Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17052
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

Post: # 1824789Post skeptic »

Would be good if this thread could just stick to discussing Ryder as most have done without making it into a drama about what individual forumite's temperaments


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

Post: # 1824807Post samoht »

Wayne42 wrote: Tue 17 Sep 2019 12:58am.

Come on Essendope, offer him the kitchen sink as well, welcome him back and save us from "stupidity".
In other words, save us from "ourselves".... ( after all, "ourselves" and "stupidity" here are interchangeable/synonymous terms). :?


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

Post: # 1824834Post B.M »

Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.

They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.

I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.

Stk history is littered with terrible decisions

To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

Post: # 1824837Post Linton Lodger »

B.M wrote: Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:31pm Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.

They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.

I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.

Stk history is littered with terrible decisions

To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
I'll be quite relaxed if we don't get him, happy with Marshall doing it himself.

However, I won't be too fussed if we do get him. I don't think we will be paying huge money and in the absolute worst case scenario, Ryder will play for Sandy and we'll have a backup if Marshall gets injured.


johnnyrayflamingo
Club Player
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Ryder to Saints (two year deal)

Post: # 1824841Post johnnyrayflamingo »

Linton Lodger wrote: Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:38pm
B.M wrote: Tue 17 Sep 2019 6:31pm Only people who think it’s a good idea are those trying to convince themselves its a good idea, in case it happens.

They also believe/d that every stk decision is a good one, until hindsight suggests it wasn’t.

I respect those who are willing to call the mistake early and risk some humble pie... because on most occasions they are right and invariably Stk makes a poor call.

Stk history is littered with terrible decisions

To continue to delude oneself of that fact, and the fact they continue to make poor decisions is strange imo
I'll be quite relaxed if we don't get him, happy with Marshall doing it himself.

However, I won't be too fussed if we do get him. I don't think we will be paying huge money and in the absolute worst case scenario, Ryder will play for Sandy and we'll have a backup if Marshall gets injured.
Exactly.


😎
Post Reply