Hahaha hahaha!
You have no idea who is behind these keyboards!
There's certainly some blunt tools in the shed
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Hahaha hahaha!
Who played on him last year at the G? Was it Hickey? Because I don't remember Gawn doing much in the game. He got a few kicks in junk time. We beat them in what was a most unexpected result.Viscount Jeremiah wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 8:58pmHe's beaten him once!samuraisaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 8:26pm Longer should come back in this week as he has a history of playing well against Gawn. Marshall stays in too of course.
The name of the game is winning - and I remember Billy toweling him up at the G a couple of years ago, when he had been on fire form wise until that stage.
Last time they played Max was BOG with 25 touches, and monster-ed Longer in the hit outs
So what, septic is making the big statements, so back it up with a source, as per forum rules!!!!!portosaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:01pmHahaha hahaha!
You have no idea who is behind these keyboards!
There's certainly some blunt tools in the shed
My source is you SCSO... you never freakin shut up about your identity and how you played football. Every third post is I played, I have credentials, blah blah blahstonecold wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:17pmSo what, septic is making the big statements, so back it up with a source, as per forum rules!!!!!portosaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:01pmHahaha hahaha!
You have no idea who is behind these keyboards!
There's certainly some blunt tools in the shed
Last time I looked, this post was directed @ me, so, maybe you don't know who is behind this keyboard, however, right or wrong that claim may be!!!!!
All I'm asking for is a poster to provide a source for their claim!!!!!
Nothing wrong with that!!!!!
You show me where I ever said I was Lazar!!!!!skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:21pmMy source is you SCSO... you never freakin shut up about your identity and how you played football. Every third post is I played, I have credentials, blah blah blahstonecold wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:17pmSo what, septic is making the big statements, so back it up with a source, as per forum rules!!!!!portosaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:01pmHahaha hahaha!
You have no idea who is behind these keyboards!
There's certainly some blunt tools in the shed
Last time I looked, this post was directed @ me, so, maybe you don't know who is behind this keyboard, however, right or wrong that claim may be!!!!!
All I'm asking for is a poster to provide a source for their claim!!!!!
Nothing wrong with that!!!!!
And now you’re crying foul
Incredible
Own your statement!!!!!skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:54pm Oh please, you’ve been carrying on and dropping hints for a year... every freaking 3-4 posts about how you understand rucking better and ppl don’t have your credentials, and that’s why you’re an expert on Longer vs Hickey. More then a couple of times ppl have dropped the name Lazar and even if if haven’t said it directly you sure as hell insinuated it.
End of the day I don’t really care because I think you’re full of it and the whole thing is a joke that you’re getting kicks out of but don’t turn around and cry foul or sook about something that you have very much created, embellished, encouraged etc
You’re not a victim, stop carrying on like one. You don’t want ppl poking into your business then STFU about it, and don’t bring it up every third post.
It is absolutely pathetic that you’d carry on as you do and now cry foul about it. Own your behaviour.
Mate your memory must be lacking haha Gawn destroyed us got all 10 coaches votes too I think but like you say we still won so all good in the end.samuraisaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:02pmWho played on him last year at the G? Was it Hickey? Because I don't remember Gawn doing much in the game. He got a few kicks in junk time. We beat them in what was a most unexpected result.Viscount Jeremiah wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 8:58pmHe's beaten him once!samuraisaint wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 8:26pm Longer should come back in this week as he has a history of playing well against Gawn. Marshall stays in too of course.
The name of the game is winning - and I remember Billy toweling him up at the G a couple of years ago, when he had been on fire form wise until that stage.
Last time they played Max was BOG with 25 touches, and monster-ed Longer in the hit outs
EDIT: Just checked - it was Longer - but we still won the game.
Fat guy in his mums basement acting tough on his keyboard again. Got a wrestlers nickname. Threatens people with a blue thinking they ll take the bait. One constant about this forum is this fucktard that thinks billy longer is a good player.stonecold wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 10:22pmOwn your statement!!!!!skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:54pm Oh please, you’ve been carrying on and dropping hints for a year... every freaking 3-4 posts about how you understand rucking better and ppl don’t have your credentials, and that’s why you’re an expert on Longer vs Hickey. More then a couple of times ppl have dropped the name Lazar and even if if haven’t said it directly you sure as hell insinuated it.
End of the day I don’t really care because I think you’re full of it and the whole thing is a joke that you’re getting kicks out of but don’t turn around and cry foul or sook about something that you have very much created, embellished, encouraged etc
You’re not a victim, stop carrying on like one. You don’t want ppl poking into your business then STFU about it, and don’t bring it up every third post.
It is absolutely pathetic that you’d carry on as you do and now cry foul about it. Own your behaviour.
Show me where I stated who I was or wasn't, you c*n't, cause your making it up!!!!!
Typical armchair bulls*** from you Septic, no surprise given your history!!!!!
So, still no proof of your statement, go away with your lies!!!!!
Enjoy your holiday!!!!!Whiskey wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 11:03pmFat guy in his mums basement acting tough on his keyboard again. Got a wrestlers nickname. Threatens people with a blue thinking they ll take the bait. One constant about this forum is this fucktard that thinks billy longer is a good player.stonecold wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 10:22pmOwn your statement!!!!!skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:54pm Oh please, you’ve been carrying on and dropping hints for a year... every freaking 3-4 posts about how you understand rucking better and ppl don’t have your credentials, and that’s why you’re an expert on Longer vs Hickey. More then a couple of times ppl have dropped the name Lazar and even if if haven’t said it directly you sure as hell insinuated it.
End of the day I don’t really care because I think you’re full of it and the whole thing is a joke that you’re getting kicks out of but don’t turn around and cry foul or sook about something that you have very much created, embellished, encouraged etc
You’re not a victim, stop carrying on like one. You don’t want ppl poking into your business then STFU about it, and don’t bring it up every third post.
It is absolutely pathetic that you’d carry on as you do and now cry foul about it. Own your behaviour.
Show me where I stated who I was or wasn't, you c*n't, cause your making it up!!!!!
Typical armchair bulls*** from you Septic, no surprise given your history!!!!!
So, still no proof of your statement, go away with your lies!!!!!
Victim of what????? Your uncountable dribble, show the prove to your statement!!!!!
10 AFLCA votes from that gamekosifantutti wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2019 9:03am Is this the game everyone is talking about?
https://m.saints.com.au/news/2016-07-18 ... -to-hickey
Speaking of fiction stoney, I've got some questions...feel free not to answerstonecold wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 11:57pmVictim of what????? Your uncountable dribble, show the prove to your statement!!!!!
You c*n't, cause it ain't there!!!!!
Dribble, fabricated by you!!!!!
Now do yourself a favour and for once, make a smart decision, find another target for you fictional little stories and imagination!!!!!
Yes, Hickey played a few good games with the Saints, had a consistent year in 2016, but otherwise spasmodic, or injured. So he's gone. At 28 he's a good age for a ruckman to hit his peak, so he might find some consistency at WCE, at least till Nic Nat gets back.sunsaint wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2019 6:06pm10 AFLCA votes from that gamekosifantutti wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2019 9:03am Is this the game everyone is talking about?
https://m.saints.com.au/news/2016-07-18 ... -to-hickey
Hickey and Gawn met twice that year and we won both games
It is interesting to note that Hickey has polled in each year - although last year I think he only got 3 votes
When did you pretend to be Lazar?????skeptic wrote: ↑Wed 17 Apr 2019 7:08pm So you’ve suggested you’re an AFL ruck
You’ve never demanded ppl match experience qualifications
You’ve never suggested that your view on Hickey is more valid because of your experience and your player friend sources at the club told you they respect Longer’s blocking more
And when ppl ask if you’re Vidovic you never cryptically avoid the question or when I pretended I was Lazar in the absurd thread, you didn’t say you knew for sure I wasn’t
Path-lease
Pathetic
You need some counselling IMO.skeptic wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 9:54pm Oh please, you’ve been carrying on and dropping hints for a year... every freaking 3-4 posts about how you understand rucking better and ppl don’t have your credentials, and that’s why you’re an expert on Longer vs Hickey. More then a couple of times ppl have dropped the name Lazar and even if if haven’t said it directly you sure as hell insinuated it.
End of the day I don’t really care because I think you’re full of it and the whole thing is a joke that you’re getting kicks out of but don’t turn around and cry foul or sook about something that you have very much created, embellished, encouraged etc
You’re not a victim, stop carrying on like one. You don’t want ppl poking into your business then STFU about it, and don’t bring it up every third post.
It is absolutely pathetic that you’d carry on as you do and now cry foul about it. Own your behaviour.
Stonecold has often claimed to know more because he has played at the level or inferred that he has. Whilst I agree that outing ppl on an anon forum isn't on, if you don't want to be outed then don't keep referring to your past as a means of winning arguments.6621104 wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 8:17pm Have to say I agree with Saynta- appeals to authority both to bolster an opinion or to refute by denigration are an unworthy distraction. An opinion may be based of fact/experience and analysis or wishful thinking. Regardless, ask for reasons, analogies -whatever, but the identity of the poster is entirely irrelevant UNLESS the poster claims expertise. Then the level of expertise does become relevant.