Lock for Bottom 4?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Buckley took over a team which had won 20 games out of 22 the year before.Shaggy wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 11:39pmGilsAuPair wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 8:18pm
Wins after first 100 games as AFL coach:
Buckley - 55
Hardwick - 45
Richo - 34
Hardwick took over a team which had Cotchin, riedwoldt, Dusty, Rance and Diledeo in his first year, and had nearly made the finals 2 years prior with a very young list.
Richo took over a list on a downward spiral. The best players remaining are Jack Steven, Billings and Robbo from his first year. Good players but our list has needed serious rebuilding under Richo.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Tue 26 Feb 2019 10:34pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Shaggy wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 11:45pmBuckley took over a team which had won 20 games out of 22 the year before.Shaggy wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 11:39pmGilsAuPair wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 8:18pmWins after first 100 games as AFL coach:
Buckley - 55
Hardwick - 45
Richo - 34
Hardwick took over a team which had Cotchin, riedwoldt, Dusty, Rance and Diledeo in his first year, and had nearly made the finals 2 years prior with a very young list.
Richo took over a list on a downward spiral. The best players remaining are Jack Steven, Billings and Robbo from his first year. Good players but our list has needed serious rebuilding under Richo.
You realise Richmond finished 2nd last in 2010. Those players you list as current day stars were all nobodies when Hardwick took over. They took 3-5 years to come good under Hardwick.
As for Collingwood. They WON a flag in 2010(remember?) and then played off in a GF in 2011.
By rights they were due for a fall and re-build after losing the likes of Swan, Shaw, Thomas, Maxwell, Didak, Cloke, Beams, O'Brien etc.
Which they have done.
Richo has had more than enough time to get a good group up going if he is good enough imo.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
So list wise we are bottom two according to SEN? They rate the lists of their 'bottom three' and Carlton is their clear winner. Guess this makes us 17th! https://www.sen.com.au/news/2019/03/05/ ... old-coast/
However, they didn't talk about coaching, management, culture, team spirit, the motivational narrative (we fight back) etc., so here are clearly in top spot!
However, they didn't talk about coaching, management, culture, team spirit, the motivational narrative (we fight back) etc., so here are clearly in top spot!
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Hardwick inherited players who took 3-5 years to develop to superstars.GilsAuPair wrote: ↑Wed 06 Mar 2019 12:37amShaggy wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 11:45pmBuckley took over a team which had won 20 games out of 22 the year before.Shaggy wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 11:39pmGilsAuPair wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 8:18pmWins after first 100 games as AFL coach:
Buckley - 55
Hardwick - 45
Richo - 34
Hardwick took over a team which had Cotchin, riedwoldt, Dusty, Rance and Diledeo in his first year, and had nearly made the finals 2 years prior with a very young list.
Richo took over a list on a downward spiral. The best players remaining are Jack Steven, Billings and Robbo from his first year. Good players but our list has needed serious rebuilding under Richo.
You realise Richmond finished 2nd last in 2010. Those players you list as current day stars were all nobodies when Hardwick took over. They took 3-5 years to come good under Hardwick.
As for Collingwood. They WON a flag in 2010(remember?) and then played off in a GF in 2011.
By rights they were due for a fall and re-build after losing the likes of Swan, Shaw, Thomas, Maxwell, Didak, Cloke, Beams, O'Brien etc.
Which they have done.
Richo has had more than enough time to get a good group up going if he is good enough imo.
Richo in his first year did not inherit superstars. Hardwick was lucky.
Collingwood won the flag in 2010 with an average age of 24 years 2 months which is really young. We were nearly averaging 27 years old in 2010. Collingwood was 25 years & 10 months old in 2018 GF.
Buckley got trade value for Shaw, Thomas, Cloke, Beams & O'Brien because they did not retire, Buckley did not want them.
There is a difference.
By rights Collingwood should have won a couple of flags since 2010 IMO.
If you want to judge Richo as having equal opportunity with the others. it is not true. He has been working with a crap list. Regardless IMO Richo is not a special coach. But most are not. Clarko is.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Richo has had long enough to have his own list now so enough of those kind of excuses. He isn't making them so no one else should in his behalf
.He is part of the recruiting team and is a development coach so recruiting poorly is partly on him, not recruiting players to fill holes in a few years is on him ie where is another quick outside mid, it's been 6 years. Luckily we have an abundance of half back flankers for some reason???
The ruck he gets a pass on as that is not his area and we have drafted plenty but none have come on, that's on the ruck coach
Look at our skill levels. Are they any good? No they are crap so who is responsible for developing skills?
Buckley was never on the verge of being let go, the board saw what he was doing and building and new it took time as did Hardwick and Richmond. What is Richo building towards, where is his game plan, where are his game winning tactics. Long bomb into 50? Let's try it again and again eventually we will get one.
Bottom line is he is done this year unless we improve dramatically and I can't see it happening. Carlisle gone, Jack Steven MAY not be at 100%, hanneberry is this year's Freeman. IE hamstring issues so he is 2 weeks away again. King won't play until July August and that will be at Sandy to give him a chance to get his form back Where are the wins coming from?
.He is part of the recruiting team and is a development coach so recruiting poorly is partly on him, not recruiting players to fill holes in a few years is on him ie where is another quick outside mid, it's been 6 years. Luckily we have an abundance of half back flankers for some reason???
The ruck he gets a pass on as that is not his area and we have drafted plenty but none have come on, that's on the ruck coach
Look at our skill levels. Are they any good? No they are crap so who is responsible for developing skills?
Buckley was never on the verge of being let go, the board saw what he was doing and building and new it took time as did Hardwick and Richmond. What is Richo building towards, where is his game plan, where are his game winning tactics. Long bomb into 50? Let's try it again and again eventually we will get one.
Bottom line is he is done this year unless we improve dramatically and I can't see it happening. Carlisle gone, Jack Steven MAY not be at 100%, hanneberry is this year's Freeman. IE hamstring issues so he is 2 weeks away again. King won't play until July August and that will be at Sandy to give him a chance to get his form back Where are the wins coming from?
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Richo has had plenty of time to build a list, that’s no excuse anymore.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
I think that's what they have been trying to do over the last six months?samoht wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 3:19pm I blame Richo too for what he's in control of, that he's not getting right - what exactly that is varies widely (too widely for mine), and personal bias comes into it , while I'm trying to be objective.
It's a lot more complicated than meets the eye. There are many factors at play - Steele credited Richo for his rapid development and rise last year. - he didn't name any midfield development coaches - he mentioned and credited Richo only.
Others might want to overlook this detail - but I'm not going to.
Carlisle is an important cog in our team - he's much more influential and important to us than he was at Essendon (to Essendon). What's stopping other players from developing too and playing to their potential - and joining Membrey, Steele, Ross, Roberton, Carlisle etc - is it Richo?
It can't only be him (we can't blame Richo for everything - or nigh on everything)
I'm providing the counter (and unpopular) argument - we should look at all the underlying reasons for where we're at - and we need to leave our biases aside.
That's the only way we will get to the truth - or move closer to it.
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Also, knowing what is right or wrong at any football club is like trying to find out how long a piece of string isbarneyboyz wrote: ↑Thu 07 Mar 2019 2:34pmI think that's what they have been trying to do over the last six months?samoht wrote: ↑Tue 05 Mar 2019 3:19pm I blame Richo too for what he's in control of, that he's not getting right - what exactly that is varies widely (too widely for mine), and personal bias comes into it , while I'm trying to be objective.
It's a lot more complicated than meets the eye. There are many factors at play - Steele credited Richo for his rapid development and rise last year. - he didn't name any midfield development coaches - he mentioned and credited Richo only.
Others might want to overlook this detail - but I'm not going to.
Carlisle is an important cog in our team - he's much more influential and important to us than he was at Essendon (to Essendon). What's stopping other players from developing too and playing to their potential - and joining Membrey, Steele, Ross, Roberton, Carlisle etc - is it Richo?
It can't only be him (we can't blame Richo for everything - or nigh on everything)
I'm providing the counter (and unpopular) argument - we should look at all the underlying reasons for where we're at - and we need to leave our biases aside.
That's the only way we will get to the truth - or move closer to it.
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Two wrongs don't make a right.
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Pythageran predictions reported on FOX for the 2018 season are here:
Richmond: 18 wins, 16.8 Pythagorean wins
West Coast: 16 wins, 14.9 Pythagorean wins
Hawthorn: 15 wins, 14.7 Pythagorean wins
Collingwood: 15 wins, 14.8 Pythagorean wins
Sydney Swans: 14 wins, 12.9 Pythagorean wins
GWS Giants: 13.5 wins, 13.7 Pythagorean wins
North Melbourne: 12 wins, 12.8 Pythagorean wins
Port Adelaide: 12 wins, 12.5 Pythagorean wins
Essendon: 12 wins, 12 Pythagorean wins
Adelaide Crows: 12 wins, 11.8 Pythagorean wins
St Kilda: 4.5 wins, 5.6 Pythagorean wins
Gold Coast Suns: 4 wins, 2.7 Pythagorean wins
Carlton: 2 wins, 2.6 Pythagorean wins
...and they are staggeringly accurate.
Anyone know what they are for 2019?
Are they BS or real statistically generated predictions?
URL : https://www.google.co.jp/amp/s/coupler. ... 0b4e9e1a39
St Kilda won 1.1 less games than predicted but the accuracy of those other predictions blows my mind. Please tell me they are not real!
Perhaps they generated algorithms post season and retrospectively applies them?
Richmond: 18 wins, 16.8 Pythagorean wins
West Coast: 16 wins, 14.9 Pythagorean wins
Hawthorn: 15 wins, 14.7 Pythagorean wins
Collingwood: 15 wins, 14.8 Pythagorean wins
Sydney Swans: 14 wins, 12.9 Pythagorean wins
GWS Giants: 13.5 wins, 13.7 Pythagorean wins
North Melbourne: 12 wins, 12.8 Pythagorean wins
Port Adelaide: 12 wins, 12.5 Pythagorean wins
Essendon: 12 wins, 12 Pythagorean wins
Adelaide Crows: 12 wins, 11.8 Pythagorean wins
St Kilda: 4.5 wins, 5.6 Pythagorean wins
Gold Coast Suns: 4 wins, 2.7 Pythagorean wins
Carlton: 2 wins, 2.6 Pythagorean wins
...and they are staggeringly accurate.
Anyone know what they are for 2019?
Are they BS or real statistically generated predictions?
URL : https://www.google.co.jp/amp/s/coupler. ... 0b4e9e1a39
St Kilda won 1.1 less games than predicted but the accuracy of those other predictions blows my mind. Please tell me they are not real!
Perhaps they generated algorithms post season and retrospectively applies them?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
If I was generating an algorithm and applying it retrospectively the algorithm would be, number of expected wins = number of actual wins.shanegrambeau wrote: ↑Thu 07 Mar 2019 5:49pm Pythageran predictions reported on FOX for the 2018 season are here:
Richmond: 18 wins, 16.8 Pythagorean wins
West Coast: 16 wins, 14.9 Pythagorean wins
Hawthorn: 15 wins, 14.7 Pythagorean wins
Collingwood: 15 wins, 14.8 Pythagorean wins
Sydney Swans: 14 wins, 12.9 Pythagorean wins
GWS Giants: 13.5 wins, 13.7 Pythagorean wins
North Melbourne: 12 wins, 12.8 Pythagorean wins
Port Adelaide: 12 wins, 12.5 Pythagorean wins
Essendon: 12 wins, 12 Pythagorean wins
Adelaide Crows: 12 wins, 11.8 Pythagorean wins
St Kilda: 4.5 wins, 5.6 Pythagorean wins
Gold Coast Suns: 4 wins, 2.7 Pythagorean wins
Carlton: 2 wins, 2.6 Pythagorean wins
...and they are staggeringly accurate.
Anyone know what they are for 2019?
Are they BS or real statistically generated predictions?
URL : https://www.google.co.jp/amp/s/coupler. ... 0b4e9e1a39
St Kilda won 1.1 less games than predicted but the accuracy of those other predictions blows my mind. Please tell me they are not real!
Perhaps they generated algorithms post season and retrospectively applies them?
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12099
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3708 times
- Been thanked: 2579 times
- shanegrambeau
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5971
- Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
- Has thanked: 334 times
- Been thanked: 711 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Right, so what is the point of the whole exercise?
You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
8 wins and the usual heavy losses interstate and at Geelong if we have a poor year.
9 wins and several very narrow losses if we have a good one.
9 wins and several very narrow losses if we have a good one.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Lol you have just put down all the reasons why Richo should have excuses for this year.DJ Higgins wrote: ↑Thu 07 Mar 2019 8:58am Richo has had long enough to have his own list now so enough of those kind of excuses. He isn't making them so no one else should in his behalf
.He is part of the recruiting team and is a development coach so recruiting poorly is partly on him, not recruiting players to fill holes in a few years is on him ie where is another quick outside mid, it's been 6 years. Luckily we have an abundance of half back flankers for some reason???
The ruck he gets a pass on as that is not his area and we have drafted plenty but none have come on, that's on the ruck coach
Look at our skill levels. Are they any good? No they are crap so who is responsible for developing skills?
Buckley was never on the verge of being let go, the board saw what he was doing and building and new it took time as did Hardwick and Richmond. What is Richo building towards, where is his game plan, where are his game winning tactics. Long bomb into 50? Let's try it again and again eventually we will get one.
Bottom line is he is done this year unless we improve dramatically and I can't see it happening. Carlisle gone, Jack Steven MAY not be at 100%, hanneberry is this year's Freeman. IE hamstring issues so he is 2 weeks away again. King won't play until July August and that will be at Sandy to give him a chance to get his form back Where are the wins coming from?
But I think the team we have built is good and will perform regardless of Carlisle, Steven, Hanneberry and King. Steele, Billings and Gresham. As a dark horse Marshall. Clark is real. We have players seriously developing at the top end IMO.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Well, (so far) the Coaches and players appear not to have read the script! We already have more wins at Docklands than we had last season (albeit by narrow margins) We are at round five and are only one win away from equalling last seasons total of wins! Small steps, yes, but IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION!
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
- mightysainters
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
I created this thread and it really pained me:. Couldn’t be happier with the effort and structure thus far. Love Ratten
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Location: Still aisle 35
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Is it just me, or does the current game style look similar to the "100% defensive pressure" style that Ross Lyon brought to the club 10 years ago?
For long periods of Sunday's match Hawthorn simply couldn't score. In the last quarter, the Hawks didn't kick a goal.
Last year, Saints were 2nd last in season tackles laid. This year, FIRST. (Source - Footywire).
That can't all be down to Billy Slater.
For long periods of Sunday's match Hawthorn simply couldn't score. In the last quarter, the Hawks didn't kick a goal.
Last year, Saints were 2nd last in season tackles laid. This year, FIRST. (Source - Footywire).
That can't all be down to Billy Slater.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23162
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
No nothing like it imho. For a start you can't flood back at the center bounce nor can you continually play an extra man in defence as Tosser the Flosser did.philtee wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 7:37pm Is it just me, or does the current game style look similar to the "100% defensive pressure" style that Ross Lyon brought to the club 10 years ago?
For long periods of Sunday's match Hawthorn simply couldn't score. In the last quarter, the Hawks didn't kick a goal.
Last year, Saints were 2nd last in season tackles laid. This year, FIRST. (Source - Footywire).
That can't all be down to Billy Slater.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
I dont think many of us were relishing this season mate. I couldn't care less about Richardson's "win-loss" ratio for 2014-18.... it's all HISTORY now and has NO bearing on 2019, other than to see what an awful season 2018 was, and that the club coaches and players seem determined to ensure it doesn't repeat.mightysainters wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 7:28pm I created this thread and it really pained me:. Couldn’t be happier with the effort and structure thus far. Love Ratten
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Nice foresight!Shaggy wrote: ↑Fri 08 Mar 2019 11:19pmLol you have just put down all the reasons why Richo should have excuses for this year.DJ Higgins wrote: ↑Thu 07 Mar 2019 8:58am Richo has had long enough to have his own list now so enough of those kind of excuses. He isn't making them so no one else should in his behalf
.He is part of the recruiting team and is a development coach so recruiting poorly is partly on him, not recruiting players to fill holes in a few years is on him ie where is another quick outside mid, it's been 6 years. Luckily we have an abundance of half back flankers for some reason???
The ruck he gets a pass on as that is not his area and we have drafted plenty but none have come on, that's on the ruck coach
Look at our skill levels. Are they any good? No they are crap so who is responsible for developing skills?
Buckley was never on the verge of being let go, the board saw what he was doing and building and new it took time as did Hardwick and Richmond. What is Richo building towards, where is his game plan, where are his game winning tactics. Long bomb into 50? Let's try it again and again eventually we will get one.
Bottom line is he is done this year unless we improve dramatically and I can't see it happening. Carlisle gone, Jack Steven MAY not be at 100%, hanneberry is this year's Freeman. IE hamstring issues so he is 2 weeks away again. King won't play until July August and that will be at Sandy to give him a chance to get his form back Where are the wins coming from?
But I think the team we have built is good and will perform regardless of Carlisle, Steven, Hanneberry and King. Steele, Billings and Gresham. As a dark horse Marshall. Clark is real. We have players seriously developing at the top end IMO.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
3 fairly lucky wins , 2 under a goal is great be we could very easily be sitting 1-3. Not being negative but let's wait until we are 10 games in before we make a call one way or the other
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23162
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9109 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
And we could just as easily be 4 zip and sitting on top of the ladder.DJ Higgins wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2019 2:55pm 3 fairly lucky wins , 2 under a goal is great be we could very easily be sitting 1-3. Not being negative but let's wait until we are 10 games in before we make a call one way or the other
Wouldn't that have been a real hoot?
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Lock for Bottom 4?
Shaggy wins the SS free thinkers award for 2019.Shaggy wrote: ↑Fri 08 Mar 2019 11:19pmLol you have just put down all the reasons why Richo should have excuses for this year.DJ Higgins wrote: ↑Thu 07 Mar 2019 8:58am Richo has had long enough to have his own list now so enough of those kind of excuses. He isn't making them so no one else should in his behalf
.He is part of the recruiting team and is a development coach so recruiting poorly is partly on him, not recruiting players to fill holes in a few years is on him ie where is another quick outside mid, it's been 6 years. Luckily we have an abundance of half back flankers for some reason???
The ruck he gets a pass on as that is not his area and we have drafted plenty but none have come on, that's on the ruck coach
Look at our skill levels. Are they any good? No they are crap so who is responsible for developing skills?
Buckley was never on the verge of being let go, the board saw what he was doing and building and new it took time as did Hardwick and Richmond. What is Richo building towards, where is his game plan, where are his game winning tactics. Long bomb into 50? Let's try it again and again eventually we will get one.
Bottom line is he is done this year unless we improve dramatically and I can't see it happening. Carlisle gone, Jack Steven MAY not be at 100%, hanneberry is this year's Freeman. IE hamstring issues so he is 2 weeks away again. King won't play until July August and that will be at Sandy to give him a chance to get his form back Where are the wins coming from?
But I think the team we have built is good and will perform regardless of Carlisle, Steven, Hanneberry and King. Steele, Billings and Gresham. As a dark horse Marshall. Clark is real. We have players seriously developing at the top end IMO.
Clearly Shaggy you have a keen eye on the club and not the Herald Sun for your form guide.