Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826861Post magnifisaint »

He's just a "look at me" person


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826864Post gringo »

saintsRrising wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 9:36pm
B.M wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 4:21pm
I don’t trust a damn thing the club does, haven’t done since they walked out on the Tassie deal (which every person on SS thought was the correct decision)
Making up stuff again I see. Not everyone who was on Saintsational back then was in favour of Thomas pulling the Saints out of Tassie.

The majority backed the coach (as it was Thomas who did not like playing there), but to state that everyone did is just plain wrong.
I think I was one who wanted out, we never won there.


BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826865Post BarryGrogan »

WTF difference would Tassie make to where we're at now?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826867Post gringo »

BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:33pm WTF difference would Tassie make to where we're at now?
A million a year for playing a couple of games? No China, no debt?


BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826870Post BarryGrogan »

gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:34pm
BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:33pm WTF difference would Tassie make to where we're at now?
A million a year for playing a couple of games? No China, no debt?
We weren't getting $1m per year were we?

North aren't getting that are they?


And besides, what has being in Tassie done for North? f*** all.

Personnally, I couldn't care less where we play. China, Gold Coast, NZ, Tassie, Ballarat, Townsville, Darwin, Docklands - who cares?

But thinking we'd be any better or worse on-field if we played games in Tassie is just nonsense.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826872Post gringo »

BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:44pm
gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:34pm
BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:33pm WTF difference would Tassie make to where we're at now?
A million a year for playing a couple of games? No China, no debt?
We weren't getting $1m per year were we?

North aren't getting that are they?


And besides, what has being in Tassie done for North? f*** all.

Personnally, I couldn't care less where we play. China, Gold Coast, NZ, Tassie, Ballarat, Townsville, Darwin, Docklands - who cares?

But thinking we'd be any better or worse on-field if we played games in Tassie is just nonsense.
We'd be s*** anywhere ATM but possibly richer. Not sure what they get for Tassie but it was significant.


BarryGrogan
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
Has thanked: 278 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826874Post BarryGrogan »

gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:47pm

We'd be s*** anywhere ATM but possibly richer. Not sure what they get for Tassie but it was significant.
So what's the difference between China and Tassie then?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826876Post gringo »

BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:53pm
gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:47pm

We'd be s*** anywhere ATM but possibly richer. Not sure what they get for Tassie but it was significant.
So what's the difference between China and Tassie then?
Travel, food poisoning, climactic adjustment, huge logistical difference, distance, costs. China gets us better sponsorship opportunity though.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826877Post desertsaint »

easy way to get out of china is for the club to publicly call on china to release the uyghurs and compensate them.
wont want a bar off us.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5938
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826879Post samuraisaint »

gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 11:14pm
BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:53pm
gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:47pm

We'd be s*** anywhere ATM but possibly richer. Not sure what they get for Tassie but it was significant.
So what's the difference between China and Tassie then?
Travel, food poisoning, climactic adjustment, huge logistical difference, distance, costs. China gets us better sponsorship opportunity though.
Let's be honest - the club only has itself to blame with this China BS. We never beat Port, and they often just get over the line against us. This is aided and abetted by the fact that we very rarely play them here. The club also had to know that our record with these types of fixtures, New Zealand, Tasmania, the Good Friday match, have all been resounding failures which have embarrassed team, club, members and supporters. The club had to know that playing a team we can never beat overseas was going to end badly. When I heard on the radio on the morning of the game that one of the teams had had several members come down with food poisoning I knew it was us, because we are extremely poor at preparing for important matches. The whole setup reeked of amateurism, absolutely stank of it, and now that the coach has gone, along with several others, I would think that the team manager would have to have his position looked at.

Next year we could easily lose this game by more than 100 points given the likelihood of an even younger, more inexperienced side taking the field in 2020 and given our completely incompetent approach to any match we have to fly across water to play.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826883Post saintsRrising »

gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:30pm
saintsRrising wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 9:36pm
B.M wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 4:21pm
I don’t trust a damn thing the club does, haven’t done since they walked out on the Tassie deal (which every person on SS thought was the correct decision)
Making up stuff again I see. Not everyone who was on Saintsational back then was in favour of Thomas pulling the Saints out of Tassie.

The majority backed the coach (as it was Thomas who did not like playing there), but to state that everyone did is just plain wrong.
I think I was one who wanted out, we never won there.

I supported the coach at the time. Most did, but many didn't.

Part of the reason we had a poor record there though radiated down from the coach as GT just did not want to play there. In the end though this was why GT had to go as he put himself before the club.

His anywhere, anytime mantra had a caveat in Tasmania.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17048
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826889Post skeptic »

saintsRrising wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 11:45pm
gringo wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:30pm
saintsRrising wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 9:36pm
B.M wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 4:21pm
I don’t trust a damn thing the club does, haven’t done since they walked out on the Tassie deal (which every person on SS thought was the correct decision)
Making up stuff again I see. Not everyone who was on Saintsational back then was in favour of Thomas pulling the Saints out of Tassie.

The majority backed the coach (as it was Thomas who did not like playing there), but to state that everyone did is just plain wrong.
I think I was one who wanted out, we never won there.

I supported the coach at the time. Most did, but many didn't.

Part of the reason we had a poor record there though radiated down from the coach as GT just did not want to play there. In the end though this was why GT had to go as he put himself before the club.

His anywhere, anytime mantra had a caveat in Tasmania.
I’m a big GT fan and think he’s way underrated here but one simply can not argue with this type of thinking being a big part of his downfall.

Imagine if we toughed it out and learned how to win at Tassie... reckon the conditions in the 09 GF would have suited us to a tee


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826892Post Scollop »

The good thing about travelling every now and then and playing in a neutral city or town (be it Alice Springs, Darwin, Launceston, Hobart or even Cairns or Townsville ) is that the team learns to adapt and get used to the routine of playing outside your home base.

North and the Hawks had strong leadership and a board that thought about the long term. These days they treat Tassie games as if they have the genuine home ground advantage and most opposition clubs hate playing there.

I think teams from interstate also have a similar advantage with the routine of regular travel but they also benefit from their genuine home ground advantage.

The other teams who I am envious of are the smart ones who made sure they nominated the MCG as their home ground. Is it any coincidence that Hawks, Collingwood, and Richmond have done so well?


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12099
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3708 times
Been thanked: 2579 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826893Post Scollop »

terry smith rules wrote: Fri 27 Sep 2019 10:45am
tony74 wrote: Fri 27 Sep 2019 6:54am FYI. Josh was not one of the more popular members of the playing group. I’m sorry I’m not going to further expand on that but just trying to give you some reason for his movement.
With respect and I understand that you have some “ credibility “ on this site , but this post is disgraceful

What you have done is come on here and slandered a much loved (by supporters ) saint, without supplying a hint of information just innuendo.

In many workplaces you would be the one considered toxic for spreading gossip and rumour.

It also screams of “look at me “ I am in the “know” and you are not.

If I ran the club and knew that you had said this it would be you out the door.

Fqf
+1


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826914Post The Fireman »

but if Tony is right wouldn't it be good for us to know this rather than not ?
any sort of inside info is what we are all here for....don't shoot the messenger.


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826915Post barneyboyz »

The Fireman wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2019 10:40am but if Tony is right wouldn't it be good for us to know this rather than not ?
any sort of inside info is what we are all here for....don't shoot the messenger.
+1


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12750
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826916Post B.M »

Barry,

If you think leaving Tassie (and you’ve got the benefit of hindsight) was a good idea, put simply, you have no idea. I understand that short sighted members like p66 thinking it was a good idea to leave at the time, because we could only win indoor, but you have seen Hawthorn flourish down there, and the reality is, that should have been StK.

It’s cost us massively financially and at least 10 000 Tassie Members.

Hawthorn are now the #1 supported team by a mile, when it was St Kilda easily.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12750
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826917Post B.M »

I am a Victorian Tasmanian and argued black and blue about the decision to leave Tas

I was even ridiculed by most of SS, admittedly back then it was a pretty different crew, headed by p66.

I received zero support at the time, and don’t remember anyone joining me to argue the fact that leaving Tassie was short sighted and weak.

The argument was

We will win more games, as we couldn’t beat The Power there, and that selfish vic members would get to see another few games

My counter argument was
We needed to learn to win anywhere to be considered a contender and what about the thousands of Tassie supporters that don’t ever get to see there beloved saints.
Plus the money and membership benefits... which the club turned its back on because at the time we were pretty successful, but alas not ultimately successful.

We went there we we needed Tas for a leg up, and left as soon as it didn’t suit us.

Typically piss poor


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12750
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826918Post B.M »

Back to Bruce

Who takes his place as a 6’5” 100kg Forward with massive work rate in 2020?


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826925Post Ghost Like »

B.M wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2019 11:17am Back to Bruce

Who takes his place as a 6’5” 100kg Forward with massive work rate in 2020?
Probably Marshall or Battle or someone else, I'll let you know after the trade period.

Let's face it, this time last year we had no idea Marshall could actually ruck. He's a terrific ball winning ruck, who can say he won't be a more impressive CHF?

I cannot believe how good Bruce has suddenly become. We cannot rate all our players this highly and still be a bottom 6 side, expecting to trade only who we don't rate.

How would you improve our list? I know you wanted a 2000 / 2001 clean out so you know we have a poor list, it is just sad we don't have the same currency or attraction as back then.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23162
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9109 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826928Post saynta »

When the doggies beat us twice next year by a total of 20 old points with Bruce kicking bags of 4 goals in both matches, I will be on here saying " I told you so."


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826929Post Ghost Like »

saynta wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2019 11:46am When the doggies beat us twice next year by a total of 20 old points with Bruce kicking bags of 4 goals in both matches, I will be on here saying " I told you so."
That's fine Saynta and if he doesn't? Will you be disappointed?

Again, how do we improve our list without changing things? We can't. We have one pick inside the first 50. We have to let go of some players that offer value to other clubs and players we think we can cover in the short term.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826939Post Joffa Burns »

BarryGrogan wrote: Mon 30 Sep 2019 10:33pm WTF difference would Tassie make to where we're at now?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7262
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826944Post evertonfc »

I'm fine to let Bruce go if we can secure something about 15-18, which is about his value.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1167 times

Re: Bruce Requests trade to Dogs

Post: # 1826947Post Saintmatt »

B.M wrote: Tue 01 Oct 2019 11:15am I am a Victorian Tasmanian and argued black and blue about the decision to leave Tas

I was even ridiculed by most of SS, admittedly back then it was a pretty different crew, headed by p66.

I received zero support at the time, and don’t remember anyone joining me to argue the fact that leaving Tassie was short sighted and weak.

The argument was

We will win more games, as we couldn’t beat The Power there, and that selfish vic members would get to see another few games

My counter argument was
We needed to learn to win anywhere to be considered a contender and what about the thousands of Tassie supporters that don’t ever get to see there beloved saints.
Plus the money and membership benefits... which the club turned its back on because at the time we were pretty successful, but alas not ultimately successful.

We went there we we needed Tas for a leg up, and left as soon as it didn’t suit us.

Typically piss poor
Fair call. We all have the great Grant Thomas to thank for that wonderful little piece of short-termism. He couldn't wait to get out of Launceston quick enough.


Go you red, black & white warriors
Post Reply