Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
my sister ‘n i just mainlined season 3 of Lucifer
about 26 bloody episodes
that was twilight zone
classic viewing
about 26 bloody episodes
that was twilight zone
classic viewing
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
... are you trying to get the thread back on track ...?
if so the AFL rule changes to stop the slide in causing leg damage was absolutely 100% the correct one
Hold your feet dont go to ground, the ump will protect your head over the ball and its all good
SIMPLE
Now the shrill voice of the media commentators (ch7 - B Taylor & W Carey) are screaming for a rule change
The AFL buckles and changes the rule - then the subsequent ACL injury will have the same voices screaming for a rule change
its a no win situation
To me its simple just like the push n the back rule if the player fakes it and dives forward play on
If a player milks falling over a player on the ground - play on
if you are referring to something else about A Goodes then ignore the above
Seeya
*************
*************
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
Poor post.sunsaint wrote: ↑Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:10pm... are you trying to get the thread back on track ...?
if so the AFL rule changes to stop the slide in causing leg damage was absolutely 100% the correct one
Hold your feet dont go to ground, the ump will protect your head over the ball and its all good
SIMPLE
Now the shrill voice of the media commentators (ch7 - B Taylor & W Carey) are screaming for a rule change
The AFL buckles and changes the rule - then the subsequent ACL injury will have the same voices screaming for a rule change
its a no win situation
To me its simple just like the push n the back rule if the player fakes it and dives forward play on
If a player milks falling over a player on the ground - play on
if you are referring to something else about A Goodes then ignore the above
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5113
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1457 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover. That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something). We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots). We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
I would ask that you have a look at how I have changed your post. Your original post looks daunting, and I was tempted to just ignore it, as it is certainly unreadable. Any editor would throw it back at you and yell at you to break it up a bit.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Wed 10 Apr 2019 8:08pm Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover.
That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something).
We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots).
We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
It's late I'm tired and you didn't give me enough to go on
I was talking about getting back on a footy subject
What are you objecting to?
Seeya
*************
*************
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
I'll have a guess; racism, and people who don't call it out.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
It'll be close - Hawthorn are still a bloody good side, but rarely win by much anymore. They're not the side they were. I would say, if I was a neutral, that given where we are with injuries, our poor style of play and lack of forwards, that the Hawks will get up by under two goals.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Wed 10 Apr 2019 8:08pm Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover. That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something). We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots). We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
I dont expect you to answer for spinner - - but seeing how you did - Im still struggling
In an effort to drag this thread back to footy related matters - just where was the post racist???
Seeya
*************
*************
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019
Stop wasting my time f***witsunsaint wrote: ↑Thu 11 Apr 2019 3:38pmI dont expect you to answer for spinner - - but seeing how you did - Im still struggling
In an effort to drag this thread back to footy related matters - just where was the post racist???
<1 day ban for abuse>