Changes v Hawks

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6610
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1338 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782901Post Jacks Back »

Out: Kent, Parker, McKenzie, 8cres :cry:
In: Long, Young, White/Coffield, Pearce/Longer

It's about time we went back to the "3 talls" strategy I mentioned in a previous thread. I mean, if Paddy was fit then he would be playing and someone would be missing out. Put Marshall down there as a forward and relief ruckman (also as previously mentioned) .


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782914Post Linton Lodger »

Out: Kent, Sinclair & Acres

In: Steven, Long & Joyce


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1993 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782916Post bigcarl »

We’re going to need another ruck v McEvoy and Ceglar.

Out: Kent, Lonie/Sinclair/Parker/Clark/Acres
In: Longer/Pierce, Steven
Last edited by bigcarl on Sun 07 Apr 2019 11:28pm, edited 3 times in total.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6610
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1338 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782917Post Jacks Back »

Linton Lodger wrote: Sun 07 Apr 2019 11:15pm Out: Kent, Sinclair & Acres

In: Steven, Long & Joyce
Damn, I forgot about Jacky boy

Out: Kent, Parker, McKenzie, 8cres :cry:
In: Steven, Long, White/Coffield, Pearce/Longer


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782919Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Out: Parker, McKenzie, Sinclair, Acres,
In: Longer or Pearce, Steven, Young or Long, Hind


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
guitars4
Club Player
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2018 11:56pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782943Post guitars4 »

Outs Parker, Kent,Lonie,
Ins Steven, Long,Hind,


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4567
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782947Post whiskers3614 »

More chance of Richo winning a beauty pageant than of Lonie being dropped.
Probably in our best 10 over the three games so far!


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782949Post SMS »

wtf? why is parker out?


guitars4
Club Player
Posts: 776
Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2018 11:56pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782950Post guitars4 »

whiskers3614 wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 12:03am More chance of Richo winning a beauty pageant than of Lonie being dropped.
Probably in our best 10 over the three games so far!
Fair enough I don't think he has but it's only my opinion :wink:


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782951Post Impatient Sainter »

Changes:

Stevens for Clark.
Young for Acres.
Last edited by Impatient Sainter on Mon 08 Apr 2019 12:12am, edited 1 time in total.


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782954Post SMS »

There were a LOT of positives today.

Clark needs time at AFL level. he could be anythigng but needs time.

2019 - the year we win 10 and gain some
respect. Where we dont get blown away and find some
talent. HOW GOOD IS WILKIE? we have snagged the 2020s sammy fisher. Brilliant.

Anyway
Out: Kent, McKenzie, Acres
In: Steven, Joyce, Long


james rose
Club Player
Posts: 1733
Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782990Post james rose »

Out Sincs or Kent
In Steven

Or

Our Sincs and kent
In Steven and Longer/Pierce

Personally would just do

Out kent
In Steven


User avatar
wolfpup
Club Player
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu 06 May 2004 6:00pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1782992Post wolfpup »

out: sinclair, kent
in: young, steven


-----------

St.Kilda Forever!
stkfc1
Club Player
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783020Post stkfc1 »

DMac, Kent, Acres Sinc out. Just not doing enough.
Joyce Longer Long Steven in.
We'll need Longer, so Marshall can go forward and share ruck duties. We're desperate for another marking forward option.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783024Post Joffa Burns »

OBVIOUS CHANGES
Out: Sinclair, Parker or Kent?
In: Steven, Long

Parker talented but undisciplined against Freo, agree with SC looked like he got ahead of himself, maybe a week in the 2’s or a kick up the arse. Kent doesn’t tackle and doesn’t get it much & doest seem to have great endurance. Decent back up option but still looks a fringe AFL player, but at least he can kick.

Sinclair is the least aggressive player I have seen in the AFL. Great skills but has to get it a lot more if you have deficiencies.

McKenzie not going to be dropped.

Perhaps Joyce in and Battle forward?
A second ruck?

Those potentially under the pump IMO?
Acres
Sinclair
Kent
Parker (for discipline)
Clark - give him another run please

Potential ins
Steven
Long
Longer
Young


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9151
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783027Post spert »

Need another strong marking option in the forward half. A few of our guys just didn't want to own the loose ball and let Freo pick up crumbs way too easy. Desperation and pressure has improved generally, but some of our mids and forwards need to get more of the ball, and do more with it. Bring in some speed too..Hind& Young maybe for Parker and Kent


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5938
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783034Post samuraisaint »

Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:

Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.

The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.

For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.

On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23156
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9105 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783038Post saynta »

samuraisaint wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:

Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.

The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.

For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.

On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
Good post mate.


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783067Post barneyboyz »

samuraisaint wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:

Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.

The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.

For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.

On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
I like it, would take a lot of courage to do. Joyce did appear to be exposed when he last played, but Battle must play forward, simply must


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783068Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

A few tins at the Sandbelt. Love it. If only it was allowed in this day and age. Do they even do that at local footy anymore?


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783072Post Linton Lodger »

samuraisaint wrote: Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:

Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.

The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.

For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.

On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
Ah Jeans & Patterson. They used to play 2 ruckman in the middle. Jeans would have both Ditterich & Mynott in the middle in the 60s and Patterson had Ditterich & Sidebottom (RIP) in 1978. That could cause carnage. I remember playing Essendon at Windy Hill in 1978, Ditterich & Sidebottom both lined up in the middle and intimidated Essendon into meek capitulation within seconds!

That was a different time. Are you suggesting we go with Billiy and Roma in the middle at the same time? :D


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783076Post Linton Lodger »

B: Savage Brown Webster

HB: Newnes Joyce McKenzie

C: Geary Ross Billings

HF: Long Battle Parker

F: Lonie Bruce Membrey

Rucks: Marshall & Steele

Rover: Gresham

Inter: Steven, Wilkie, Clark & Dunstan


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19154
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2030 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783086Post SaintPav »

I would be very surprised if they start playing Battle in the forward line this year.

We might have to wait until next year now.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
twirlyhair
Club Player
Posts: 792
Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783091Post twirlyhair »

The team is going so well (compared to out expectations preseason) so I am loathed to make too many changes. I also like to give players a chance to redeem themselves after a poor game, so for me, Parker stays in. We really need Acres to perform, and as we know, your second game back at the top level is often your poorest, so I am willing to give him another chance to. Kent was good and bad, with too many fumbles, but I am also willing to give him the chance to be better. So for me, only one change.
In: Jack
Out: Sinclair


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1783093Post desertsaint »

Battle showing signs of being a very good backman. Let him develop there. Our focus this year should be on development, not suddenly getting ahead of ourselves on the basis of three competitive games against mediocre clubs.
Clark stays in for that reason. Sincs
and Acres continue to disappoint and Kent is simply a depth player. Parker may need to have a think in the twos but Long was very undisciplined in his last game. Steven & Longer in for Sincs & Kent.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Post Reply