Craig mysteriously wont be anywhere near a phone, and will be oblivious to the fact that one of his clients has shafted another of his clients. Just like last time.
Brad Scott
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Brad Scott
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: Brad Scott
Ah - Lyon to Freo! OK, yes of course. Whatever - there's more to this than Brad Scott (or BS as I prefer to call him) stepping away for the good of the team. Yeah, right.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2019 9:30pm
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 112 times
Re: Brad Scott
Yep. Strategically very sound.HighettMan wrote: ↑Sun 26 May 2019 8:49am It's been interesting. Brad's stocks would have fallen sharply had he been sacked or not had his contract renewed however to exit in the manner he has cast's an interesting new landscape for coach AND club.
I like his mongrel. We need a lot more of that
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Brad Scott
I really would be amazed if the St. Kilda footy club were to recruit Scott as senior coach. AND disappointed, for just one compelling reason.... EX-Malthouse assistant.... really? do we need ANOTHER one of those????
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: Brad Scott
Brad Scott has left the Roos; he has exited the club.
Can we call it 'Brexit' ?
Can we call it 'Brexit' ?
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Brad Scott
Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12099
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3708 times
- Been thanked: 2579 times
Re: Brad Scott
Footy Classified reminded us last night about the period just before Brad was appointed. If you believe the rumours, the Kangaroos first choice was going to be Nathan Buckley. This is before Figjam had even had any experience as an assistant coach.
Apparantly Figjam may have used the offer that North provided as leveridge for the security at Collingwood and the promise that he would get the senior coach gig. The reason they brought it up was because of the succession plan offered to Bucks and the reasons that Collingwood offered it.
They (especially Nathan's biggest fan - Eddie) wanted to lock him in and not lose the opportunity of having him coach Collingwood and not potentially seeing him successfully coaching another team. Classified mentioned Sam Mitchell and Hawthorn possibly having a similar siuation with Sam Mitchell on the radar for a potential senior coaching gig. Hutchy thought they may nned to contemplate locking Sam in so that they don't lose him.
Both Juddy and Lloyd said that they were pretty sure that Hawthorn aren't going to entertain a succession plan or locking in any guarantees to an assistant, even if it's Sam Mitchell
Apparantly Figjam may have used the offer that North provided as leveridge for the security at Collingwood and the promise that he would get the senior coach gig. The reason they brought it up was because of the succession plan offered to Bucks and the reasons that Collingwood offered it.
They (especially Nathan's biggest fan - Eddie) wanted to lock him in and not lose the opportunity of having him coach Collingwood and not potentially seeing him successfully coaching another team. Classified mentioned Sam Mitchell and Hawthorn possibly having a similar siuation with Sam Mitchell on the radar for a potential senior coaching gig. Hutchy thought they may nned to contemplate locking Sam in so that they don't lose him.
Both Juddy and Lloyd said that they were pretty sure that Hawthorn aren't going to entertain a succession plan or locking in any guarantees to an assistant, even if it's Sam Mitchell
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun 28 Apr 2019 2:55pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Brad Scott
Where's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Brad Scott
Scott confirmed he didn't want to be part of any rebuild and the club needed fresh air to reinvent itself.
Scott must have something lined up IMO. Interesting.
Scott must have something lined up IMO. Interesting.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: Brad Scott
Well, Scott said it himself yesterday on Sky, apparently.King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/roos-surpri ... l-comments
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Brad Scott
cant believe that king12 would argue otherwise very clearly a board decision and very clearly moved forward and caught Scott by surprisefreely wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:37pmWell, Scott said it himself yesterday on Sky, apparently.King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/roos-surpri ... l-comments
It has hurt him deeply
Personally I dont think he has anything lined up to walk "straight into"
In the interview on 360 last night clearly loves the players, the job, and was still talking about US ( kangas)
Seeya
*************
*************
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Brad Scott
Oops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun 12 Aug 2018 12:18pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 63 times
Re: Brad Scott
Not a fan of Brad Scott... more petulant than his brother... I recall when he took over at Norf... he referred to himself as a third person rarely saying "we" just seemed to blame everyone else but himself
As a coach I think he is not much better than Richo... and fwiw at least Richo seems to be finally getting better....
Personally hope Scott didn't get a job, cause I reckon he sold Norf down the farm to keep his dismal record looking better...
First video I ever watch is after Norf loose... to watch him carry on like a spoilt , surly kid... he has no class what so ever...
In fact I think he's an a grade arsehole
As a coach I think he is not much better than Richo... and fwiw at least Richo seems to be finally getting better....
Personally hope Scott didn't get a job, cause I reckon he sold Norf down the farm to keep his dismal record looking better...
First video I ever watch is after Norf loose... to watch him carry on like a spoilt , surly kid... he has no class what so ever...
In fact I think he's an a grade arsehole
I used to be supersaints but after 16 years my profile dissapeared... ??? if I make any reference to past posts .. it will be under supersiants.. glad to be back on line
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun 28 Apr 2019 2:55pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Brad Scott
Stop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun 28 Apr 2019 2:55pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Brad Scott
That is correct Ted, key statement being: Scott said he didn't want to be part of a rebuild!tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:35pm Scott confirmed he didn't want to be part of any rebuild and the club needed fresh air to reinvent itself.
Scott must have something lined up IMO. Interesting.
Scott was shocked because it got out, (leaked by club on purpose) he wanted to coach out the year, that's why he was shocked. Read and spin it anyway you want, Scott made the decision to leave, North just bought the end forward!
When your negotiating a payout, you are always happy to paint your former employer in a good light, think about that one!
Scott has a new job, don't worry about that, the last to find out these things are the dud supporters and armchairs!
Don't worry Dud, you will have a new coach to bash soon!
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Brad Scott
King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:10pmStop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.
Yeah it’s hard to keep track of what you’ve given away with all these profiles, isn’t it
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5115
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1457 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Brad Scott
Scott, B. may have out smarted himself. Thinks, offer three obvious options, the Board won't consider the one that involves me leaving, I'll say I don't want to be part of a rebuild, the option they probably have to go for, they will beg me and after a suitable pause I'll agree to stay for a lot more money. What could go wrong.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
- mightysainters
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun 28 Apr 2019 2:55pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Brad Scott
So Lazar is a Stoney is he?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:37pmKing12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:10pmStop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.Yeah it’s hard to keep track of what you’ve given away with all these profiles, isn’t it
Is that what you're saying, is it?
At least your judgement is consistent anyway, both with people and football.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Brad Scott
And I presume you think the Americans didn't walk on the moon like others on SS?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:37pmKing12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:10pmStop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.Yeah it’s hard to keep track of what you’ve given away with all these profiles, isn’t it
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Sat 06 Apr 2019 10:34am
- Has thanked: 278 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
Re: Brad Scott
He said on AFL360 that he offered to stay for the rebuild. He felt that a new voice could be best for the club, but he'd do it if they felt he was the best person for the job.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:54pm Scott, B. may have out smarted himself. Thinks, offer three obvious options, the Board won't consider the one that involves me leaving, I'll say I don't want to be part of a rebuild, the option they probably have to go for, they will beg me and after a suitable pause I'll agree to stay for a lot more money. What could go wrong.
They felt he wasn't.
So they'd agreed that he'd stay on until the end of year then leave. But then the whispers got out and Robbo was writing an article about it on the Friday, so the Board wrapped it up and got rid of him on the spot.
Whether it's true or not, who knows. But according to him, he was effectively sacked.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Brad Scott
I don’t know, you’re the one telling the story.King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 10:21pmSo Lazar is a Stoney is he?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:37pmKing12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:10pmStop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.Yeah it’s hard to keep track of what you’ve given away with all these profiles, isn’t it
Is that what you're saying, is it?
At least your judgement is consistent anyway, both with people and football.
When the similarities between yours and Stonecolds posting style was highlighted, you referred (above) to him as ‘Lazar’ without any prompting from anyone else. That’s a weird thing to say about a poster who seemed to vanish just as you showed up...
I can imagine juggling so many personas can get a bit tricky!
And for the record, I prefer Stoney
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun 28 Apr 2019 2:55pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Brad Scott
As per usual, you are letting your imagination get in the way of the facts, you should re-read what you and others have posted re Lazar, anyway, keep sucking up the St.Kilda wins, both on and off the field.The_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 29 May 2019 12:08amI don’t know, you’re the one telling the story.King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 10:21pmSo Lazar is a Stoney is he?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:37pmKing12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 7:10pmStop calling me a Stoney pls, I'm dead against drugs, not sure what your on about?The_Dud wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 6:54pmOops, another swing-and-a-miss Stoney!King12 wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:33pmWhere's your evidence for such a 'big statement'?saintsRrising wrote: ↑Tue 28 May 2019 4:53am Scott was pushed. Did not walk.
If we were stupid enough to appoint him you can turn the lights out.
Your statement couldn't be any further from the truth.
Thank you.Yeah it’s hard to keep track of what you’ve given away with all these profiles, isn’t it
Is that what you're saying, is it?
At least your judgement is consistent anyway, both with people and football.
When the similarities between yours and Stonecolds posting style was highlighted, you referred (above) to him as ‘Lazar’ without any prompting from anyone else. That’s a weird thing to say about a poster who seemed to vanish just as you showed up...
I can imagine juggling so many personas can get a bit tricky!
And for the record, I prefer Stoney
Sleep tight Cupcake!