Hill to Geelong?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1828987Post BarryGrogan »

Ape_Man wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 9:14pm

I was just pointing out that Ross’ disposal efficiency is higher than Hill’s.

2019: Hill 67%. Ross 73%
Career: Hill 71% Ross 73%

I think it is also important to note that Champion data consider any kick over 45 meters to be effective.

Maybe I’m off my rocker, but these numbers say Ross hits his targets more often than Hill.

And Seb gets it more often. Over careers Hill averages 20.1 disposals. Seb 24.5.

This year Hill 25.1. Seb 26.0.

I’ve shown you mine, now show me yours.
You don't have to hit your target to get an 'effective disposal'.

It's a very misleading stat.


You could have the full forward 20m clear on a lead, but shank the kick and instead of it being an easy spot up and shot at goal - it ends up being a contest that is punched over the boundary line.

That counts as an effective disposal.


It also doesn't consider the option. Ignoring someone on their own in F50, amd instead bombing it to 50/50 also counts as an effective disposal.


derby Street
Club Player
Posts: 1105
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: everywhere
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1828989Post derby Street »

BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 10:03pm
Ape_Man wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 9:14pm

I was just pointing out that Ross’ disposal efficiency is higher than Hill’s.

2019: Hill 67%. Ross 73%
Career: Hill 71% Ross 73%

I think it is also important to note that Champion data consider any kick over 45 meters to be effective.

Maybe I’m off my rocker, but these numbers say Ross hits his targets more often than Hill.

And Seb gets it more often. Over careers Hill averages 20.1 disposals. Seb 24.5.

This year Hill 25.1. Seb 26.0.

I’ve shown you mine, now show me yours.
You don't have to hit your target to get an 'effective disposal'.

It's a very misleading stat.


You could have the full forward 20m clear on a lead, but shank the kick and instead of it being an easy spot up and shot at goal - it ends up being a contest that is punched over the boundary line.

That counts as an effective disposal.


It also doesn't consider the option. Ignoring someone on their own in F50, amd instead bombing it to 50/50 also counts as an effective disposal.
Correct - hence Savages long bombs down the line or into the F50 not affecting his DE %


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3638
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1828997Post saintbob »

Joffa Burns wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 8:33pm
To the top wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 7:12pm The question to be asked is, Hill has nominated St Kilda where (apparently) he will be the ONLY A Grade player we will have, the rest C and D Grade and worse as we are constantly reminded by a serial, recalcitrant contributor on here - and, to boot, our administration is not up to standard

So Hill has nominated to come to a Club which will be propping up the competition during the remainder of Hill’s career

Why has he nominated St Kilda?

In fact, why has anyone nominated St Kilda?
A question.

Who would you deem A grade at St Kilda at the moment?
Closest would be Marshall, Billings & Ross at a guess.
Steven was A grade but jury out now.

Hill has nominated Saints IMO for $$$$ he cannot get elsewhere and probably had a great relationship with Ratten whilst at Hawthorn.

Hill is a priority as he adds speed & very good disposal to a one paced midfield.
Let’s not kid ourselves, we haven’t had an A Grader since Riewoldt retired.
Steven has been our best player since but to call him a A grader is a fair stretch.
Compare him to Bontempelli or Cripps and he is no where near the mark.

Cripps - 3 x B&F’s and 2 x AA’s

Bontempelli -3 x B&F’s, 2 x AA’s and a premiership medallion


Now that’s what an A Grade Midfielders CV should look like.
Last edited by saintbob on Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:42am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829000Post Spinner »

Only a matter of time till an alternative option got air in the papers.

You would think the $$$$ would be difficult for Geelong to match. Probs walks in their highest paid player.


kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829004Post kalsaint »

silverhalo wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 5:16pm
st.byron wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 5:12pm
silverhalo wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 5:05pm I'm getting a bit jack of this now, if Freo keeps making these unreasonable demands, as much as I'd love to have Hill, I'd be really satisfied to get the other 4 as they do address a number of our needs, keep pick 12 for the draft and target a speedy mid.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ ... b027027634
Can't read it behind the paywall.
Try this one:-
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-tr ... 2f574279d4
Geelong midfielder Sam Menegola has emerged as a potential left-field saviour to the stalled Bradley Hill deal, with Fremantle interested in the player they delisted five years ago.

The Western Australian is below. It has a slightly different take to Fox.
Ex-Docker, now Cat Sam Menegola emerges as key in Bradley Hill trade

Braden Quartermaine
The West Australian
Sunday, 13 October 2019 12:57PM

Sam Menegola spent a season with Subiaco in 2015 before Geelong became his third AFL team. Credit: WA News
While Hill is considered most likely to be at St Kilda come the end of the trade period on Wednesday, the Cats are understood to have moved into the frame as a contingency club in the wake of a bitter breakdown in negotiations between the Dockers and Saints last week.
It is expected Geelong would have to shed a player to provide for Hill’s hefty wage demands.

St Kilda stunned Fremantle on Thursday when they split their prized pick six, which the Dockers had wanted as part of a deal to release the contracted Hill, in a swap which netted them picks 12 and 18 from Greater Western Sydney.
Menegola, 27, could return to Fremantle even if Hill gets his wish to move to the Saints on a long-term deal where he would receive a significant pay rise.
He would give the Dockers a much-needed hard-running wing option in the wake of Ed Langdon’s departure to Melbourne and the expected loss of Hill.

Fremantle’s midfield has been battered by the loss of star clearance winner Lachie Neal to Brisbane 12 months ago and now key wingmen Langdon and possibly Hill, who both finished in the top five of this season’s Doig Medal.

Menegola, who was initially delisted by Hawthorn without playing a game in 2011, has a year remaining on his contract and is happy at Geelong. But he could expect more security as well as a pay rise if he joined Fremantle.
The East Fremantle product spent three seasons on the rookie list at the Dockers, where he battled injury issues before being delisted at the end of the 2014 season without playing a game.
The journeyman rejuvenated his career in a more attacking role at Subiaco in 2015 before landing at his third AFL club when the Cats took him with pick 66 in the 2015 national draft.
He has played 65 games in four seasons at Geelong, including 12 this year in a season that was interrupted by a knee injury.

The local West journo, Mark Duffield, also gave them a serve for stupidity.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829005Post groupie1 »

Easy.
Josh Bruce and Dunstan to ESSENDON; allowing them to part with Joe Daniher and they get the inside bull they're missing... we get Swans pick 5. 5 and 12 for Hill and next year's Freo's 1st rounder; 18 and some swaps for the two Port boys; Steven to Geelong for 36 or 37, passed onto Sydney with Jack Newnes and Lonie for Jones and 25 in return for snagging Daniher for them. Richmond is nice enough to let Butler go for free. Sydney will still get 9 for Papley, plus Newnes in whom they had had interest and Lonie to go some distance replacing Papley.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829006Post groupie1 »

And the finger to the Bulldogs for good measure


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829007Post groupie1 »

adding to this we could complicate it by proposing Menenggola to Freo; Steven to Geelong for NIL (and we don't pay his salary)... satisfying Freo's needs even more... Be great to see Carlisle find a new home also for a pick next year.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829009Post SaintPav »

Hill is not worth pick 5 and 12.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829011Post barneyboyz »

BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 10:03pm
Ape_Man wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 9:14pm

I was just pointing out that Ross’ disposal efficiency is higher than Hill’s.

2019: Hill 67%. Ross 73%
Career: Hill 71% Ross 73%

I think it is also important to note that Champion data consider any kick over 45 meters to be effective.

Maybe I’m off my rocker, but these numbers say Ross hits his targets more often than Hill.

And Seb gets it more often. Over careers Hill averages 20.1 disposals. Seb 24.5.

This year Hill 25.1. Seb 26.0.

I’ve shown you mine, now show me yours.
You don't have to hit your target to get an 'effective disposal'.

It's a very misleading stat.


You could have the full forward 20m clear on a lead, but shank the kick and instead of it being an easy spot up and shot at goal - it ends up being a contest that is punched over the boundary line.

That counts as an effective disposal.


It also doesn't consider the option. Ignoring someone on their own in F50, amd instead bombing it to 50/50 also counts as an effective disposal.
What it does suggest though, is that if Ross were to improve his kicking he'd be elite


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829013Post groupie1 »

Freo's 1st pick next year comes back


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829014Post Secret Kiel »

saintbob wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:26am
Joffa Burns wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 8:33pm
To the top wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 7:12pm The question to be asked is, Hill has nominated St Kilda where (apparently) he will be the ONLY A Grade player we will have, the rest C and D Grade and worse as we are constantly reminded by a serial, recalcitrant contributor on here - and, to boot, our administration is not up to standard

So Hill has nominated to come to a Club which will be propping up the competition during the remainder of Hill’s career

Why has he nominated St Kilda?

In fact, why has anyone nominated St Kilda?
A question.

Who would you deem A grade at St Kilda at the moment?
Closest would be Marshall, Billings & Ross at a guess.
Steven was A grade but jury out now.

Hill has nominated Saints IMO for $$$$ he cannot get elsewhere and probably had a great relationship with Ratten whilst at Hawthorn.

Hill is a priority as he adds speed & very good disposal to a one paced midfield.
Let’s not kid ourselves, we haven’t had an A Grader since Riewoldt retired.
Steven has been our best player since but to call him a A grader is a fair stretch.
Compare him to Bontempelli or Cripps and he is no where near the mark.

Cripps - 3 x B&F’s and 2 x AA’s

Bontempelli -3 x B&F’s, 2 x AA’s and a premiership medallion


Now that’s what an A Grade Midfielders CV should look like.
I think you have to include performances in big matches such as finals and GFs and Cripps is an unknown quantity in that regard at the moment, how many players have looked A grade until they choke on the big stage.

And why does everyone keep throwing up that Hill only want's to come to the saints because of the dollars, of coarse that is the main reason, probably 99% of the reason. Imagine being a 26yo man and offered 900k per year to do anything let alone play football and be treated like a god, there probably isn't a drug around that can give you a bigger come up.


Image
BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829017Post BarryGrogan »

barneyboyz wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 7:30am
BarryGrogan wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 10:03pm
Ape_Man wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 9:14pm

I was just pointing out that Ross’ disposal efficiency is higher than Hill’s.

2019: Hill 67%. Ross 73%
Career: Hill 71% Ross 73%

I think it is also important to note that Champion data consider any kick over 45 meters to be effective.

Maybe I’m off my rocker, but these numbers say Ross hits his targets more often than Hill.

And Seb gets it more often. Over careers Hill averages 20.1 disposals. Seb 24.5.

This year Hill 25.1. Seb 26.0.

I’ve shown you mine, now show me yours.
You don't have to hit your target to get an 'effective disposal'.

It's a very misleading stat.


You could have the full forward 20m clear on a lead, but shank the kick and instead of it being an easy spot up and shot at goal - it ends up being a contest that is punched over the boundary line.

That counts as an effective disposal.


It also doesn't consider the option. Ignoring someone on their own in F50, amd instead bombing it to 50/50 also counts as an effective disposal.
What it does suggest though, is that if Ross were to improve his kicking he'd be elite
I think most have acknowledged that for some time.

But when you're in your late 20s, a sudden improvement in fundamental skills is pretty rare.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829035Post SaintPav »

I think we should just rename RESA Park Dockers Park and name one of the new stands the Peter Bell Stand


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11354
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1349 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829066Post Sainternist »

Spinner wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:37am Only a matter of time till an alternative option got air in the papers.

You would think the $$$$ would be difficult for Geelong to match. Probs walks in their highest paid player.
Yeah Geelong getting him doesn’t sound right. They’ll be really struggling with cap space if they got him.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829067Post Secret Kiel »

We are offering to pay Hill 900k per year, doesn't Geelong have a rule about not overpaying their stars, would they really be willing to pay overs like we are? Doubt it.


Image
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1862
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 265 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829069Post longtimesaint »

They would have the cap space because they were prepared to pay Kelly if he stayed and he would have wanted as much as Hill


One year will be our year
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829073Post The_Dud »

Doesn’t Hill want to play in Melbourne for family reasons? If we’ve learnt one thing this last year it’s that the Geelong-Melbourne distance is an insurmountable obstacle for an AFL player to overcome.

So I’m not worried!


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829075Post sax »

I do think now Ben King has resigned with Gold Coast, Saints will offer Freo pick 12 this year & next years first rounder for Brad Hill


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829078Post The OtherThommo »

longtimesaint wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:29pm They would have the cap space because they were prepared to pay Kelly if he stayed and he would have wanted as much as Hill
And, the suggestion they were prepared to pay Kelly was laughed off in about 2 nanoseconds.

Everyone knew he was going home, and they knew that last year.

Would they have been willing to shed as much 'value', as they extracted from Wet Toast, to keep Kelly?

Purely from the aspect of regarding Hill's $900k p.a. as equivalent to what Geelong would have been prepared to pay Kelly, would Geelong regard Hill as a sufficient replacement for Kelly?

They are very, very different players, and nothing like interchangeable.


'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829079Post The OtherThommo »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:50pm Doesn’t Hill want to play in Melbourne for family reasons? If we’ve learnt one thing this last year it’s that the Geelong-Melbourne distance is an insurmountable obstacle for an AFL player to overcome.

So I’m not worried!
Prefacing this with the usual Jon Ralph rider, July 4th;



'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10799
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 837 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829123Post ace »

suss wrote: Sun 13 Oct 2019 5:50pm I can’t remember a team swooping in and knicking a player in this situation. Has been threatened many a time (e.g. Carlisle) but I can’t remember it actually happening.
Could this be Geelong playing hard ball over the Jack Steven deal.
There is absolutely no way Geelong can afford both Hill and Steven in their salary cap despite losing Kelly.

If Geelong take Hill there is absolutely no way St Kilda should pay a cent of Geelong's salary to Steven.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829158Post wally »

Probably Buddy...He was supposed to go to GWS then Sydney came from nowhete to sign him especially since they took Tippett the year earlier supposed to go to Suns


wally
Club Player
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829159Post wally »

For Hill to go to geelong we are probably expected to pay half his salary on top of payng Jacks


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Hill to Geelong?

Post: # 1829163Post saintsRrising »

wally wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 6:21pm Probably Buddy...He was supposed to go to GWS then Sydney came from nowhete to sign him especially since they took Tippett the year earlier supposed to go to Suns
Buddy had not nominated GWS.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Post Reply