1955
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12109
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3711 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: 1955
How would you do it?
Would you delist 10 players every year for the next few years? If you did that, you'd only be picking up a few high end younsters in the draft and then you'd have to recruit or trade in other blokes, but I reckon you'd just need to fill your list with State league players wouldn't you?
With the amount of debt that we have and the fact that we've been a cellar dwellar since 2012 means it would be a difficult call for the club. Practically it is not going to happen in 3-4 seasons and perhaps it means that whoever takes on the job has to rebuild slowly
Would you delist 10 players every year for the next few years? If you did that, you'd only be picking up a few high end younsters in the draft and then you'd have to recruit or trade in other blokes, but I reckon you'd just need to fill your list with State league players wouldn't you?
With the amount of debt that we have and the fact that we've been a cellar dwellar since 2012 means it would be a difficult call for the club. Practically it is not going to happen in 3-4 seasons and perhaps it means that whoever takes on the job has to rebuild slowly
Last edited by Scollop on Sun 25 Aug 2019 12:57am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12768
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2721 times
Re: 1955
It’s not 1955
How do you replace a heap of players?
You can only have a certain amount of kids, and you only get a few good draft selections
Only a few good players on the trade table
What free agents want to go to a bottom team
How do you replace a heap of players?
You can only have a certain amount of kids, and you only get a few good draft selections
Only a few good players on the trade table
What free agents want to go to a bottom team
- Furphy
- Club Player
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
- Location: Berwick
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: 1955
Or, how about we hire a private investigator to ‘bug’ the Hawthorn director’s office and find out who they are planning to draft then we jump in and draft them first? They always seem to easily find superstars between draft picks 30 and 50
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: 1955
The point is we need radical change.
Somethings gotta give.
Somethings gotta give.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Sun 19 May 2019 7:49pm
- Has thanked: 237 times
- Been thanked: 131 times
Re: 1955
I think I recall a poster on here who was pretty spot on with his early calls about 2 years ago. He predicted that we needed a cleanout of all departments after we played our JLT matches in 2018. It was a culmination of observations from our poor performances at the back end of 2017, to list management, to recruiting, to the decision to extend Richo's contract at the end of 2017 and he reconfirmed his position once the 2018 season started...
Find that potty mouthed bloke who called himself Con Gorazides and offer him the role of CEO
Find that potty mouthed bloke who called himself Con Gorazides and offer him the role of CEO
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: 1955
Agree somewhat. Although Billings aint crap.
Long Parker have great potential. Give them a break they need at least 3 years.
Lonie will never make it.
Sell everything we can and get HILL and KING
Acres we need to keep. 194cm beast who when on is very good. Possibly his height and positioning is why he is taking long to develop. But giving him up to freo and then he becomes elite would be a disaster.
A lot of the issues is MENTAL. Need better coaches.
Newnes, McKennzie, Lonie, Rice, Longer
Carlisle is a disgrace. Clearly he doesnt care, is slow and makes bad slow decisions.
Get something for him.
Long Parker have great potential. Give them a break they need at least 3 years.
Lonie will never make it.
Sell everything we can and get HILL and KING
Acres we need to keep. 194cm beast who when on is very good. Possibly his height and positioning is why he is taking long to develop. But giving him up to freo and then he becomes elite would be a disaster.
A lot of the issues is MENTAL. Need better coaches.
Newnes, McKennzie, Lonie, Rice, Longer
Carlisle is a disgrace. Clearly he doesnt care, is slow and makes bad slow decisions.
Get something for him.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: 1955
Agree somewhat. Although Billings aint crap.
Long Parker have great potential. Give them a break they need at least 3 years.
Lonie will never make it.
Sell everything we can and get HILL and KING
Acres we need to keep. 194cm beast who when on is very good. Possibly his height and positioning is why he is taking long to develop. But giving him up to freo and then he becomes elite would be a disaster.
A lot of the issues is MENTAL. Need better coaches.
Newnes, McKennzie, Lonie, Rice, Longer
Carlisle is a disgrace. Clearly he doesnt care, is slow and makes bad slow decisions.
Get something for him.
Long Parker have great potential. Give them a break they need at least 3 years.
Lonie will never make it.
Sell everything we can and get HILL and KING
Acres we need to keep. 194cm beast who when on is very good. Possibly his height and positioning is why he is taking long to develop. But giving him up to freo and then he becomes elite would be a disaster.
A lot of the issues is MENTAL. Need better coaches.
Newnes, McKennzie, Lonie, Rice, Longer
Carlisle is a disgrace. Clearly he doesnt care, is slow and makes bad slow decisions.
Get something for him.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: 1955
So lock in a flag for 2030.
...only 242 H&A games away.
...only 242 H&A games away.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
Re: 1955
The Way Clarko Drafted was everything revolves
around your talls ,now we have Bruce at CHF &
if all is to be believed King at FF (Geez we are due for a bit of luck)Membrey as our third tall with Gresh & Long running around their feet so hopefully the forward line is sort of solved ,Battle at CHB was very good if Carlisle goes but we do need a quality Full Back and midfielder maybe Bytel(pray),Marshall is a gun,Wilkie is solid,Billings & Acres would be better if coached properly and surrounded by better players ,not sure we are that far off it our field kicking & shots for goal need vast improvement but we get the ball a shitload as Dunstall said and as he said
if we improve those two things a quick rise is not beyond us!PS Go hard at B.King now!
around your talls ,now we have Bruce at CHF &
if all is to be believed King at FF (Geez we are due for a bit of luck)Membrey as our third tall with Gresh & Long running around their feet so hopefully the forward line is sort of solved ,Battle at CHB was very good if Carlisle goes but we do need a quality Full Back and midfielder maybe Bytel(pray),Marshall is a gun,Wilkie is solid,Billings & Acres would be better if coached properly and surrounded by better players ,not sure we are that far off it our field kicking & shots for goal need vast improvement but we get the ball a shitload as Dunstall said and as he said
if we improve those two things a quick rise is not beyond us!PS Go hard at B.King now!
PADDLEPOP1000
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: 1955
Personally I don’t think it’s that hard.
Keep players that have demonstrated talent and fit in your structure and expectations even if they’ve had patches where they’ve struggled over the last 2 years
Start moving on players that will never get close to being the players they should
Play undeveloped players that are improving
Don’t offer long contracts to young players that have been in the system a few years longer but have stagnated for a long time
Keep: Coffield, Clarke, Carlisle, Billings, Steven, Bruce, Membrey, Steele, Ross, Gresham, Hannebery, Roberton (if fit), Marshall, Webster, Wilkie, and Battle
The next category is the unproven/unestablished but looks promising though not definite top 22... keep the majority of if not all
Lonie, Long, Parker, Paton, Langlands, Phillips, Hind, Marsh
Then you have the too early to tell group... pbly keeping unless you really need to turnover or you get an offer
King, Bytel, Clavarino, Mayo, Marsh, Austin
Then you have your straight to move on group
Armitage, Longer, Pierce, Rowe, Paddy (sorry but it’s time) and Rice (been long enough).
The final group is where list managers make their money. These are players that can be good, can be average, could be depth, have potential but all things considered at the end of the day they are not yet entirely what we want them to be.
Dunstan
Geary
McKenzie
Young
Joyce
Sinclair
Kent
White
Savage
Newnes
Acres
Brown
Can’t move them all on... and obviously many are contracted. Me personally I would keep Brown for depth, Geary, Dunstan, Acres, White and Sinclair and at a push Newnes and McKenzie but they are on the fringe as they’re only so many to cut
So the guys that go are
Armitage, Longer, Pierce, Rowe, Paddy, Rice, Savage, Kent, Joyce, Young.
That’s 10. Geeez that’s a lot even giving Newnes, McKenzie and Roberton (injury) lifelines. 3 draft picks in, say 1-2 trades and an FA or 2... that’s 7 in at most.
I guess you have to look at that bottom column and see if you can get a trade or two for guys like Acres or Savage. Get something back for Steven in addition to a pick if he goes. Alternatively, guys 1-3 players... pbly those under contract like Kent May get a reprieve.
I guess the reality is we’ve hung on to too many players that aren’t up to scratch for too long
Keep players that have demonstrated talent and fit in your structure and expectations even if they’ve had patches where they’ve struggled over the last 2 years
Start moving on players that will never get close to being the players they should
Play undeveloped players that are improving
Don’t offer long contracts to young players that have been in the system a few years longer but have stagnated for a long time
Keep: Coffield, Clarke, Carlisle, Billings, Steven, Bruce, Membrey, Steele, Ross, Gresham, Hannebery, Roberton (if fit), Marshall, Webster, Wilkie, and Battle
The next category is the unproven/unestablished but looks promising though not definite top 22... keep the majority of if not all
Lonie, Long, Parker, Paton, Langlands, Phillips, Hind, Marsh
Then you have the too early to tell group... pbly keeping unless you really need to turnover or you get an offer
King, Bytel, Clavarino, Mayo, Marsh, Austin
Then you have your straight to move on group
Armitage, Longer, Pierce, Rowe, Paddy (sorry but it’s time) and Rice (been long enough).
The final group is where list managers make their money. These are players that can be good, can be average, could be depth, have potential but all things considered at the end of the day they are not yet entirely what we want them to be.
Dunstan
Geary
McKenzie
Young
Joyce
Sinclair
Kent
White
Savage
Newnes
Acres
Brown
Can’t move them all on... and obviously many are contracted. Me personally I would keep Brown for depth, Geary, Dunstan, Acres, White and Sinclair and at a push Newnes and McKenzie but they are on the fringe as they’re only so many to cut
So the guys that go are
Armitage, Longer, Pierce, Rowe, Paddy, Rice, Savage, Kent, Joyce, Young.
That’s 10. Geeez that’s a lot even giving Newnes, McKenzie and Roberton (injury) lifelines. 3 draft picks in, say 1-2 trades and an FA or 2... that’s 7 in at most.
I guess you have to look at that bottom column and see if you can get a trade or two for guys like Acres or Savage. Get something back for Steven in addition to a pick if he goes. Alternatively, guys 1-3 players... pbly those under contract like Kent May get a reprieve.
I guess the reality is we’ve hung on to too many players that aren’t up to scratch for too long
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: 1955
People were calling out for SOS to be axed, that all went quiet when Teague took over and showed everyone how much talent SOS has amassed at Carlton.barneyboyz wrote: ↑Tue 27 Aug 2019 8:34amThe interesting part of this comment (and situation), is that earlier this year the whole industry was calling for his neck
Teague showed everyone that Bolton was the issue, not SOS.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?