Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783152Post Devilhead »

sunsaint wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 5:28pm I know where you live Devil - and I see your work
Image


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783215Post asiu »

my sister ‘n i just mainlined season 3 of Lucifer

about 26 bloody episodes
that was twilight zone :)

classic viewing


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783417Post sunsaint »

Cairnsman wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 6:06pm Just like the AFL were way too slow to react to the Adam Goodes situation because they didn't understand the situation,
... are you trying to get the thread back on track ...?
if so the AFL rule changes to stop the slide in causing leg damage was absolutely 100% the correct one
Hold your feet dont go to ground, the ump will protect your head over the ball and its all good
SIMPLE

Now the shrill voice of the media commentators (ch7 - B Taylor & W Carey) are screaming for a rule change
The AFL buckles and changes the rule - then the subsequent ACL injury will have the same voices screaming for a rule change
its a no win situation

To me its simple just like the push n the back rule if the player fakes it and dives forward play on
If a player milks falling over a player on the ground - play on

if you are referring to something else about A Goodes then ignore the above


Seeya
*************
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783426Post Spinner »

sunsaint wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:10pm
Cairnsman wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 6:06pm Just like the AFL were way too slow to react to the Adam Goodes situation because they didn't understand the situation,
... are you trying to get the thread back on track ...?
if so the AFL rule changes to stop the slide in causing leg damage was absolutely 100% the correct one
Hold your feet dont go to ground, the ump will protect your head over the ball and its all good
SIMPLE

Now the shrill voice of the media commentators (ch7 - B Taylor & W Carey) are screaming for a rule change
The AFL buckles and changes the rule - then the subsequent ACL injury will have the same voices screaming for a rule change
its a no win situation

To me its simple just like the push n the back rule if the player fakes it and dives forward play on
If a player milks falling over a player on the ground - play on

if you are referring to something else about A Goodes then ignore the above
Poor post.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5113
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1457 times
Been thanked: 1525 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783445Post Yorkeys »

Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover. That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something). We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots). We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8391
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783446Post WellardSaint »

Yorkeys wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 8:08pm Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover.

That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something).

We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots).

We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.
I would ask that you have a look at how I have changed your post. Your original post looks daunting, and I was tempted to just ignore it, as it is certainly unreadable. Any editor would throw it back at you and yell at you to break it up a bit.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783490Post sunsaint »

Spinner wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:37pm
Poor post.
It's late I'm tired and you didn't give me enough to go on
I was talking about getting back on a footy subject
What are you objecting to?


Seeya
*************
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783494Post Cairnsman »

sunsaint wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 3:24am
Spinner wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:37pm
Poor post.
It's late I'm tired and you didn't give me enough to go on
I was talking about getting back on a footy subject
What are you objecting to?
I'll have a guess; racism, and people who don't call it out.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783495Post Cairnsman »

[bbvideo] [/bbvideo]


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5938
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783509Post samuraisaint »

Yorkeys wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 8:08pm Late observations - watched the game in the Billabong drinking establishment in Danang; overlooks the beach, just beautiful so I was always going to leave the game happy, but was admittedly a little upset when we went down 5 goals never to recover. That is a digression of course, but mentioned for context. We should have won with the effort and scoring opportunities not all of which were reflected in the goals/points columns. So wandering back to the hotel I thought this is a little bit dejavu-ish. We were the better side, had the chance to ice an immensely valuable away game, played better than the opposition but got beaten, arguably (?) because Walters and Matera had limited but effective purple patches. So why dejavu?: AR was outcoached again, how else did the Matera mismatch go on for so long and why wasn't Walters closed down (Sinclair must be good for something). We are still inaccurate, we made appalling decisions in dominant attacking positions (again) and when the game was there to be had the Freo defence just intercepted and ran the ball out as a group no Saints forwards in the frame - what was going on I wondered as I wandered, where were our forwards. Continuing the outcoached hypothesis, if our forwards were only told to pressure the Freo defenders rather than leave them as a single block we just needed to break even or win a couple in those easy clearance plays to have won; where were our forwards while the purple jerseys ran the ball out like a training drill (real question, could not tell from the screen shots). We have beaten the Suns, just, and that form line is good but should have won by far more, similarly we should have beaten Essendon by close to 5 goals. We are pretty pleased with the efforts of the players this year but sit outside the 8 and will face a test this weekend because returning from a hard WA fixture means players are physically challenged and Clarko will out coach AR. How many goals that is worth I can't quantify but I rue the waste against Freo. And I still think there is not a lot of evidence that AR's new found humility has made any improvement in his coaching nous.
It'll be close - Hawthorn are still a bloody good side, but rarely win by much anymore. They're not the side they were. I would say, if I was a neutral, that given where we are with injuries, our poor style of play and lack of forwards, that the Hawks will get up by under two goals.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783533Post sunsaint »

Cairnsman wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 8:16am
sunsaint wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 3:24am
Spinner wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:37pm
Poor post.
It's late I'm tired and you didn't give me enough to go on
I was talking about getting back on a footy subject
What are you objecting to?
I'll have a guess; racism, and people who don't call it out.
I dont expect you to answer for spinner - - but seeing how you did - Im still struggling
In an effort to drag this thread back to footy related matters - just where was the post racist???


Seeya
*************
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Dockers Round 3 2019

Post: # 1783597Post Cairnsman »

sunsaint wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 3:38pm
Cairnsman wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 8:16am
sunsaint wrote: Thu 11 Apr 2019 3:24am
Spinner wrote: Wed 10 Apr 2019 6:37pm
Poor post.
It's late I'm tired and you didn't give me enough to go on
I was talking about getting back on a footy subject
What are you objecting to?
I'll have a guess; racism, and people who don't call it out.
I dont expect you to answer for spinner - - but seeing how you did - Im still struggling
In an effort to drag this thread back to footy related matters - just where was the post racist???
Stop wasting my time f***wit

<1 day ban for abuse>


Post Reply