo, Gaff, Shuey, Sheed, Darling and Hurn would all be in 800K conversation. Now they have Tim Kelly – he’s got to be in same bracket. (I am unsure how they achieve this but that’s for another topic).
The upshot is that successful clubs manage the salary cap very well, and they don’t overplay the foot soldiers.
Good players want great players to come to their club so as the premiership dream can become a possibility.