Shaggy wrote: ↑Sun 25 Nov 2018 9:43pm
brewski wrote: ↑Sun 25 Nov 2018 7:51pm
That's not a law genius, where did you extract that doozy of info from hahaha......you know its all you overly sensitive flogs that are ruining this country, now we need to check with the political correctness nazis before we can post anything, seriously what is this joint becoming...next you will tell me i cant write here how
moist my cake was because you will get offended
i will choose to continue using the word Cho because its not offensive, i grew up with 2 lads with Richardson as their last name and have called them Cho and lil Cho for more than 30 years, so yes BFUSA cho can be a nickname for Richardson...and guess what people i told them about this forum conversation and they are still not offended, they actually thought it was funny ....who would imagine that right??
So if the coach would like to jump on this forum and tell us all that we are offending him i will consider refraining from using it in future but i cant accept that people here are speaking on his behalf because they assume he is offended...go be a martyr somewhere else.
#itsoktobewhite
Cho is not offensive but there was an added "the" and I doubt Allan Richardson will ever know or care.
The poster whom I believe first used the nickname was quite vitriolic and appeared full of hate at the time.
Some may think it is funny and freedom of speech but I think it was a mental health problem.
Others who have used it since of course not.
IMO the nick needs to be banned for the poster's benefit, not Richardson.
Be better not bitter!
This thread keeps on giving
so we all accept the word Cho is not offensive but only if you put "the" in front of it, well i hope that's what you mean because if the word "the" is now considered offensive i'm gonna have some problems constructing my sentences in the future.
i can only assume the original post for this term you refer to was
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=96381 if so i am really struggling to find the vitriol in it unless it was the one piece redacted with "edit by mod" and as i cant read that information i can only give an opinion on content available and have to say, it was one of the most tamest threads i have seen on here, but as you must be an expert in the field of psychology and able to ascertain an individuals mental health, i will just have to take your word for it.
People sensitivities are not my concern here, someone may be offended by the word cucumber because it has additional uses other than in the food chain but this is the problem of the person taking offence, not mine.
As we now use the urban Dictionary as our literary standard for saintsational i would like to point out that i may be offended by some of the user names here, should they be banned??
(below are extracted directly from our new bible the Urban Dictionary will try to censor to PG13 but apologies in advance if any offence caused
because some of us are a sensitive little bunch)
Take away
Used to refer to a person who is picked up at a party or other social gathering purely for s*x.
John:Did you hear? Becky was a take away at last night's party.
Kevin:Oh please. She's a take away at every party.
shaggy
The guy that gave scooby h**d in episode #69.
Give it back to shaggy, he was sucking it better.
Theodore
Theodore's rather to be known as Ted and can be fun to hang around with but after around 30 seconds get really bloody annoying doesn't have many friends and is always extra h*rny even when it comes to looking at his friends.
stonecold
1. anything goes in the bedroom
2. the act of sl*tting
3. s*xual liberal with no remorse
"Kristen is a stonecold sl*t."
"Dude, I would go stonecold for her in a minute."
Be careful what you wish for, because offence can be found in probably nearly every word if you look hard enough, this site is about our freedom to express ourselves and our opinion about something we are very passionate about our Saints and this ridiculous censorship has no place here.