Big news for the Saints

[Gordo']

Haha! Love it...watching 'Saintsational Team Porn' getting all frothy...

ffs! the band members have just received a 'stralyia invasion day' holiday snap from young harrietm. ffs! plucker666, stringer and myself aren't sure what to say.

<content removed>

actually, plucker is rather impressed. which is flowering strange. ffs, we all flowering thought that he preferred felines.

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

[asiu]

lol.

i knew this thread was about EVERYTHING

[desertsaint]

A naked dog ispornography? Or do i need glasses?

[SaintPav]

A naked dog ispornography? Or do i need glasses?

Think I might be in trouble.

[asiu]

wow

its always a bitch
that brings a man down

and , it was probably a bit grown up
for our demographic


not sure about this one

edgy certainly
permanent .... hmmmm

[degruch]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

[saynta]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

[outside66]

Geez, this forum is cooked!

[sunsaint]

...there is certainly a foul odour pervading the threads

[Myron Gaines]

Make saintsational great again

[tedtheodorelogan2018]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Don't feed the dragons too much Saynta. I did it myself too much in the past!

[asiu]

you are full of sh!t

if that actually was your intent
you’d say nothing

but it’s not your intent

[degruch]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Quite a few of us didn't miss the pornographic dribble you posted a link to on here, old tube. Despite you and your pervy mates claims to the contrary, 99.9% of people on here had no idea what you were talking about. Lucky for you the mod missed it, or you'd be gone. If you weren't strutting around like a rooster trying to deflect onto other posters and claiming you are the moral white knight of the forum, I reckon we'd have turned a blind eye.

[takeaway]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Quite a few of us didn't miss the pornographic dribble you posted a link to on here, old tube. Despite you and your pervy mates claims to the contrary, 99.9% of people on here had no idea what you were talking about. Lucky for you the mod missed it, or you'd be gone. If you weren't strutting around like a rooster trying to deflect onto other posters and claiming you are the moral white knight of the forum, I reckon we'd have turned a blind eye.

99.9%? .... Source?

[degruch]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Quite a few of us didn't miss the pornographic dribble you posted a link to on here, old tube. Despite you and your pervy mates claims to the contrary, 99.9% of people on here had no idea what you were talking about. Lucky for you the mod missed it, or you'd be gone. If you weren't strutting around like a rooster trying to deflect onto other posters and claiming you are the moral white knight of the forum, I reckon we'd have turned a blind eye.

99.9%? .... Source?

Well, you were engaged in such a torrid internal struggle you probably didn't notice, but barely anyone know what the hell you 3 moral crusaders were talking about. When I pointed it out, noting the application of a common nickname, I was told by Saynta/Stinger I was a liar...being such a great judge of character, he obviously knows me better than I know myself. Then proceeding to post the details of what we all apparently already knew, just in case we'd forgotten, I guess? Great stuff, I thought..."As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted"?

[asiu]

except when Stinger does it of course

thats the old boys cucumber club for ya

we of the farmable commodity
get to suck it up

vade retro satanas

[takeaway]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Quite a few of us didn't miss the pornographic dribble you posted a link to on here, old tube. Despite you and your pervy mates claims to the contrary, 99.9% of people on here had no idea what you were talking about. Lucky for you the mod missed it, or you'd be gone. If you weren't strutting around like a rooster trying to deflect onto other posters and claiming you are the moral white knight of the forum, I reckon we'd have turned a blind eye.

99.9%? .... Source?

Well, you were engaged in such a torrid internal struggle you probably didn't notice, but barely anyone know what the hell you 3 moral crusaders were talking about. When I pointed it out, noting the application of a common nickname, I was told by Saynta/Stinger I was a liar...being such a great judge of character, he obviously knows me better than I know myself. Then proceeding to post the details of what we all apparently already knew, just in case we'd forgotten, I guess? Great stuff, I thought..."As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted"?

Barely anyone? Source? You can speak for yourself, that is all.

[degruch]

except when Stinger does it of course

thats the old boys cucumber club for ya

we of the farmable commodity
get to suck it up

vade retro satanas

Seems about right my cryptic friend...and when the entire forum points it out, apparently no-one does! A couple of off-season dual-nic retrograde nobodies come creeping out from under their rocks and start slagging off at regular posters, trolling en masse and posting porn and hey presto...nothing happens.

[satchmo]

<poster banned permanently for posting inappropriate semi-pornographic content>

PORNOGRAPHY AND SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL

As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted. Any such postings will constitute a permanent ban without warning.

We'd be one lunatic less on here had this rule been applied to everyone.

Why did we miss something you posted other than your sleazy nic name for the coach, which I see you are still persisting with?

Quite a few of us didn't miss the pornographic dribble you posted a link to on here, old tube. Despite you and your pervy mates claims to the contrary, 99.9% of people on here had no idea what you were talking about. Lucky for you the mod missed it, or you'd be gone. If you weren't strutting around like a rooster trying to deflect onto other posters and claiming you are the moral white knight of the forum, I reckon we'd have turned a blind eye.

99.9%? .... Source?

Well, you were engaged in such a torrid internal struggle you probably didn't notice, but barely anyone know what the hell you 3 moral crusaders were talking about. When I pointed it out, noting the application of a common nickname, I was told by Saynta/Stinger I was a liar...being such a great judge of character, he obviously knows me better than I know myself. Then proceeding to post the details of what we all apparently already knew, just in case we'd forgotten, I guess? Great stuff, I thought..."As a forum open to all ages, pornographic, or semi-pornographic images, inferences, references and anecdotes, are not permitted"?

Barely anyone? Source? You can speak for yourself, that is all.

so you are saying saynta was wrong to suggest that others knew the filthy connotation that he printed?

Haven't seen anyone claim to know that the disgusting meaning existed prior to it's publication on this site, so I'm sure that you will tell him..."You can speak for yourself, that is all."

At any rate, the forum admin has decreed that "cho" is ok. So "cho" it is.

[skeptic]

I think it's safe to say that stuff all ppl knew what some obscure mean to a nickname meant according to the urban dictionary

it was very clearly an attempt from a select few to get some of the regular posters they were quarrelling with band... then of course having backed themselves into corners, the only avenue available was to hide behind the moral highground with extra righteouness.
With the irony of course being that said group introduced the concept of the smut and then in turn posted the smutty definition

the whole thing was farcical

what's interesting now is watching how said ppl are now perpetuating they idea of gangs/groups...
I have no loyalty of affinity to Pav (given me the hardest time of anyone here years ago... fortunately he's capable of letting things go and interested in talking footy more then vendettas), Dragit (really busted my balls here a year ago), JoffaBurns (really hates my pro-GT stance), Degruch etc I like talking with all of these guys and our views on some aspects of the club are similar, that's all.

Alternatively, I also like Cairnsman, Samoht, takeaway etc who see things very differently from me at the moment

There are a few others however that troll, abuse and play up this gang mentality thing frequently and then cry foul and play victim... no time for that

[Joffa Burns]

I think it's safe to say that stuff all ppl knew what some obscure mean to a nickname meant according to the urban dictionary

it was very clearly an attempt from a select few to get some of the regular posters they were quarrelling with band... then of course having backed themselves into corners, the only avenue available was to hide behind the moral highground with extra righteouness.
With the irony of course being that said group introduced the concept of the smut and then in turn posted the smutty definition

the whole thing was farcical

what's interesting now is watching how said ppl are now perpetuating they idea of gangs/groups...
I have no loyalty of affinity to Pav (given me the hardest time of anyone here years ago... fortunately he's capable of letting things go and interested in talking footy more then vendettas), Dragit (really busted my balls here a year ago), JoffaBurns (really hates my pro-GT stance), Degruch etc I like talking with all of these guys and our views on some aspects of the club are similar, that's all.

Alternatively, I also like Cairnsman, Samoht, takeaway etc who see things very differently from me at the moment

There are a few others however that troll, abuse and play up this gang mentality thing frequently and then cry foul and play victim... no time for that

Great post skeptic, accurate and articulate and way to hold a grudge

There is no doubt in my mind that very few knew the obscure urban dictionary version (I’ll write version as UD does not warrant as a reference) of the term.

I had never used it personally but never thought anything could be implied until the link was posted on here by a degenerate.

Perhaps I am naive and in the minority, as I didn’t know the term pegging until I googled it after reading a reference on here by the by the same letch.

I do think that the term (the ch- and any reference) has run its race on here and it’s time to move on from it.

[tedtheodorelogan2018]

195 posts about nothing.

What a waste of storage for 0's and 1's!

Next please. Footy is only a few weeks away thank god.

[satchmo]

1121 posts about nothing.

What a waste of storage for 0's and 1's!

Next please. Footy is only a few weeks away thank god.

EFA

[takeaway]

I think it's safe to say that stuff all ppl knew what some obscure mean to a nickname meant according to the urban dictionary

it was very clearly an attempt from a select few to get some of the regular posters they were quarrelling with band... then of course having backed themselves into corners, the only avenue available was to hide behind the moral highground with extra righteouness.
With the irony of course being that said group introduced the concept of the smut and then in turn posted the smutty definition

the whole thing was farcical

what's interesting now is watching how said ppl are now perpetuating they idea of gangs/groups...
I have no loyalty of affinity to Pav (given me the hardest time of anyone here years ago... fortunately he's capable of letting things go and interested in talking footy more then vendettas), Dragit (really busted my balls here a year ago), JoffaBurns (really hates my pro-GT stance), Degruch etc I like talking with all of these guys and our views on some aspects of the club are similar, that's all.

Alternatively, I also like Cairnsman, Samoht, takeaway etc who see things very differently from me at the moment

There are a few others however that troll, abuse and play up this gang mentality thing frequently and then cry foul and play victim... no time for that

Great post skeptic, accurate and articulate and way to hold a grudge

There is no doubt in my mind that very few knew the obscure urban dictionary version (I’ll write version as UD does not warrant as a reference) of the term.

I had never used it personally but never thought anything could be implied until the link was posted on here by a degenerate.

Perhaps I am naive and in the minority, as I didn’t know the term pegging until I googled it after reading a reference on here by the by the same letch.

I do think that the term (the ch- and any reference) has run its race on here and it’s time to move on from it.

Yes, I suggested some time ago that the issue was dealt with and time to move on. Typically over time history becomes increasingly fabricated (above).
It has been continued by some posters who cannot accept the decision made and keep posting the snide comments. (not yourself or skeptic, Joffa)

The issue has been dealt with and posters still have a little play name they can use if they wish. Good result.

[asiu]

lol @playname

in this thread about EVERYTHING
(that beats Teds or is it Takers thread about nothing)

i present

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/201 ... fmredir=ms

d : 199
n : 156