degruch wrote: ↑Thu 28 Mar 2019 10:38pmWell, I would like to see the metrics on that...please indulge me.tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Thu 28 Mar 2019 6:14pm ...and since the inception of the AFL we have basically been better than Richmond and Carlton (2 big sides of the AFL).
Club | Saints | Essendon | Carlton | Richmond | Collingwood |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg. Ladder Position | 9.3 | 8.3 | 10 | 10.2 | 8.0 |
Saints | Essendon | Carlton | Richmond | Collingwood | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finals Played | 25 | 32 | 22 | 13 | 33 |
Finals Won | 11 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 19 |
Finals Appearances | 10 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 14 |
Wooden Spoons | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
Flags | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
McLellan Trophys | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
GFs | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
Caught Cheating | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Now this isn't intended to be a dick swinging contest to see who is the better club. Clearly, the 0 in the 'Flags' column rules the Saints out of that type of contest. These are just figures that show that we've clearly outperformed Carlton and Richmond for the past 30 years in terms of 'sustained success' or 'long term performance', and aren't all that far behind Essendon either.
Our average ladder position is better, we've had more finals appearances than them, won more finals than them, played in more GFs than them and finished on top more than them.