Changes v Hawks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Changes v Hawks
Out: Kent, Parker, McKenzie, 8cres
In: Long, Young, White/Coffield, Pearce/Longer
It's about time we went back to the "3 talls" strategy I mentioned in a previous thread. I mean, if Paddy was fit then he would be playing and someone would be missing out. Put Marshall down there as a forward and relief ruckman (also as previously mentioned) .
In: Long, Young, White/Coffield, Pearce/Longer
It's about time we went back to the "3 talls" strategy I mentioned in a previous thread. I mean, if Paddy was fit then he would be playing and someone would be missing out. Put Marshall down there as a forward and relief ruckman (also as previously mentioned) .
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1993 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
We’re going to need another ruck v McEvoy and Ceglar.
Out: Kent, Lonie/Sinclair/Parker/Clark/Acres
In: Longer/Pierce, Steven
Out: Kent, Lonie/Sinclair/Parker/Clark/Acres
In: Longer/Pierce, Steven
Last edited by bigcarl on Sun 07 Apr 2019 11:28pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Damn, I forgot about Jacky boy
Out: Kent, Parker, McKenzie, 8cres
In: Steven, Long, White/Coffield, Pearce/Longer
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Out: Parker, McKenzie, Sinclair, Acres,
In: Longer or Pearce, Steven, Young or Long, Hind
In: Longer or Pearce, Steven, Young or Long, Hind
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4567
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
More chance of Richo winning a beauty pageant than of Lonie being dropped.
Probably in our best 10 over the three games so far!
Probably in our best 10 over the three games so far!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Fri 10 Aug 2018 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Fair enough I don't think he has but it's only my opinionwhiskers3614 wrote: ↑Mon 08 Apr 2019 12:03am More chance of Richo winning a beauty pageant than of Lonie being dropped.
Probably in our best 10 over the three games so far!
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1078 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Changes:
Stevens for Clark.
Young for Acres.
Stevens for Clark.
Young for Acres.
Last edited by Impatient Sainter on Mon 08 Apr 2019 12:12am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
There were a LOT of positives today.
Clark needs time at AFL level. he could be anythigng but needs time.
2019 - the year we win 10 and gain some
respect. Where we dont get blown away and find some
talent. HOW GOOD IS WILKIE? we have snagged the 2020s sammy fisher. Brilliant.
Anyway
Out: Kent, McKenzie, Acres
In: Steven, Joyce, Long
Clark needs time at AFL level. he could be anythigng but needs time.
2019 - the year we win 10 and gain some
respect. Where we dont get blown away and find some
talent. HOW GOOD IS WILKIE? we have snagged the 2020s sammy fisher. Brilliant.
Anyway
Out: Kent, McKenzie, Acres
In: Steven, Joyce, Long
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Out Sincs or Kent
In Steven
Or
Our Sincs and kent
In Steven and Longer/Pierce
Personally would just do
Out kent
In Steven
In Steven
Or
Our Sincs and kent
In Steven and Longer/Pierce
Personally would just do
Out kent
In Steven
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
DMac, Kent, Acres Sinc out. Just not doing enough.
Joyce Longer Long Steven in.
We'll need Longer, so Marshall can go forward and share ruck duties. We're desperate for another marking forward option.
Joyce Longer Long Steven in.
We'll need Longer, so Marshall can go forward and share ruck duties. We're desperate for another marking forward option.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
OBVIOUS CHANGES
Out: Sinclair, Parker or Kent?
In: Steven, Long
Parker talented but undisciplined against Freo, agree with SC looked like he got ahead of himself, maybe a week in the 2’s or a kick up the arse. Kent doesn’t tackle and doesn’t get it much & doest seem to have great endurance. Decent back up option but still looks a fringe AFL player, but at least he can kick.
Sinclair is the least aggressive player I have seen in the AFL. Great skills but has to get it a lot more if you have deficiencies.
McKenzie not going to be dropped.
Perhaps Joyce in and Battle forward?
A second ruck?
Those potentially under the pump IMO?
Acres
Sinclair
Kent
Parker (for discipline)
Clark - give him another run please
Potential ins
Steven
Long
Longer
Young
Out: Sinclair, Parker or Kent?
In: Steven, Long
Parker talented but undisciplined against Freo, agree with SC looked like he got ahead of himself, maybe a week in the 2’s or a kick up the arse. Kent doesn’t tackle and doesn’t get it much & doest seem to have great endurance. Decent back up option but still looks a fringe AFL player, but at least he can kick.
Sinclair is the least aggressive player I have seen in the AFL. Great skills but has to get it a lot more if you have deficiencies.
McKenzie not going to be dropped.
Perhaps Joyce in and Battle forward?
A second ruck?
Those potentially under the pump IMO?
Acres
Sinclair
Kent
Parker (for discipline)
Clark - give him another run please
Potential ins
Steven
Long
Longer
Young
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Need another strong marking option in the forward half. A few of our guys just didn't want to own the loose ball and let Freo pick up crumbs way too easy. Desperation and pressure has improved generally, but some of our mids and forwards need to get more of the ball, and do more with it. Bring in some speed too..Hind& Young maybe for Parker and Kent
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:
Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.
The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.
For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.
On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.
The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.
For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.
On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23156
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Good post mate.samuraisaint wrote: ↑Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:
Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.
The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.
For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.
On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
- barneyboyz
- Club Player
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
I like it, would take a lot of courage to do. Joyce did appear to be exposed when he last played, but Battle must play forward, simply mustsamuraisaint wrote: ↑Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:
Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.
The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.
For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.
On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
A few tins at the Sandbelt. Love it. If only it was allowed in this day and age. Do they even do that at local footy anymore?
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Ah Jeans & Patterson. They used to play 2 ruckman in the middle. Jeans would have both Ditterich & Mynott in the middle in the 60s and Patterson had Ditterich & Sidebottom (RIP) in 1978. That could cause carnage. I remember playing Essendon at Windy Hill in 1978, Ditterich & Sidebottom both lined up in the middle and intimidated Essendon into meek capitulation within seconds!samuraisaint wrote: ↑Mon 08 Apr 2019 11:35am Need to get back to basics for our match against the old rival. What would Mike Patterson or Alan Jeans have planned for this week? Well, here we go. My take:
Must go in against Hawthorn with a traditional 2 ruckmen, 3 tall forwards setup.
The ball is moved out of centre clearances and out of the forward line far too easily. None of our players are able to mark passes anymore, which is due to our blind kick and hope game style we have been playing since 2014. We'll get cleaned up royally in the next six matches against top eight sides if we go in with the same setup as we have so far. I would play Marshall as the second tall with Bruce and play Battle up forward too.
Bring in Billy Longer next week to ruck all day, with Marshall to give him a chop out as a kind of ruck rover when Billy is rested. Billy to rest in the forward line or on the pine during these periods.
Bring back Joyce to cover Battle down back, and two of our under-performing small forwards out for Steven and Long back in. Joyce and Long should never have been dropped in the first place.
For our main training session this week an emphasis on kick-to-kick with a focus on forwards playing in front, and goal kicking practice - 50 shots each after training. Probably freshen the players up anyway.
On the evening after recovery, a few cans each at the Sandbelt for a bonding session before Hawthorn match. We play on Sunday night so that would be alright.
That was a different time. Are you suggesting we go with Billiy and Roma in the middle at the same time?
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
B: Savage Brown Webster
HB: Newnes Joyce McKenzie
C: Geary Ross Billings
HF: Long Battle Parker
F: Lonie Bruce Membrey
Rucks: Marshall & Steele
Rover: Gresham
Inter: Steven, Wilkie, Clark & Dunstan
HB: Newnes Joyce McKenzie
C: Geary Ross Billings
HF: Long Battle Parker
F: Lonie Bruce Membrey
Rucks: Marshall & Steele
Rover: Gresham
Inter: Steven, Wilkie, Clark & Dunstan
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
I would be very surprised if they start playing Battle in the forward line this year.
We might have to wait until next year now.
We might have to wait until next year now.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
The team is going so well (compared to out expectations preseason) so I am loathed to make too many changes. I also like to give players a chance to redeem themselves after a poor game, so for me, Parker stays in. We really need Acres to perform, and as we know, your second game back at the top level is often your poorest, so I am willing to give him another chance to. Kent was good and bad, with too many fumbles, but I am also willing to give him the chance to be better. So for me, only one change.
In: Jack
Out: Sinclair
In: Jack
Out: Sinclair
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Changes v Hawks
Battle showing signs of being a very good backman. Let him develop there. Our focus this year should be on development, not suddenly getting ahead of ourselves on the basis of three competitive games against mediocre clubs.
Clark stays in for that reason. Sincs
and Acres continue to disappoint and Kent is simply a depth player. Parker may need to have a think in the twos but Long was very undisciplined in his last game. Steven & Longer in for Sincs & Kent.
Clark stays in for that reason. Sincs
and Acres continue to disappoint and Kent is simply a depth player. Parker may need to have a think in the twos but Long was very undisciplined in his last game. Steven & Longer in for Sincs & Kent.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "