Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828122Post st.byron »

barneyboyz wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:19pm
fugazi wrote: Tue 08 Oct 2019 5:02pm He is right about us over rating the list.
DMac on a 3 year extension is one of the bizarre decisions in AFL history.
No A list or B+ list players
Would have thought a fit Hannaberry would be B+, as well as Billings. But then again, maybe it's better to be a hard marker.
Ratts would have to have something in mind re DMac?, it was an very interesting signing. I like him though and he clearly has a good work ethic
With respect Barney, having a good work ethic is not negotiable I reckon. It's a bit of a hangover from the past few years..... C grade players with a good work ethic aren't going to cut it when it comes to contending.


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828124Post barneyboyz »

Rubyjo wrote: Tue 08 Oct 2019 6:41pm Gresh, hunter, Marshall, Steele, Ross, Membrey, Bruce.. All B graders
Every one of them has had at least 1 AA game so far, and I base that on having individually influenced games to a win. But, all have limitations, which if corrected would see them at A as minimum (permanent)

Consistency is our problem, but that will come


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828126Post barneyboyz »

st.byron wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:21pm
barneyboyz wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:19pm
fugazi wrote: Tue 08 Oct 2019 5:02pm He is right about us over rating the list.
DMac on a 3 year extension is one of the bizarre decisions in AFL history.
No A list or B+ list players
Would have thought a fit Hannaberry would be B+, as well as Billings. But then again, maybe it's better to be a hard marker.
Ratts would have to have something in mind re DMac?, it was an very interesting signing. I like him though and he clearly has a good work ethic
With respect Barney, having a good work ethic is not negotiable I reckon. It's a bit of a hangover from the past few years..... C grade players with a good work ethic aren't going to cut it when it comes to contending.
Yeah, I agree but they clearly believe he's got something worth the deal. Leadership???


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828132Post st.byron »

barneyboyz wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:27pm
st.byron wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:21pm
barneyboyz wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 1:19pm
fugazi wrote: Tue 08 Oct 2019 5:02pm He is right about us over rating the list.
DMac on a 3 year extension is one of the bizarre decisions in AFL history.
No A list or B+ list players
Would have thought a fit Hannaberry would be B+, as well as Billings. But then again, maybe it's better to be a hard marker.
Ratts would have to have something in mind re DMac?, it was an very interesting signing. I like him though and he clearly has a good work ethic
With respect Barney, having a good work ethic is not negotiable I reckon. It's a bit of a hangover from the past few years..... C grade players with a good work ethic aren't going to cut it when it comes to contending.
Yeah, I agree but they clearly believe he's got something worth the deal. Leadership???
Maybe. I question giving him a 3 year deal though and would be happy to see him go. Same with Kent. Buckenara was right in saying that we have too many average players on our list. Maybe if we keep him, players like DMac will find a new lease of life under Ratten and the new footy dept.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2080
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 224 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828143Post freely »

What would you rather, C grade players with a good work ethic like DMac or potential A/B+ graders with a lousy work ethic - e.g., Carlisle, Gresham, Acres?


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828148Post barneyboyz »

freely wrote: Wed 09 Oct 2019 2:37pm What would you rather, C grade players with a good work ethic like DMac or potential A/B+ graders with a lousy work ethic - e.g., Carlisle, Gresham, Acres?
I'm not sure of the correct answer here. I want work ethic for culture, which should switch thhe lazy buggers on. I think Acres just needs some love and the right management


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Gary Buckenara analyses St Kilda's list

Post: # 1828151Post Devilhead »

So if we have to be prepared to accept 56 for Steven does that mean we must be prepared to take 56 for Billings (if we were trading him)?

I mean they are rated the same apparently


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Post Reply