Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 9:56pm
How the f##k dies Kent hold his spot in this team?
Seriously, how do guys performing in the twos like Hind and Dunstan and even Armo perceive the selection process when a guy like Kent retains his spot?
The guy doesn’t tackle, is soft as butter at the contest and barely gets the ball.
Did they guarantee him Game when he signed?
FFS, this is a joke!
Ever heard of like for like Corf?????
Get over it!!!!!
Ever heard of rewarding on form and performance Stonecold?
Ever heard of enticement where number if Games are guaranteed?
Answer me one question.
Do you believe Kent has earned his place in the team through performance?
He’s as soft as butter, doest tackle and barely gets the pill. What does he actually do that warrants retention?
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 9:56pm
How the f##k dies Kent hold his spot in this team?
Seriously, how do guys performing in the twos like Hind and Dunstan and even Armo perceive the selection process when a guy like Kent retains his spot?
The guy doesn’t tackle, is soft as butter at the contest and barely gets the ball.
Did they guarantee him Game when he signed?
FFS, this is a joke!
Ever heard of like for like Corf?????
Get over it!!!!!
Ever heard of rewarding on form and performance Stonecold?
Ever heard of enticement where number if Games are guaranteed?
Answer me one question.
Do you believe Kent has earned his place in the team through performance?
He’s as soft as butter, doest tackle and barely gets the pill. What does he actually do that warrants retention?
So, in your eye's, he's the new Mav!!!!!
You won't like this, however, he plays his role, something you don't seem to understand!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 11:16pm
Good selections and makeup. We picked a quick side to beat Melbourne's slowish side and midfield.
Especially Kent, given Parker may not get up and Young may debut, maybe!!!!!
Of course. All players in the side deserved their spot and are playing their part. Even if a player has a down week it seems the selectors will back them in to get the team makeup right. E.g. Sinclair after Freo
I like it.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Yep, because I think Kent is a dud I’m not s supporter.
My thoughts on Kent remove the sponsorship money Ive spent for many years, the memorabilia purchased, the $ kicked into player trips and funds when requested to do so, the ex players I’ve employed, yep because I think Kents a dud I’m not a supporter.
You sir are a genius
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
So you blokes judge an AFL footy player that is new to our club after 4 games and give him a very ordinary nickname. You forget he has played not far off a 100 games and would have probably been in Melbourne's finals side barring injury last year.
Kent hasn't been excellent this year but he hasn't been terrible either. He has been playing his part as most likely asked by the coaches in 3 winning sides. E.g. he shut down Harbrow in the first game against the Suns
Kent hasn't played a lot of footy in the last 2 seasons but he will get much better with a deep run of games. He doesn't get massive numbers but I'm glad as a Saints supporter that he is on our list as he provides excellent depth and expierence in his position.
I'd rather show my support than bag out a new fella to the club as a supporter.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 11:48pm
So you blokes judge an AFL footy player that is new to our club after 4 games and give him a very ordinary nickname. You forget he has played not far off a 100 games and would have probably been in Melbourne's finals side barring injury last year.
Kent hasn't been excellent this year but he hasn't been terrible either. He has been playing his part as most likely asked by the coaches in 3 winning sides. E.g. he shut down Harbrow in the first game against the Suns
Kent hasn't played a lot of footy in the last 2 seasons but he will get much better with a deep run of games. He doesn't get massive numbers but I'm glad as a Saints supporter that he is on our list as he provides excellent depth and expierence in his position.
I'd rather show my support than bag out a new fella to the club as a supporter.
Your a supporter Ted, some are not!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!! We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
Now which one is true?
The story you perpetuated in multiple posts about Mav Kent being a best 22 player at Melbourne set to be picked in the finals team or this evenings feeble retraction.
I’ll save you the trouble bulls*** Ted, don’t bother answering a question, you never do.
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sun 14 Oct 2018 3:09pm
Kent was in Melbourne's best 22. Played the last game and was set for finals but got injured.
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 11:48pm
So you blokes judge an AFL footy player that is new to our club after 4 games and give him a very ordinary nickname. You forget he has played not far off a 100 games and would have probably been in Melbourne's finals side barring injury last year.
Can’t wait for the dud to be banished to the twos to play out the rest of his 3 year deal at Sandy.
3 year deal for a dud fringe player from Melbourne
<1 day ban for commenting negatively on a poster as part of an ongoing dispute and as such all subsequent offences will be deemed as 1 week bans>
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Probably the best team we have fielded this season, but there is some risk if we lose a tall early in the game i.e. marshall or brown. Dees have gone tall, so we will either beat them with speed and pressure or get caught out for height down back.
Dmac is quickish but also plays tall as third man up and i dont think patton or geary are a like for like .
Wouldnt be surprised if marsh at 193cm comes in for patton. Seems the classic utility type- quick but good in the air and xan play anywhere
Also interested to see what happens if parker doesnt come up.
Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Fri 19 Apr 2019 12:59am
Again proving you are full of s*** Ted.
Now which one is true?
The story you perpetuated in multiple posts about Mav Kent being a best 22 player at Melbourne set to be picked in the finals team or this evenings feeble retraction.
I’ll save you the trouble bulls*** Ted, don’t bother answering a question, you never do.
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sun 14 Oct 2018 3:09pm
Kent was in Melbourne's best 22. Played the last game and was set for finals but got injured.
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Thu 18 Apr 2019 11:48pm
So you blokes judge an AFL footy player that is new to our club after 4 games and give him a very ordinary nickname. You forget he has played not far off a 100 games and would have probably been in Melbourne's finals side barring injury last year.
Can’t wait for the dud to be banished to the twos to play out the rest of his 3 year deal at Sandy.
3 year deal for a dud fringe player from Melbourne
Wow. Harsh assessment. Not great support to be wishing ill upon our own players.
